Anthropomorphism and human likeness in the design of robots and human-robot interaction

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 7621 LNAI, Issue , 2012, Pages 199-208

  Fink, Julia ^a  

^a EPFL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

anthropomorphism; design; human robot interaction; literature review; social factors in robotics; social robots

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOMORPHISM; INTERACTIVE ROBOT; LITERATURE REVIEWS; ROBOTICS RESEARCH; SOCIAL FACTOR; SOCIAL ROBOTS;

ANTHROPOMORPHIC ROBOTS; DESIGN; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; MACHINE DESIGN; MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS; ROBOTICS;

HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTION;

EID: 84868704624     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-34103-8_20     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (48)

1. Fong, T., Nourbakhsh, I., Dautenhahn, K.: A survey of socially interactive robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 42, 143-166 (2003)
2. Duffy, B.R.: Anthropomorphism and Robotics. Presented at the Symposium on Animating Expressive Characters of Social Interactions, Imperial College, London (2002)
3. Reeves, B., Nass, C.: The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television, and New Media Like Real People and Places. Cambridge University Press (1996)
4. Oberman, L.M., McCleery, J.P., Ramachandran, V.S., Pineda, J.A.: EEG evidence for mirror neuron activity during the observation of human and robot actions: Toward an analysis of the human qualities of interactive robots. Neurocomputing 70, 2194-2203 (2007)
5. Admoni, H., Scassellati, B.: A Multi-Category Theory of Intention. In: Proceedings of COGSCI 2012, Sapporo, Japan, pp. 1266-1271 (2012)
6. Epley, N., Waytz, A., Cacioppo, J.T.: On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review 114, 864-886 (2007)
7. DiSalvo, C., Gemperle, F.: From seduction to fulfillment: the use of anthropomorphic form in design. In: Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces, pp. 67-72. ACM, New York (2003)
8. DiSalvo, C.F., Gemperle, F., Forlizzi, J., Kiesler, S.: All robots are not created equal: the design and perception of humanoid robot heads. In: Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques, pp. 321-326. ACM, New York (2002)
9. DiSalvo, C.: Imitating the Human Form: Four Kinds of Anthropomorphic Form, http://www.anthropomorphism.org/pdf/Imitating.pdf
10. Mori, M.: The Uncanny Valley (1970)
11. Bartneck, C., Forlizzi, J.: Shaping human-robot interaction: understanding the social aspects of intelligent robotic products. In: CHI 2004 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1731-1732. ACM, New York (2004)
12. Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D.: A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science 46, 186-204 (2000)
13. Duffy, B.R.: Anthropomorphism and the social robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 42, 177-190 (2003)
14. Goetz, J., Kiesler, S.: Cooperation with a robotic assistant. In: CHI 2002 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 578-579. ACM, New York (2002)
15. Eyssel, F., Hegel, F., Horstmann, G., Wagner, C.: Anthropomorphic inferences from emotional nonverbal cues: A case study. In: 2010 IEEE RO-MAN, pp. 646-651. IEEE (2010)
16. Riek, L.D., Rabinowitch, T.-C., Chakrabarti, B., Robinson, P.: How anthropomorphism affects empathy toward robots. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction, pp. 245-246. ACM, New York (2009)
17. Krach, S., Hegel, F., Wrede, B., Sagerer, G., Binkofski, F., Kircher, T.: Can Machines Think? Interaction and Perspective Taking with Robots Investigated via fMRI. PLoS ONE 3, e2597 (2008)
18. Goetz, J., Kiesler, S., Powers, A.: Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation. In: Proceedings of the 12th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, ROMAN 2003, pp. 55-60. IEEE (2003)
19. Bartneck, C., Forlizzi, J.: A design-centred framework for social human-robot interaction. In: 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, ROMAN 2004, pp. 591-594. IEEE (2004)
20. Axelrod, L., Hone, K.: E-motional advantage: performance and satisfaction gains with affective computing. In: CHI 2005 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1192-1195. ACM, New York (2005)
21. Austermann, A., Yamada, S., Funakoshi, K., Nakano, M.: How do users interact with a pet-robot and a humanoid. In: Proceedings of the 28th of the International Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 3727-3732. ACM, New York (2010)
22. Kaplan, F.: Who is afraid of the Humanoid? Investigating cultural differences in the acceptance of robots (2004)
23. Caporael, L.R.: Anthropomorphism and mechanomorphism: Two faces of the human machine. Computers in Human Behavior 2, 215-234 (1986)
24. Bartneck, C., Suzuki, T., Kanda, T., Nomura, T.: The influence of people's culture and prior experiences with Aibo on their attitude towards robots. AI & Society 21, 217-230 (2006)
25. Lee, S., Lau, I.Y., Kiesler, S., Chiu, C.-Y.: Human Mental Models of Humanoid Robots. In: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA 2005, pp. 2767-2772. IEEE (2005)
26. Schmitz, M.: Concepts for life-like interactive objects. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction, pp. 157-164. ACM, New York (2011)
27. Kiesler, S., Goetz, J.: Mental models of robotic assistants. In: CHI 2002 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 576-577. ACM, Minneapolis (2002)
28. Breazeal, C.: Toward sociable robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 42, 167-175 (2003)
29. Dautenhahn, K., Billard, A.: Bringing up robots or - the psychology of socially intelligent robots: from theory to implementation. In: Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference on Autonomous Agents, pp. 366-367. ACM, New York (1999)
30. Kahn, P.H., Ishiguro, H., Friedman, B., Kanda, T.: What is a Human? - Toward Psychological Benchmarks in the Field of Human-Robot Interaction. In: The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, ROMAN 2006, pp. 364-371 (2006)
31. Bartneck, C., Kulí, D., Croft, E., Zoghbi, S.: Measurement Instruments for the Anthropomorphism, Animacy, Likeability, Perceived Intelligence, and Perceived Safety of Robots. International Journal of Social Robotics 1, 71-81 (2008)
32. Friedman, B., Kahn Jr., P.H., Hagman, J.: Hardware companions?: what online AIBO discussion forums reveal about the human-robotic relationship. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 273-280. ACM, New York (2003)
33. Fink, J., Mubin, O., Kaplan, F., Dillenbourg, P.: Anthropomorphic Language in Online Forums about Roomba, AIBO, and the iPad. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (ARSO 2012), pp. 54-59 (2012)
34. Admoni, H., Bank, C., Tan, J., Toneva, M., Scassellati, B.: Robot gaze does not reflexively cue human attention. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Boston, MA, USA, pp. 1983-1988 (2011)
35. Oztop, E., Franklin, D.W., Chaminade, T., Cheng, G.: Human-humanoid interaction: Is a humanoid robot perceived as a human? International Journal of Humanoid Robotics 2, 537-559 (2005)
36. Forlizzi, J.: How robotic products become social products: an ethnographic study of cleaning in the home. In: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human- Robot Interaction, pp. 129-136. ACM, New York (2007)
37. Feil-Seifer, D., Mataric, M.J.: Human-robot interaction. In: Encyclopedia of Complexity and System Science, Springer (2008)
38. Kanda, T., Miyashita, T., Osada, T., Haikawa, Y., Ishiguro, H.: Analysis of Humanoid Appearances in Human-Robot Interaction. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 24, 725-735 (2008)
39. Kiesler, S., Powers, A., Fussell, S.R., Torrey, C.: Anthropomorphic Interactions with a Robot and Robot-like Agent. Social Cognition 26, 169-181 (2008)
40. Bainbridge, W., Hart, J., Kim, E., Scassellati, B.: The Benefits of Interactions with Physically Present Robots over Video-Displayed Agents. International Journal of Social Robotics 3, 41-52 (2011)
41. Bartneck, C., Nomura, T., Kanda, T., Suzuki, T., Kato, K.: Cultural Differences in Attitudes Towards Robots. In: Proceedings of the AISB Symposium on Robot Companions: Hard Problems and Open Challenges in Human-Robot Interaction, Hatfield, pp. 1-4 (2005)
42. Short, E., Hart, J., Vu, M., Scassellati, B.: No fair? An interaction with a cheating robot. In: 2010 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). pp. 219 -226 (2010).
43. Gonsior, B., Sosnowski, S., Mayer, C., Blume, J., Radig, B., Wollherr, D., Kuhnlenz, K.: Improving aspects of empathy and subjective performance for HRI through mirroring facial expressions. In: 2011 IEEE RO-MAN, pp. 350-356. IEEE (2011)
44. Fussell, S.R., Kiesler, S., Setlock, L.D., Yew, V.: How people anthropomorphize robots. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction, pp. 145-152. ACM, New York (2008)
45. Powers, A., Kiesler, S.: The advisor robot: tracing people's mental model from a robot's physical attributes. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART Conference on Human- Robot Interaction, pp. 218-225. ACM, New York (2006)
46. Dautenhahn, K., Saunders, J.: New Frontiers in Human-Robot Interaction. John Benjamins Publishing Company (2011)
47. Park, J., Kim, G.J.: Robots with projectors: an alternative to anthropomorphic HRI. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction, pp. 221-222. ACM, New York (2009)
48. Shibata, T., Kawaguchi, Y., Wada, K.: Investigation on People Living with Seal Robot at Home. International Journal of Social Robotics 4, 53-63 (2011)