Teachers' instructional perspectives and use of educational software

Teaching and Teacher Education

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 15-31

  Niederhauser, D S ^a   Stoddart, T ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Constructivist approaches; Instructional technology; Teacher perspectives; Transmission approaches

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035545548     PISSN: 0742051X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00036-6     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Becker H.J. How computers are used in United States schools. Basic data from the 1989 I.E.A computers in education survey Journal of Educational Computing Research. 7:1991;385-406.
2. Bork, A. (1980). Preparing computer-student dialogues: Advice to teachers. In R. P. Taylor (Ed.), The computer in the school: Tutor, tool, tutee. New York: Teachers College Press.
3. Bork A. Learning in the twenty-first century. Interactive multimedia technology Giardina M. Interactive multimedia learning environments: Human factors and technical considerations on design issues. 1992;2-18 Springer, Heidelberg, Germany.
4. Broderbund Where in the world is Carmen San Diego (Computer software). 1996;Broderbund, Novato, CA.
5. Buchanan T., Burts D.C., Bidner J., White V.F., Charlesworth R. Predictors of the developmental appropriateness of the beliefs and practices of first, second, and third grade teachers. Early Childhood Research Quarterly. 13(3):1998;459-483.
6. Clark, C. M., & Peterson, P. L. (1986). Teachers' thought processes. In: M.C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching. New York: Macmillan.
7. Cohen D.K. Educational technology, policy, and practice. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 9(2):1987;153-170.
8. Cohen D.K. Teaching practice. Plus ca change Jackson P.W. Contributing to educational change: Perspectives on research and practice. 1990;27-84 McCutcheon, Berkley, CA.
9. Cohen D.K., Ball D.L. Policy and practice. An overview Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 12(3):1990;347-353.
10. Cole, M., & Griffen, P. (Eds.). (1987). Contextual factors in education. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Center for Educational Research.
11. Cradler J. School-based technology use planning. Educational IRM Quarterly. 3(3-4):1994;12-16.
12. Cuban L. Teachers and machines. 1986;Teachers College Press, New York.
13. Cummins L.E. Educational technology-a faculty resistance view. Part II. Challenges of resources, technology and tradition Educational Technology Review. 5:1996;18-20.
14. Czerniak C.M., Lumpe A.T. Relationship between teacher beliefs and science education reform. Journal of Science Teacher Education. 7(4):1996;247-266.
15. David, J. (1991). Restructuring and technology: Partners in change. Phi Delta Kappan, 73(1), 37-40, 78-82.
16. David J.L. Realizing the promise of technology. A policy perspective Means B. Technology and education reform. 1994;169-190 Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
17. DeFord D.E. Validating the construct of theoretical orientation in reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly. 20(3):1985;351-367.
18. Dick W. An instructional designer's view of constructivism. Educational Technology. 31:1991;41-44.
19. diSessa A.A. Artificial worlds and real experience. Instructional Science. 14:1986;207-227.
20. Duffy G.D., Anderson L. Teachers' theoretical orientations and the real classroom. Reading Psychology. 5:1986;97-104.
21. Duffy T.M., Jonassen D.H. Constructivism. New implications for instructional technology Duffy T.M., Jonassen D.H. Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation. 1992;1-16 Lawerence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
22. Duffy, G., & Metheny, W. (1979). Measuring teachers' beliefs about reading. Research Report #41, East Lansing, MI: The Institute for Research on Teaching.
23. Dwyer D.C. Apple classrooms of tomorrow. What we've learned Educational Leadership. 51(7):1994;4-10.
24. Dwyer D.C., Ringstaff C., Sandholtz J.H. Changes in teachers' beliefs and practices in technology-rich classrooms. Educational Technology. 48(8):1991;45-52.
25. Elmore R.F. Reform and the culture of authority in schools. Educational Administration Quarterly. 23(4):1987;60-78.
26. Fang Z. A review of research on teacher beliefs and practices. Educational Research. 38(1):1996;47-65.
27. Fowler F.J. Improving survey questions. 1995;Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
28. Gomez, M. L., & Stoddart, T. (1991). Learning to teach writing: The balancing of personal and professional perspectives. In R. Clift, & C. Evertson (Eds.), Focal points: Qualitative inquiries into teaching. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
29. Goodlad J.I. School-university partnerships and partner schools. Educational Policy. 7(1):1993;24-39.
30. Hawkins J., Collins A. Design-experiments for infusing technology into learning. Educational Technology. 32(9):1992;63-67.
31. Hook C.M., Rosenshine B.V. Accuracy of teacher reports of their classroom behavior. Review of Educational Research. 49:1979;1-12.
32. International Business Machines. (1987). IBM personal computer basic skills product: Math practice series (Computer software). Atlanta, GA: International Business Machines Corporation.
33. International Business Machines. (1989). Exploring measurement, time, and money (Computer software). Atlanta, GA: International Business Machines Corporation.
34. International Business Machines (1991). Touchtyping for beginners (Computer software). Atlanta, GA: International Business Machines Corp.
35. Johnson K.E. The relationship between teachers' beliefs and practices during literacy instruction for non-native speakers of English. Journal of Reading Behavior. 24(1):1992;83-108.
36. Lakoff G. Women, fire, and dangerous things. What categories reveal about the mind:1987;University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
37. Linn, M. C. (1998). Learning and instruction in science education: Taking advantage of technology. In D. Tobin, & B. Frazer (Eds.), International handbook of science education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
38. Litwin M.S. How to measure survey reliability and validity. 1995;Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
39. Maddux C.D., Johnson L.D., Willis J.W. Educational computing. Learning with tomorrow's technologies:1992;Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights, MA.
40. Maddux C.D., Willis J.W. Integrated learning systems and their alternatives. Educational Technology. 32(9):1992;51-57.
41. McLaughlin M.W. The RAND change agent study ten years later. Macro perspectives and micro realities:1989;Center for Research on the Context of Secondary School Teaching, Stanford, CA.
42. Merrill M.D. Constructivism and instructional design. Educational Technology. 31:1991;45-52.
43. Muchmore J.A. A statewide survey of the beliefs and practices of chapter 1 reading teachers. Remedial and Special Education. 15(4):1994;252-259.
44. Nettle E.B. Stability and change in the beliefs of student teachers during practice teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education. 14(2):1998;193-204.
45. Office of Technology Assessment. (1988). Power on! New tools for teaching and learning summary. Washington, DC: Office of Technology Assessment.
46. Office of Technology Assessment. (1995). Teachers and technology: Making the connection. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
47. Pajares M. Teacher's beliefs and educational research. Cleaning up a messy construct Review of Educational Research. 62(3):1992;307-332.
48. Papert S. Mindstorms. Children, computers and powerful ideas:1980;Basic Books, New York.
49. Papert S. The children's machine. Rethinking school in the age of the computer:1993;BasicBooks, New York.
50. Peterson P.L., Fennema E., Carpenter T.P., Loef M. Teachers' pedagogical content beliefs in mathematics. Cognition and Instruction. 6(1):1989;1-40.
51. Posner G.J., Strike K.A., Hewson P.W., Gertzog W.A. Accomodation of a scientific concept. Toward a theory of conceptual change Science Education. 67(4):1982;489-508.
52. Rakes G. Using the Internet as a Tool in a Resource-Based Learning Environment. Educational Technology. 36(5):1996;52-56.
53. Richardson, V. (1994). The consideration of teachers' beliefs. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Teacher change and the staff development process: A case in reading instruction. New York: Teachers College Press.
54. Richardson V., Anders P., Tidwell D., Lloyd C. The relationship between teachers' beliefs and practices in reading comprehension. American Educational Research Journal. 28(3):1991;559-586.
55. Rieber L.P. Computer-based microworlds. A bridge between constructivism and direct instruction Educational Technology Research and Development. 40(1):1993;93-106.
56. Sandholtz J.H., Ringstaff C., Dwyer D.C. Teaching with technology. Creating student-centered classrooms:1997;Teachers College Press, New York.
57. Savery J.R., Duffy T.M. Problem based learning. An instructional model and its constructivist framework Educational Technology. 35:1995;31-38.
58. Scardamalia M., Bereiter C. Engaging students in a knowledge society. Educational Leadership. 54(3):1996;6-10.
59. Schwartz J.L., Yerushalmy M. The geometric supposer. An intellectual prosthesis for making conjectures College Mathematics Journal. 18(1):1987;58-65.
60. Scott, B. N., & Hannafin, R. D. (1996). Attitudes and beliefs about school learning environments: A survey of teachers and parents. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, April.
61. Shavelson R.J. Review of research on teachers' pedagogical judgment, plans, and decisions. Elementary School Journal. 83:1983;392-415.
62. Sheingold K. Restructuring for learning with technology. The potential for synergy Phi Delta Kappan. 73(1):1991;17-27.
63. Skinner B.F. The technology of teaching. 1968;Meredith, Des Moines, IA.
64. Stoddart T. Learning to teach English, Math, and Science in an alternative route to teacher certification. The Curriculum Journal. 2(3):1991;259-281.
65. Stoddart T., Niederhauser D.S. Technology and educational change. Computers in the Schools. 9:1993;5-22.
66. Tabachnick B.R., Zeichner K.M. The impact of the student teaching experience on the development of teacher perspectives. Journal of Teacher Education. 35(6):1984;28-36.
67. The Learning Company. (1991). Reader rabbit (Computer software). Fremont, CA: The Learning Company.
68. Vacc N.N., Bright G.W. Elementary preservice teachers' changing beliefs and instructional use of children's mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 30(1):1999;89-110.
69. Van Dusen L.M., Worthen B.R. Factors that facilitate or impede implementation of integrated learning systems. Educational Technology. 32(9):1992;16-21.
70. Van Dusen L.M., Worthen B.R. Can integrated instructional technology transform the classroom? Educational Leadership. 53(2):1995;28-33.
71. Waterford Institute. (1992). Mental math games, classroom edition (Computer software). Sandy, UT: Waterford Institute.
72. West, P. (1996). Many Governors touting technology as silver bullet. Education Week, 15(25), 1, 22-23.
73. Yocum K. Teacher-centered staff development for integrating technology into classrooms. Technology Horizons in Education. 24(4):1996;88-91.
74. Zeichner K.M., Tabachnick B.R., Densmore K. Individual instructional and cultural influences on the development of teachers' craft knowledge. Calderhead J. Exploring teachers thinking. 1987;1-20 Cassel, Eastbourne, England.