Cytoprotective properties of carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) when used prior to wearing contact lenses treated with cationic disinfecting agents

Eye and Contact Lens

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 177-180

  Vehige, Joseph G ^a   Simmons, Peter A ^a   Anger, Claude ^a   Graham, Richard ^a   Tran, Lam ^a   Brady, Nancy ^a  

^a ALLERGAN INC   (United States)

Author keywords

Carboxymethylcellulose; Cytoprotection; Multipurpose solutions; Polyhexamethylene biguanide; Rewetting drops

Indexed keywords

CARBOXYMETHYLCELLULOSE; DISINFECTANT AGENT; POLY(HEXAMETHYLENEBIGUANIDE); WATER; BIGUANIDE DERIVATIVE; CONTACT LENS SOLUTION; EYE DROPS;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL STRAIN; BACTERIAL SURVIVAL; CELL PROTECTION; COMPLEX FORMATION; CONTACT LENS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG ACTIVITY; DRUG BINDING; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPECTROPHOTOMETRY; ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE; BIOAVAILABILITY; DRUG EFFECT; DRUG INTERACTION; MICROBIOLOGICAL EXAMINATION; PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS;

BIGUANIDES; BIOLOGICAL AVAILABILITY; CARBOXYMETHYLCELLULOSE; CONTACT LENS SOLUTIONS; CONTACT LENSES; CYTOPROTECTION; DRUG INTERACTIONS; DRUG RESISTANCE, BACTERIAL; MICROBIAL SENSITIVITY TESTS; OPHTHALMIC SOLUTIONS; PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS;

EID: 0142058102     PISSN: 15422321     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.ICL.0000074106.82322.17     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. IRI. Audited market data. US contact lens care products. 2001.
2. Pham XT, Huff JW. Cytotoxicity evaluation of multipurpose contact lens solutions using an in vitro test battery. CLAO J 1999;25(1):28-35.
3. Begley CG, Waggoner PJ, Jani NB, et al. The effects of soft contact lens disinfection solutions on rabbit corneal epithelium. CLAO J 1994;20(1):52-58.
4. Begley CG, Waggoner PJ, Hafner GS, et al. Effect of rigid gas permeable contact lens wetting solutions on the rabbit corneal epithelium. Optom Vis Sci 1991;68(3):189-197.
5. Jones L, Jones D, Houlford M. Clinical comparison of three polyhexanide-preserved contact lens solutions. Contact Lens Anterior Eye 1997;20(1):23-30.
6. Vehige JG, Madden RK. Salt and pepper stain secondary to chemical disinfecting agents. Optom Vis Sci 1992;69:49.
7. Caroline P. The next revolution in contact lenses. Optometry Today 1998;6:34-36.
8. Artique GM. Solution concerns [letter]. Contact Lens Spectrum 2001;17:1.
9. Vehige JG, Currie JP. Compositions and methods for enhancing contact lens wearability. Patent 5858346. 1999.
10. Muller G, Kramer A. In vitro action of a combination of selected antimicrobial agents and chondroitin sulfate. Chem Biol Interact 2000;124(2):77-85.
11. Debbasch C, De La Salle SB, Brignole F, et al. Cytoprotective effects of hyaluronic acid and carbomer 934P in ocular surface epithelial cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43(11):3409-3415.
12. Gilbert P, Pemberton D, Wilkinson DE. Synergism within polyhexamethylene biguanide biocide formulations. J Appl Bacteriol 1990;69(4):593-598.
13. Gilbert P, Pemberton D, Wilkinson DE. Barrier properties of the gram-negative cell envelope towards high molecular weight polyhexamethylene biguanides. J Appl Bacteriol 1990;69(4):585-592.
14. ISO. Microbiological requirements and test methods for products and regimens for hygienic management of contact lenses. [172/SC 7/WG 5]. Contact Lenses II, 2000.
15. Miller MJ, Callahan DE, McGrath D, et al. Disinfection efficacy of contact lens care solutions against ocular pathogens. CLAO J 2001;27(1):16-22.
16. Hunt G, Kearney P, Kellaway IW. Mucoadhesive polymers in drug delivery systems. In: Johnson P, Lloyd-Jones JG, eds. Drug Delivery Systems: Fundamentals and Techniques. Deerfield Beach, FL, VCH, 1987, pp 180-199.
17. McNamara NA, Polse KA, Brand RJ, et al. Tear mixing under a soft contact lens: effects of lens diameter. Am J Ophthalmol 1999;127(6):659-665.
18. McNamara NA, Polse KA, Bonanno JA. Fluorophotometry in contact lens research: the next step. Optom Vis Sci 1998;75(5):316-322.
19. Thai LC, Tomlinson A, Simmons PA. In vitro and in vivo effects of a lubricant in a contact lens solution. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2002;22(4):319-329.
20. Simmons PA, Donshik PC, Kelly WF, et al. Conditioning of hydrogel lenses by a multipurpose solution containing an ocular lubricant. CLAO J 2001;27(4):192-194.
21. Coles M-LC, Brennan NA, Shuley V, et al. The influence of lens conditioning on signs and symptoms with new hydrogel lenses. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Optometry, December 2002. Optom Vis Sci 2002;79(12S):138.