Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness values using stratus optical coherence tomography and Heidelberg retina tomograph-III

Journal of Glaucoma

Volumn 18, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 528-534

  Moreno Montañés, Javier ^a   Antón, Alfonso ^b,c   García, Noelia ^a   Olmo, Natalia ^a   Morilla, Antonio ^b   Fallon, Mónica ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY CLINIC OF NAVARRA   (Spain)

^b Institut Catala de Retina   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Glaucoma; Heidelberg retina tomograph; Ocular hypertension; Optical coherence tomography; Retinal nerve fiber layer

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR HYPERTENSION; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPTIC DISK CUP; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; PATIENT CODING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RETINA NERVE CELL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VISUAL FIELD;

ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; LASERS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE FIBERS; OCULAR HYPERTENSION; OPHTHALMOSCOPY; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; PERIMETRY; RETINAL GANGLION CELLS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 70349739664     PISSN: 10570829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e318193c29f     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Tuulonen A, Lehtola J, Airaksinen PJ. Nerve fiber layer defects with normal visual fields. Do normal optic disc and normal visual field indicate absence of glaucomatous abnormality? Ophthalmology. 1993;100:587-597.
2. Sommer A, Katz J, Quigley HA, et al. Clinically detectable nerve fiber atrophy precedes the onset of glaucomatous field loss. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991;109:77-83.
3. Kerrigan-Baumrind LA, Quigley HA, Pease ME, et al. Number of ganglion cells in glaucoma eyes compared with threshold visual field tests in the same persons. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:741-748.
4. Quigley HA, Katz J, Derick RJ, et al. An evaluation of optic disc and nerve fiber layer examinations in monitoring progression of early glaucoma damage. Ophthalmology. 1992;99:19-28.
5. Harwerth RS, Carter-Dawson L, Shen F, et al. Ganglion cell losses underlying visual field defects from experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40:2242-2250. (Pubitemid 29418378)
6. Hee MR, Izatt JA, Swanson EA, et al. Optical coherence tomography of the human retina. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113:325-332.
7. Huang Y, Cideciyan AV, Papastergiou GI, et al. Relation of optical coherence tomography to microanatomy in normal and rd chickens. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998;39:2405-2416. (Pubitemid 28485652)
8. Rohrschneider K, Burk RO, Kruse FE, et al. Reproducibility of the optic nerve head topography with a new laser tomographic scanning device. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:1044-1049. (Pubitemid 24183160)
9. Janknecht P, Funk J. Optic nerve head analyzer and Heidelberg retina tomograph: accuracy and reproducibility of topographic measurements in a model eye and in volunteers. Br J Ophthalmol. 1994;78:760-768. (Pubitemid 24311513)
10. Anton A, Moreno-Montañés J, Blazquez F, et al. Usefulness of optical coherence tomography parameters of the optic disc and the retinal nerve fiber layer to differentiate glaucomatous, ocular hypertensive, and normal eyes. J Glaucoma. 2007;16:1-8. (Pubitemid 46114766)
11. Moreno-Montañés J, Alvarez A, Bes-Rastrollo M, et al. Optical coherence tomography evaluation of posterior capsule opacification related to intraocular lens design. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34:643-650.
12. Moreno-Montañés J, Alvarez A, Maldonado MJ. Objective quantification of posterior capsule opacification after cataract surgery, with optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:3999-4006. (Pubitemid 44264598)
13. DeLong E, DeLong D. Comparing the area under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristics curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988;44:837-845. (Pubitemid 18243017)
14. Hilden J, Glasziou P. Regret graphs, diagnostic uncertainty and Youden's index. Stat Med. 1996;15:969-986. (Pubitemid 26168321)
15. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;20:37-46.
16. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307-310. (Pubitemid 16134762)
17. Jaffe GJ, Caprioli J. Optical coherence tomography to detect and manage retinal disease and glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;137:156-169. (Pubitemid 38045202)
18. Savini G, Bellusci C, Carbonelli M, et al. Detection and quantification of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in optic disc edema using stratus OCT. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006;124:1111-1117. (Pubitemid 44232340)
19. Budenz DL, Michael A, Chang RT, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of the Stratus OCT for perimetric glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:3-9. (Pubitemid 40075311)
20. DeLeón-Ortega JE, Arthur SN, McGwin G, et al. Discrimination between glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous eyes using quantitative imaging devices and subjective optic nerve head assessment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:3374-3380.
21. Hood DC, Harizman N, Kanadani FN, et al. Retinal nerve fibre thickness measured with optical coherence tomography accurately detects confirmed glaucomatous damage. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91:905-907. (Pubitemid 47013102)
22. Parikh RS, Parikh S, Sekhar GC, et al. Diagnostic capability of optical coherence tomography (Stratus OCT 3) in early glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:2238-2243. (Pubitemid 350181104)
23. Kim TW, Park UC, Park KH, et al. Ability of Stratus OCT to identify localized retinal nerve fiber layer defects in patients with normal standard automated perimetry results. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:1635-1641.
24. Ferreras A, Pajarín AB, Polo V, et al. Diagnostic ability of Heidelberg retina tomograph 3 classifications glaucoma probability score versus Moorfields regression analysis. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:1981-1987. (Pubitemid 350016355)
25. Zangwill LM, Jain S, Racette L, et al. The effect of disc size and severity of disease on the diagnostic accuracy of the Heidelberg retina tomograph glaucoma probability score. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:2653-2660. (Pubitemid 351261217)
26. Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, et al. Influence of disease severity and optic disc size on the diagnostic performance of imaging instruments in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:1008-1015. (Pubitemid 46768333)
27. Barkana Y, Harizman N, Gerber Y, et al. Measurements of optic disk size with HRT II, Stratus OCT, and funduscopy are not interchangeable. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;142:375-380. (Pubitemid 44767528)
28. Patella VM. Stratus OCT: establishment of normative reference values for retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements. Dublin, CA: Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc; 2003.
29. Savini G, Barboni P, Carbonelli M, et al. The effect of scan diameter on retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurement using Stratus optic coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125:901-905. (Pubitemid 47076426)
30. Heidelberg Retina Tomograph Glaucoma Module. Operating Instructions Software Version 3.0. Heidelberg, Germany: Heidelberg Engineering; 2005.
31. Wu Z, Vazeen M, Varma R, et al. Factors associated with variability in retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements obtained by optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:1505-1512. (Pubitemid 47126592)
32. Greenland S, Rothman KJ. Introduction to stratified analysis. In: Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL, eds. Modern Epidemiology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins; 2008;258-282.