Investigating the sources of teachers' instructional technology use through the decomposed theory of planned behavior

Journal of Educational Computing Research

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 425-453

  Shiue, Ya Ming ^a  

^a CHIA NAN UNIVERSITY OF PHARMACY AND SCIENCE   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547499432     PISSN: 07356331     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2190/A407-22RR-50X6-2830     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Angeli, C. (2005). Transforming a teacher education method, course through technology: Effects on preservice teachers' technology competency. Computers and Education, 45(4), 383-398.
2. Aron, A., & Aron, E. N. (1997). Statistics for psychology (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
4. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A. social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
5. Baylor, A. L., & Ritchie, D. (2002). What factors facilitate teacher skill, teacher moral, and perceived, student learning in technology using classroom. Computers and Education, 39(2), 395-414.
6. Bebell, D., Russell, M., & O'Dwyer, L. (2004). Measuring teachers' technology uses: Why multiple-measures are more revealing. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(1), 45-63.
7. Butler, D., & Sellborn, M. (2002). Barriers to adopting technology for teaching and learning. Educase Quarterly, 25(2), 22-28.
8. Christensen, R. (2002). Effects of technology integration education on the attitudes of teachers and students. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10, 131.-1.50.
9. Compeau, D. R., Huggins, C. A., & Huff, S. L. (1999). Social cognitive theory to training for computer skills. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 1.18-143.
10. Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and understand: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technologies. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
12. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.
13. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior (2nd ed.). New York: Plenum Press.
14. Delcourt, M. A. B., & Kinzie, M. B. (1993). Computer technologies in teacher education: The measurement of attitudes and self-efficacy. Journal or Research and Development in Education, 27, 35-41.
15. Dexter S. L., Anderson, R. E., & Ronnkvist A. M. (2002). Quality technology support: What is it? Who is it? And what difference does it make? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 26(3), 265-285.
16. Dupagne, M., & Krendl, K. A. (1992). Teachers' attitudes toward computers: A review of the literature. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 24(3), 420-429.
17. Ertmer, P. A., Addison, P., Lane, M., Ross, E., & Woods, D. (1999). Examining teachers' beliefs about the role of technology in the elementary classroom. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32(1), 54-72.
18. Fabry, D., & Higgs, J. (1997). Barriers to the effective use of technology in education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 385-395.
19. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1985). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to research and theory. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.
20. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. I., & Block, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.), Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
21. Henderson, R., & Divert, M. J. (2003). Perceived, usefulness, ease of use and electronic supermarket use and electronic supermarket use. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(3), 383-395.
22. Hu, P. T. H., Clark, T. H. K., & Ma, W. W. (2003). Examining technology acceptance by school teachers: A longitudinal study. Information and Management, 41(2), 227-241.
23. Igbaria, M., & Iivari, J. (1995). The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage. Omega, 23(6), 587-605.
24. Kearsley, G. (1994). Computers for educational administrators: Leadership in the information age. New Jersey: Ablex Publishing.
25. Lee, S. L. (2001). Special issue in Education: Grade 1-9 curriculum reform. Common-wealth, November, pp. 124-138.
26. Lewis, W., Agarwal, R., & Sambamurthy, V. (2003). Sources of influence on beliefs about information technology use: An empirical study of knowledge workers. MIS Quarterly, 7(4), 657-678.
27. Lim, J. (2003). A conceptual framework on the adoption of negotiation support Systems. Information and Software Systems, 24, 469-477.
28. Lloyd, B. H., & Gressard, D. E. (1986). Gender and amount of computer experience of teachers in staff development programs: Effects on computer attitudes and perceptions of the usefulness of computers. AEDS Journal, 18(3), 302-311.
29. Malhotra, N. K., & Birks, D. F. (2000). Marketing research: An applied approach. (European Edition). Financial Times, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
30. Mathieson, K. (1991). Predicting user intentions: Comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 173-191.
31. Mouza, C. (2003). Leaning to teach with new technology: Implications for professional development. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 35(2), 245-259.
32. Norum, K., Grabinger, R. S., & Duffield, J. A. (1999). Healing the universe is an inside job: Teachers' view on investigating technology. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 22(3), 187-203.
33. Pelgrum, W. (2001), Obstacles to the integration, of ICT in education: Results from a worldwide educational assessment. Computers and Education, 37, 163-178.
34. Riemenschneider, C. K., Harrison, D. A., & Mykytyn, P. P. (2003). Understanding it adoption decisions in small business: Integrating current theories. Information and Management, 40, 269-285.
35. Smylie, M. (1995). Teacher learning in the workplace: Implications for school reform. In T. R. Guskey & M. Huberman (Eds.), New York: Teachers College Press.
36. Steinberg, A. (1998). Will teachers open their doors to change? In R. Tovey (Eds.), Professional development. Cambridge, MA: The Harvard Educational Letters Focus Series No. 4.
37. Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(1), 144-176.
38. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., & Ackerman, P. L. (2000). A longitudinal field investigation of gender differences in individual technology adoption decision-making processes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 83(1), 33-60.
39. Yuen, A., & Ma, W. (2002). Gender differences in teacher computer acceptance. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(3), 365-382.
40. Wasserman, E., & Millgram, Y. (2005). Change in the approaches of teachers following computerization, of schools. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(3), 241-264.