Mapping standard automated perimetry to the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer in glaucoma

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 49, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 3018-3025

  Ferreras, Antonio ^a   Pablo, Luís E ^a   Garway Heath, David F ^b,c   Fogagnolo, Paolo ^c   García Feijoo, Julián ^d  

^a HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO MIGUEL SERVET   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c IRCCS FONDAZIONE BIETTI   (Italy)

^d HOSPITAL CLÍNICO SAN CARLOS   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NERVE FIBER; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; OPTIC NERVE DISEASE; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; PERIMETRY; PIGMENT GLAUCOMA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSEUDOEXFOLIATIVE GLAUCOMA; RETINA NERVE CELL; STANDARD; VALIDITY; VISION; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL THRESHOLD; DIFFERENTIAL THRESHOLD; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; MIDDLE AGED; OPTIC DISK; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; RETINA;

ADULT; AGED; AUTOMATION; DIFFERENTIAL THRESHOLD; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE FIBERS; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; PERIMETRY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RETINA; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 48249115940     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.08-1775     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. American Academy of Ophthalmology Glaucoma Panel. Preferred Practice Pattern: Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma. San Francisco: American Academy of Ophthalmology; 2005:3.
2. Quigley HA. Neuronal death in glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res. 1999;18:39-57. (Pubitemid 28457038)
3. Kass MA, Heuer DK, Higginbotham EJ, et al. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: a randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:701- 713, discussion 829-830 (Pubitemid 34620348)
4. European Glaucoma Prevention Study (EGPS) Group. Results of the European Glaucoma Prevention Study. Ophthalmology 2005; 112:366-375. (Pubitemid 40312486)
5. Hood DC, Kardon RH. A framework for comparing structural and functional measures of glaucomatous damage. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2007;26:688-710. (Pubitemid 47615565)
6. Shah NN, Bowd C, Medeiros FA, et al. Combining structural and functional testing for detection of glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:1593-1602. (Pubitemid 44292333)
7. Garway-Heath DF, Friedman DS. How should results from clinical tests be integrated into the diagnostic process? Ophthalmology. 2006;113:1479-1480. (Pubitemid 44292330)
8. Bengtsson B, Olsson J, Heijl A, Rootzen H. A new generation of algorithms for computerized threshold perimetry, SITA. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1997;75:368-375. (Pubitemid 27470462)
9. Bengtsson B, Heijl A. Evaluation of a new perimetric threshold strategy, SITA, in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1998;76:268-272. (Pubitemid 28327578)
10. Schuman JS, Pedut-Kloizman T, Hertzmark E, et al. Reproducibility of nerve fiber layer thickness measurements using optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 1996;103:1889-1898. (Pubitemid 26403745)
11. Lin SC, Singh K, Jampel HD, et al. Optic nerve head and retinal nerve fiber layer analysis: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:1937-1949. (Pubitemid 47483942)
12. Blumenthal EZ, Williams JM, Weinreb RN, Girkin CA, Berry CC, Zangwill LM. Reproducibility of nerve fiber layer thickness measurements by use of optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:2278-2282.
13. Carpineto P, Ciancaglini M, Zuppardi E, Falconio G, Doronzo E, Mastropasqua L. Reliability of nerve fiber layer thickness measurements using optical coherence tomography in normal and glaucomatous eyes. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:190-195. (Pubitemid 36068744)
14. Budenz DL, Chang RT, Huang X, Knighton RW, Tielsch JM. Reproducibility of retinal nerve fiber thickness measurements using the stratus OCT in normal and glaucomatous eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:2440-2443. (Pubitemid 43119491)
15. Pueyo V, Polo V, Larrosa JM, Mayoral F, Ferreras A, Honrubia FM. Reproducibility of optic nerve head and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements using optical coherence tomography (in Spanish). Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2006;81:205-211.
16. Budenz DL, Fredette MJ, Feuer WJ, Anderson DR. Reproducibility of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber thickness measurements with Stratus OCT in glaucomatous eyes. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(4): 661-666.
17. Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, et al. Comparison of the GDx VCC scanning laser polarimeter, HRT II confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope, and StratusOCT optical coherence tomograph for the detection of glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:827-837. (Pubitemid 38736241)
18. Nouri-Mahdavi K, Hoffman D, Tannenbaum DP, et al. Identifying early glaucoma with optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;137:228-235. (Pubitemid 38220993)
19. Budenz DL, Michael A, Chang RT, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of the Stratus OCT for perimetric glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:3-9. (Pubitemid 40075311)
20. Jeoung JW, Park KH, Kim TW, et al. Diagnostic ability of optical coherence tomography with a normative database to detect localized retinal nerve fiber layer defects. Ophthalmology. 2005;112: 2157-2163. (Pubitemid 41720995)
21. Sihota R, Sony P, Gupta V, et al. Diagnostic capability of optical coherence tomography in evaluating the degree of glaucomatous retinal nerve fiber damage. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47: 2006-2010. (Pubitemid 46768282)
22. Ferreras A, Polo V, Larrosa JM, et al. Can frequency-doubling technology and short-wavelength automated perimetries detect visual field defects before standard automated perimetry in patients with pre-perimetric glaucoma? J Glaucoma. 2007;16:372-383. (Pubitemid 46945534)
23. Ferreras A, Pablo LE, Pajarín AB, Larrosa JM, Polo V, Honrubia FM. Logistic regression analysis for early glaucoma diagnosis using optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(4): 465-470. (Pubitemid 351549836)
24. Wirtschafter JD, Becker WL, Howe JB, Younge BR. Glaucoma visual field analysis by computed profile of nerve fiber function in optic disc sectors. Ophthalmology. 1982;89:255-267.
25. Weber J, Dannheim F, Dannheim D. The topographical relationship between optic disc and visual field in glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1990;68:568-574. (Pubitemid 20373803)
26. Yamagishi N, Anton A, Sample PA, Zangwill L, Lopez A, Weinreb RN. Mapping structural damage of the optic disk to visual field defect in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997;123:667-676. (Pubitemid 27203287)
27. Anton A, Yamagishi N, Zangwill L, Sample PA, Weinreb RN. Mapping structural to functional damage in glaucoma with standard automated perimetry and confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;125:436-446. (Pubitemid 28236910)
28. Garway-Heath DF, Poinoosawmy D, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA. Mapping the visual field to the optic disc in normal tension glaucoma eyes. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:1809-1815. (Pubitemid 30769619)
29. Gardiner SK, Johnson CA, Cioffi GA. Evaluation of the structure- function relationship in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:3712-3717. (Pubitemid 44264676)
30. Huang D, Swanson EA, Lin CP, et al. Optical coherence tomography. Science. 1991;254:1178-1181. (Pubitemid 21917444)
31. Stratus OCT Model 3000 User Manual. Dublin, CA: Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc; 2003.
32. Bressler NM, Ahmed IIK, Nguyen QD, Shah M, Do DV, Hwang T. About OCT. In: Haley MJ, eds. The Stratus OCT Primer. Essential OCT. Dublin, Ca: Carl Zeiss Meditec; 2006:1-6.
33. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE, Tatham RL. Multivariate Data Analysis. 6th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2005.
34. Chylack LT Jr, Wolfe JK, Singer DM, et al. Longitudinal Study of Cataract Study Group The Lens Opacities Classification System III. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111:831-836.
35. Tuulonen A, Airaksinen PJ. Initial glaucomatous optic disk and retinal nerve fiber layer abnormalities and their progression. Am J Ophthalmol. 1991;111:485-490.
36. Heijl A, Lindgren A, Lindgren G. Test-retest variability in glaucomatous visual fields. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989;108:130-135. (Pubitemid 19197944)
37. Chauhan BC, Johnson CA. Test-retest variability of frequency-doubling perimetry and conventional perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40: 648-656. (Pubitemid 29109443)
38. PA 765: Quantitative methods in public administration. Factor analysis. Available at: http://www2.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/pa765/ factor.htm. Accessed December 8, 2007.
39. Exploratory factor analysis. Available at: http://www.unc.edu/ ~rcm/book/factornew.htm. Accessed December 8, 2007.
40. Heijl A, Patella VM. Essential Perimetry: The Field Analyzer Primer. 3rd ed. Dublin, CA: Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc; 2002.
41. Hodapp E, Parrish RK II, Anderson DR. Clinical Decisions in Glaucoma. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 1993:52-61.
42. Radius RL, Anderson DR. The course of axons through the retina and optic nerve head. Arch Ophthalmol. 1979;97:1154-1158. (Pubitemid 9187852)
43. Minckler DS. The organization of nerve fiber bundles in the primate optic nerve head. Arch Ophthalmol. 1980;98:1630-1636. (Pubitemid 10001114)
44. Ogden TE. Nerve fiber layer of the macaque retina: retinotopic organization. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1983;24:85-98. (Pubitemid 13187239)
45. Fitzgibbon T, Taylor SF. Retinotopy of the human retinal nerve fibre layer and optic nerve head. J Comp Neurol. 1996;375:238-251. (Pubitemid 26378134)
46. Fitzgibbon T. The human fetal retinal nerve fiber layer and optic nerve head: a DiI and DiA tracing study. Vis Neurosci. 1997;14: 433-447. (Pubitemid 27415977)
47. Harwerth RS, Vilupuru AS, Rangaswamy NV, Smith EL 3rd. The relationship between nerve fiber layer and perimetry measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:763-773. (Pubitemid 351260711)
48. Hood DC, Anderson SC, Wall M, Kardon RH. Structure versus function in glaucoma: an application of a linear model. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:3662-3668. (Pubitemid 351261102)
49. Zangwill LM, Williams J, Berry CC, Knauer S, Weinreb RN. Comparison of optical coherence tomography and retinal nerve fiber layer photography for detection of nerve fiber layer damage in glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:1309-1315. (Pubitemid 30828496)
50. El Beltagi TA, Bowd C, Boden C, et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured with optical coherence tomography is related to visual function in glaucomatous eyes. Ophthalmology. 2003; 110:2185-2191. (Pubitemid 37337857)
51. Kanamori A, Nakamura M, Escano MF, Seya R, Maeda H, Negi A. Evaluation of the glaucomatous damage on retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135:513-520. (Pubitemid 36315963)
52. Leung CK, Yung WH, Ng AC, Woo J, Tsang MK, Tse KK. Evaluation of scanning resolution on retinal nerve fiber layer measurement using optical coherence tomography in normal and glaucomatous eyes. J Glaucoma. 2004;13:479-485. (Pubitemid 39546342)
53. Strouthidis NG, Vinciotti V, Tucker AJ, Gardiner SK, Crabb DP, Garway-Heath DF. Structure and function in glaucoma: The relationship between a functional visual field map and an anatomic retinal map. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:5356-5362. (Pubitemid 46723785)
54. Garway-Heath D, Hitchings RA. Sources of bias in studies of optic disc and retinal nerve fiber layer morphology. Br J Ophthalmol. 1998;82:984-986. (Pubitemid 28451266)
55. Quigley HA, Dunkelberger GR, Green WR. Retinal ganglion cell atrophy correlated with automated perimetry in human eyes with glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989;107:453-464. (Pubitemid 19136617)
56. Kerrigan-Baumrind LA, Quigley HA, Pease ME, et al. Number of ganglion cells in glaucoma eyes compared with threshold visual field tests in the same persons. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000; 41:741-748. (Pubitemid 30158884)
57. Harwerth RS, Carter-Dawson L, Smith EL III, et al. Neural losses correlated with visual losses in clinical perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:3152-3160. (Pubitemid 39121849)
58. Harwerth RS, Quigley HA. Visual field defects and retinal ganglion cell losses in patients with glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006;124: 853-859. (Pubitemid 43877679)
59. Jonas JB, Gusek GC, Naumann GO. Optic disc morphometry in chronic primary open-angle glaucoma. I. Morphometric intrapapillary characteristics. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1988; 226:522-530. (Pubitemid 18271425)
60. Ferreras A, Pablo LE, Pajarín AB, Larrosa JM, Polo V, Pueyo V. Diagnostic ability of the Heidelberg retina tomograph 3 for glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145(2):354-359.
61. Ojima T, Tanabe T, Hangai M, Yu S, Morishita S, Yoshimura N. Measurement of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and macular volume for glaucoma detection using optical coherence tomography. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2007;51:197-203. (Pubitemid 46889497)
62. Uchida H, Brigatti L, Caprioli J. Detection of structural damage from glaucoma with confocal laser image analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996;37:2393-2401. (Pubitemid 26391277)
63. Balazsi AG, Drance SM, Schulzer M, Douglas GR. Neuroretinal rim area in suspected glaucoma and early chronic open-angle glaucoma: correlation with parameters of visual function. Arch Ophthalmol. 1984;102:1011-1014. (Pubitemid 14083480)
64. Jonas JB, Budde WM, Lang P. Neuroretinal rim width ratios in morphological glaucoma diagnosis. Br J Ophthalmol. 1998;82: 1366-1371. (Pubitemid 28556519)
65. Delis DC, Jacobson M, Bondi MW, Hamilton JM, Salmon DP. The myth of testing construct validity using factor analysis or correlations with normal or mixed clinical populations: lessons from memory assessment. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2003;9:936-946. (Pubitemid 37139021)
66. Larrabee GJ. Lessons on measuring construct validity: a commentary on Delis, Jacobson, Bondi, Hamilton, and Salmon. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2003;9:947-953. (Pubitemid 37139022)