Correlation between local glaucomatous visual field defects and loss of nerve fiber layer thickness measured with polarimetry and spectral domain OCT

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 50, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 1971-1977

  Horn, Folkert K ^a   Mardin, Christian Y ^a   Laemmer, Robert ^a   Baleanu, Delia ^a   Juenemann, Anselm M ^a   Kruse, Friedrich E ^a   Tornow, Ralf P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ERLANGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOCULAR HYPERTENSION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NERVE FIBER LAYER THICKNESS; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; OPTIC NERVE; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; PERIMETRY; POLARIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA; RETINA NEUROEPITHELIAL LAYER; SCANNING LASER POLARIMETRY; SPECTRAL DOMAIN OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; STATISTICAL MODEL; THEORETICAL MODEL; THICKNESS; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GONIOSCOPY; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE FIBER; OCULOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY; OPTIC NERVE DISEASE; PATHOLOGY; RETINA GANGLION CELL; SCOTOMA; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL SYSTEM EXAMINATION;

DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; GONIOSCOPY; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, THEORETICAL; NERVE FIBERS; OCULAR HYPERTENSION; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; PERIMETRY; RETINAL GANGLION CELLS; SCOTOMA; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE; TONOMETRY, OCULAR; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 65549087075     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.08-2405     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Reus NJ, Lemij HG. The relationship between standard automated perimetry and GDx VCC measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:840-845.
2. Bowd C, Zangwill LM, Weinreb RN. Association between scanning laser polarimetry measurements using variable corneal polarization compensation and visual field sensitivity in glaucomatous eyes. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121:961-966.
3. Chen YY, Chen PP, Xu L, Ernst PK, Wang L, Mills RP. Correlationof peripapillary nerve fiber layer thickness by scanning laser pola-rimetry with visual field defects in patients with glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 1998;7(5):312-316.
4. Garway-Heath DF, Holder GE, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA. Relation-ship between electrophysiological, psychophysical, and anatomi-cal measurements in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002; 43:2213-2220.
5. Bagga H, Greenfield DS, Knighton RW. Scanning laser polarimetry with variable corneal compensation and optical coherence tomog-raphy in normal and glaucomatous eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003; 135:512-529.
6. Horn F, Jonas JB, Martus P, Mardin CY, Budde WM. Polarimetricmeasurements of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in glaucoma diagnosis. J Glaucoma. 1999;8:353-362.
7. Weinreb RN, Shakiba S, Sample PA, et al. Association between quantitative nerve fiber layer measurement and visual field loss in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1995;120:732-738.
8. Junemann AG, Martus P, Wisse M, Jonas J. Quantitative analysis of visual field and optic disc in glaucoma: retinal nerve fiber bundle- associated analysis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2000;238: 306-314.
9. Hood DC, Anderson SC, Wall M, Kardon RH. Structure versus function in glaucoma: an application of a linear model. Inves Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:3662-3668.
10. Garway-Heath DF, Poinoosawmy D, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA. Map-ping the visual field to the optic disc in normal tension glaucoma eyes Ophthalmology. 2000;107:1809-1815.
11. Jonas JB, Gusek GC, Naumann GOH. Optic disc morphometry inchronic primary open angle glaucoma. II. Correlation of the intra- papillary morphometric data to visual field indices. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1988;226:531-538.
12. Bowd C, Zangwill LM, Blumenthal EZ, et al. Imaging of the optic disc and retinal nerve fiber layer: the effects of age, optic disc area, refractive error, and gender. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2002;19:197-207.
13. Laemmer R, Horn FK, Viestenz A, Juenemann AG, Mardin CY. Influence of optic disc size on parameters of retinal nerve fiber analysis with laser scanning polarimetry. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006;244:603-608.
14. Jonas JB, Budde WM, Panda-Jonas S. Ophthalmoscopic evaluation of the optic nerve head. Surv Ophthalmol. 1999;43:293-320.
15. Hood DC, Kardon RH. A framework for comparing structural and functional measures of glaucomatous damage (review). Prog Retin Eye Res. 2007;26:688-710.
16. Bowd C, Zangwill LM, Medeiros FA, et al. Structure-function rela- tionships using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy, optical coherence tomography, and scanning laser polarimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:2889-2895.
17. Miglior S, Riva I, Guareschi M, et al. Retinal sensitivity and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by optical coherence tomog- raphy in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;144:733-740.
18. Bowd C, Zangwill L, Berry CC, et al. Detecting early glaucoma by assessment of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and visual func-tion. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:1993-2003.
19. Colen TP, Tang NE, Mulder PG, Lemij HG. Sensitivity and speci-ficity of new GDx parameters. J Glaucoma. 2004;13:28-33.
20. Nguyen NX, Horn FK, Hayler J, Wakili N, Junemann A, Mardin CY.Retinal nerve fiber layer measurements using laser scanning pola-rimetry in different stages of glaucomatous optic nerve damage. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2002;240:608-614.
21. Trible JR, Schultz RO, James CR, Robinson JC, Rothe TL. Accuracy of scanning laser polarimetry in the diagnosis of glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:1298-1304.
22. rd ed. Boston: Blackwell Oxford Scientific Publications; 1994
23. Leung CK, Chan WM, Chong KK, et al. Comparative study of retinal nerve fiber layer measurement by StratusOCT and GDx VCC, I: correlation analysis in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:3214-3220.
24. Gulati V, Agarwal HC, Sihota R, Saxena R. Correlation analysis of visual field thresholds and scanning laser ophthalmoscopic optic nerve head measurements in glaucoma. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2003;23:233-242.
25. Horn FK, Mardin CY, Viestenz A, Jünemann AG. Association between localized visual field losses and thickness deviation of the nerve fiber layer in glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2005;14:419-425.
26. El Beltagi TA, Bowd C, Boden C, et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured with optical coherence tomography is related to visual function in glaucomatous eyes. Ophthalmology. 2003; 110:2185-2191.
27. Schlottmann PG, De Cilla S, Greenfield DS et al. Relationship between visual field sensitivity and retinal nerve fiber layer thick-ness as measured by scanning laser polarimetry. Invest Ophthal- mol Vis Sci. 2004;45:1823-1829.
28. Bagga H, Greenfield DS, Feuer WJ. Quantitative assessment of atypical birefringence images using scanning laser polarimetry with variable corneal compensation. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005 Mar; 139(3):437-446.
29. Tóth M, Holló G. Enhanced corneal compensation for scanning laser polarimetry on eyes with atypical polarisation pattern. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89:1139-1142.
30. Orlev A, Horani A, Rapson Y, Cohen MJ, Blumenthal EZ. Clinical characteristics of eyes demonstrating atypical patterns in scanning laser polarimetry. Eye. 2008;22(11):1378-1383.
31. Choi J, Kim KH, Lee CH, et al. Relationship between retinal nerve fibre layer measurements and retinal sensitivity by scanning laser polarimetry with variable and enhanced corneal compensation. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92:906-911.
32. Mai TA, Reus NJ, Lemij HG. Structure-function relationship is stronger with enhanced corneal compensation than with variable corneal compensation in scanning laser polarimetry. Invest Oph- thalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:1651-1658.
33. Leung CK, Chong KK, Chan WM, et al. Comparative study of retinal nerve fiber layer measurement by StratusOCT and GDx VCC, II: structure/function regression analysis in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:3702-3711.
34. Greenfield DS, Knighton RW, Huang XR. Effect of corneal polar-ization axis on assessment of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness by scanning laser polarimetry. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;129:15-22.
35. Colen TP, Lemij. Prevalence of split nerve fiber layer bundles in healthy eyes imaged with scanning laser polarimetry. Ophthalmol-ogy. 2001;108:151-156.
36. Essock EA, Sinai MJ, Fechtner RD. Interocular symmetry in nerve fiber layer thickness of normal eyes as determined by polarimetry. J Glaucoma. 1999;8:90-98.
37. Hoh ST, Greenfield DS, Liebmann JM, et al. Factors affecting image acquisition during scanning laser polarimetry. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1998;29:545-551.
38. Iester M, Mermoud A. Normal retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in the peripapillary region measured by scanning laser polarimetry. J Glaucoma. 2001;10:170-176.
39. Funaki S, Shirakashi M, Funaki H, Yaoeda K, Abe H. Relationship between age and the thickness of the retinal nerve fiber layer in normal subjects. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 1999;43:180-185.
40. Kanamori A, Escano MFT, Eno A, et al. Evaluation of the effect of aging on retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2003;217:273-278.
41. Vesti E, Kivelae T. Exfoliation syndrome and exfoliation glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2000;19:345-368.