Phylogenomic Relationships between Amylolytic Enzymes from 85 Strains of Fungi

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 11, 2012, Pages

  Chen, Wanping ^a   Xie, Ting ^a   Shao, Yanchun ^a   Chen, Fusheng ^a  

^a HUAZHONG AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALPHA GLUCOSIDASE; AMYLASE; BETA AMYLASE; GLUCAN 1,4 ALPHA GLUCOSIDASE; GLYCOSIDASE;

ARTICLE; ASCOMYCETES; BASIDIOMYCETES; CHYTRIDIOMYCETES; CLADISTICS; ENZYME BINDING; EVOLUTIONARY ADAPTATION; FUNGAL GENE; FUNGAL STRAIN; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENOMICS; PHYLOGENY; ZYGOMYCETES;

ALPHA-GLUCOSIDASES; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; AMYLASES; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; FUNGI; GENE TRANSFER, HORIZONTAL; GENOME, FUNGAL; GLUCAN 1,4-ALPHA-GLUCOSIDASE; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHYLOGENY; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION DOMAINS AND MOTIFS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; STARCH;

ASCOMYCOTA; BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); BASIDIOMYCOTA; CHYTRIDIOMYCOTA; EUKARYOTA; FUNGI; ZYGOMYCOTA;

EID: 84869231881     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049679     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Stam MR, Danchin EGJ, Rancurel C, Coutinho PM, Henrissat B, (2006) Dividing the large glycoside hydrolase family 13 into subfamilies: towards improved functional annotations of α-amylase-related proteins. Protein Eng Des Sel 19: 555-562.
2. Tsukagoshi N, Kobayashi T, Kato M, (2001) Regulation of the amylolytic and (hemi-)cellulolytic genes in aspergilli. J Gen Appl Microbiol 47: 1-19.
3. van der Maarel MJEC, van der Veen B, Uitdehaag JCM, Leemhuis H, Dijkhuizen L, (2002) Properties and applications of starch-converting enzymes of the α-amylase family. J Biotechnol 94: 137-155.
4. Cheng J, Khan MA, Qiu WM, Li J, Zhou H, et al. (2012) Diversification of genes encoding granule-bound starch synthase in monocots and dicots is marked by multiple genome-wide duplication events. PLoS ONE 7: e30088.
5. Uma Maheswar Rao JL, Boorgula GDY, Leitão AL (2011) Fungal Enzymes: Present Scenario and Future Perspectives. In: Leitão AL, editor. Mycofactories. Bussum: Bentham Science Publishers 3-27.
6. Andersen MR, Salazar MP, Schaap PJ, van de Vondervoort PJ, Culley D, et al. (2011) Comparative genomics of citric-acid-producing Aspergillus niger ATCC 1015 versus enzyme-producing CBS 513.88. Genome Res 21: 885-897.
7. de Oliveira JM, van Passel MW, Schaap PJ, de Graaff LH, (2011) Proteomic analysis of the secretory response of Aspergillus niger to D-maltose and D-xylose. PLoS ONE 6: e20865.
8. Nakamura T, Maeda Y, Tanoue N, Makita T, Kato M, et al. (2006) Expression profile of amylolytic genes in Aspergillus nidulans. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 70: 2363-2370.
9. Sato A, Oshima K, Noguchi H, Ogawa M, Takahashi T, et al. (2011) Draft genome sequencing and comparative analysis of Aspergillus sojae NBRC4239. DNA Res 18: 165-176.
10. Yuan XL, van der Kaaij RM, van den Hondel CA, Punt PJ, van der Maarel MJ, et al. (2008) Aspergillus niger genome-wide analysis reveals a large number of novel alpha-glucan acting enzymes with unexpected expression profiles. Mol Genet Genomics 279: 545-561.
11. Kobayashi T, Abe K, Asai K, Gomi K, Juvvadi PR, et al. (2007) Genomics of Aspergillus oryzae. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 71: 646-670.
12. Cantarel BL, Coutinho PM, Rancurel C, Bernard T, Lombard V, et al. (2009) The Carbohydrate-Active EnZymes database (CAZy): an expert resource for Glycogenomics. Nucleic Acids Res 37: D233-D238.
13. van der Kaaij RM, Janeček Š, van der Maarel MJEC, Dijkhuizen L, (2007) Phylogenetic and biochemical characterization of a novel cluster of intracellular fungal α-amylase enzymes. Microbiology 153: 4003-4015.
14. Liu Y, Lei Y, Zhang X, Gao Y, Xiao Y, et al. (2012) Identification and phylogenetic characterization of a new subfamily of α-amylase enzymes from marine microorganisms. Mar Biotechnol 14: 253-260.
15. Papagianni M, (2004) Fungal morphology and metabolite production in submerged mycelial processes. Biotechnol Adv 22: 189-259.
16. Janeček Š, Kuchtová A (2012) In silico identification of catalytic residues and domain fold of the family GH119 sharing the catalytic machinery with the alpha-amylase family GH57. FEBS Lett: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2012.1007.1020.
17. Blesák K, Janeček Š, (2012) Sequence fingerprints of enzyme specificities from the glycoside hydrolase family GH57. Extremophiles 16: 497-506.
18. MacGregor EA, Janeček Š, Svensson B, (2001) Relationship of sequence and structure to specificity in the α-amylase family of enzymes. BBA- Protein Struct Mol Enzymol 1546: 1-20.
19. Janeček Š, (2002) How many conserved sequence regions are there in the α-amylase family? Biologia 57: 29-41.
20. Janeček Š, (1997) α-Amylase family: molecular biology and evolution. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 67: 67-97.
21. Da Lage JL, Feller G, Janeček Š, (2004) Horizontal gene transfer from Eukarya to Bacteria and domain shuffling: the α-amylase model. Cell Mol Life Sci 61: 97-109.
22. Janeček Š, (1994) Sequence similarities and evolutionary relationships of microbial, plant and animal α-amylases. Eur J Biochem 224: 519-524.
23. Sauer J, Sigurskjold BW, Christensen U, Frandsen TP, Mirgorodskaya E, et al. (2000) Glucoamylase: structure/function relationships, and protein engineering. BBA-Protein Struct Mol Enzymol 1543: 275-293.
24. Horváthová V, Janeček Š, Šturdík E, (2001) Amylolytic enzymes: molecular aspects of their properties. Gen Physiol Biophys 20: 7-32.
25. Coutinho PM, Reilly PJ, (1997) Glucoamylase structural, functional, and evolutionary relationships. Protein Struct Funct Bioinform 29: 334-347.
26. Aleshin AE, Feng P-H, Honzatko RB, Reilly PJ, (2003) Crystal structure and evolution of a prokaryotic glucoamylase. J Mol Biol 327: 61-73.
27. Hata Y, Ishida H, Kojima Y, Ichikawa E, Kawato A, et al. (1997) Comparison of two glucoamylases produced by Aspergillus oryzae in solid-state culture (koji) and in submerged culture. J Ferment Bioeng 84: 532-537.
28. Chen W, Xie T, Shao Y, Chen F, (2012) Genomic characteristics comparisons of 12 food-related filamentous fungi in tRNA gene set, codon usage and amino acid composition. Gene 497: 116-124.
29. Horváthová V, Janeček Š, Šturdík E, (2001) Amylolytic enzymes: their specificities, origins and properties. Biologia 56: 605-615.
30. Ernst HA, Lo Leggio L, Willemoës M, Leonard G, Blum P, et al. (2006) Structure of the sulfolobus solfataricus α-glucosidase: implications for domain conservation and substrate recognition in GH31. J Mol Biol 358: 1106-1124.
31. Vihinen M, Mantsala P, (1989) Microbial amylolytic enzymes. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 24: 329-418.
32. Gabriško M, Janeček Š, (2011) Characterization of maltase clusters in the genus Drosophila. J Mol Evol 72: 104-118.
33. Janeček Š, Svensson B, MacGregor EA, (2007) A remote but significant sequence homology between glycoside hydrolase clan GH-H and family GH31. FEBS Lett 581: 1261-1268.
34. Rigden DJ, (2002) Iterative database searches demonstrate that glycoside hydrolase families 27, 31, 36 and 66 share a common evolutionary origin with family 13. FEBS Lett 523: 17-22.
35. Machovič M, Janeček Š, (2006) The evolution of putative starch-binding domains. FEBS Lett 580: 6349-6356.
36. Janeček Š, Svensson B, MacGregor EA, (2003) Relation between domain evolution, specificity, and taxonomy of the α-amylase family members containing a C-terminal starch-binding domain. Eur J Biochem 270: 635-645.
37. Christiansen C, Abou Hachem M, Janeček Š, Viksø-Nielsen A, Blennow A, et al. (2009) The carbohydrate-binding module family 20-diversity, structure, and function. FEBS J 276: 5006-5029.
38. Rodriguez-Sanoja R, Oviedo N, Sanchez S, (2005) Microbial starch-binding domain. Curr Opin Microbiol 8: 260-267.
39. Ashikari T, Nakamura N, Tanaka Y, Kiuchi N, Shibano Y, et al. (1986) Rhizopus raw-starch-degrading glucoamylase: its cloning and expression in yeast. Agric Biol Chem 50: 957-964.
40. Janeček Š, Svensson B, MacGregor EA, (2011) Structural and evolutionary aspects of two families of non-catalytic domains present in starch and glycogen binding proteins from microbes, plants and animals. Enzyme Microb Technol 49: 429-440.
41. Jiang T-Y, Ci Y-P, Chou W-I, Lee Y-C, Sun Y-J, et al. (2012) Two unique ligand-binding clamps of Rhizopus oryzae starch binding domain for helical structure disruption of amylose. PLoS ONE 7: e41131.
42. Janeček Š, Ševči{dotless}k J, (1999) The evolution of starch-binding domain. FEBS Lett 456: 119-125.
43. Eksteen JM, van Rensburg P, Cordero Otero RR, Pretorius IS, (2003) Starch fermentation by recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains expressing the α-amylase and glucoamylase genes from Lipomyces kononenkoae and Saccharomycopsis fibuligera. Biotechnol Bioeng 84: 639-646.
44. Birol G, Önsan Zİ, Ki{dotless}rdar B, Oliver SG, (1998) Ethanol production and fermentation characteristics of recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains grown on starch. Enzyme Microb Technol 22: 672-677.
45. Knox AM, du Preez JC, Kilian SG, (2004) Starch fermentation characteristics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains transformed with amylase genes from Lipomyces kononenkoae and Saccharomycopsis fibuligera. Enzyme Microb Technol 34: 453-460.
46. Li S, Sing S, Wang Z, (2011) Improved expression of Rhizopus oryzae α-amylase in the methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris. Protein Expr Purif 79: 142-148.
47. Soccol CR, Iloki I, Marin B, Raimbault M, (1994) Comparative production of alpha-amylase, glucoamylase and protein enrichment of raw and cooked cassava by Rhizopus strains in submerged and solid state fermentations. J Food Sci Technol 31: 320-323.
48. Battaglia E, Benoit I, van den Brink J, Wiebenga A, Coutinho PM, et al. (2011) Carbohydrate-active enzymes from the zygomycete fungus Rhizopus oryzae: a highly specialized approach to carbohydrate degradation depicted at genome level. BMC Genomics 12: 38.
49. Kumar V, (2011) Identification of the sequence motif of glycoside hydrolase 13 family members. Bioinformation 6: 61-63.
50. Machovič M, Janeček Š, (2003) The invariant residues in the α-amylase family: just the catalytic triad. Biologia 58: 1127-1132.
51. Kumar V, (2010) Analysis of the key active subsites of glycoside hydrolase 13 family members. Carbohyd Res 345: 893-898.
52. Marchler-Bauer A, Lu S, Anderson JB, Chitsaz F, Derbyshire MK, et al. (2011) CDD: a Conserved Domain Database for the functional annotation of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 39: D225-229.
53. Maczkowiak F, Lage J-L, (2006) Origin and evolution of the Amyrel gene in the α-amylase multigene family of Diptera. Genetica 128: 145-158.
54. Da Lage JL, Van Wormhoudt A, Cariou ML, (2002) Diversity and evolution of the α-amylase genes in animals. Biologia 57: 181-189.
55. Kuriki T, Imanaka T, (1999) The concept of the α-amylase family: structural similarity and common catalytic mechanism. J Biosci Bioeng 87: 557-565.
56. Frandsen TP, Svensson B, (1998) Plant α-glucosidases of the glycoside hydrolase family 31. Molecular properties, substrate specificity, reaction mechanism, and comparison with family members of different origin. Plant Mol Biol 37: 1-13.
57. Machovič M, Janeček Š, (2006) Starch-binding domains in the post-genome era. Cell Mol Life Sci 63: 2710-2724.
58. Machovič M, Svensson B, Ann MacGregor E, Janeček Š, (2005) A new clan of CBM families based on bioinformatics of starch-binding domains from families CBM20 and CBM21. FEBS J 272: 5497-5513.
59. Chou WI, Pai TW, Liu SH, Hsiung BK, Chang MD, (2006) The family 21 carbohydrate-binding module of glucoamylase from Rhizopus oryzae consists of two sites playing distinct roles in ligand binding. Biochem J 396: 469-477.
60. Sumitani J, Tottori T, Kawaguchi T, Arai M, (2000) New type of starch-binding domain: the direct repeat motif in the C-terminal region of Bacillus sp. no. 195 alpha-amylase contributes to starch binding and raw starch degrading. Biochem J 350 Pt 2: 477-484.
61. Machovič M, Janeček Š, (2008) Domain evolution in the GH13 pullulanase subfamily with focus on the carbohydrate-binding module family 48. Biologia 63: 1057-1068.
62. Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP, (2009) FastTree: computing large minimum evolution trees with profiles instead of a distance matrix. Mol Biol Evol 26: 1641-1650.
63. Letunic I, Bork P, (2007) Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL): an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Bioinformatics 23: 127-128.
64. Waterhouse AM, Procter JB, Martin DMA, Clamp M, Barton GJ, (2009) Jalview Version 2-a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench. Bioinformatics 25: 1189-1191.
65. Cole C, Barber JD, Barton GJ, (2008) The Jpred 3 secondary structure prediction server. Nucleic Acids Res 36: W197-W201.