Evaluation of proximal junctional kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis following pedicle screw, hook, or hybrid instrumentation

Spine

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 177-181

  Helgeson, Melvin D ^a   Shah, Suken A ^b   Newton, Peter O ^c   Clements III, David H ^d   Betz, Randal R ^e   Marks, Michelle C ^c   Bastrom, Tracey ^c  

^a WALTER REED ARMY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b NEMOURS ALFRED I DUPONT HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN   (United States)

^c RADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^d Department of Anesthesiology   (United States)

^e SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN   (United States)

Author keywords

Deformity; Idiopathic scoliosis; Instrumentation; Proximal kyphosis; Sagittal balance; Surgical treatment

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; BONE SCREW; CHILD; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; KYPHOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; ORTHOPEDIC EQUIPMENT; PEDIATRIC SURGERY; PEDICLE SCREW; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROXIMAL HOOK; PROXIMAL JUNCTIONAL KYPHOSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCHOOL CHILD; SPINE FUSION; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; SURGICAL RISK; THORACIC SPINE;

ADOLESCENT; BONE SCREWS; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; KYPHOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SCOLIOSIS; SPINAL FUSION; THORACIC VERTEBRAE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77749304944     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c77f8c     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Cotrel Y, Dubousset J, Guillaumat M. New universal instrumentation in spinal surgery. Clin Orthop 1988;227:10-23.
2. Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. Free hand pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine: is it safe? Spine 2004;29:333-42.
3. Webb JK, Burwell RG, Cole AA, et al. Posterior instrumentation in scoliosis. Eur Spine J 1995;4:2-5.
4. Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Proximal junctional kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis following segmental posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion: minimum 5-year follow-up. Spine 2005;30:2045-50.
5. Lee GA, betz RR, Clements DH III, et al. Proximal kyphosis after posterior spinal fusion in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1999;24:795-9.
6. Rhee JM, Bridwell KH, Clements DH III, et al. Sagittal plane analysis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: the effect of anterior versus posterior instrumentation. Spine 2002;27:2350-6.
7. Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Cho SK, et al. Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hook instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2004;29:2040-8.
8. Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Kim J, et al. Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2006;31:291-8.
9. Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. Proximal junctional kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after 3 different types of posterior segmental spinal instrumentation and fusions. Spine 2007;32:2731-8.
10. Carman DL, Browne RH, Birch JG. Measurement of scoliosis and kyphosis radiographs. Intraobserver and interobserver variation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990;72:328-33.
11. McCance SE, Denis F, Lonstein JE, et al. Coronal and sagittal balance in surgically treated adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with the King II curve pattern. A review of 67 consecutive cases having selective thoracic arthrodesis. Spine 1998;23:2063-73.