The effect of disc size and severity of disease on the diagnostic accuracy of the Heidelberg retina tomograph glaucoma probability score

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 48, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 2653-2660

  Zangwill, Linda M ^a   Jain, Sonia ^a   Racette, Lyne ^a   Ernstrom, Karin B ^a   Bowd, Christopher ^a   Medeiros, Felipe A ^a   Sample, Pamela A ^a   Weinreb, Robert N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HEIDELBERG RETINA TOMOGRAPH GLAUCOMA PROBABILITY SCORE; HUMAN; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOORFIELDS REGRESSION ANALYSIS; OPTIC DISK; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RETINA NERVE CELL; SCORING SYSTEM; HOSPITALIZATION; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE FIBER; OPTIC NERVE DISEASE; PATHOLOGY; PROBABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; RETINA GANGLION CELL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY; VISUAL DISORDER; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL SYSTEM EXAMINATION;

AGED; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE FIBERS; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; PROBABILITY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETINAL GANGLION CELLS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TOMOGRAPHY; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 34347228699     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.06-1314     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Zangwill LM, Medeiros FA, Bowd C, Weinreb RN. Optic nerve imaging devices: recent advances. In: Grehn F, Stampher R, eds. Essentials in Ophthalmology: Glaucoma. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 2004:63-91.
2. Greaney MJ, Hoffman DC, Garway-Heath DF, et al. Comparison of optic nerve imaging methods to distinguish normal eyes from those with glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:140-145.
3. Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Weinreb RN. Comparison of the GDx VCC Scanning Laser Polarimeter, HRT II Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscope, and Stratus OCT Optical Coherence Tomograph for the detection of glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:827-837.
4. Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Berry CC, et al. Discriminating between normal and glaucomatous eyes using the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph, GDx Nerve Fiber Analyzer, and Optical Coherence Tomograph. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:985-993.
5. Iester M, Jonas JB, Mardin CY, Budde WM. Discriminant analysis models for early detection of glaucomatous optic disc changes. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000;84:464-468.
6. Iester M, Mikelberg FS, Drance SM. The effect of optic disc size on diagnostic precision with the Heidelberg retina tomograph. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:545-548.
7. Bowd C, Zangwill LM, Blumenthal EZ, et al. Imaging of the optic disc and retinal nerve fiber layer: the effects of age, optic disc area, refractive error, and gender. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2002;19:197-207.
8. Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, et al. Influence of disease severity and optic disc size on the diagnostic performance of imaging instruments in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:1008-1015.
9. Wollstein G, Garway-Heath DF, Hitchings RA. Identification of early glaucoma cases with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:1557-1563.
10. Bathija R, Zangwill L, Berry CC, et al. Detection of early glaucomatous structural damage with confocal scanning laser tomography. J Glaucoma. 1998;7:121-127.
11. Ford BA, Artes PH, McCormick TA, et al. Comparison of data analysis tools for detection of glaucoma with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:1145-1150.
12. Mardin CY, Horn FK. Influence of optic disc size on the sensitivity of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1998;236:641-645.
13. Leisenring W, Pepe MS, Longton G. A marginal regression modelling framework for evaluating medical diagnostic tests. Stat Med. 1997;16:1263-1281.
14. Liang KY, Zeger SL. Longitudinal data-analysis using generalized linear-models. Biometrika. 1986;73:13-22.
15. Martus P, Stroux A, Junemann AM, et al. GEE approaches to marginal regression models for medical diagnostic tests. Stat Med. 2004;23:1377-1398.
16. Iester M, Mikelberg FS, Courtright P, et al. Interobserver variability of optic disk variables measured by confocal scanning laser tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001;132:57-62.
17. Miglior S, Albe E, Guareschi M, et al. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility in the evaluation of optic disc stereometric parameters by Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:1072-1077.
18. Swindale NV, Stjepanovic G, Chin A, Mikelberg FS. Automated analysis of normal and glaucomatous optic nerve head topography images. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:1730-1742.
19. Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study. 2. Visual field test scoring and reliability. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:1445-1455.
20. Newcombe RG. Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods. Stat Med. 1998;17:857-872.
21. Wilson E. Probable inference, the law of succession, and statistical inference. J Am Stat Assoc. 1927;22:209-217.
22. Simel DL, Samsa GP, Matchar DB. Likelihood ratios with confidence: sample size estimation for diagnostic test studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44:763-770.
23. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988;44:837-845.
24. Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Sackett DL. Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test B - what are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA. 1994;271:703-707.
25. Harizman N, Zelefsky JR, Ilitchev E, et al. Detection of glaucoma using operator-dependent versus operator-independent classification in the Heidelberg retinal tomograph-III. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:1390-1392.
26. Coops A, Henson DB, Kwartz AJ, Artes PH. Automated analysis of heidelberg retina tomograph optic disc images by glaucoma probability score. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:5348-5355.
27. Langlotz CP. Fundamental measures of diagnostic examination performance: usefulness for clinical decision making and research. Radiology. 2003;228:3-9.