Preoperative planning simulator for spinal deformity surgeries

Spine

Volumn 33, Issue 20, 2008, Pages 2143-2152

  Aubin, C E ^a,b   Labelle, H ^b   Chevrefils, C ^a,b   Desroches, G ^a,b   Clin, J ^a,b   Eng, A Boivin M ^a,b  

^a ÉCOLE POLYTECHNIQUE DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MONTREAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Biomechanical model; Biomechanics; Computer assisted surgery; Scoliosis; Spinal instrumentation; Surgery simulator

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CHILD; FEMALE; GEOMETRY; HUMAN; IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; KINETICS; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHOOL CHILD; SIMULATION; SIMULATOR; SPINE MALFORMATION; SPINE SURGERY; SURGEON; TREATMENT PLANNING; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONGENITAL MALFORMATION; INTERNAL FIXATOR; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; PREOPERATIVE CARE; SCOLIOSIS; SPINE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; INTERNAL FIXATORS; MODELS, ANATOMIC; PREOPERATIVE CARE; SCOLIOSIS; SOFTWARE; SPINE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 55449107278     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817bd89f     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Moe JH, Byrd JA. Idiopathic Scoliosis. Toronto, Canada: WB Saunders Company; 1987.
2. Aubin CE, Labelle H, Ciolofan OC. Variability of spinal instrumentation configurations in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 2007;16: 57-64.
3. Robitaille, M. Aubin C-E, Labelle H. Intra and interobserver variability of preoperative planning for surgical instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 2007;16:1604-14.
4. Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Cho SK, et al. Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hook instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idio-pathic scoliosis. Spine 2004;29:2040-8.
5. Liljenqvist U, Lepsien U, Hackenberg L, et al. Comparative analysis of pedicle screw and hook instrumentation in posterior correction and fusion of idiopathic thoracic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 2002;l1:336-43.
6. Lenke LG, Betz RR, Haher TR et al. Multisurgeon assessment of surgical decision-making in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: curve classification, operative approach, and fusion levels. Spine 2001;26:2347-53.
7. Aubin CE, Petit Y, Stokes IA, et al. Biomechanical modeling of posterior instrumentation of the scoliotic spine. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2003;6:27-32.
8. O'Toole RV, HI, Jaramaz B, DiGioia AM, HI, et al. Biomechanics for preop-erative planning and surgical simulations in orthopaedics. Comput Biol Med 1995;25:183-91.
9. Aubin CE, Goussev V, Petit Y. Biomechanical modelling of segmental instrumentation for surgical correction of 3D spinal deformities using Euler-Bernoulli thin-beam elastic deformation equations. Med Biol Eng Comput 2004;42:216-21.
10. Gardner-Morse M, Stokes IA. Three-dimensional simulations of the scoliosis derotation maneuver with Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation. J Biomech 1994;27:177-81.
11. Lafage V, Dubousset J, Lavaste F, et al. 3D finite element simulation of Cotrel-Dubousset correction. Comput Aided Surg 2004;9:17-25.
12. Stokes IA, Gardner-Morse M. Three-dimensional simulation of Harrington distraction instrumentation for surgical correction of scoliosis. Spine 1993; 18:2457-64.
13. Deleted in proof.
14. Poulin F, Aubin CE, Stokes IA, et al. Biomechanical modeling of instrumentation for the scoliotic spine using flexible elements: a feasibility study. Ann Qhir 1998;52:761-7.
15. Desroches G, Aubin CE, Sucato DJ, et al. Simulation of an anterior spine instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using a flexible multi-body model. Med Biol Eng Comput 2007;45:759-68.
16. Cheriet F, Dansereau J, Petit Y, et al. Towards the self-calibration of a multiview radiographic imaging system for the 3D reconstruction of the human spine and rib cage. Intern J Pattern Recognit Artif Intel 1999;13: 761-79.
17. Delorme S, Petit Y, De Guise JA, et al. Assessment of the 3-D reconstruction and high-resolution geometrical modeling of the human skeletal trunk from 2-D radiographic images. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2003;50:989-98.
18. Trochu, F. Contouring program based on dual kriging interpolation. Engin Qomput (New York) 1993;9:160-77.
19. Aubin CE, Descrimes JL, Dansereau J, et al. Geometrical modeling of the spine and the thorax for the biomechanical analysis of scoliotic deformities using the finite element method. Ann Chir 1995;49:749-61.
20. Panjabi MM, Brand RA Jr, White AA, HI. Three-dimensional flexibility and stiffness properties of the human thoracic spine. J Biomech 1976;9:185-92.
21. Gardner-Morse MG, Laible JP, Stokes IA. Incorporation of spinal flexibility measurements into finite element analysis. J Biomech Eng 1990;l 12:481-3.
22. Petit Y, Aubin CE, Labelle H. Patient-specific mechanical properties of a flexible multi-body model of the scoliotic spine. Med Biol Eng Comput 2004;42:55-60.
23. Lee SM, Suk SI, Chung ER. Direct vertebral rotation: a new technique of three-dimensional deformity correction with segmental pedicle screw fixation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2004;29:343-9.
24. Lehman RA Jr, Polly DW Jr, Kuklo TR, et al. Straight-forward versus anatomic trajectory technique of thoracic pedicle screw fixation: a biomechanical analysis. Spine 2003;28:2058-65.
25. Delorme S, Labelle H, Poitras B, et al. Pre-, intra-, and postoperative three-dimensional evaluation of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Spinal Disord 2000;13:93-101.
26. Hitchon PW, Brenton MD, Black AG, et al. In vitro biomechanical comparison of pedicle screws, sublaminar hooks, and sublaminar cables. J Neurosurg 2003;99:104-9.
27. Gayet LE, Hamcha H, Charbonneau A, et al. Biomechanical study and digital modeling of traction resistance in posterior thoracic implants. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2001;87:459-68.
28. Belmont PJ Jr, Polly DW Jr, Cunningham BW, et al. The effects of hook pattern and kyphotic angulation on mechanical strength and apical rod strain in a long-segment posterior construct using a synthetic model. Spine 2001;26:627-35.
29. Robitaille, M. Aubin CE, Labelle H. Effects of alternative instrumentation strategies in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a biomechanical analysis. J Orthop Res 2008; July 16 [Epub ahead of print.]