A prospective, randomized comparison of 3 contemporary bioprosthetic aortic valves: Should hemodynamic performance influence device selection?

Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Volumn 144, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1387-1398

  Suri, Rakesh M ^a   Michelena, Hector I ^a   Burkhart, Harold M ^a   Greason, Kevin L ^a   Daly, Richard C ^a   Dearani, Joseph A ^a   Park, Soon J ^a   Joyce, Lyle D ^a   Stulak, John M ^a   Sundt III, Thoralf M ^b   Li, Zhuo ^a   Schaff, Hartzell V ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AORTA VALVE PROSTHESIS; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; AORTA VALVE STENOSIS; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; EDWARDS MAGNA BIOPROSTHESIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEART HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SORIN MITROFLOW BIOPROSTHESIS; ST JUDE EPIC BIOPROSTHESIS;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; BIOPROSTHESIS; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; FEMALE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; MALE; MINNESOTA; PATIENT SELECTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84869036701     PISSN: 00225223     EISSN: 1097685X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.07.105     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. M.A. Borger, A.F. Nette, M. Maganti, and C.M. Feindel Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna valve versus Medtronic Hancock II: a matched hemodynamic comparison Ann Thorac Surg 83 2007 2054 2058
2. F. Botzenhardt, W.B. Eichinger, R. Guenzinger, S. Bleiziffer, I. Wagner, and R. Bauernschmitt Hemodynamic performance and incidence of patient-prosthesis mismatch of the complete supraannular Perimount Magna bioprosthesis in the aortic position Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 53 2005 226 230
3. M.J. Dalmau, J.M. González-Santos, J.A. Blázquez, J.A. Sastre, J. López-Rodríguez, and M. Bueno Hemodynamic performance of the Medtronic Mosaic and Perimount Magna aortic bioprostheses: five-year results of a prospectively randomized study Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 39 2011 844 852
4. A. Goetzenich, G. Langebartels, S. Christiansen, N. Hatam, R. Autschbach, and G. Dohmen Comparison of the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount and St. Jude Medical Epic bioprostheses for aortic valve replacement: a retrospective echocardiographic short-term study J Cardiac Surg 24 2009 260 264
5. W.R. Jamieson, W.R. Forgie, R.I. Hayden, Y. Langlois, H. Ling, and E.A. Stanford Hemodynamic performance of mitroflow aortic pericardial bioprosthesis: optimizing management for the small aortic annulus Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 58 2010 69 75
6. W.R. Jamieson, C.T. Lewis, M.P. Sakwa, D.A. Cooley, V.R. Kshettry, and K.W. Jones St Jude Medical Epic porcine bioprosthesis: results of the regulatory evaluation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 141 2011 1449 1454
7. W.R.E. Jamieson, R. Koerfer, C.A. Yankah, A. Zittermann, R.I. Hayden, and H. Ling Mitroflow aortic pericardial bioprosthesis: clinical performance Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 36 2009 818 824
8. A. Maitland, G.M. Hirsch, and E.A. Pascoe Hemodynamic performance of the St. Jude Medical Epic supra aortic stented valve J Heart Valve Dis 20 2011 327 331
9. S.M. Said, E. Ashikhmina, K.L. Greason, R.M. Suri, S.J. Park, and R.C. Daly Do pericardial bioprostheses improve outcome of elderly patients undergoing aortic valve replacement? Ann Thorac Surg 93 2012 1868 1874 discussion, 1874-5
10. M.A. Quinones, A.D. Waggoner, L.A. Reduto, J.G. Nelson, J.B. Young, and W.L. Winters Jr. A new, simplified and accurate method for determining ejection fraction with two-dimensional echocardiography Circulation 64 1981 744 753
11. S. Rich, A. Sheikh, J. Gallastegui, G.T. Kondos, T. Mason, and W. Lam Determination of left ventricular ejection fraction by visual estimation during real-time two-dimensional echocardiography Am Heart J 104 1982 603 606
12. M.A. Quinones, C.M. Otto, M. Stoddard, A. Waggoner, and W.A. Zoghbi Recommendations for quantification of Doppler echocardiography: a report from the Doppler Quantification Task Force of the Nomenclature and Standards Committee of the American Society of Echocardiography J Am Soc Echocardiogr 15 2002 167 184
13. H. Baumgartner, J. Hung, J. Bermejo, J.B. Chambers, A. Evangelista, and B.P. Griffin Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice Eur J Echocardiogr 10 2009 1 25
14. W.A. Zoghbi, M. Enriquez-Sarano, E. Foster, P.A. Grayburn, C.D. Kraft, and R.A. Levine Recommendations for evaluation of the severity of native valvular regurgitation with two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography J Am Soc Echocardiogr 16 2003 777 802
15. J. Bermejo, R. Odreman, J. Feijoo, M.M. Moreno, P. Gomez-Moreno, and M.A. Garcia-Fernandez Clinical efficacy of Doppler-echocardiographic indices of aortic valve stenosis: a comparative test-based analysis of outcome J Am Coll Cardiol 41 2003 142 151
16. N.J. Howell, B.E. Keogh, D. Ray, R.S. Bonser, T.R. Graham, and J. Mascaro Patient-prosthesis mismatch in patients with aortic stenosis undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement does not affect survival Ann Thorac Surg 89 2010 60 64
17. S.H. Rahimtoola Valve prosthesis-patient mismatch: an update J Heart Valve Dis 7 1998 207 210
18. S.H. Rahimtoola Is severe valve prosthesis-patient mismatch (VP-PM) associated with a higher mortality? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 30 2006 1
19. S.H. Rahimtoola Choice of prosthetic heart valve in adults: an update J Am Coll Cardiol 55 2010 2413 2426
20. D.J. Ruzicka, I. Hettich, A. Hutter, S. Bleiziffer, C.C. Badiu, and R. Bauernschmitt The complete supraannular concept in vivo hemodynamics of bovine and porcine aortic bioprostheses Circulation 120 2009 S139 S145
21. W.A. Zoghbi, J.B. Chambers, J.G. Dumesnil, E. Foster, J.S. Gottdiener, and P.A. Grayburn Recommendations for evaluation of prosthetic valves with echocardiography and doppler ultrasound: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Task Force on Prosthetic Valves, developed in conjunction with the American College of Cardiology Cardiovascular Imaging Committee, Cardiac Imaging Committee of the American Heart Association, the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, the Japanese Society of Echocardiography and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography, endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation, American Heart Association, European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, the Japanese Society of Echocardiography, and Canadian Society of Echocardiography J Am Soc Echocardiogr 22 2009 975 1014 Quiz. 82-4
22. R. Seitelberger, J. Bialy, R. Gottardi, G. Seebacher, R. Moidl, and M. Mittelböck Relation between size of prosthesis and valve gradient: comparison of two aortic bioprosthesis Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 25 2004 358 363
23. P. Pibarot, G.N. Honos, L.G. Durand, and J.G. Dumesnil Substitution of left ventricular outflow tract diameter with prosthesis size is inadequate for calculation of the aortic prosthetic valve area by the continuity equation J Am Soc Echocardiogr 8 1995 511 517
24. I.M. Wagner, W.B. Eichinger, S. Bleiziffer, F. Botzenhardt, I. Gebauer, and R. Guenzinger Influence of completely supra-annular placement of bioprostheses on exercise hemodynamics in patients with a small aortic annulus J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 133 2007 1234 1241
25. C. Blais, J.G. Dumesnil, R. Baillot, S. Simard, D. Doyle, and P. Pibarot Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on short-term mortality after aortic valve replacement Circulation 108 2003 983 988
26. D. Mohty, J.G. Dumesnil, N. Echahidi, P. Mathieu, F. Dagenais, and P. Voisine Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival after aortic valve replacement: influence of age, obesity, and left ventricular dysfunction J Am Coll Cardiol 53 2009 39 47
27. D. Mohty-Echahidi, J.F. Malouf, S.E. Girard, H.V. Schaff, D.E. Grill, and M.E. Enriquez-Sarano Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival in patients with small St Jude medical mechanical prostheses in the aortic position Circulation 113 2006 420 426
28. G. Tasca, F. Brunelli, M. Cirillo, M. Dallatomba, Z. Mhagna, and G. Troise Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on left ventricular mass regression following aortic valve replacement Ann Thorac Surg 79 2005 505 510
29. G. Tasca, Z. Mhagna, S. Perotti, P.B. Centurini, T. Sabatini, and A. Amaducci Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on cardiac events and midterm mortality after aortic valve replacement in patients with pure aortic stenosis Circulation 113 2006 570 576
30. T. Walther, A. Rastan, V. Falk, S. Lehmann, J. Garbade, and A.K. Funkat Patient prosthesis mismatch affects short- and long-term outcomes after aortic valve replacement Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 30 2006 15 19
31. E.H. Blackstone, D.M. Cosgrove, W.R.E. Jamieson, N.J. Birkmeyer, J.H. Lemmer Jr., and D.C. Miller Prosthesis size and long-term survival after aortic valve replacement J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 126 2003 783 796
32. D.A. Cotoni, R.T. Palac, L.J. Dacey, and D.J. O'Rourke Defining patient-prosthesis mismatch and its effect on survival in patients with impaired ejection fraction Ann Thorac Surg 91 2011 692 699
33. W. Flameng, B. Meuris, P. Herijgers, and M.C. Herregods Prosthesis-patient mismatch is not clinically relevant in aortic valve replacement using the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount valve Ann Thorac Surg 82 2006 530 536
34. N.J. Howell, B.E. Keogh, V. Barnet, R.S. Bonser, T.R. Graham, and S.J. Rooney Patient-prosthesis mismatch does not affect survival following aortic valve replacement Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 30 2006 10 14
35. J.L. Monin, M. Monchi, M.E.W. Kirsch, H. Petit-Eisenmann, S. Baleynaud, and C. Chauvel Low-gradient aortic stenosis: impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on survival Eur Heart J 28 2007 2620 2626
36. N. Hanayama, G.T. Christakis, H.R. Mallidi, C.D. Joyner, S.E. Fremes, and C.D. Morgan Patient-prosthesis mismatch is rare after aortic valve replacement: valve size may be irrelevant Ann Thorac Surg 73 2002 1822 1829
37. H.M. Connolly, J.K. Oh, H.V. Schaff, V.L. Roger, S.L. Osborn, and D.O. Hodge Severe aortic stenosis with low transvalvular gradient and severe left ventricular dysfunction: result of aortic valve replacement in 52 patients Circulation 101 2000 1940 1946
38. S. Urso, R. Sadaba, and G. Aldamiz-Echevarria Is patient-prosthesis mismatch an independent risk factor for early and mid-term overall mortality in adult patients undergoing aortic valve replacement? Int Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 9 2009 510 518
39. T.E. David, S. Armstrong, and M. Maganti Hancock II bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement: the gold standard of bioprosthetic valves durability? Ann Thorac Surg 90 2010 775 781
40. W.R. Jamieson, M.T. Janusz, J. MacNab, and C. Henderson Hemodynamic comparison of second- and third-generation stented bioprostheses in aortic valve replacement Ann Thorac Surg 71 2001 S282 S284
41. R.M. Suri, K.J. Zehr, T.M. Sundt III, J.A. Dearani, R.C. Daly, and J.K. Oh Left ventricular mass regression after porcine versus bovine aortic valve replacement: a randomized comparison Ann Thorac Surg 88 2009 1232 1237
42. G. Gerosa, V. Tarzia, G. Rizzoli, and T. Bottio Small aortic annulus: the hydrodynamic performances of 5 commercially available tissue valves J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 131 2006 1058 1064
43. T. Bottio, V. Tarzia, G. Rizzoli, and G. Gerosa The changing spectrum of bioprostheses hydrodynamic performance: considerations on in-vitro tests Int Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 7 2008 750 754