Hemodynamic comparison of second- and third-generation stented bioprostheses in aortic valve replacement

Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Volumn 71, Issue 5 SUPPL., 2001, Pages

  Jamieson, W R Eric ^a,b   Janusz, Michael T ^a   MacNab, Joan ^a   Henderson, Charmaine ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b ST PAUL S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFERENCE PAPER; HEART VALVE BIOPROSTHESIS; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STENT; SWINE;

AORTIC VALVE; BIOPROSTHESIS; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEMODYNAMIC PROCESSES; HUMANS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS FITTING; STENTS; SURVIVAL RATE;

EID: 0035014882     PISSN: 00034975     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0003-4975(01)02540-1     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Pibarot P, Honos GN, Durand LG, Dumesnil JG. The effect of prosthesis-patient mismatch on aortic bioprosthetic valve hemodynamic performance and patient clinical status. Can J Cardiol 1996;12:379-87.
2. Cosgrove DM, Lytle BW, Gill CC, et al. In vivo hemodynamic comparison of porcine, and pericardial valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1985;89:358-68.
3. McDonald ML, Daly RC, Schaff HV, et al. Hemodynamic performance of small aortic valve bioprostheses: is there a difference? Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63:362-6.
4. Thomson DJ, Jamieson WRE, Dumesnil JG, et al. Medtronic Mosaic porcine bioprosthesis satisfactory early clinical performance. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:S122-5.
5. Pibarot P, Dumesmil JG, Lemieux M, Cartier P, Métras J, Durand LG. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on hemodynamic and symptomatic status, morbidity and mortality after aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthetic heart valve. J Heart Valve Dis 1998;7:211-8.
6. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG, Jobin J, Cartier P, Honos G, Durand LG. Hemodynamic and physical performance during maximal exercise in patients with an aortic bioprosthetic valve: comparison of stentless versus stented bioprostheses. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;34:1609-17.
7. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG, LeBlanc MH, Cartier P, Métras J. Changes in left ventricular mass and function after aortic valve replacement: a comparison between stentless and stented bioprosthetic valves. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1999;12: 981-7.
8. Dumesnil JG, LeBlanc MH, Cartier PC, et al. Hemodynamic features of the freestyle aortic bioprosthesis compared with stented bioprosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:S130-3.
9. Walther T, Falk V, Autschbach R, et al. Hemodynamic assessment of the stentless Toronto SPV bioprosthesis by echocardiography. J Heart Dis 1994;3:657-65.
10. Del Rizzo DF, Goldman BS, Christakis GT, David TE. Hemodynamic benefits of the Toronto stentless valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;112:1431-45.
11. Del Rizzo DF, Abdoh A. Clinical and hemodynamic comparison of the Medtronic Freestyle and Toronto SPV stentless valves. J Card Surg 1998;13:398-407.
12. Jin XY, Zhang ZM, Gibson DG, Yacoub MH, Pepper JR. Effects of valve substitute on changes in left ventricular function and hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:683-90.
13. Yun KL, Jamieson WRE, Khonsari S, Burr LH, Munro AI, Sintek CF. Prosthesis-patient mismatch: hemodynamic comparison of stented and stentless aortic valves. Semin Thor Cardiovasc Surg 1999;11(4 Suppl 1):98-102.
14. Rao V, Christakis GT, Sever J, et al. A novel comparison of stentless versus stented valves in the small aortic root. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;117:431-6.
15. Del Rizzo DF, Abdoh A, Cartier P, Doty D, Westaby S. Factors affecting left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement with stentless valves. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;11(4 Suppl 1):114-20.
16. David TE, Puschmann R, Ivanov J, et al. Aortic valve replacement with stentless and stented porcine valves: a case-match study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;116:236-41.
17. Del Rizzo DF, Abdoh A, Cartier P, Doty D, Westaby S. The effect of prosthetic valve type on survival after aortic valve surgery. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;11:1-8.
18. Rao V, Jamieson WRE, Ivanov J, Armstrong S, David TE. Patient-prosthesis mismatch affects survival after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 2000:102(Suppl III):III 5-9.