Biomechanical analysis of corrective forces in spinal instrumentation for scoliosis treatment

Spine

Volumn 37, Issue 24, 2012, Pages

  Wang, Xiaoyu ^a   Aubin, Carl Eric ^a,b   Labelle, Hubert ^b   Parent, Stefan ^b   Crandall, Dennis ^c  

^a ÉCOLE POLYTECHNIQUE DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MONTREAL   (Canada)

^c Sonoran Spine Center   (United States)

Author keywords

pedicle screw; scoliosis; spinal instrumentation

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE SCREW; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER MODEL; EXTRA FORCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MEDICAL DEVICE; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; PEDICLE SCREW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCOLIOSIS; TRUE CORRECTIVE FORCE; VERTEBRA;

ADOLESCENT; BIOMECHANICS; BONE SCREWS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNAL FIXATORS; MALE; MODELS, ANATOMIC; SCOLIOSIS; SPINAL FUSION; THORACIC VERTEBRAE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84870224447     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182706745     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Lenke LG, Kuklo TR, Ondra S, et al. Rationale behind the current state-of-the-art treatment of scoliosis (in the pedicle screw era). Spine 2008; 33:1051-4.
2. Suk SI, Kim JH, Kim SS, et al. Pedicle screw instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) [published online ahead of print August 30, 2011]. Eur Spine J 2012; 21:13-22.
3. Ledonio CG, Polly DW Jr, Vitale MG, et al. Pediatric pedicle screws: comparative effectiveness and safety: a systematic literature review from the Scoliosis Research Society and the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America task force. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93:1227-34.
4. Quan GM, Gibson MJ. Correction of main thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using pedicle screw instrumentation: does higher implant density improve correction ? Spine 2010; 35:562-7.
5. Cheung KM, Natarajan D, Samartzis D, et al. Predictability of the fulcrum bending radiograph in scoliosis correction with alternate-level pedicle screw fi xation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92:169-76.
6. Clements DH, Betz RR, Newton PO, et al. Correlation of scolio-sis curve correction with the number and type of fi xation anchors. Spine 2009; 34:2147-50.
7. Hwang CJ, Lee CK, Chang BS, et al. Minimum 5-year follow-up results of skipped pedicle screw fi xation for fl exible idiopathic scoliosis. J Neurosurg Spine 2011; 15:146-50.
8. Yang S, Jones-Quaidoo SM, Eager M, et al. Right adolescent idiopathic thoracic curve (Lenke 1 A and B): does cost of instrumentation and implant density improve radiographic and cosmetic parameters ? Eur Spine J 2011; 20:1039-47.
9. Lonner BS, Auerbach JD, Boachie-Adjei O, et al. Treatment of thoracic scoliosis: are monoaxial thoracic pedicle screws the best form of fi xation for correction ? Spine 2009; 34:845-51.
10. O'Brien MF, Newton PO. Surgical treatment of adolescent idio-pathic scoliosis. In: ̀ Kim DH, Betz RR, Huhn SL, et al., eds. Surgery of the Pediatric Spine. 1st ed. New York, NY: Thieme Medical Publishers; 2008:602-34.
11. Wang X, Aubin CE, Crandall D, et al. Biomechanical comparison of force levels in spinal instrumentation using monoaxial versus multi degree of freedom postloading pedicle screws. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011; 36: E95-104.
12. Kuklo TR, Potter BK, Polly DW Jr, et al. Monaxial versus multiaxial thoracic pedicle screws in the correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005; 30:2113-20.
13. Dalal A, Upasani VV, Bastrom TP, et al. Apical vertebral rotation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: comparison of uniplanar and polyaxial pedicle screws. J Spinal Disord Tech 2011; 24:251-7.
14. Wang X, Aubin CE, Crandall D, et al. Biomechanical modeling and analysis of a direct incremental segmental translation system for the instrumentation of scoliotic deformities. Clin Biomech 2011; 26:548-55.
15. Lee SM, Suk SI, Chung ER. Direct vertebral rotation: a new technique of three-dimensional deformity correction with segmental pedicle screw fi xation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004; 29:343-9.
16. Parent S, Odell T, Oka R, et al. Does the direction of pedicle screw rotation affect the biomechanics of direct transverse plane vertebral derotation ? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008; 33:1966-9.
17. Rose PS, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. Pedicle screw instrumentation for adult idiopathic scoliosis: an improvement over hook/hybrid fi xation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34:852-7; discussion 858.
18. Cheng I, Hay D, Iezza A, et al. Biomechanical analysis of derotation of the thoracic spine using pedicle screws. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010; 35:1039-43.
19. Bess RS, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. Comparison of thoracic pedicle screw to hook instrumentation for the treatment of adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007; 32:555-61.
20. Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Cho SK, et al. Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hook instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004; 29:2040-8.
21. Storer SK, Vitale MG, Hyman JE, et al. Correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using thoracic pedicle screw fi xation versus hook constructs. J Pediatr Orthop 2005; 25:415-9.
22. Cheh G, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Adjacent segment disease following lumbar/thoracolumbar fusion with pedicle screw instrumentation: a minimum 5-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007; 32:2253-7.
23. Helgeson MD, Shah SA, Newton PO, et al. Evaluation of proximal junctional kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis following pedicle screw, hook, or hybrid instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010; 35:177-81.
24. Hicks JM, Singla A, Shen FH, et al. Complications of pedicle screw fi xation in scoliosis surgery: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010; 35: E465-70.
25. Katonis P, Christoforakis J, Kontakis G, et al. Complications and problems related to pedicle screw fi xation of the spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003;411:86-94.
26. Faraj AA, Webb JK. Early complications of spinal pedicle screw. Eur Spine J 1997; 6:324-6.
27. Esses SI, Sachs BL, Dreyzin V. Complications associated with the technique of pedicle screw fi xation. A selected survey of ABS members. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1993; 18:2231-8; discussion 2238-9.
28. Fogel GR, Reitman CA, Liu W, et al. Physical characteristics of polyaxial-headed pedicle screws and biomechanical comparison of load with their failure. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003; 28:470-3.
29. Chen CS, Chen WJ, Cheng CK, et al. Failure analysis of broken pedicle screws on spinal instrumentation. Med Eng Phys 2005; 27:487-96.
30. Rohlmann A, Arntz U, Graichen F, et al. Loads on an internal spinal fi xation device during sitting. J Biomech 2001; 34:989-93.
31. Rohlmann A, Graichen F, Weber U, et al. 2000 Volvo Award winner in biomechanical studies: Monitoring in vivo implant loads with a telemeterized internal spinal fi xation device. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000; 25:2981-6.
32. Rohlmann A, Bergmann G, Graichen F. Loads on an internal spinal fi xation device during walking. J Biomech 1997; 30:41-7.
33. Aubin CE, Labelle H, Chevrefi ls C, et al. Preoperative planning simulator for spinal deformity surgeries. Spine 2008; 33:2143-52.
34. Aubin CE, Bellefl eur C, Joncas J, et al. Reliability and accuracy analysis of a new semiautomatic radiographic measurement software in adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011; 36: E780-90.
35. Cheriet F, Laporte C, Kadoury S, et al. A novel system for the 3-D reconstruction of the human spine and rib cage from biplanar x-ray images. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2007; 54:1356-8.
36. Delorme S, Petit Y, de Guise JA, et al. Assessment of the 3-D reconstruction and high-resolution geometrical modeling of the human skeletal trunk from 2-D radiographic images. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2003; 50:989-98.
37. Labelle H, Dansereau J, Bellefl eur C, et al. Variability of geometric measurements from three-dimensional reconstructions of scoliotic spines and rib cages. Eur Spine J 1995; 4:88-94.
38. Panjabi MM, Brand RA Jr, White AA III. Three-dimensional fl exibility and stiffness properties of the human thoracic spine. J Biomech 1976; 9:185-92.
39. Panjabi MM, Oxland TR, Yamamoto I, et al. Mechanical behavior of the human lumbar and lumbosacral spine as shown by three-dimensional load-displacement curves. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1994; 76:413-24.
40. Gardner-Morse MG, Laible JP, Stokes IA. Incorporation of spinal fl exibility measurements into fi nite element analysis. J Biomech Eng 1990; 112:481-3.
41. Petit Y, Aubin CE, Labelle H. Patient-specifi c mechanical properties of a fl exible multi-body model of the scoliotic spine. Med Biol Eng Comput 2004; 42:55-60.
42. Rao SS. Engineering Optimization-Theory and Practice. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2009.
43. Chen T-Y, Yang C-M. Multidisciplinary design optimization of mechanisms. Adv Eng Soft 2005; 36:301-11.
44. Parent S, Labelle H, Skalli W, et al. Thoracic pedicle morphom-etry in vertebrae from scoliotic spines. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004; 29:239-48.
45. Bledsoe JM, Fenton D, Fogelson JL, et al. Accuracy of upper thoracic pedicle screw placement using three-dimensional image guidance. Spine J 2009; 9:817-21.
46. Amato V, Giannachi L, Irace C, et al. Accuracy of pedicle screw placement in the lumbosacral spine using conventional technique: computed tomography postoperative assessment in 102 consecutive patients. J Neurosurg Spine 2010; 12:306-13.
47. Sarlak AY, Tosun B, Atmaca H, et al. Evaluation of thoracic pedicle screw placement in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 2009; 18:1892-7.
48. Majdouline Y, Aubin CE, Robitaille M, et al. Scoliosis correction objectives in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 2007; 27:775-81.
49. Majdouline Y, Aubin CE, Sangole A, et al. Computer simulation for the optimization of instrumentation strategies in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Med Biol Eng Comput 2009; 47:1143-54.
50. Panjabi MM, Brand RA, White AA. Mechanical properties of the human thoracic spine as shown by three-dimensional load-displacement curves. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1976; 58:642-52.