Correlation of structural retinal nerve fibre layer parameters and functional measures using Heidelberg Retinal Tomography and Spectralis spectral domain optical coherence tomography at different levels of glaucoma severity

Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

Volumn 40, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 802-812

  Leaney, John ^a   Healey, Paul R ^b   Lee, Martin ^c   Graham, Stuart L ^a  

^a MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Glaucoma; Glaucomatous field defect; Imaging system

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; GLAUCOMA; HEIDELBERG RETINAL TOMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NERVOUS SYSTEM PARAMETERS; OPTIC DISK; RETINA NERVE CELL; RETINAL NERVE FIBER LAYER; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCANNING LASER OPHTHALMOSCOPY; SCORING SYSTEM; SCOTOMA; SPECTRAL DOMAIN OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; TOMOGRAPHY; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT;

AGED; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; DISEASE PROGRESSION; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; LASERS; NERVE FIBERS; OPHTHALMOSCOPY; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; RETINAL GANGLION CELLS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE; TONOMETRY, OCULAR; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 84869094980     PISSN: 14426404     EISSN: 14429071     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2012.02807.x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Chauhan BC, McCormick TA, Nicolela MT, LeBlanc RP. Optic disc and visual field changes in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with glaucoma: comparison of scanning laser tomography with conventional perimetry and optic disc photography. Arch Ophthalmol 2001; 119: 1492-9.
2. Boland MV, Zhang L, Broman AT, Jampel HD, Quigley HA. Comparison of optic nerve head topography and visual field in eyes with open-angle and angle-closure glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2008; 115: 239-45, e232.
3. Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Brandt JD etal. The ocular hypertension treatment study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2002; 120: 714-20; discussion 829-730.
4. Leung CK, Ye C, Weinreb RN etal. Retinal nerve fiber layer imaging with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography a study on diagnostic agreement with heidelberg retinal tomograph. Ophthalmology 2010; 117: 267-74.
5. Healey PR, Anne JL, Tin A, Tien YW, Paul M. Diagnostic accuracy of the heidelberg retina tomograph for glaucoma: a population-based assessment. Ophthalmology 2010; 117: 1667-73.
6. Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Sample PA, Weinreb RN. Influence of disease severity and optic disc size on the diagnostic performance of imaging instruments in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47: 1008-15.
7. Rao HL, Leite MT, Weinreb RN etal. Effect of disease severity and optic disc size on diagnostic accuracy of RTVue spectral domain optical coherence tomograph in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010; 52: 1290-6.
8. Gonzalez-Hernandez M, Pablo LE, Armas-Dominguez K, de la Vega RR, Ferreras A, de la Rosa MG. Structure-function relationship depends on glaucoma severity. Br J Ophthalmol 2009; 93: 1195-9.
9. Hood DC, Anderson SC, Wall M, Raza AS, Kardon RH. A test of a linear model of glaucomatous structure-function loss reveals sources of variability in retinal nerve fiber and visual field measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009; 50: 4254-66.
10. Zhu H, Crabb DP, Schlottmann PG etal. Predicting visual function from the measurements of retinal nerve fibre layer structure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010; 51: 5657-66.
11. Hood DC, Anderson SC, Wall M, Kardon RH. Structure versus function in glaucoma: an application of a linear model. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007; 48: 3662-8.
12. Gardiner SK, Johnson CA, Cioffi GA. Evaluation of the structure-function relationship in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46: 3712-17.
13. Schlottmann PG, De Cilla S, Greenfield DS, Caprioli J, Garway-Heath DF. Relationship between visual field sensitivity and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness as measured by scanning laser polarimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004; 45: 1823-9.
14. Kanamori A, Naka M, Nagai-Kusuhara A, Yamada Y, Nakamura M, Negi A. Regional relationship between retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and corresponding visual field sensitivity in glaucomatous eyes. Arch Ophthalmol 2008; 126: 1500-6.
15. Ferreras A, Pablo LE, Garway-Heath DF, Fogagnolo P, Garcia-Feijoo J. Mapping standard automated perimetry to the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008; 49: 3018-25.
16. Mills RP, Budenz DL, Lee PP etal. Categorizing the stage of glaucoma from pre-diagnosis to end-stage disease. Am J Ophthalmol 2006; 141: 24-30.
17. Garway-Heath DF, Caprioli J, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA. Scaling the hill of vision: the physiological relationship between light sensitivity and ganglion cell numbers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000; 41: 1774-82.
18. Garway-Heath DF, Holder GE, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA. Relationship between electrophysiological, psychophysical, and anatomical measurements in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002; 43: 2213-20.
19. Oddone F, Centofanti M, Iester M etal. Sector-based analysis with the heidelberg retinal tomograph 3 across disc sizes and glaucoma stages: a multicenter study. Ophthalmology 2009; 116: 1106-11.
20. Leung CK-S, Chong KK-L, Chan W-M etal. Comparative study of retinal nerve fiber layer measurement by stratus oct and gdx vcc, ii: structure/function regression analysis in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46: 3702-11.
21. Miglior S, Riva I, Guareschi M etal. Retinal sensitivity and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by optical coherence tomography in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 2007; 144: 733-40.
22. Artes PH, O'Leary N, Hutchison DM etal. Properties of the statpac visual field index. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52: 4030-8.
23. Horn FK, Mardin CY, Laemmer R etal. Correlation between local glaucomatous visual field defects and loss of nerve fiber layer thickness measured with polarimetry and spectral domain oct. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009; 50: 1971-7.
24. Moreno-Montanes JMDP, Anton AMDP, Garcia ND, Olmo NMD, Morilla AP, Fallon MD. Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness values using stratus optical coherence tomography and heidelberg retina tomograph-iii. J Glaucoma 2009; 18: 528-34.
25. Sato S, Hirooka K, Baba T etal. Correlation between retinal nerve fibre layer thickness and retinal sensitivity. Acta Opthalmologica 2008; 86: 609-13.
26. Kim N, Lee ES, Seong GJ, Kim JH, An HG, Chan YK. Structure-function relationship and diagnostic value of macular ganglion cell complex measurement using fourier-domain oct in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010; 51: 4646-51.
27. Danesh-Meyer HV, Ku JYF, Papchenko TL, Jayasundera T, Hsiang JC, Gamble GD. Regional correlation of structure and function in glaucoma, using the disc damage likelihood scale, heidelberg retina tomograph, and visual fields. Ophthalmology 2006; 113: 603-11.
28. Saito H, Tsutsumi T, Iwase A, Tomidokoro A, Araie M. Correlation of disc morphology quantified on stereophotographs to results by heidelberg retina tomograph ii, gdx variable corneal compensation, and visual field tests. Ophthalmology 2010; 117: 282-9.
29. Ford BA, Artes PH, McCormick TA, Nicolela MT, LeBlanc RP, Chauhan BC. Comparison of data analysis tools for detection of glaucoma with the heidelberg retina tomograph. Ophthalmology 2003; 110: 1145-50.
30. Zangwill LM, Jain S, Racette L etal. The effect of disc size and severity of disease on the diagnostic accuracy of the heidelberg retina tomograph glaucoma probability score. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007; 48: 2653-60.
31. Vessani RM, Moritz R, Batis L etal. Comparison of quantitative imaging devices and subjective optic nerve head assessment by general ophthalmologists to differentiate normal from glaucomatous eyes. J Glaucoma 2009; 18: 253-61.
32. Bowd C, Zangwill LM, Medeiros FA etal. Structure-function relationships using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy, optical coherence tomography, and scanning laser polarimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47: 2889-95.
33. Grewal DS, Sehi M, Greenfield DS. Diffuse glaucomatous structural and functional damage in the hemifield without significant pattern loss. Arch Ophthalmol 2009; 127: 1442-8.