Comparison of thoracic pedicle screw to hook instrumentation for the treatment of adult spinal deformity

Spine

Volumn 32, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 555-561

  Bess, R Shay ^a   Lenke, Lawrence G ^a   Bridwell, Keith H ^a   Cheh, Gene ^a   Mandel, Stephen ^a   Sides, Brenda ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Adult spinal deformity; Spinal instrumentation; Thoracic pedicle screw

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; KYPHOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PEDICLE SCREW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSEUDARTHROSIS; QUESTIONNAIRE; RADIOGRAPHY; SCORING SYSTEM; SPINE MALFORMATION; THORACIC SPINE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; BONE SCREWS; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PSEUDARTHROSIS; QUESTIONNAIRES; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SPINAL CURVATURES; SPINAL FUSION; SURGICAL WOUND INFECTION; THORACIC VERTEBRAE; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33947130732     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000256445.31653.0e     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Beveren S, Deviren V, Demir-Deviren S, et al. Studies in the modified scoliosis research society outcomes instrument in adults: validation, reliability, and discriminatory capacity. Spine 2003;28:2164-9.
2. Ascani E, Bartolozzi P, Logroscino CA, et al. Natural history of untreated idiopathic scoliosis after skeletal maturity. Spine 1986;11:784-9.
3. Collis DK, Ponseti IV. Long-term follow-up of patients with idiopathic scoliosis not treated surgically. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1969;51:425-45.
4. Danielsson A. Outcome of Treatment for Scoliosis: A Multidisciplinary Follow-up at Least 20 Years After Surgery or Brace Treatment in Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis With Comparison to a Matching Control Group. Gottenborg, Sweden: Goteborg University Press, 2000.
5. Fowles JV, Drummond DS, L'Ecuyer S, et al. Untreated scoliosis in the adult. Clin Orthop 1978;134:212-7.
6. Nachemson A. A long-term follow-up study of non-treated scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1969;51:2-4.
7. Nilsonne U, Lundgren KD. Long-term prognosis in idiopathic scoliosis. Acta Orthop Scand 1968;39:456-65.
8. Noonan KJ, Dolan LA, Jacobson WC, et al. Long-term psychosocial characteristics of patients treated for idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 1997;17:712-7.
9. Weinstein S, Zavala DC, Ponseti IV. Idiopathic scoliosis: long-term follow-up and prognosis in untreated patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1981;63:701-12.
10. Weinstein S. Bristol-Myers Squibb/Zimmer award for distinguished achievement in orthopaedic research. Long-term follow-up of pediatric orthopaedic conditions: natural history and outcomes of treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000;82:980-90.
11. Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Spratt KF, et al. Health and function of patients with untreated idiopathic scoliosis: a 50-year natural history study. JAMA 2003;289:559-67.
12. Weinstein SL. Natural history. Spine 1999;24:2592-600.
13. Bradford DS, Tay BK, Hu SS. Adult scoliosis: surgical indications, operative management, complications, and outcomes. Spine 1999;24:2617-29.
14. Deviren V, Berven S, Kleinstuec F, et al. Predictors of flexibility and pain patterns in thoracolumbar and lumbar idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2002;27:2346-9.
15. Helenius I, Remes V, Yrjonen T, et al. Harrington and Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: long-term functional and radiographic outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85:2303-9.
16. Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Baldus C, et al. Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1992;74:1056-67.
17. Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Blanke K, et al. Radiographic results of arthrodesis with Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a five to ten-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998;80:807-14.
18. Humke T, Grob D, Scheier H, et al. Cotrel-Dubousset and Harrington instrumentation in idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison of long-term results. Eur Spine J 1995;4:280-3.
19. Thompson GH, Wilber RG, Shaffer JW, et al. Segmental spinal instrumentation in idiopathic scoliosis: a preliminary report. Spine 1985;10:623-30.
20. Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Cho SK, et al. Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hook instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2004;29:2040-8.
21. Brown CA, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. Complications of pediatric thoracolumbar and lumbar pedicle screws. Spine 1998;23:1566-71.
22. Hamill CL, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. The use of pedicle screw fixation to improve correction in the lumbar spine of patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1996;21:1241-9.
23. Gaines RW. The use of pedicle-screw internal fixation for the operative treatment of spinal disorders. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000;82:1458-69.
24. Barr SJ, Schuette AM, Emans JB. Lumbar pedicle screws versus hooks. Spine 1997;22:1369-79.
25. Delorme S, Labelle H, Aubin C, et al. Intraoperative comparison of two instrumentation techniques for the correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1999;24:2011-8.
26. Halm H, Niemeyer TH, Link TH, et al. Segmental pedicle screw instrumentation in idiopathic thoracolumbar and lumbar scoliosis. Eur Spine J 2000;9:191-7.
27. Liljenqvist U, Halm H, Link TH. Pedicle screw instrumentation of the thoracic spine in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1997;22:2239-45.
28. Suk SI, Lee CK, Kim W, et al. Segmental pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1995;20:1399-405.
29. Suk SI, Kim W, Lee S, et al. Thoracic pedicle screw fixation in spinal deformity: are they really safe? Spine 2001;26:2049-57.
30. Liljenqvist U, Allkemper T, Hackenberg L, et al. Analysis of the vertebral morphology in idiopathic scoliosis with magnetic resonance imaging using multiplanar reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002;84:359-68.
31. O'Brien MF, Lenke LG, Mardjetko S, et al. Pedicle morphology in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: is pedicle fixation an anatomically viable technique? Spine 2000;25:2285-93.
32. Papin P, Arlet V, Marchsei D, et al. Unusual presentation of spinal cord compression related to misplaced pedicle screws in thoracic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 1999;8:156-9; discussion 159-60.
33. Ali RM, Boachie-Adjei O, Rawlins BA, et al. Functional and radiographic outcomes after surgery for adult scoliosis using third-generation instrumentation techniques. Spine 2003;28:1163-9; discussion 1169-70.
34. Vaccaro AR, Rizzolo SJ, Allardyce TJ, et al. Placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine: I. Morphometric analysis of the thoracic vertebrae. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995;77:1193-9.
35. Vaccaro AR, Rizzolo SJ, Balderston RA, et al. Placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine: II. An anatomical and radiographic assessment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995;77:1200-6.
36. Yue JJ, Sossan A, Selgrath C, et al. The treatment of unstable thoracic spine fractures with transpedicular screw instrumentation: a 3-year consecutive series. Spine 2002;27:2782-7.
37. Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Keith HB, et al. Free hand pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine: is it safe? [Spine SRS Specialty Issue] Spine 2004;29:333-42.
38. Drummond DS, Keene JS. Spinous process segmental spinal instrumentation. Orthopedics 1988;11:1403-10.
39. Cotrel Y, Dubousset J, Guillaumat M. New universal instrumentation in spinal surgery. Clin Orthop 1988;227:10-23.
40. Webb JK, Burwell RG, Cole AA, et al. Posterior instrumentation in scoliosis. Eur Spine J 1995;4:2-5.
41. Raynor BL, Lenke LG, Kim YJ, et al. Can triggered EMG thresholds accurately predict thoracic pedicle screw placement? Spine 2002;27:2030-5.
42. Cobb JR. Outline for the study of scoliosis. In: Edwards JW, ed. Instructional Course Lectures, vol. 5. Ann Arbor, MI: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 1948.
43. Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Pseudarthrosis in primary fusions for adult idiopathic scoliosis: incidence, risk factors, and outcome analysis. Spine 2005;30:468-74.
44. O'Brien MF, Smith DA, Kuklo TR. Biomechanics of thoracic fixation in deformity: II. Hooks versus screws. Semin Spine Surg 2002;14:16-34.
45. Takahashi S, Delecrin J, Passuti N. Surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis in adults: an age-related analysis of outcome. Spine 2002;27:1742-8.
46. Booth KC, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Complications and predictive factors for the successful treatment of flatback deformity (fixed sagittal imbalance). Spine 1999;24:1712-20.
47. Bridwell KH, Lewis SJ, Lenke LG, et al. Pedicle subtraction osteotomy for the treatment of fixed sagittal imbalance. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85:454-63.
48. Potter BK, Lenke LG, Kuklo TR. Prevention and management of iatrogenic flatback deformity. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86:1793-808.
49. Bernhardt M, Bridwell KH. Segmental analysis of the sagittal plane alignment of the normal thoracic and lumbar spines and thoracolumbar junction. Spine 1989;14:717-21.
50. Stagnara P, De Mauroy JC, Dran G, et al. Reciprocal angulation of vertebral bodies in the sagittal plane: approach to references for the evaluation of kyphosis and lordosis. Spine 1982;7:335-42.
51. Lee GA, Betz RR, Clements DH 3rd, et al. Proximal kyphosis after posterior spinal fusion in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1999;24:795-9.
52. Grubb SA, Lipscomb HJ, Suh PB. Results of surgical treatment of painful adult scoliosis. Spine 1994;19:1619-27.
53. Hu SS, Holly EA, Lele C, et al. Patient outcomes after spinal reconstructive surgery in patients >=40 years of age. J Spinal Disord 1996;9:460-9.
54. Simmons ED Jr, Kowalski JM, Simmons EH. The results of surgical treatment for adult scoliosis. Spine 1993;18:718-24.
55. Berven S. Point of view. Spine 2003;28:1169-70.
56. Rinella A, Bridwell K, Kim Y, et al. Late complications of adult idiopathic scoliosis primary fusions to L4 and above: the effect of age and distal fusion level. Spine 2004;29:318-25.
57. Merola AA, Haher TR, Brkaric M, et al. A multicenter study of the outcomes of the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) outcome instrument. Spine 2002;27:2046-51.
58. Asher M, Min Lai S, Burton D, et al. Scoliosis Research Society-22 patient questionnaire: responsiveness to change associated with surgical treatment. Spine 2003;28:70-3.
59. Bridwell KH, Cats-Baril W, Harrast J, et al. The validity of the SRS-22 instrument in an adult spinal deformity population compared with the Oswestry and SF-12: a study of response distribution, concurrent validity, internal consistency, and reliability. Spine 2005;30:455-61.