The Impact of Inoculation Parameters on the Pathogenesis of Contact Lens-Related Infectious Keratitis

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 51, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 3100-3106

  Tam, Connie ^a   Mun, James J ^a,b   Evans, David J ^a,c   Fleiszig, Suzanne M J ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c TOURO UNIVERSITY CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL STRAIN; BACTERIUM CONTAMINATION; BIOFILM; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; CONTACT LENS; CONTACT LENS RELATED INFECTIOUS KERATITIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HYDROGEL; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; IN VIVO STUDY; INOCULATION; KERATITIS; NONHUMAN; PATHOGENESIS; PHAGOCYTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA; PSEUDOMONAS INFECTION; RAT; T LYMPHOCYTE; ANIMAL; BACTERIAL EYE INFECTION; BACTERIUM ADHERENCE; CORNEA ULCER; DISEASE MODEL; FLUORESCENT ANTIBODY TECHNIQUE; HYDROPHILIC CONTACT LENS; LEWIS RAT; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGICAL EXAMINATION; MICROBIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; BACTERIAL ADHESION; BACTERIOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES; BIOFILMS; CONTACT LENSES, HYDROPHILIC; CORNEAL ULCER; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; EYE INFECTIONS, BACTERIAL; FEMALE; FLUORESCENT ANTIBODY TECHNIQUE, INDIRECT; HYDROGEL; MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL; PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA; PSEUDOMONAS INFECTIONS; RATS; RATS, INBRED LEW;

EID: 77950682184     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.09-4593     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Green M, Apel A, Stapleton F. A longitudinal study of trends in keratitis in Australia. Cornea. 2008;27:33-39.
2. Cheng KH, Leung SL, Hoekman HW, et al. Incidence of contact-lens-associated microbial keratitis and its related morbidity. Lancet. 1999;354:181-185.
3. Ibrahim YW, Boase DL, Cree IA. Epidemiologic characteristics, predisposing factors and microbiological profile of infectious cor-neal ulcers: the Portsmouth Corneal Ulcer Study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;93:1319-1324.
4. Morgan PB, Efron N, Hill EA, et al. Incidence of keratitis of varying severity among contact lens wearers. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89: 430-436.
5. Yamamoto N, Jester JV, Petroll WM, Cavanagh HD. Prolonged hypoxia induces lipid raft formation and increases Pseudomonas internalization in vivo after contact lens wear and lid closure. Eye Contact Lens. 2006;32:114-120.
6. Zhu H, Kumar A, Ozkan J, et al. Fimbrolide-coated antimicrobial lenses: their in vitro and in vivo effects. Optom Vis Sci. 2008;85: 292-300.
7. Sankaridurg PR, Rao GN, Rao HN, Sweeney DF, Holden BA. AT-Pase-positive dendritic cells in the limbal and corneal epithelium of guinea pigs after extended wear of hydrogel lenses. Cornea. 2000; 19:374-377.
8. Hazlett LD. Corneal response to Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2004;23:1-30.
9. Willcox MD. Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection and inflammation during contact lens wear: a review. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84: 273-278.
10. Evans DJ, McNamara NA, Fleiszig SM. Life at the front: dissecting bacterial-host interactions at the ocular surface. Ocul Surf. 2007; 5:213-227.
11. Szliter EA, Barrett RP, Gabriel MM, Zhang Y, Hazlett LD. Pseudo-monas aeruginosa-induced inflammation in the rat extended-wear contact lens model. Eye Contact Lens. 2006;32:12-18.
12. Zhang Y, Gabriel MM, Mowrey-McKee MF, et al. Rat silicone hydrogel contact lens model: effects of high- versus low-Dk lens wear. Eye Contact Lens. 2008;34:306-311.
13. Lakkis C, Fleiszig SM. Resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates to hydrogel contact lens disinfection correlates with cyto-toxic activity. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39:1477-1486.
14. Lee EJ, Evans DJ, Fleiszig SM. Role of Pseudomonas aeruginosa ExsA in penetration through corneal epithelium in a novel in vivo model. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:5220-5227.
15. Lee EJ, Cowell BA, Evans DJ, Fleiszig SM. Contribution of ExsA-regulated factors to corneal infection by cytotoxic and invasive Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a murine scarification model. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:3892-3898.
16. Stover CK, Pham XQ, Erwin AL, et al. Complete genome sequence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1, an opportunistic pathogen. Nature. 2000;406:959-964.
17. Zolfaghar I, Angus AA, Kang PJ, et al. Mutation of retS, encoding a putative hybrid two-component regulatory protein in Pseudomo-nas aeruginosa, attenuates multiple virulence mechanisms. Microbes Infect. 2005;7:1305-1316.
18. Zolfaghar I, Evans DJ, Ronaghi R, Fleiszig SM. Type III secretion-dependent modulation of innate immunity as one of multiple factors regulated by Pseudomonas aeruginosa RetS. Infect Im-mun. 2006;74:3880-3889.
19. Mah TF, O'Toole GA. Mechanisms of biofilm resistance to antimicrobial agents. Trends Microbiol. 2001;9:34-39.
20. Drenkard E, Ausubel FM. Pseudomonas biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance are linked to phenotypic variation. Nature. 2002;416:740-743.
21. Prince AS. Biofilms, antimicrobial resistance, and airway infection. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1110-1111.
22. Szczotka-Flynn LB, Imamura Y, Chandra J, et al. Increased resistance of contact lens-related bacterial biofilms to antimicrobial activity of soft contact lens care solutions. Cornea. 2009;28:918-926.
23. Hume EB, Stapleton F, Willcox MD. Evasion of cellular ocular defenses by contact lens isolates of Serratia marcescens. Eye Contact Lens. 2003;29:108-112.
24. Schein OD, Glynn RJ, Poggio EC, Seddon JM, Kenyon KR. The relative risk of ulcerative keratitis among users of daily-wear and extended-wear soft contact lenses: a case-control study. Microbial Keratitis Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1989;321:773-778.
25. Mun JJ, Tam C, Kowbel D, et al. Clearance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from a healthy ocular surface involves surfactant protein D and is compromised by bacterial elastase in a murine null-infection model. Infect Immun. 2009;77:2392-2398.
26. McNamara NA, Polse KA, Brand RJ, et al. Tear mixing under a soft contact lens: effects of lens diameter. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999; 127:659-665.
27. Lin MC, Chen YQ, Polse KA. The effects of ocular and lens parameters on the postlens tear thickness. Eye Contact Lens. 2003;29:S33-S36; discussion S57-S39, S192-S194.
28. Lin MC, Polse KA. Hypoxia, overnight wear, and tear stagnation effects on the corneal epithelium: data and proposed model. Eye Contact Lens. 2007;33:378-381, discussion 382.
29. Maltseva IA, Fleiszig SM, Evans DJ, et al. Exposure of human corneal epithelial cells to contact lenses in vitro suppresses the upregulation of human beta-defensin-2 in response to antigens of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Exp Eye Res. 2007;85:142-153.
30. Ladage PM, Yamamoto K, Ren DH, et al. Proliferation rate of rabbit corneal epithelium during overnight rigid contact lens wear. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:2804-2812.
31. Yamamoto K, Ladage PM, Ren DH, et al. Effects of low and hyper Dk rigid gas permeable contact lenses on Bcl-2 expression and apoptosis in the rabbit corneal epithelium. CLAO J. 2001;27:137-143.
32. Ladage PM, Yamamoto K, Ren DH, et al. Effects of rigid and soft contact lens daily wear on corneal epithelium, tear lactate dehy-drogenase, and bacterial binding to exfoliated epithelial cells. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:1279-1288.
33. Fleiszig SM, Efron N, Pier GB. Extended contact lens wear enhances Pseudomonas aeruginosa adherence to human corneal epithelium. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992;33:2908-2916.