A Multi-Category Theory of Intention

Building Bridges Across Cognitive Sciences Around the World - Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2012

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1266-1271

  Admoni, Henny ^a   Scassellati, Brian ^a  

^a Department of Computer Science ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

animacy; computer model; human robot interaction; intention; robotics

Indexed keywords

ANIMACY; CATEGORY THEORY; COMPUTER MODELS; EXCEL; HUMANS-ROBOT INTERACTIONS; INTENTION; INTENTIONALITY; SIMPLE++; THEORY OF MINDS; TWO-DIMENSIONS;

HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTION;

EID: 84868699062     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Aarno, D., & Kragic, D. (2006). Layered HMM for motion intention recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS 2006) (pp. 5130–5135). Beijing, China.
2. Bainbridge, W. A., Hart, J. W., Kim, E. S., & Scassellati, B. (2011). The benefits of interactions with physically present robots over video-displayed agents. International Journal of Social Robotics, 3, 41–52.
3. Baker, C. L., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Saxe, R. R. (2006). Bayesian models of human action understanding. In Y. Weiss, B. Schölkopf, & J. Platt (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems 18. MIT Press.
4. Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Breazeal, C., & Scassellati, B. (1999). How to build robots that make friends and influence people. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS’99) (Vol. 2, pp. 858–863). Kyongju, South Korea.
6. Feldman, J., & Tremoulet, P. D. (2008). The attribution of mental architecture from motion: Towards a computational theory (Tech. Rep. No. 87). Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science (RuCCS).
7. Gao, T., Newman, G. E., & Scholl, B. J. (2009). The psychophysics of chasing: A case study in the perception of animacy. Cognitive Psychology, 59, 154–179.
8. Heider, F., & Simmel, M. (1944, April). An experimental study of apparent behavior. The American Journal of Psychology, 57(2), 243–259.
9. Heyes, C., & Dickinson, A. (1990). The intentionality of animal aciton. Mind and Language, 5(1).
10. Knobe, J. (2005, August). Theory of mind and moral cognition: exploring the connections. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(8).
11. Leslie, A. M. (1987). Pretense and representation: The origins of “theory of mind”. Psychological Review, 94(4), 412–426.
12. Meltzoff, A. N. (1995). Understanding the intentions of others: Re-enactment of intended acts by 18-month-old children. Developmental Psychology, 31(5), 838–850.
13. Michotte, A. (1963). The perception of causailty. Oxford, England: Basic Books.
14. Mutlu, B., Yamaoka, F., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., & Hagita, N. (2009, March). Nonverbal leakage in robots: Communication of intentions through seemingly unintentional behavior. In Human robot interactions (HRI’09). La Jolla, California: ACM.
15. Nehaniv, C. L., Dautenhahn, K., Kubacki, J., Haegele, M., & Parlitz, C. (2005). A methodological approach relating the classification of gesture to identification of human intent in the context of human-robot interaction. In Proceedings of the IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication (ROMAN 2005) (pp. 371–377).
16. Pantelis, P. C., Cholewiak, S., Ringstad, P., Sanik, K., Weinstein, A., Wu, C.-C., et al. (2011). Perceptions of intentions and mental states in autonomous virtual agents. Journal of Vision, 11(11), 1990–1995.
17. Pelphrey, K. A., Morris, J. P., & McCarthy, G. (2004). Grasping the intentions of others: The perceived intentionality of an action influences activity in the superior temoral sulcus during social perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(10), 1706–1716.
18. Phillips, W., Baron-Cohen, S., & Rutter, M. (1998). Understanding intention in normal development and in autism. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16, 337–348.
19. Scholl, B. J., & Tremoulet, P. D. (2000, August). Perceptual causality and animacy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(8).
20. Schrempf, O. C., Albrecht, D., & Hanbeck, U. D. (2007). Tractable probabilistic models for intention recognition based on expert knowledge. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS 2007) (pp. 1429–1434). San Diego, CA.
21. Short, E., Hart, J., Vu, M., & Scassellati, B. (2010). No fair!! an interaction with a cheating robot. In 5th ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (pp. 219–226).
22. Tremoulet, P. D., & Feldman, J. (2000). Perception of animacy from the motion of a single object. Perception, 29, 943–951.
23. Tremoulet, P. D., & Feldman, J. (2006). The influence of spatial context and the role of intentionality in the interpretation of animacy from motion. Perception and Psychophysics, 68(6), 1047–1058.
24. Wellman, H. M., Cross, D., & Watson, J. (2001, May/June). Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: The truth about false belief. Child Development, 72(3), 655–684.