Hemodynamic performance of the St. Jude Medical Epic™ supra aortic stented valve

Journal of Heart Valve Disease

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 327-331

  Maitland, Andrew ^a   Hirsch, Gregory M ^b   Pascoe, Edward A ^c  

^a FOOTHILLS HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b QUEEN ELIZABETH II HEALTH SCIENCES CENTRE   (Canada)

^c ST BONIFACE GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; AORTA CLAMPING; AORTA VALVE PROSTHESIS; AORTA VALVE REGURGITATION; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; CANADA; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; DEVICE SAFETY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPH; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEART HEMODYNAMICS; HEART VALVE BIOPROSTHESIS; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; NEW YORK HEART ASSOCIATION CLASS; PATIENT MONITORING; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRESSURE GRADIENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL APPROACH; AORTA VALVE; BIOPROSTHESIS; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS; BLOOD VESSEL TRANSPLANTATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; ECHOGRAPHY; HEMODYNAMICS; INSTRUMENTATION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROSTHESIS; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VALVULAR HEART DISEASE;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE INSUFFICIENCY; BIOPROSTHESIS; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; CANADA; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEMALE; HEART VALVE DISEASES; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; MALE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79961231311     PISSN: 09668519     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Vahanian A, Baumgartner H, Bax J, et al. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease: The task force on the management of valvular heart disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2007;28:230-268
2. Mykén PS, Bech-Hansen O. A 20-year experience of 1712 patients with the Biocor porcine bioprosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009;137:76-81
3. Eichinger WB, Hettich IM, Ruzicka DJ, et al. Twenty-year experience with the St. Jude Medical Biocor bioprosthesis in the aortic position. Ann Thorac Surg 2008;86:1204-1211
4. Vyavahare NR, Jones PL, Hirsch D, Schoen FJ, Levy RJ. Prevention of glutaraldehyde-fixed bioprosthetic heart valve calcification by alcohol pretreatment: Further mechanistic studies. J Heart Valve Dis 2000;9:561-566
5. Vyavahare N, Hirsch D, Lerner E, et al. Prevention of bioprosthetic heart valve calcification by ethanol preincubation. Efficacy and mechanisms. Circulation 1997;95:479-488
6. Lehmann S, Walther T, Leontjev S, et al. Mid-term results after Epic xenograft implantation for aortic, mitral, and double valve replacement. J Heart Valve Dis 2007;16:641-648
7. Jamieson WR, Lewis C, Sakwa M, et al. St. Jude Medical Epic porcine bioprosthesis: Results of the regulatory evaluation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg (in press)
8. Jamieson E, Ye J, Higgins J, et al. Effect of prosthe-sis- patient mismatch on long-term survival with aortic valve replacement: Assessment to 15 years. Ann Thorac Surg 2010;89:51-59
9. Kunadian B, Vijayalakshmi K, Thornley AR, et al. Meta-analysis of valve hemodynamics and left ventricular mass regression for stentless versus stented aortic valves. Ann Thorac Surg 2007;84:73-79
10. Pepper J, Cheng D, Stanbridge R, et al. Stentless versus stented bioprosthetic aortic valves: A consensus statement of the International Society of Minimally Invasive Cardiothoracic Surgery (ISMICS) 2008. Innovations 2009;4:49-60
11. Bach DS, Sakwa MP, Goldbach M, Petracek MR, Emery RW, Mohr FW. Hemodynamics and early clinical performance of the St. Jude Medical Regent mechanical aortic valve. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;74:2003-2009
12. Sommers KE, David TE. Aortic valve replacement with patch enlargement of the aortic annulus. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63:1608-1612
13. Kulik A, Al-Saigh M, Chan V, et al. Enlargement of the small aortic root during aortic valve replacement: Is there a benefit? Ann Thorac Surg 2008;85:94-101
14. Ruzicka DJ, Hettich I, Hutter A, et al. The complete supraannular concept: In vivo hemodynamics of bovine and porcine aortic bioprostheses. Circulation 2009;120(Suppl.1):S139-S145
15. Yankah CA, Pasic M, Musci M, et al. Aortic valve replacement with the Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis: Durability results up to 21 years. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;136:688-696
16. Borger MA, Ivanov J, Armstrong S, Christie- Hrybinsky D, Feindel CM, David TE. Twenty-year results of the Hancock II bioprosthesis. J Heart Valve Dis 2006;15:49-56
17. Jamieson WR, Burr LH, Miyagishima RT, et al. Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular aortic porcine bioprosthesis: Clinical performance over 20 years. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;130:994-1000
18. Ruzicka D, Eichinger W, Hettich I, Bleiziffer S, Bauernschmitt R, Lange R. Hemodynamic performance of the new St. Jude Medical Epic Supra porcine bioprosthesis in comparison to the Medtronic Mosaic on the basis of patient annulus diameter. J Heart Valve Dis 2008;17:426-434
19. House CM, Nelson WB, Raikar GV, Ahmed I, Dahiya R. How reliable is an effective orifice area indexed chart? J Heart Valve Dis 2009;18:530-534
20. García-Bengochea J, Sierra J, González-Juanatey JR, et al. Left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement with the new Mitroflow 12A pericardial bioprosthesis. J Heart Valve Dis 2006;15:446-452
21. Jamieson WR, Forgie WR, Hayden RI, et al. Hemodynamic performance of Mitroflow aortic pericardial bioprosthesis: Optimizing management for the small aortic annulus. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010;58:69-75
22. Gerosa G, Tarzia V, Rizzoli G, Bottio T. Small aortic annulus: The hydrodynamic performances of 5 commercially available tissue valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;131:1058-1064
23. Dzemali O, Bakhtiary F, Steinseiffer U, et al. Hemodynamic performance of fresh and calcified aortic valve prostheses in critical low stroke volume. J Heart Valve Dis 2008;17:317-324
24. Akins CW, Travis B, Yoganathan AP. Energy loss for evaluating heart valve performance. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;136:820-833
25. Hole T, Otterstad JE, St John Sutton M, Frøland G, Holme I, Skjaerpe T. Differences between echocardiographic measurements of left ventricular dimensions and function by local investigators and a core laboratory in a 2-year follow-up study of patients with an acute myocardial infarction. Eur J Echocardiography 2002;3:263-270
26. Oh JK. Is core laboratory essential for using echocardiography in clinical trials? Controlled vs. random error. Eur J Echocardiogr 2002;3:245-247
27. Douglas PS, DeCara JM, Devereux RB, et al. Echocardiographic imaging in clinical trials: American society of echocardiography standards for echocardiography core laboratories. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2009;22:755-765