Contact lens-related adverse events and the silicone hydrogel lenses and daily wear care system used

Archives of Ophthalmology

Volumn 127, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 1616-1623

  Carnt, Nicole A ^a   Evans, Victoria E ^a   Naduvilath, Thomas J ^a   Willcox, Mark D P ^a,b   Papas, Eric B ^a,b   Frick, Kevin D ^c   Holden, Brien A ^a,b  

^a BRIEN HOLDEN VISION INSTITUTE   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AQUIFY; CLEAR CARE; CONTACT LENS SOLUTION; OPTI FREE EXPRESS; OPTI FREE REPLENISH; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; SILICONE DERIVATIVE;

ADULT; ADVERSE OUTCOME; ARTICLE; CONTACT LENS; CORNEA DISEASE; CORNEA EROSION; CORNEA LESION; CORNEAL STAINING; FEMALE; HUMAN; KERATITIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MYOPIA; PAPILLARY CONJUNCTIVITIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SILICONE HYDROGEN CONTACT LENS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EYE REFRACTION; HYDROGEL; HYDROPHILIC CONTACT LENS; INCIDENCE; PHYSIOLOGY; VISUAL ACUITY;

ADULT; CONTACT LENS SOLUTIONS; CONTACT LENSES, HYDROPHILIC; CORNEAL DISEASES; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYDROGELS; INCIDENCE; MALE; MYOPIA; REFRACTION, OCULAR; SILICONES; VISUAL ACUITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 73349099379     PISSN: 00039950     EISSN: 15383601     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.313     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Poggio EC, Glynn RJ, Schein OD, et al. The incidence of ulcerative keratitis among users of daily-wear and extended-wear soft contact lenses. N Engl J Med. 1989; 321(12):779-783.
2. Cheng KH, Leung D, Hoekman H, et al. Incidence of contact-lens-associated microbial keratitis and its related morbidity. Lancet. 1999;354(9174):181-185.
3. Morgan PB, Woods CA, Tranoudis IG, et al. International contact lens prescribing in 2008. Contact Lens Spectrum. 2009;24(2):28-32.
4. O'Hare N, Stapleton F, Naduvilath T, Jalbert I, Sweeney DF, Holden BA. Interaction between the contact lens and the ocular surface in the etiology of superior epithelial arcuate lesions. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2002;506(pt B):973-980.
5. Jalbert I, Sweeney DF, Holden BA. Epithelial split associated with wear of a silicone hydrogel contact lens. CLAO J. 2001;27(4):231-233.
6. Dumbleton K. Adverse events with silicone hydrogel continuous wear. Contact Lens Anterior Eye. 2002;25(3):137-146.
7. Dumbleton K. Noninflammatory silicone hydrogel contact lens complications. Eye Contact Lens. 2003;29(1)(suppl):S186-S189.
8. Skotnitsky C, Sankaridurg PR, Sweeney DF, Holden BA. General and local contact lens induced papillary conjunctivitis (CLPC). Clin Exp Optom. 2002;85 (3):193-197.
9. Skotnitsky CC, Naduvilath TJ, Sweeney DF, Sankaridurg PR. Two presentations of contact lens-induced papillary conjunctivitis (CLPC) in hydrogel lens wear: local and general. Optom Vis Sci. 2006;83(1):27-36.
10. Sankaridurg PR, Holden BA, Jalbert I. Adverse effects and infections: which ones and how many? In: Sweeney DF, ed. Silicone Hydrogels: Continuous-Wear Contact Lenses. 2nd ed. Oxford, England: Butterworth Heinemann; 2004:217-274.
11. Jones L, Macdougall N, Sorbara GL. Asymptomatic corneal staining associated with the use of balafilcon silicone-hydrogel contact lenses disinfected with a polyaminopropyl biguanide-preserved care regimen. Optom Vis Sci. 2002;79(12): 753-761.
12. Andrasko G, Ryen K. A series of evaluations of MPS and silicone hydrogel lens combinations. Rev Cornea and Contact Lenses. March 2007:36-42.
13. Andrasko G, Ryen K. Corneal staining and comfort observed with traditional and silicone hydrogel lenses and multipurpose solution combinations. Optometry. 2008;79(8):444-454.
14. Carnt N, Jalbert I, Stretton S, Naduvilath T, Papas E. Solution toxicity in soft contact lens daily wear is associated with corneal inflammation. Optom Vis Sci. 2007; 84(4):309-315.
15. Tilia D, Jalbert I, Carnt N, et al. Evaluation of solution toxicity associated with lens care products during silicone hydrogel lens wear. Paper presented at: American Academy of Optometry Annual Meeting; December 10, 2006; Denver, CO.
16. Holden BA, Sankaridurg PR, Jalbert I. Adverse events and infections: which ones and how many? In: Sweeney D, ed. Silicone Hydrogels: The Rebirth of Continuous Wear Contact Lenses. Oxford, England: Butterworth Heinemann; 2000:90-149.
17. Sweeney DF, Jalbert I, Covey M, et al. Clinical characterization of corneal infiltrative events observed with soft contact lens wear. Cornea. 2003;22(5):435-442.
18. Jalbert I, Sweeney DF, Holden BA. The characteristics of corneal staining in successful daily and extended disposable contact lens wearers. Clin Exp Optom. 1999; 82(1):4-10.
19. Carnt N, Willcox MDP, Evans V, et al. Corneal staining: the IER Matrix Study. Contact Lens Spectrum. 2007;22(9):38-43.
20. Carnt N, Evans V, Holden B, et al. IER Matrix update: adding another silicone hydrogel. Contact Lens Spectrum. 2008;23(3):40-43.
21. Diec J, Carnt N, Tilia D, et al. Prompt diagnosis and treatment of microbial keratitis in a daily wear lens. Optom Vis Sci. 2009;86(7):E904-E907.
22. Hickson S, Papas E. Prevalence of idiopathic corneal anomalies in a non contact lens-wearing population. Optom Vis Sci. 1997;74(5):293-297.
23. Sankaridurg PR, Sweeney DF, Holden BA, et al. Comparison of adverse events in daily disposable hydrogels and spectacle lens wear: results from a 12-month prospective clinical trial. Ophthalmology. 2003;110(12):2327- 2334.
24. Morgan PB, Efron N, Hill EA, Raynor MK, Whiting MA. Incidence of keratitis of varying severity among contact lens wearers. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89(4): 430-436.
25. Long B, McNally J. The clinical performance of a silicone hydrogel lens for daily wear in an Asian population. Eye Contact Lens. 2006;32(2):65-71.
26. Dillehay SM, Miller MB. Performance of lotrafilcon B silicone hydrogel contact lenses in experienced low-Dk/t daily lens wearers. Eye Contact Lens. 2007; 33(6, pt 1):272-277.
27. Long B, Schweizer H, Bleshoy H, Zeri F. Expanding your use of silicone hydrogel contact lenses: using lotrafilcon A for daily wear. Eye Contact Lens. 2009;35 (2):59-64.
28. Chalmers RL. What have pre- and postapproval studies shown about contact lensrelated inflammatory events? Eye Contact Lens. 2007;33(6, pt 2):388-391.
29. Helms PJ. "Real world" pragmatic clinical trials: what are they and what do they tell us? Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2002;13(1):4-9.
30. Willcox M, Sankaridurg PR, Zhu H, et al. Inflammation and infection and the effects of the closed eye. In: Sweeney DF, ed. Silicone Hydrogels: Continuous Wear Contact Lenses. 2nd ed. Oxford, England: Butterworth Heinemann; 200490125.
31. Robertson DM, Petroll WM, Cavanagh HD. The effect of nonpreserved care solutions on 12 months of daily and extended silicone hydrogel contact lens wear. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(1):7-15.
32. Cavanagh HD, Ladage PM, Li SL, et al. Effects of daily and overnight wear of a novel hyper oxygen-transmissible soft contact lens on bacterial binding and corneal epithelium: a 13-month clinical trial. Ophthalmology. 2002;109(11):1957-1969.
33. Amos CF, George MD. Clinical and laboratory testing of a silver-impregnated lens case. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2006;29(5):247-255.
34. Yung MS, Boost M, Cho P, Yap M. Microbial contamination of contact lenses and lens care accessories of soft contact lens wearers (university students) in Hong Kong. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2007;27(1):11-21.