Effect of disease severity and optic disc size on diagnostic accuracy of rtvue spectral domain optical coherence tomograph in glaucoma

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 52, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 1290-1296

  Rao, Harsha L ^a,b   Leite, Mauro T ^a,c   Weinreb, Robert N ^a   Zangwill, Linda M ^a   Alencar, Luciana M ^a,d   Sample, Pamela A ^a   Medeiros, Felipe A ^a,c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b L V PRASAD EYE INSTITUTE   (India)

^c FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OPTIC DISK; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RETINA; RETINA GANGLION CELL; RETINA MACULA LUTEA; RETINAL NERVE FIBER LAYER; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPECTRAL DOMAIN OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; THICKNESS;

AGED; AREA UNDER CURVE; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE FIBERS; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETINAL GANGLION CELLS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE; TONOMETRY, OCULAR;

EID: 79955941049     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.10-5546     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Iester M, Mikelberg FS, Drance SM. The effect of optic disc size on diagnostic precision with the Heidelberg retina tomograph. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:545-548.
2. Bathija R, Zangwill L, Berry CC, Sample PA, Weinreb RN. Detection of early glaucomatous structural damage with confocal scanning laser tomography. J Glaucoma. 1998;7:121-127.
3. Mardin CY, Horn FK. Influence of optic disc size on the sensitivity of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1998;236:641-645.
4. Wollstein G, Garway-Heath DF, Hitchings RA. Identification of early glaucoma cases with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:1557-1563.
5. Ford BA, Artes PH, McCormick TA, Nicolela MT, LeBlanc RP, Chauhan BC. Comparison of data analysis tools for detection of glaucoma with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:1145-1150.
6. Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Sample PA, Weinreb RN. Influence of disease severity and optic disc size on the diagnostic performance of imaging instruments in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:1008-1015.
7. Zangwill LM, Jain S, Racette L, et al. The effect of disc size and severity of disease on the diagnostic accuracy of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph Glaucoma Probability Score. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:2653-2660.
8. Hoesl LM, Mardin CY, Horn FK, Juenemann AG, Laemmer R. Influence of glaucomatous damage and optic disc size on glaucoma detection by scanning laser tomography. J Glaucoma. 2009;18: 385-389.
9. Nassif N, Cense B, Park B, et al. In vivo high-resolution video-rate spectral-domain optical coherence tomography of the human retina and optic nerve. Opt Express. 2004;12:367-376.
10. Wojtkowski M, Srinivasan V, Ko T, Fujimoto J, Kowalczyk A, Duker J. Ultrahigh-resolution, high-speed, Fourier domain optical coherence tomography and methods for dispersion compensation. Opt Express. 2004;12:2404-2422.
11. Leung CK, Cheung CY, Weinreb RN, et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer imaging with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: a variability and diagnostic performance study. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:1257-1263.
12. Sehi M, Grewal DS, Sheets CW, Greenfield DS. Diagnostic ability of Fourier-domain vs time-domain optical coherence tomography for glaucoma detection. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;148:597-605.
13. Rao HL, Zangwill LM, Weinreb RN, et al. Comparison of different spectral domain optical coherence tomography scanning areas for glaucoma diagnosis. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:1692-1699.e1.
14. Bengtsson B, Heijl A. A visual field index for calculation of glaucoma rate of progression. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145:343-353.
15. Zangwill LM, Medeiros FA, Bowd C, Weinreb RN. Optic nerve imaging devices: recent advances. In: Grehn F, Stampher R, eds. Essentials in Ophthalmology: Glaucoma. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 2004:63-91.
16. Zangwill LM, Weinreb RN, Berry CC, et al. The confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy ancillary study to the ocular hypertension treatment study: study design and baseline factors. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;137:219-227.
17. Medeiros FA, Sample PA, Zangwill LM, Liebmann JM, Girkin CA, Weinreb RN. A statistical approach to the evaluation of covariate effects on the receiver operating characteristic curves of diagnostic tests in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:2520-2527.
18. Pepe MS. A regression modelling framework for receiver operating characteristic curves in medical diagnostic testing. Biometrika. 1997;84:595-608.
19. Pepe MS. Three approaches to regression analysis of receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous test results. Biometrics. 1998;54:124-135.
20. Pepe MS. An interpretation for the ROC curve and inference using GLM procedures. Biometrics. 2000;56:352-359.
21. Alonzo TA, Pepe MS. Distribution-free ROC analysis using binary regression techniques. Biostatistics. 2002;3:421-432.
22. Janes H, Pepe MS. Adjusting for covariates in studies of diagnostic, screening, or prognostic markers: an old concept in a new setting. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;168:89-97.
23. Costa VP, Lauande-Pimentel R, Fonseca RA, Magacho L. The influence of age, sex, race, refractive error and optic disc parameters on the sensitivity and specificity of scanning laser polarimetry. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2004;82:419-425.
24. Girkin CA, McGwin G Jr, Long C, DeLeon-Ortega J, Graf CM, Everett AW. Subjective and objective optic nerve assessment in African Americans and whites. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004; 45:2272-2278.
25. Zelefsky JR, Harizman N, Mora R, et al. Assessment of a racespecific normative HRT-III database to differentiate glaucomatous from normal eyes. J Glaucoma. 2006;15:548-551.
26. De Leon-Ortega JE, Sakata LM, Monheit BE, McGwin G Jr, Arthur SN, Girkin CA. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 to discriminate glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;144:525-532.
27. Zhou X-H, Obuchowski NA, McClish DK. Analysis of correlated ROC data. In: Zhou X-H, Obuchowski NA, McClish DK, eds. Statistical Methods in Diagnostic Medicine. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2002:274-306.
28. Glynn RJ, Rosner B. Accounting for the correlation between fellow eyes in regression analysis. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110:381-387.
29. Coops A, Henson DB, Kwartz AJ, Artes PH. Automated Analysis of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph Optic Disc Images by Glaucoma Probability Score. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:5348-5355.
30. Medeiros FA, Bowd C, Zangwill LM, Patel C, Weinreb RN. Detection of glaucoma using scanning laser polarimetry with enhanced corneal compensation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:3146-3153.
31. Hodapp E, Parrish RK, Anderson DR. Clinical Decisions in Glaucoma. St. Louis: Mosby; 1993:53.
32. Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study. 2. Visual field test scoring and reliability. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:1445-1455.
33. Medeiros FA, Vizzeri G, Zangwill LM, Alencar LM, Sample PA, Weinreb RN. Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer and optic disc imaging for diagnosing glaucoma in patients suspected of having the disease. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:1340-1346.
34. Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Vessani RM, Susanna R Jr, Weinreb RN. Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer, optic nerve head, and macular thickness measurements for glaucoma detection using optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;139:44-55.
35. Wollstein G, Ishikawa H, Wang J, Beaton SA, Schuman JS. Comparison of three optical coherence tomography scanning areas for detection of glaucomatous damage. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;139: 39-43.
36. Medeiros FA, Ng D, Zangwill LM, Sample PA, Bowd C, Weinreb RN. The effects of study design and spectrum bias on the evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:214-222.
37. Lijmer JG, Mol BW, Heisterkamp S, et al. Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests. JAMA. 1999;282: 1061-1066.