Inquiry-Based Science Education Competencies of Primary School Teachers: A literature study and critical review of the American National Science Education Standards

International Journal of Science Education

Volumn 34, Issue 17, 2012, Pages 2609-2640

  Alake Tuenter, Ester ^a,b   Biemans, Harm J A ^b   Tobi, Hilde ^b   Wals, Arjen E J ^b   Oosterheert, Ida ^c   Mulder, Martin ^b  

^a Iselinge Hogeschool PABO   (Netherlands)

^b WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c University of Applied Science Arnhem   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Pedagogical content knowledge; Primary school; Teacher knowledge

Indexed keywords

EID: 84869430799     PISSN: 09500693     EISSN: 14645289     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2012.669076     Document Type: Review

References (79)

1. Abell, S. K. 2000. Science teacher education. An international perspective, Edited by: Abell, S. K. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
2. Abell, S. K. 2008. Twenty years later: Does pedagogical content knowledge remain as useful idea?. International Journal of Science Education, 30: 1405-1416. (doi:10.1080/09500690802187041)
3. Akerson, V. L. and Volrich, M. C. 2006. Teaching nature of science explicitly in a first grade internship setting. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43: 377-394. (doi:10.1002/tea.20132)
4. Amaral, O. M. and Garrison, L. 2006. Missing the forest for the trees. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16: 155-169. (doi:10.1007/s10956-006-9026-2)
5. Appleton, K. 2002. How do beginning primary school teachers cope with science? Toward an understanding of science teaching practice. Research in Science Education, 33: 1-25. (doi:10.1023/A:1023666618800)
6. Avraamidou, L. and Zembal-Saul, C. 2005. Giving priority to evidence in science teaching: A first-year elementary teacher's specialised knowledge and practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42: 965-986. (doi:10.1002/tea.20081)
7. Avraamidou, L. and Zembal-Saul, C. 2010. In search of well-started beginning science teachers: Insights from two first-year elementary teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47: 661-686. (doi:10.1002/tea.20359)
8. Baxter, B. K., Jenkins, C. C., Southerland, S. A. and Wilson, P. 2004. Using a multilevel assessment scheme in reforming science methods courses. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 15: 211-234. (doi:10.1023/B:JSTE.0000047084.51834.a3)
9. Bhattacharayya, S., Volk, T. and Lumpe, A. 2009. The influence of an extensive inquiry-based field experience on pre-service elementary student teachers' science teaching beliefs. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20: 199-218. (doi:10.1007/s10972-009-9129-8)
10. Biemans, H., Nieuwenhuis, L., Poell, R., Mulder, M. and Wesselink, R. 2004. Competence-based VET in the Netherlands: Backgrounds and pitfalls. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 56: 523-538. (doi:10.1080/13636820400200268)
11. Biemans, H., Wesselink, R., Gulikers, J., Schaafsma, S., Verstegen, J. and Mulder, M. 2009. Towards competence based VET: Dealing with the pitfalls. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 61: 267-286. (doi:10.1080/13636820903194682)
12. Britner, S. L. and Finson, K. D. 2005. Preservice teachers' reflections on their growth in an inquiry-oriented science pedagogy course. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 17: 39-54. (doi:10.1007/BF03174672)
13. Cavagnetto, A., Hand, B. and Norton-Meier, L. 2011. Negotiating the inquiry question: A comparison of whole class and small group strategies in grade five classrooms. Research in Science Education, 41: 193-209. (doi:10.1007/s11165-009-9152-y)
14. du Chatenier, E., Verstegen, J. A.A.M., Biemans, H. J.A., Mulder, M. and Omta, O. S.W.F. 2010. Identification of competencies for professionals in open innovation teams. R & D Management, 40: 271-280. (doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2010.00590.x)
15. Choy, S. and Ramsey, J. 2009. Constructing elementary teachers' beliefs, attitudes and practical knowledge through an inquiry-based elementary science course. School Science and Mathematics, 109: 313-324. (doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2009.tb18101.x)
16. Cuevas, P., Lee, O., Hart, J. and Deaktor, R. 2005. Improving science inquiry with elementary students of diverse backgrounds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42: 337-357. (doi:10.1002/tea.20053)
17. Davis, E. A. 2005. Pre-service elementary teachers' critique of instructional materials for science. Science Teacher Education, 90: 348-375.
18. Dietz, C. M. and Davis, E. A. 2009. Pre-service elementary teachers' reflection on narrative images of inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20: 219-243. (doi:10.1007/s10972-009-9132-0)
19. Eick, C. J. and Stewart, B. 2010. Dispositions supporting elementary interns in the teaching of reform-based science materials. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21: 783-800. (doi:10.1007/s10972-009-9174-3)
20. Erikson, M. 2005. Science, culture and society: Understanding science in the twenty-first century, Cambridge: Polity Press.
21. Forbes, C. T. and Davis, E. A. 2010. Curriculum design for inquiry: Pre-service elementary teachers' mobilization and adaptation of science curriculum materials. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47: 820-839. (doi:10.1002/tea.20379)
22. Ford, M. 2006. 'Grasp of practice' as a reasoning resource for inquiry and nature of science understanding. Science & Education, 17: 147-177. (doi:10.1007/s11191-006-9045-7)
23. Gess-Newsome, J. 1999. "Pedagogical content knowledge: An introduction and orientation". In Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education, Edited by: Gess-Newsome, J. and Lederman, N. G. 3-20. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
24. Glen, N. J. and Dotger, S. 2009. Elementary teachers' use of language to label and interpret science concepts. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21: 71-83. (doi:10.1007/BF03182358)
25. Glynn, S. M. and Winter, L. K. 2004. Contextual teaching and learning of science in elementary schools. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 16: 51-63. (doi:10.1007/BF03173645)
26. Gonsalez, P., Williams, T., Jocelyn, L., Roey, S., Kastberg, D. and Brenwald, S. 2009. Highlights from TIMMS 2007. Mathematics and science achievement of U.S. fourth and eight-grade students in an international context, Washington, DC: National Centre for Education standards.
27. Grossman, P. L. 1990. The making of a teacher. Teacher knowledge and teacher education, New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
28. Guerra-Ramos, M. T., Rijder, J. and Leach, J. 2010. Ideas about the nature of science in pedagogically relevant contexts: Insights from a situated perspective of primary teachers' knowledge. Science Education, 94: 282-307.
29. Howes, E. V., Lim, M. and Campos, J. 2009. Journeys into inquiry-based elementary science: Literacy practices, questioning, and empirical study. Science Education, 93: 189-217. (doi:10.1002/sce.20297)
30. Hubbard, P. and Abell, S. 2005. Setting sail or missing the boat: Comparing the beliefs of pre-service elementary teachers with and without an inquiry-based physics course. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 16: 5-25. (doi:10.1007/s10972-005-6026-7)
31. Isabelle, A. D. and de Groot, C. 2008. Alternate conceptions of pre-service elementary teachers: The Itakura method. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19: 417-435. (doi:10.1007/s10972-008-9105-8)
32. Kang, N. H. 2007. Elementary teachers' epistemological and ontological understanding of teaching for conceptual learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44: 1292-1317. (doi:10.1002/tea.20224)
33. Katz, L., Sadler, K. and Craig, D. V. 2005. Science professors serve as mentors for early childhood preservice teachers in the design and implementation of standards-based science units. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 17: 43-55. (doi:10.1007/BF03174680)
34. Kim, M. and Tan, A. L. 2011. Rethinking difficulties of teaching inquiry-based practical work: Stories from elementary pre-service teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 33: 465-486. (doi:10.1080/09500691003639913)
35. Lee, O., Hart, J. E., Cuevas, P. and Enders, C. 2004. Professional development in inquiry-based science for elementary teachers of diverse student groups. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41: 1021-1043. (doi:10.1002/tea.20037)
36. Lee, O., Lewis, S., Adamson, K., Maerten-Rivera, J. and Secada, W. G. 2007. Urban elementary school teachers' knowledge and practices in teaching science to English language learners. Science Education, 92: 733-758. (doi:10.1002/sce.20255)
37. Lee, O., Maerten-Rivera, J., Buxton, C., Penfield, R. and Secada, W. G. 2008. Urban elementary teachers' perspectives on teaching science to English language learners. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20: 263-286. (doi:10.1007/s10972-009-9133-z)
38. Leonard, J., Boakes, N. and Moore, C. M. 2009. Conducting science inquiry in primary classrooms: Case studies of two pre-service teachers' inquiry based practices. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21: 27-50. (doi:10.1007/BF03174714)
39. Lewthwaite, B. 2006. Constraints and contributors to becoming a science teacher-leader. Science Education, 90: 331-347. (doi:10.1002/sce.20093)
40. Liang, L. L. and Gabel, D. L. 2005. Effectiveness of a constructivist approach to science instruction for prospective elementary teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 27: 1143-1162. (doi:10.1080/09500690500069442)
41. Liang, L. L. and Richardson, G. M. 2009. Enhancing prospective teachers' science teaching efficacy beliefs through scaffolded, student-directed inquiry. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21: 51-66. (doi:10.1007/BF03174715)
42. Lin, H., Hong, Z. and Cheng, Y. Y. 2009. The interplay of the classroom learning environment and inquiry-based activities. International Journal of Science Education, 31: 1013-1024. (doi:10.1080/09500690701799391)
43. Luera, G. R., Moyer, R. H. and Everett, S. A. 2005. What type and level of science content knowledge of elementary education students affect their ability to construct an inquiry-based science lesson?. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 17: 12-25. (doi:10.1007/BF03174670)
44. Luera, G. R. and Otto, C. A. 2005. Development and evaluation of an inquiry-based elementary science teacher education program reflecting current reform movements. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 16: 241-258. (doi:10.1007/s10972-005-4585-2)
45. Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J. and Borko, H. 1999. "Nature, sources and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching". In Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education, Edited by: Gess-Newsome, J. and Lederman, N. G. 95-122. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
46. Marble, S. 2007. Inquiring into teaching: Lesson study in elementary science methods. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18: 935-953. (doi:10.1007/s10972-007-9071-6)
47. McDonald, S. and Butler Songer, N. 2008. Enacting classroom inquiry: Theorizing teachers' conceptions of science teaching. Science Education, 27: 45-60.
48. Ministerie van Onderwijs, cultuur en wetenschappen. (2004). Blijf groeien. Wet op de beroepen in het onderwijs [Ministry of Education, Culture and Science. Keep on growing. Law on professions in education]. Den Haag: Ministerie van Onderwijs.
49. Moseley, C., Ramsey, S. J. and Ruff, K. 2004. Science buddies: An authentic context for developing pre-service teachers' understanding of learning, teaching and scientific inquiry. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 16: 1-18. (doi:10.1007/BF03173642)
50. Mulder, M. (2001). Competentieontwikkeling in organisaties. Perspectieven en praktijk. [Competence development in organisations. Perspectives and practises]. 's-Gravenhage: Elsevier Bedrijfsinformatie.
51. Mulder, M. 2007. Competence: The essence and use of the concept in ICVT. European Journal of Vocational Training, 40: 5-22.
52. Mulder, M., Weigel, T. and Collins, K. 2006. The concept of competence in the development of vocational education and training in selected EU member states. A critical analysis. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 59: 65-85.
53. National Research Council (NRC). 1996. National science education standards, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
54. National Research Council (NRC). 2000. Inquiry and the national science education standards, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
55. National Science Teacher Association. (2003). Standards for science teacher preparation. Retrieved on July 13, 2009, from http://www.nsta.org/pdfs/NSTAstandards2003.pdf.
56. Nilsson, P. (2008). Teaching for understanding - The complex nature of PCK in pre-service teacher education. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1281-1299.
57. Oliveira, A. W. 2009. Developing elementary teachers' understanding of the discourse structure of inquiry-based science classrooms. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8: 247-269. (doi:10.1007/s10763-009-9172-0)
58. Oliveira, A. W. 2010. Engaging students in guided science inquiry discussions: Elementary teachers' oral strategies. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21: 747-765. (doi:10.1007/s10972-009-9168-1)
59. Osborne, J. and Dillon, J. 2008. Science education in Europe: Critical reflections, London: King's College.
60. Park Rogers, M. A. 2009. Elementary pre-service teachers' experience with inquiry: Connecting evidence to explanation. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21: 47-61. (doi:10.1007/BF03174722)
61. Piaget, P. 1985. Equilibrium of cognitive structures, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
62. Schwarz, C. 2009. Developing pre-service elementary teachers' knowledge and practice through modelling-centred scientific inquiry. Science Education, 93: 720-744. (doi:10.1002/sce.20324)
63. Schwarz, C. V. and Gwekwerere, Y. N. 2007. Using a guided inquiry and modelling instructional framework (EIMA) to support pre-service K-8 science teaching. Science Education, 91: 158-186. (doi:10.1002/sce.20177)
64. Shulman, L. S. 1986a. Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15: 4-14.
65. Shulman, L. S. 1986b. "Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching: A contemporary perspective". In Handbook of research on teaching, Edited by: Wittrock, M. C. 3-36. New York: Macmillan.
66. Shulman, L. S. 1987. Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57: 1-22.
67. Shymanski, J. A., Yore, L. D. and Anderson, J. O. 2004. Impact of a school district's science reform effort on the achievement and attitudes of third- and fourth-grade students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41: 771-790. (doi:10.1002/tea.20025)
68. Smolleck, L. D., Zembal-Saul, C. and Yoder, E. P. 2006. The development and validation of an instrument to measure pre-service teachers' self-efficacy in regard to the teaching of science as inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17: 137-163. (doi:10.1007/s10972-006-9015-6)
69. Spector, B., Burkett, R. S. and Leard, C. 2007. Mitigating resistance to teaching science through inquiry: Studying self. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18: 185-208. (doi:10.1007/s10972-006-9035-2)
70. Trundle, K. C., Atwood, R. K. and Christopher, J. E. 2007. A longitudinal study of conceptual change: pre-service elementary teachers' conceptions of moon phases. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44: 303-326. (doi:10.1002/tea.20121)
71. Van Aalst, J. and Truong, M. S. 2011. Promoting knowledge creation discourse in an Asian primary five classroom: Results from an inquiry into life cycles. International Journal of Science Education, 33: 487-515. (doi:10.1080/09500691003649656)
72. Varma, T., Volkmann, M. and Hanuscin, D. 2009. Pre-service teachers; perceptions of their understanding of inquiry and inquiry-based science pedagogy: Influence of an elementary science education methods course and a science field experience. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21: 1-22. (doi:10.1007/BF03182354)
73. Vikström, A. 2008. What is intended, what is realized, and what is learned? Teaching and learning biology in the primary school classroom. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19: 211-233. (doi:10.1007/s10972-008-9090-y)
74. Volkmann, M. J. and Zgagacz, M. 2004. Learning to teach physics through inquiry: The lived experience of a graduate teaching assistant. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41: 584-602. (doi:10.1002/tea.20017)
75. Warwick, P. and Siraj-Blatchford, J. 2006. Using data comparison and interpretation to develop procedural understandings in the primary classroom: Case study evidence from action research. International Journal of Science Education, 28: 443-467. (doi:10.1080/09500690500277896)
76. Weld, J. and Funk, L. 2005. 'I'm not the science type': Effect of an inquiry biology content course on pre-service elementary teachers' intentions about teaching science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 16: 189-204. (doi:10.1007/s10972-005-4860-2)
77. Williams, M., Linn, M. C., Ammon, P. and Gearhart, M. 2004. Learning to teach inquiry science in a technology-based environment: A case study. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13: 189-206. (doi:10.1023/B:JOST.0000031258.17257.48)
78. Windschitl, M. (2003). Inquiry projects in science teacher education: What can investigative experiences reveal about teacher thinking and eventual classroom practice? Science Education, 87(1), 112-143.
79. van Zee, E. H., Hammer, D., Bell, M., Roy, P. and Peter, J. 2005. Learning and teaching science as inquiry: A case study of elementary school teachers' investigations of light. Science Teacher Education, 89: 1007-1042.