Diagnostic accuracy of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph for Glaucoma: A population-based assessment

Ophthalmology

Volumn 117, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 1667-1673

  Healey, Paul R ^a   Lee, Anne J ^a   Aung, Tin ^b   Wong, Tien Y ^b   Mitchell, Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b SINGAPORE EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTICLE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FOLLOW UP; HEIDELBERG RETINA TOMOGRAPH; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; OPTIC DISK; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POPULATION BASED CASE CONTROL STUDY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; PREDICTOR VARIABLE; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCREENING; SENESCENCE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY; VISUAL FIELD;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; LASERS; MALE; NEW SOUTH WALES; OCULAR HYPERTENSION; OPHTHALMOSCOPES; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; PHOTOGRAPHY; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREVALENCE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 77956302296     PISSN: 01616420     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.07.001     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. H.A. Quigley, and A.T. Broman The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020 Br J Ophthalmol 90 2006 262 267
2. P. Mitchell, W. Smith, K. Attebo, and P.R. Healey Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma in Australia: the Blue Mountains Eye Study Ophthalmology 103 1996 1661 1669
3. S.Y. Shen, T.Y. Wong, and P.J. Foster The prevalence and types of glaucoma in Malay people: the Singapore Malay Eye Study Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49 2008 3846 3851
4. A. Azuaro-Blanco, and L. Zangwill Is there an appropriate, acceptable, and reasonably accurate screening test? R.N. Weinreb, P.R. Healey, F. Topouzis, Glaucoma Screening 2008 Kugler The Hague 31 48 Consensus Series 5
5. G. Mowatt, J.M. Burr, J.A. Cook OAG Screening Project Screening tests for detecting open-angle glaucoma: systematic review and meta-analysis Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49 2008 5373 5385
6. D.F. Garway-Heath, and R.A. Hitchings Quantitative evaluation of the optic nerve head in early glaucoma Br J Ophthalmol 82 1998 352 361
7. J. Caprioli, and J.M. Miller Optic disc rim area is related to disc size in normal subjects Arch Ophthalmol 105 1987 1683 1685
8. J.B. Jonas, G.C. Gusek, I. Guggenmoos-Holzmann, and G.O. Naumann Correlations of the neuroretinal rim area with ocular and general parameters in normal eyes Ophthalmic Res 20 1988 298 303
9. G. Wollstein, D.F. Garway Heath, and R.A. Hitchings Identification of early glaucoma cases with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope Ophthalmology 105 1998 1557 1563
10. G. Wollstein, D.F. Garway-Heath, L. Fontana, and R.A. Hitchings Identifying early glaucomatous changes: comparison between expert clinical assessment of optic disc photographs and confocal scanning ophthalmoscopy Ophthalmology 107 2000 2272 2277
11. S. Miglior, M. Guareschi, and E. Albe' Detection of glaucomatous visual field changes using the Moorfields regression analysis of the Heidelberg retina tomograph Am J Ophthalmol 136 2003 26 33
12. B.A. Ford, P.H. Artes, and T.A. McCormick Comparison of data analysis tools for detection of glaucoma with the Heidelberg retina tomograph Ophthalmology 110 2003 1145 1150
13. S. Ohkubo, H. Takeda, and T. Higashide A pilot study to detect glaucoma with confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy compared with nonmydriatic stereoscopic photography in a community health screening J Glaucoma 16 2007 531 538
14. P.J. Harasymowycz, D.G. Papamatheakis, and A.K. Fansi Validity of screening for glaucomatous optic nerve damage using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II) in high-risk populations: a pilot study Ophthalmology 112 2005 2164 2171
15. M.J. Hawker, S.A. Vernon, and G. Ainsworth Specificity of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph's diagnostic algorithms in a normal elderly population: the Bridlington Eye Assessment Project Ophthalmology 113 2006 778 785
16. P.R. Healey, P. Mitchell, W. Smith, and J.J. Wang Relationship between cup-disc ratio and optic disc diameter: the Blue Mountains Eye Study Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 25 suppl 1997 S99 S101
17. A. Elschnig Das Colobom am Sehnerveneintritte und der Conus nach unten Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 51 1900 391 430
18. F.E. Fantes, and D.R. Anderson Clinical histologic correlation of human peripapillary anatomy Ophthalmology 96 1989 205
19. J.B. Jonas, X.N. Nguyen, G.C. Gusek, and G.O. Naumann Parapapillary chorioretinal atrophy in normal and glaucoma eyes I. Morphometric data Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 30 1989 908 918
20. B. Bengtsson, and C.E. Krakau Correction of optic disc measurements on fundus photographs Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 230 1992 24 28
21. Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II Operating Instructions Software Version 1.6.387 2002 Heidelberg Engineering Dossenheim, Germany 33
22. P.R. Healey, and P. Mitchell Optic disk size in open-angle glaucoma: the Blue Mountains Eye Study Am J Ophthalmol 128 1999 515 517
23. S.A. Vernon, M.J. Hawker, and G. Ainsworth Laser scanning tomography of the optic nerve head in a normal elderly population: the Bridlington Eye Assessment Project Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46 2005 2823 2828
24. A. Coops, D.B. Henson, A.J. Kwartz, and P.H. Artes Automated analysis of Heidelberg retina tomograph optic disc images by glaucoma probability score Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47 2006 5348 5355
25. M.J. Hawker, S.A. Vernon, C.L. Tattersall, and H.S. Dua Linear regression modeling of rim area to discriminate between normal and glaucomatous optic nerve heads: the Bridlington Eye Assessment Project J Glaucoma 16 2007 345 351
26. B.C. Chauhan, R.P. LeBlanc, T.A. McCormick, and J.B. Rogers Test-retest variability of topographic measurements with confocal scanning laser tomography in patients with glaucoma and control subjects Am J Ophthalmol 118 1994 9 15
27. J.G. Lijmer, B.W. Mol, and S. Heisterkamp Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests JAMA 282 1999 1061 1066