Pedicle screw instrumentation for adult idiopathic scoliosis: An improvement over hook/hybrid fixation

Spine

Volumn 34, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 852-857

  Rose, Peter S ^a   Lenke, Lawrence G ^a   Bridwell, Keith H ^a   Mulconrey, Daniel S ^a   Cronen, Geoffrey A ^a   Buchowski, Jacob M ^a   Schwend, Richard M ^b   Sides, Brenda A ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b CHILDREN S MERCY HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Adult idiopathic scoliosis; Anterior release; Outcomes; Pedicle screws

Indexed keywords

BONE MORPHOGENETIC PROTEIN 2;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CLINICAL FEATURE; COHORT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FIXATION DEVICE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; INSTRUMENTATION; KYPHOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; PEDICLE SCREW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSEUDARTHROSIS; RADIOGRAPHY; SCORING SYSTEM;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BONE SCREWS; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORTHOPEDIC FIXATION DEVICES; ORTHOPEDIC PROCEDURES; SCOLIOSIS; SPINAL FUSION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 67650472182     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818e5962     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Barr SJ, Schuette AM, Emans JB. Lumbar pedicle screws versus hooks. Results in double major curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1997; 22:1369-79.
2. Dobbs MB, Lenke LG, Kim YJ, et al. Selective posterior thoracic fusions for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: comparison of hooks versus pedicle screws. Spine 2006;31:2400-4.
3. Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Cho SK, et al. Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hook instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idio-pathic scoliosis. Spine 2004;29:2040-8.
4. Suk SI, Kim WJ, Kim JH, et al. Restoration of thoracic kyphosis in the hypokyphotic spine: a comparison between multiple-hook and segmental pedicle screw fixation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Spinal Disord 1999;12:489-95.
5. Suk SI, Lee CK, Kim WJ, et al. Segmental pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of ithoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1995;20:1399-405.
6. Cheng I, Kim Y, Gupta MC, et al. Apical sublaminar wires versus pedicle screws-which provides better results for surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? Spine 2005;30:2104-12.
7. Dobbs MB, Lenke LG, Kim YJ, et al. Anterior/posterior spinal instrumentation versus posterior instrumentation alone for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliotic curves more than 90 degrees. Spine 2006;31: 2386-91.
8. Luhmann SJ, Lenke LG, Kim YJ, et al. Thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis curves between 70 degrees and 100 degrees: is anterior release necessary? Spine 2005;30:2061-7.
9. Suk SI, Kim JH, Cho KJ, et al. Is anterior release necessary in severe scoliosis treated by posterior segmental pedicle screw fixation? Eur Spine J 2007:16: 1359-65.
10. Kuklo TR, Meyer LA. What really are the instrumentation costs for AIS surgery? Paper Presented at: 14th International Meeting on Advanced Spine Techniques; July 2007; Paradise Island, Bahamas.
11. Takahashi S, Delecrin J, Passuti N. Surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis in adults: an age-related analysis of outcome. Spine 2002;27: 1742-8.
12. Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Pseudarthrosis in adult spinal deformity following multisegmental instrumentation and arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88:721-8.
13. Asher MA, Min LaiS,Burton DC. Further development and validationofthe Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) outcomes instrument. Spine 2000;25: 2381-6.
14. Haher TR, Gorup JM, Shin TM, et al. Results of the Scoliosis Research Society instrument for evaluation of surgical outcome in adolescent idio-pathic scoliosis. A multicenter study of 244 patients. Spine 1999;24: 1435-40.
15. O'Brien MF, Kuklo TR, Blanke KM, et al. Spinal Deformity Study Group Radiographic Measurement Manual. Memphis, TN: Medtronic Sofamor Danek; 2004.
16. Deviren V, Acaroglu E, Lee J, et al. Pedicle screw fixation of the thoracic spine: an in vitro biomechanical study on different configurations. Spine 2005;30:2530-7.
17. Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Kim J,et al. Comparative analysisof pedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2006;31:291- 8.
18. Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. Pulmonary function in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis relative to the surgical procedure. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87:1534-41.
19. Heini P, Scholl E, Wyler D, et al. Fatal cardiac tamponade associated with posterior spinal instrumentation. A case report. Spine 1998;23: 2226-30.
20. Papin P, Arlet V, Marchesi D, et al. Unusual presentation of spinal cord compression related to misplaced pedicle screws in thoracic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 1999;8:156-9.
21. Vanichkachorn JS, Vaccaro AR, Cohen MJ,etal. Potential large vessel injury during thoracolumbar pedicle screw removal. A case report. Spine 1997;22: 110-3.
22. Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. Free hand pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine: is it safe? Spine 2004;29:333- 42.
23. Liljenqvist U, Hackenberg L, Link T, et al. Pullout strength of pedicle screws versus pedicle and laminar hooks in the thoracic spine. Acta Orthop Belg 2001;67:157-63.