Biomechanical modeling and analysis of a direct incremental segmental translation system for the instrumentation of scoliotic deformities

Clinical Biomechanics

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 548-555

  Wang, Xiaoyu ^a,b   Aubin, Carl Eric ^a,b   Crandall, Dennis ^c   Labelle, Hubert ^b  

^a ÉCOLE POLYTECHNIQUE DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MONTREAL   (Canada)

^c Sonoran Spine Center   (United States)

Author keywords

Biomechanical modeling; Direct incremental segmental translation; Scoliosis; Spine instrumentation

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICAL MODEL; BIOMECHANICAL MODELING; BIOMECHANICAL PROPERTIES; DEFORMITY CORRECTION; DIRECT INCREMENTAL SEGMENTAL TRANSLATION; EXPERIMENTAL DATA; INDEPENDENT VARIABLES; KINEMATIC JOINTS; LOAD SHARING; PEDICLE SCREWS; RIGID BODY; SCOLIOSIS; SCOLIOTIC DEFORMITIES; SIMULATION PARAMETERS; SPINE DEFORMITY; SPINE INSTRUMENTATION; STANDARD DEVIATION; SURGICAL INSTRUMENTATION; TRANSLATION SYSTEMS;

BIOMECHANICS; DEFORMATION; DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); FORCE CONTROL; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM; PHILOSOPHICAL ASPECTS; RADIOGRAPHY; SCREWS; SURGERY;

INSTRUMENTS;

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BODY POSITION; BONE SCREW; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DIRECT INCREMENTAL SEGMENTAL TRANSLATION; GEOMETRY; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; KINEMATICS; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCOLIOSIS; SIMULATION; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; SPINE SURGERY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

BIOMECHANICS; BONE SCREWS; CALIBRATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; MODELS, ANATOMIC; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SCOLIOSIS; SPINE;

EID: 79959333200     PISSN: 02680033     EISSN: 18791271     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2011.01.011     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Abshire, B.B., McLain, R.F., Valdevit, A., Kambic, H.E., 2001. Characteristics of pullout failure in conical and cylindrical pedicle screws after full insertion and back-out. Spine 1, 408-414. (Pubitemid 33378110)
2. Aubin, C.E., Labelle, H., Chevrefils, C., Desroches, G., Clin, J., Boivin, A., 2008. Preoperative planning simulator for spinal deformity surgeries. Spine 33, 2143-2152.
3. Boos, N., Aebi, M., 2008. Spinal Disorders: Fundamentals of Diagnosis and Treatment. Springer.
4. Bridwell, K.H., 1988. Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation. Orthop. Nurs. 7, 11-16.
5. Bridwell, K.H., 1994. Surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: the basics and the controversies. Spine 19, 1095-1100. (Pubitemid 24141134)
6. Bridwell, K.H., 1997. Spinal instrumentation in the management of adolescent scoliosis. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 335, 64-72.
7. Carman, D.L., Browne, R.H., Birch, J.G., 1990. Measurement of scoliosis and kyphosis radiographs. Intraobserver and interobserver variation. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 72, 328-333.
8. Cheriet, F., Laporte, C., Kadoury, S., Labelle, H., Dansereau, J., 2007. A novel system for the 3-D reconstruction of the human spine and rib cage from biplanar X-ray images. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 54, 1356-1358.
9. Crandall, D., Morrison, M., Slaughter, D., Baker, D., Hankins, P., 2004. Scoliosis correction using a new screw with a pivoting reduction post: biomechanical testing and 2 year clinical results. Spine J. 4 (5), S73-S74.
10. Delorme, S., Petit, Y., de Guise, J.A., Labelle, H., Aubin, C.E., Dansereau, J., 2003. Assessment of the 3-D reconstruction and high-resolution geometrical modeling of the human skeletal trunk from 2-D radiographic images. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 50, 989-998.
11. Desroches, G., Aubin, C.E., Sucato, D.J., Rivard, C.H., 2007. Simulation of an anterior spine instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using a flexible multi-body model. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 45, 759-768.
12. Dobbs, M.B., Lenke, L.G., Walton, T., Peelle, M., Della Rocca, G., Steger-May, K., et al., 2004. Can we predict the ultimate lumbar curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing a selective fusion with undercorrection of the thoracic curve? Spine 29, 277-285.
13. Duke, K., Aubin, C.E., Dansereau, J., Labelle, H., 2005. Biomechanical simulations of scoliotic spine correction due to prone position and anaesthesia prior to surgical instrumentation. Clin. Biomech. 20, 923-931.
14. Gardner-Morse, M.G., Laible, J.P., Stokes, I.A.F., 1990. Incorporation of spinal flexibility measurements into finite element analysis. J. Biomech. Eng. 112, 481-483.
15. Hamill, C.L., Lenke, L.G., Bridwell, K.H., Chapman, M.P., Blanke, K., Baldus, C., 1996. The use of pedicle screw fixation to improve correction in the lumbar spine of patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Is it warranted? Spine 21, 1241-1249. (Pubitemid 26161391)
16. Heary, R.F., Albert, T.J., 2007. Spinal Deformities: The Essentials. Thieme Medical Publishers.
17. Johnston, C.E., Ashman, R.B., Sherman, M.C., Eberle, C.F., Herndon,W.A., Sullivan, J.A., et al., 1987. Mechanical consequences of rod contouring and residual scoliosis in sublaminar segmental instrumentation. J. Orthop. Res. 5, 206-216.
18. Kadoury, S., Cheriet, F., Laporte, C., Labelle, H., 2007. A versatile 3D reconstruction system of the spine and pelvis for clinical assessment of spinal deformities. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 45, 591-602.
19. Labelle, H., Dansereau, J., Bellefleur, C., Jequier, J.C., 1995. Variability of geometric measurements from three-dimensional reconstructions of scoliotic spines and rib cages. Eur. Spine J. 4, 88-94.
20. Lee, C.K., Denis, F., Winter, R.B., Lonstein, J.E., 1993. Analysis of the upper thoracic curve in surgically treated idiopathic scoliosis. A new concept of the double thoracic curve pattern. Spine 18, 1599-1608.
21. Lenke, L.G., Dobbs, M.B., 2007. Management of juvenile idiopathic scoliosis. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 89 (Suppl 1), 55-63.
22. Lenke, L.G., Kuklo, T.R., Ondra, S., Polly Jr., D.W., 2008. Rationale behind the current state-of-the-art treatment of scoliosis (in the pedicle screw era). Spine 33, 1051-1054.
23. Loder, R.T., Spiegel, D., Gutknecht, S., Kleist, K., Ly, T., Mehbod, A., 2004. The assessment of intraobserver and interobserver error in the measurement of noncongenital scoliosis in children < or = 10 years of age. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29, 2548-2553.
24. Luque, E.R., 1982. The anatomic basis and development of segmental spinal instrumentation. Spine 7, 256-259. (Pubitemid 12038266)
25. Majdouline, Y., Aubin, C.E., Robitaille, M., Sarwark, J.F., Labelle, H., 2007. Scoliosis correction objectives in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J. Pediatr. Orthop. 27, 775-781.
26. Mason, D.E., Schindler, A., King, N., 1998. Estimation of the lumbar curve magnitude with correction of the right thoracic curve in idiopathic scoliosis. J. Pediatr. Orthop. 18, 602-605.
27. Newton, P.O., Thompson, G., Bridwell, K., 2005. Summary statement: innovative technologies for traditional scoliosis surgery. Spine 30, S92-S93. (Pubitemid 41292209)
28. Panjabi, M.M., Brand Jr., R.A., White III, A.A., 1976a. Three dimensional flexibility and stiffness properties of the human thoracic spine. J. Biomech. 9, 185-192.
29. Panjabi, M.M., Brand Jr., R.A., White III, A.A., 1976b. Mechanical properties of the human thoracic spine as shown by three-dimensional load-displacement curves. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 58, 642-652.
30. Panjabi, M.M., Oxland, T.R., Yamamoto, I., Crisco, J.J., 1994. Mechanical behavior of the human lumbar and lumbosacral spine as shown by three-dimensional loaddisplacement curves. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 76, 413-424.
31. Petit, Y., Aubin, C.E., Labelle, H., 2004. Patient-specific mechanical properties of a flexible multi-body model of the scoliotic spine. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 42, 55-60.
32. Pfeiffer, M., Gilbertson, L.G., Goel, V.K., Griss, P., Keller, J.C., Ryken, T.C., et al., 1996. Effect of specimen fixation method on pullout tests of pedicle screws. Spine 21, 1037-1044. (Pubitemid 26148159)
33. Polly Jr., D.W., Kilkelly, F.X., McHale, K.A., Asplund, L.M., Mulligan, M., Chang, A.S., 1996. Measurement of lumbar lordosis. Evaluation of intraobserver, interobserver, and technique variability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21, 1530-1535 discussion 1535-6.
34. Richards, B.S., Johnston, C.E., 1987. Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Orthopedics 10, 649-654. (Pubitemid 17060003)
35. Rohlmann, A., Richter, M., Zander, T., Klockner, C., Bergmann, G., 2006. Effect of different surgical strategies on screw forces after correction of scoliosis with a VDS implant. Eur. Spine J. 15, 457-464.
36. Singh, H., Rahimi, S.Y., Yeh, D.J., D, F., 2004. History of posterior thoracic instrumentation. Neurosurg. Focus 16, E11.
37. Suk, S.I., Lee, C.K.,Min,H.J., Cho,K.H.,Oh, J.H., 1994. Comparison of Cotrel-Dubousset pedicle screws and hooks in the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. Int. Orthop. 18, 341-346.
38. Suk, S.I., Lee, C.K., Kim, W.J., Chung, Y.J., Park, Y.B., 1995. Segmental pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 20, 1399-1405.
39. Suzuki, T., Abe, E., Okuyama, K., Sato, K., 2001. Improving the pullout strength of pedicle screws by screw coupling. J. Spinal Disord. 14, 399-403. (Pubitemid 32946143)
40. Wang, X., Aubin, C.E., Crandall, D., Labelle, H., 2011. Biomechanical comparison of force levels in spinal instrumentation using monoaxial versus multi degree of freedom postloading pedicle screws. Spine 36, E95-E104.
41. White, K.K., Oka, R., Mahar, A.T., Lowry, A., Garfin, S.R., 2006. Pullout strength of thoracic pedicle screw instrumentation: comparison of the transpedicular and extrapedicular techniques. Spine 31, E355-E358. (Pubitemid 43833063)
42. Zdeblick, T.A., Kunz, D.N., Cooke, M.E., McCabe, R., 1993. Pedicle screw pullout strength. Correlation with insertional torque. Spine 18, 1673-1676.