Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch in Patients With Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Isolated Aortic Valve Replacement Does Not Affect Survival

Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Volumn 89, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 60-64

  Howell, Neil J ^a   Keogh, Bruce E ^b   Ray, Daniel ^a   Bonser, Robert S ^a   Graham, Tim R ^a   Mascaro, Jorge ^a   Rooney, Stephen J ^a   Wilson, Ian C ^a   Pagano, Domenico ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS BIRMINGHAM NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON HOSPITALS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AORTA STENOSIS; AORTA VALVE PROSTHESIS; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HISTOINCOMPATIBILITY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURVIVAL;

AGED; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GREAT BRITAIN; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS FITTING; SURVIVAL RATE;

EID: 76549135679     PISSN: 00034975     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.07.037     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Rahimtoola S.H. The problem of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch. Circulation 58 (1978) 20-24
2. Pibarot P., and Dumensil J.G. Haemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention. J Am Coll Card 36 (2000) 1131-1141
3. Blais C., Dumensnil J.G., Baillot R., Simard S., Doyle D., and Pibarot P. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on short term mortality after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 108 (2003) 983-988
4. Bleiziffer S., Eichinger W.B., Hettich I., et al. Prediction of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch prior to aortic valve replacement: which is the best method. Heart 93 (2007) 615-620
5. Pibarot P., and Dumensil J.G. Prosthesis-patient mismatch: definition, clinical impact and prevention. Heart 92 (2006) 1022-1029
6. Pibarot P., Dumensil J.G., Cartier P.C., Metra J., and Lemieux M. Patient prosthesis mismatch can be predicted at the time of operation. Ann Thorac Surg 71 (2001) S265-S268
7. Tasca G., Mhagna Z., and Perotti S. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on short term on cardiac events and mid-term mortality after aortic valve replacement in patients with pure aortic stenosis. Circulation 113 (2006) 570-576
8. Walther T., Rastan A., Falk V., et al. Patient prosthesis mismatch affects short- and long-term outcome after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 108 (2003) 983-988
9. Dumensil J.G., Honos G.N., Lemieux M., and Beauchemin J. Validation and applications of indexed aortic prosthetic valve areas calculated by Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 16 (1990) 637-643
10. Peterson M.D., Borger M., Feindel C.M., and David T. Aortic annular enlargement during aortic valve replacement: improving results with time. Ann Thorac Surg 83 (2007) 2044-2049
11. Tasca G., Brunelli F., Cirillo M., et al. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on left ventricular mass regression following aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 79 (2005) 505-510
12. Castro L.J., Arcidi Jr. J.M., Fisher A.L., and Gaudiani V.A. Routine enlargement of the small aortic root: a preventive strategy to minimize mismatch. Ann Thorac Surg 74 (2002) 31-36
13. Howell N.J., Keogh B.E., Barnet V., et al. Patient-prosthesis mismatch does not affect survival following aortic valve replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 30 (2006) 10-14
14. Nozohoor S., Nilsson J., Luhrs C., Roijer A., and Sjogren J. Influence of prosthesis-patient mismatch on diastolic heart failure after aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 85 (2008) 1310-1318
15. Roscitano A., Benedetto U., Sciangula A., et al. Indexed effective orifice area after mechanical aortic valve replacement does not affect left ventricular mass regression in the elderly. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 29 (2006) 139-143
16. Hanayama N., Christakis G.T., Mallidi H.R., et al. Patient prosthesis mismatch is rare after aortic valve replacement: valve size may be irrelevant. Ann Thoracic Surg 73 (2002) 1822-1829
17. Moon M.R., Pasque M.K., Munfakh N.A., et al. Prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement: impact of age and body size on late survival. Ann Thorac Surg 81 (2006) 481-488
18. Ruel M., Rubens F.D., Master R.G., et al. Late incidence and predictors of persistent or recurrent heart failure in patients with aortic prosthetic valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 127 (2004) 149-159
19. Mohty D., Dumensil J.G., Echahidi N., et al. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival after aortic valve replacement: influence of age, obesity and left ventricular dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol 53 (2009) 39-47
20. Rao V., Jamieson W.R.E., Ivanov J., Armstrong S., and David T.E. Prosthesis-patient mismatch affects survival following aortic valve replacement. Circulation 102 (2003) III-5-III-9
21. Zoghbi W., Enrique-Sarano M., Foster E., et al. Recommendations for evaluation of the severity of native valvular regurgitation with two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 16 (2003) 777-802
22. Pagano D., Freemantle N.J., Bridgewater B., et al. Social deprivation and prognostic benefits of cardiac surgery. BMJ 338 (2009) b902
23. Blackstone E.H., Cosgrove D.M., Jamieson W.R., et al. Prosthesis size and long-term survival after aortic valve replacement. J Thoracic Cardiovasc Surg 126 (2003) 783-793
24. Fuster R.G., Montero Argudo J.A., Albarova O.G., et al. Patient-prosthesis mismatch in aortic valve replacement: really tolerable?. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 27 (2005) 441-449
25. Monin J.L., Monchi M., Kirsch M.E., et al. Low-gradient aortic stenosis: impact of patient prosthesis mismatch on survival. Eur Heart J 28 (2007) 2620-2626
26. Lamb H.J., Beyerbacht H.P., de Roos A., et al. Left ventricular remodelling early after aortic valve replacement: differential effects of diastolic function in aortic valve stenosis and aortic regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol 40 (2002) 2182-2188
27. Cohen G., David T.E., Ivanov J., Armstrong S., and Feindel C. The impact of age, coronary artery disease and cardiac comorbidity on late survival after bioprosthetic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 117 (1999) 273-284
28. Gonzalez-Juanatey J.R., Garcia-Acuna J.M., Fernandez M.V., et al. Influence of the size of the aortic prostheses on hemodynamics and change in left ventricular mass: implications for the surgical management of aortic stenosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 112 (1996) 273-280
29. Levy D., Garrison R.J., Savage D.D., Kannel W.B., and Castelli W.P. Prognostic implications of echocardiographic determined left ventricular mass in the Framingham heart study. N Engl J Med 322 (1990) 1561-1566
30. Garner C., Lecomte E., Viskis S., Abergel S., Lathrop M., and Soubrier F. Genetic and environmental influences on left ventricular mass: a family study. Hypertension 36 (2000) 740-746
31. Verdecchia P., Reboldi G.P., Schillaci G., et al. Circulating insulin and insulin growth factor-1 are independent determinants of left ventricular mass and geometry in essential hypertension. Circulation 100 (1999) 1802-1807
32. Dellegren G., Erikson M.J., Blange I., Brodin L.A., Radegran K., and Sylven C. Angiotensin-converting enzyme gene polymorphism influences degree of left ventricular hypertrophy and its regression following in patients undergoing operation for aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol 84 (1999) 909-913
33. Bleiziffer S., Eichinger W.B., Hettich I., et al. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on exercise capacity in patients after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement. Heart 94 (2007) 637-641