Influencing Preservice Teachers’ Intention to Adopt Web 2.0 Services

Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 53-64

  Cheon, Jongpil ^a   Song, Jaeki ^a   Jones, Donald R ^a   Nam, Kichan ^b  

^a TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Sogang University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

expectancy value theory; preservice teacher; technology integration; Web 2.0

Indexed keywords

EID: 84869806949     PISSN: 21532974     EISSN: 23327383     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/21532974.2010.10784658     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Adams, D.A., Nelson, R.R., & Todd, P.A., (1992). Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: A replication. MIS Quarterly, 16(2), 227–247
2. Ajjan, A., & Hartshorne, R., (2008). Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests. Internet and Higher Education, 11(2), 71–80
3. Ajzen, I., (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211
4. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M., (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
5. Anderson, E. W., Fornell, C., & Lehman, D. R., (1994). Customer satisfaction, market share and profitability: Findings from Sweden. Journal of Marketing, 58, 53–66
6. Anderson, T., (2004). Toward a theory of online learning. In T., Anderson & F., Elloumi (Eds.), Theory and practice of online learning (pp. 33–60). Athabasca, Alberta, Canada: Athabasca University
7. H.J.Becker, (2000). Findings from the teaching, learning and computing survey: Is Larry Cuban right? Report from a national study. Irvine, CA: Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations. Retrieved March 10, 2010, from http://www.crito.uci.edu/tlc/findings/ccsso.pdf
8. H.J.Becker, (2001, April). How are teachers using computers in instruction? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA
9. Bryant, T., (2006). Social software in academia. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 29(2), 61–64
10. Churchill, D., (2009). Educational applications of Web 2.0: Using blogs to support teaching and learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 179–183
11. Cuban, L., (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
12. Davis, F. D., (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340
13. Dexter, S., & Riedel, E., (2003). Why improving preservice teacher educational technology preparation must go beyond the college’s walls. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(5), 334–346
14. Doering, A., Hughes, J., & Huffman, D., (2003). Preservice teachers: Are we thinking with technology? Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35(3), 342–361
15. Ertmer, P. A., (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4) 25–39
16. Fishbein, M., (1963). An investigation of relationships between beliefs about an object and the attitude toward that object. Human Relations, 16, 233–240
17. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D., (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50
18. T.Franklin, & M.van Harmelen, (2007). Web 2.0 for content for learning and teaching in higher education. Retrieved April 23, 2009, from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/digitalrepositories/web2-content-learning-and-teaching.pdf
19. Grant, M. M., & Mims, C., (2009). Web 2.0 in teacher education: Characteristics, implications and limitations. In T., Kidd and I., Chen (Eds.), Wired for learning: An educators guide to Web 2.0 (pp. 343–360). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing
20. T.Hammond, T.Hannay, B.Lund, & J.Scott, (2005) Social bookmarking tools (I): A general review. D-Lib Magazine, 11(4). Retrieved July 23, 2010, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/april05/hammond/04hammond.html
21. Hargrave, C. P., & Hsu, Y. S., (2000). Survey of instructional technology courses for preservice teachers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 8(4), 303–314
22. Havenstein, H., (2008). Companies are looking for new ways to measure Web 2.0. Computerworld, 42(45), 14–15
23. Hermans, R., Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M., (2008). The impact of primary school teachers’ educational beliefs on the classroom use of computers. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1499–1509
24. International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (2008). National Educational Technology Standards and Performance Indicators for Teachers. Eugene, OR. Retrieved August, 20, 2009, from http://www.iste.org/standards/nets-for-teachers.aspx
25. Klassen, A., (2008). Can social networks predict what you’ll buy? Advertising Age, 79(43), 3–4
26. McRobbie, C., Ginns, I., & Stein, S., (2000). Preservice primary teachers’ thinking about technology and technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 10(1), 81–101
27. Mills, L. B., (2007). The next wave now: Web 2.0. Education Digest: Essential Readings Condensed for Quick Review, 73(4), 4–5
28. Mumtaz, S., (2000). Factors affecting teachers’ use of information and communications technology: A review of the literature. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 9(3), 319–341
29. Nadkarni, S., & Gupta, R., (2007). A task-based model of perceived website complexity. MIS Quarterly, 31(3), 501–524
30. Niederhauser, D. S., & Stoddart, T., (2001). Teachers’ instructional perspectives and use of educational software. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(1), 15–31
31. T.O’Reilley, (2005). What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Retrieved June 29, 2009, from http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html
32. Pedretti, E., Smith-Mayer, J., & Woodrow, J., (1999). Teaming technology enhanced instruction in the science classroom and teacher professional development. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 7, 131–143
33. Pierson, M. E., & Cozart, A., (2004). Case studies of future teachers: Learning to teach with technology. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 21(2), 59–63
34. Pope, M., Hare, D., & Howard, E., (2002). Technology integration: Closing the gap between what preservice teachers are taught to do and what they can do. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(2), 191–203
35. M.Prensky, (2001, October). Digital natives, digital immigrants. Retrieved April 23, 2009, from http://www.marcprensky.com/writing
36. J.Ravitz, Y.Wong, & H.Becker, (1999). Report to participants. Irvine, CA: Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations. Retrieved August 20, 2009, from http://www.crito.uci.edu/tlc/findings/special_report/index.htm
37. Rollett, H., Lux, M., Strohmaier, M., Dösinger, G., & Tochtermann, K., (2007) The Web 2.0 way of learning with technologies. International Journal of Learning Technology, 3(1), 87–107
38. Russell, M., Bebell, D., O’Dwyer, L., & O’Connor, K., (2003). Examining teacher technology use: Implications for preservice and inservice teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(4), 297–310
39. Segars, A., (1997). Assessing the unidimensionality of measurement: a paradigm and illustration within the context of information systems research. Omega, 25(1) 107–121
40. Segars, A. H., & Grover, V., (1993). Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness: A confirmatory factor analysis. MIS Quarterly, 17, 517–525
41. Selwyn, N., (2008). An investigation of differences in undergraduates’ academic use of the Internet. Active Learning in Higher Education, 9(11), 11–22
42. Shiue, Y., (2007). Investigating the sources of teachers’ instructional technology use through the decomposed theory of planned behavior. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 36(4), 425–453
43. st century: A report on teachers’ use of technology (NCES 2000-102)
44. Song, J., & Zahedi, F. M., (2005). A theoretical approach to Web design in e-commerce: A belief reinforcement model. Management Science, 51(8), 1219–1235
45. Taylor, S., & Todd, P.A., (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144
46. Thackery, R., Neiger, B. L., Hanson, C. L., & McKenzie, J. F., (2008). Enhancing promotional strategies within social marketing programs: Use of Web 2.0 social media. Health Promotion Practice, 9(4), 338–343
47. van Braak, J., Tondeur, J., & Valcke, M., (2004). Explaining different types of computer use among primary school teachers. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 19(4), 407–422
48. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D., (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204
49. Venkatesh, V., Brown, S. A., Maruping, L. M., & Bala, H., (2008). Predicting different conceptualizations of system use: The competing roles of behavioral intention, facilitating conditions, and behavioral expectation. MIS Quarterly, 32(3), 483–502
50. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27 (3), 425 – 478
51. Wang, L., Ertmer, P., & Newby, T., (2004). Increasing preservice teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs for technology integration. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(3), 231–244
52. Warshaw, P. R., & Davis, F. D., (1984). Self-understanding and the accuracy of behavioral expectation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10(1), 111–118
53. Warshaw, P. R., & Davis, F. D., (1985). Disentangling behavioral intention and behavioral expectation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21(3), 213–228
54. Whetstone, L., & Carr-Chellman, A. A., (2001). Preparing preservice teachers to use technology: Survey results. Tech Trends, 46(4), 11–17
55. Williams, J., & Chinn, S. J., (2009). Using Web 2.0 to support the active learning experience. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(2), 165–174
56. Wixom, B. H., & Todd, P.A., (2005). A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Information Systems Research, 16(1), 85–102
57. Yildirim, S., (2000). Effects of an educational computing course on preservice and inservice teachers: A discussion and analysis of attitudes and use. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32(4), 479–495