A preliminary study of silicone hydrogel lens material and care solution bioincompatibilities

Cornea

Volumn 30, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 772-779

  Paugh, Jerry R ^a   Nguyen, Andrew Loc ^b   Hall, Jonathan Q ^a   Krall, Daniel ^a   Webb, Justin R ^c   Ramsey, Alison C ^c   Meadows, David L ^c  

^a SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c ALCON RESEARCH LTD   (United States)

Author keywords

barrier function; fluorophotometry; silicone hydrogel; solution toxicity

Indexed keywords

DYE; FLUORESCEIN; MYRISTAMIDOPROPYL DIMETHYLAMINE; POLY(HEXAMETHYLENEBIGUANIDE); POLYQUATERNIUM 1; SILICONE GEL; SODIUM CHLORIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA; CRYOPRESERVATION; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; FEMALE; FLUORESCENCE HISTOCHEMISTRY; FLUOROMETER; HUMAN; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; LENS; LENS IMPLANT; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SOLUTION AND SOLUBILITY;

ADULT; BIGUANIDES; CONTACT LENS SOLUTIONS; CONTACT LENSES, HYDROPHILIC; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; EPITHELIUM, CORNEAL; FEMALE; FLUORESCEIN; FLUOROPHOTOMETRY; HUMANS; HYDROGELS; MALE; MATERIALS TESTING; PERMEABILITY; POLYMERS; PROPYLAMINES; REFRACTIVE ERRORS; SILICONES; STAINING AND LABELING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79959268071     PISSN: 02773740     EISSN: 15364798     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e318206ca96     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Morgan P, Efron N, Brennan NA, et al. Risk factors for the development of corneal infiltrative events associated with contact lens wear. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:3136-3143. (Pubitemid 44264298)
2. Szczotka-Flynn L, Debanne SM, Cheruvu VK, et al. Predictive factors for corneal infiltrates with continuous wear of silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125:488-492. (Pubitemid 46596720)
3. Carnt N, Jalbert I, Stretton S, et al. Solution toxicity in soft contact lens daily wear is associated with corneal inflammation. Optom Vis Sci. 2007; 84:309-315. (Pubitemid 46624856)
4. Green M, Apel A, Stapleton F. Risk factors and causative organisms in microbial keratitis. Cornea. 2008;27:22-27.
5. Keay L, Stapleton F, Schein O. Epidemiology of contact lens-related inflammation and microbial keratitis: a 20-year perspective. Eye Contact Lens. 2007;33:346-353. (Pubitemid 350059548)
6. Stapleton F, Keay L, Edwards K, et al. The incidence of contact lensrelated microbial keratitis in Australia. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:1655
7. Stapleton F, Edwards K, Keay L, et al. Risk factors for severe microbial keratitis in daily wear contact lens users. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008; ARVO abstract 4853.
8. Wilson G, Ren H, Laurent J. Corneal epithelial fluorescein staining. J Am Optom Assoc. 1995;66:435-441.
9. Schwallie JD, McKenney CD, Long WD, et al. Corneal staining patterns in normal non-contact lens wearers. Optom Vis Sci. 1997;74:92-98. (Pubitemid 27147882)
10. Paugh JR, Marsden HJ, Edrington TB, et al. A pre-application drop containing carboxymethylcellulose can reduce multipurpose solutioninduced corneal staining. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84:65-71. (Pubitemid 46105022)
11. Jones L, MacDougal N, Sorbara LG. Asymptomatic corneal staining associated with the use of balafilcon silicone-hydrogel contact lenses disinfected with a polyaminopropyl biguanide-preserved care regimen. Optom Vis Sci. 2002;79:753-761. (Pubitemid 36015140)
12. Ward K. Superficial punctate fluorescein staining of the ocular surface. Optom Vis Sci. 2008;85:8-16.
13. Yokoi N, Kinoshita S. Clinical evaluation of corneal epithelial barrier function with the slit-lamp fluorophotometer. Cornea. 1995;14:485-489.
14. Wilson FM. Toxic and allergic reactions to topical ophthalmic formulations. In: Arffa RC, ed. Graysons Diseases of the Cornea. St Louis, MO: Mosby-Year Book Inc; 1997:669-678.
15. Morgan PB, Maldonado-Codina C. Corneal staining: do we really understand what we are seeing? Contact Lens Anterior Eye. 2009;32:48-54.
16. de Kruijf EJFM, Boot JP, Laterveer L, et al. A simple method for determination of corneal epithelial permeability in humans. Curr Eye Res. 1987;6:1327-1334.
17. Joshi A, Maurice D, Paugh JR. A new method for determining corneal epithelial barrier to fluorescein in humans. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996;37:1008-1016. (Pubitemid 26164232)
18. Gobbels M, Spitznas M. Corneal epithelial permeability of dry eyes before and after treatment with artificial tears. Ophthalmology. 1992;99: 873-878.
19. Ramselaar JAM, Boot JP, van Haeringen NJ, et al. Corneal epithelial permeability after instillation of ophthalmic solutions containing local anaesthetics and preservatives. Curr Eye Res. 1988;7:947-950.
20. Nelson JD. Simultaneous evaluation of tear turnover and corneal epithelial permeability by fluorophotometry in normal subjects and patients with keratoconjunctivitis sicca (KCS).Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1995;93:709-753.
21. Miyata K, Amano S, Sawa M, et al. A novel grading method for superficial punctate keratopathy magnitude and its correlation with corneal epithelial permeability. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121:1537-1539. (Pubitemid 37392355)
22. Maurice D, Mishima S. Ocular pharmacokinetics. In: Sears ML, ed. Pharmacology of the Eye. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1984:19-117.
23. Klyce SD. Transport of Na, Cl, and water by the rabbit corneal epithelium at resting potential. Am J Physiol. 1975;228:1446-1452.
24. Efron N, Morgan PB, Katsara SS. Validation of grading scales for contact lens complications. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2000;21:17-29.
25. Anderson JR. Aids to corneal staining. Ophthalmologica. 1949;118: 444-449.
26. Terrry RL, Schnider CM, Holden BA, et al. CCLRU standards for success of daily and extended wear contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 1993;70:234-243. (Pubitemid 23174863)
27. Thomas ML, Szeto VR, Gan C, et al. Sequential staining: the effects of sodium fluorescein, osmolarity, and pH on human corneal epithelium. Optom Vis Sci. 1997;74:207-210.
28. Jalbert I, Sweeney DF, Holden BA. The characteristics of corneal staining in successful daily and extended disposable contact lens wearers. Clin Exp Opt. 1999;82:4-10.
29. Schnider CM. Keratitis. In: Tomlinson A, ed. Complications of Contact Lens Wear. St Louis, MO: Mosby-Year Book Inc; 1992:120.
30. Davis LJ, Lebow KA. Noninfectious corneal staining. In: Silbert JA, ed. Anterior Segment Complications of Contact Lens Wear. Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2000:68-70.
31. Sweeney DF, du Toit R, Keay L, et al. Clinical performance of silicone hydrogel lenses. In: Sweeney D, ed. Silicone Hydrogels: Continuous Wear Contact Lenses. St Louis, MO: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2004:183-187.
32. Bailey IL, Bullimore MA, Raasch TW, et al. Clinical grading and the effects of scaling. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991;32:422-432.
33. King-Smith PE, Fink BA, Fogt N, et al. The thickness of the human precorneal tear film: evidence from reflection spectra. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:3348-3359.
34. Paugh JR, Sasai A, Joshi A. Preservative effect on epithelial barrier function measured with a novel technique. In: Sullivan DA, Dartt DA, Meneray MA, ed. Lacrimal Gland, Tear Film, and Dry Eye Syndromes 2. Bermuda: New York: Plenum Press; 1998:731-735.
35. Bantseev V, McCanna D, Driot J-V, et al. Biocompatibility of contact lens solutions using confocal laser scanning microscopy and the in-vitro bovine cornea. Eye Contact Lens. 2007;33:308-316. (Pubitemid 350098718)
36. McCanna DJ, Harington KL, Driot J-Y, et al. Use of a human corneal epithelial cell line for screening the safety of contact lens care solutions in vitro. Eye Contact Lens. 2008;34:6-12.
37. Imayasu M, Shiraishi A, Ohashi Y, et al. Effects of multipurpose solutions on corneal epithelial tight junctions. Eye Contact Lens. 2008;34:50-55.