Biomechanical comparison of force levels in spinal instrumentation using monoaxial versus multi degree of freedom postloading pedicle screws

Spine

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2011, Pages

  Wang, Xiaoyu ^a,b   Aubin, Carl Eric ^a,b   Crandall, Dennis ^c   Labelle, Hubert ^b  

^a ÉCOLE POLYTECHNIQUE DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MONTREAL   (Canada)

^c Sonoran Spine Center   (United States)

Author keywords

Biomechanical modeling; direct incremental segmental translation; rod derotation technique; scoliosis; spine instrumentation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FORCE; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KYPHOSIS; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; PEDICLE SCREW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCOLIOSIS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

ADOLESCENT; BIOMECHANICS; BONE SCREWS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SCOLIOSIS; SPINAL FUSION;

EID: 79551509365     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f07cca     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Lenke LG, Dobbs MB. Management of juvenile idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89(suppl 1):55-63.
2. Heary R, Albert T. Spinal Deformities: The Essentials. New York, NY: Thieme Medical Publishers; 2007.
3. Bridwell KH. Surgical treatment of idiopathic adolescent scoliosis. Spine 1999;24:2607-16.
4. Hamill CL, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. The use of pedicle screw fi xation to improve correction in the lumbar spine of patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Is it warranted? Spine 1996;21:1241-9.
5. Lenke LG, Kuklo TR, Ondra S, et al. Rationale behind the current state-of-the-art treatment of scoliosis (in the pedicle screw era). Spine 2008;33:1051-4.
6. Suk SI, Lee CK, Kim WJ, et al. Segmental pedicle screw fi xation in the treatment of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1995;20:1399-405.
7. Suk SI, Lee CK, Min HJ, et al. Comparison of Cotrel-Dubousset pedicle screws and hooks in the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. Int Orthop 1994;18:341-6.
8. Newton PO, Thompson G, Bridwell K. Summary statement: innovative technologies for traditional scoliosis surgery. Spine 2005;30:S92-3.
9. Boos N, Aebi M. Spinal Disorders: Fundamentals of Diagnosis and Treatment. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg; 2008.
10. Bridwell KH. Surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: the basics and the controversies. Spine 1994;19:1095-100.
11. Kim D, Betz R, Huhn S, et al. Surgery of the Pediatric Spine. New York, NY: Thieme Medical Publishers; 2008.
12. Crandall D, Morrison M, Slaughter D, et al. Scoliosis correction using a new screw with a pivoting reduction post: biomechanical testing and 2 year clinical results. Spine J 2004;4(5):S73-4.
13. Wang X, Aubin CE, Crandall D, et al. Biomechanical modeling and analysis of the direct incremental segmental translation system for the instrumentation of scoliotic deformities. Clin Biomech (submitted for publication).
14. Clements DH, Betz RR, Newton PO, et al. Correlation of scoliosis curve correction with the number and type of fi xation anchors. Spine 2009;34:2147-50.
15. Aubin CE, Labelle H, Ciolofan OC. Variability of spinal instrumentation confi gurations in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 2007;16:57-64.
16. Amato V, Giannachi L, Irace C, et al. Accuracy of pedicle screw placement in the lumbosacral spine using conventional technique: computed tomography postoperative assessment in 102 consecutive patients. J Neurosurg Spine 2010;12:306-13.
17. Duffy MF, Phillips JH, Knapp DR, et al. Usefulness of electromyography compared to computed tomography scans in pedicle screw placement. Spine 2010;35:E43-8.
18. Verma R, Krishan S, Haendlmayer K, et al. Functional outcome of computer-assisted spinal pedicle screw placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 23 studies including 5,992 pedicle screws. Eur Spine J 2010;19:370-5.
19. Bledsoe JM, Fenton D, Fogelson JL, et al. Accuracy of upper thoracic pedicle screw placement using three-dimensional image guidance. Spine 2009;9:817-21.
20. Sarlak AY, Tosun B, Atmaca H, et al. Evaluation of thoracic pedicle screw placement in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 2009;18:1892-7.
21. Bridwell KH. Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation. Orthop Nurs 1988;7:11-6.
22. Richards BS, Johnston CE. Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Orthopedics 1987;10:649-54.
23. Singh H, Rahimi SY, Yeh DJ, et al. History of posterior thoracic instrumentation. Neurosurg Focus 2004;16:E11.
24. Luque ER. The anatomic basis and development of segmental spinal instrumentation. Spine 1982;7:256-9.
25. Wang X, Aubin CE, Labelle H, et al. Biomechanical modelling of a direct vertebral translation instrumentation system: preliminary results. Stud Health Technol Inform 2008;140:128-32.
26. Cheriet F, Laporte C, Kadoury S, et al. A novel system for the 3-D reconstruction of the human spine and rib cage from biplanar x-ray images. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2007;54:1356-8.
27. Kadoury S, Cheriet F, Laporte C, et al. A versatile 3D reconstruction system of the spine and pelvis for clinical assessment of spinal deformities. Med Biol Eng Comput 2007;45:591-602.
28. Delorme S, Petit Y, de Guise JA, et al. Assessment of the 3-D reconstruction and high-resolution geometrical modeling of the human skeletal trunk from 2-D radiographic images. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2003;50:989-98.
29. Panjabi MM, Brand RA Jr, White AA III. Three dimensional fl exibility and stiffness properties of the human thoracic spine. J Biomech 1976;9:185-92.
30. Panjabi MM, Brand RA Jr, White AA III. Mechanical properties of the human thoracic spine as shown by three-dimensional loaddisplacement curves. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1976;58:642-52.
31. Panjabi MM, Oxland TR, Yamamoto I, et al. Mechanical behavior of the human lumbar and lumbosacral spine as shown by three-dimensional load-displacement curves. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1994;76:413-24.
32. Gardner-Morse MG, Laible JP, Stokes IAF. Incorporation of spinal fl exibility measurements into fi nite element analysis. J Biomech Eng 1990;112:481-3.
33. Aubin CE, Labelle H, Chevrefi ls C, et al. Preoperative planning simulator for spinal deformity surgeries. Spine 2008;33:2143-52.
34. Petit Y, Aubin CE, Labelle H. Patient-specifi c mechanical properties of a fl exible multi-body model of the scoliotic spine. Med Biol Eng Comput 2004;42:55-60.
35. Desroches G, Aubin CE, Sucato DJ, et al. Simulation of an anterior spine instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using a fl exible multi-body model. Med Biol Eng Comput 2007;45:759-68.
36. Suk SI, Lee CK, Chung SS. Comparison of Zielke ventral derotation system and Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation in the treatment of idiopathic lumbar and thoracolumbar scoliosis. Spine 1994;19:419-29.
37. Bess RS, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. Comparison of thoracic pedicle screw to hook instrumentation for the treatment of adult spinal deformity. Spine 2007;32:555-61.
38. Lowenstein JE, Matsumoto H, Vitale MG, et al. Coronal and sagittal plane correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison between all pedicle screw versus hybrid thoracic hook lumbar screw constructs. Spine 2007;32:448-52.
39. Fu G, Kawakami N, Goto M, et al. Comparison of vertebral rotation corrected by different techniques and anchors in surgical treatment of adolescent thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. J Spinal Disord Tech 2009;22:182-9.
40. Dobbs MB, Lenke LG, Kim YJ, et al. Selective posterior thoracic fusions for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: comparison of hooks versus pedicle screws. Spine 2006;31:2400-4.
41. Erkan S, Hsu B, Wu C, et al. Alignment of pedicle screws with pilot holes: can tapping improve screw trajectory in thoracic spines? Eur Spine J 2010;19:71-7.
42. Samdani AF, Ranade A, Sciubba DM, et al. Accuracy of free-hand placement of thoracic pedicle screws in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: how much of a difference does surgeon experience make? Eur Spine J 2010;19:91-5.
43. Senaran H, Shah SA, Gabos PG, et al. Diffi cult thoracic pedicle screw placement in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Spinal Disord Tech 2008;21:187-91.
44. Modi H, Suh SW, Song HR, et al. Accuracy of thoracic pedicle screw placement in scoliosis using the ideal pedicle entry point during the freehand technique. Int Orthop 2009;33:469-75.
45. Sarlak AY, Buluc L, Sarisoy HT, et al. Placement of pedicle screws in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis: a magnetic resonance imaging analysis of screw placement relative to structures at risk. Eur Spine J 2008;17:657-62.
46. Wang X, Aubin CE, Labelle H, et al. Rod derotation vs. direct incremental segmental translation: a biomechanical analysis. Spine J 2009;9(10, suppl 1):S194-5.
47. Crandall D, Morrison M, Baker D, et al. Adult scoliosis correction by direct vertebral translation technique: 2 year clinical and radiographic results. Spine J 2005;5(4, suppl 1):S118.
48. Crandall D, Morrison M, Baker D, et al. Adult scoliosis correction: a comparison of techniques. Spine J 2006;6(5, suppl 1):S150-1.
49. Crandall D, Revella J. Translational vs. derotational correction of adult scoliosis: a comparison of clinical and radiographic outcomes. Paper presented at: 16th International Meeting on Advanced Spine Techniques; 2009; p86.