Cyclin-dependent kinase suppression by WEE1 kinase protects the genome through control of replication initiation and nucleotide consumption

Molecular and Cellular Biology

Volumn 32, Issue 20, 2012, Pages 4226-4236

  Beck, Halfdan ^a   Nähse Kumpf, Viola ^b   Larsen, Marie Sofie Yoo ^a   O'Hanlon, Karen A ^a   Patzke, Sebastian ^b   Holmberg, Christian ^c   Mejlvang, Jakob ^a   Groth, Anja ^a   Nielsen, Olaf ^c   Syljuåsen, Randi G ^b   Sørensen, Claus Storgaard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b OSLO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYCLIN DEPENDENT KINASE; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA; MUS81 NUCLEASE; NUCLEASE; NUCLEOTIDE; PHOSPHOTRANSFERASE; PROTEIN; SLX4 PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; WEE1 KINASE;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA REPLICATION; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME INHIBITION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IONIZING RADIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; S PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT;

CDC2 PROTEIN KINASE; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CELL LINE; DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; DNA REPLICATION; GENOME, HUMAN; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; HUMANS; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; NUCLEOTIDES; PROTEIN-TYROSINE KINASES; RECOMBINASES; S PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINTS;

EID: 84868689115     PISSN: 02707306     EISSN: 10985549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.00412-12     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Anglana M, Apiou F, Bensimon A, Debatisse M. 2003. Dynamics of DNA replication in mammalian somatic cells: nucleotide pool modulates origin choice and interorigin spacing. Cell 114:385-394.
2. Bartkova J, et al. 2005. DNA damage response as a candidate anti-cancer barrier in early human tumorigenesis. Nature 434:864-870.
3. Bartkova J, et al. 2006. Oncogene-induced senescence is part of the tumorigenesis barrier imposed by DNA damage checkpoints. Nature 444: 633-637.
4. Beck H, et al. 2010. Regulators of cyclin-dependent kinases are crucial for maintaining genome integrity in S phase. J. Cell Biol. 188:629-638.
5. Bester AC, et al. 2011. Nucleotide deficiency promotes genomic instability in early stages of cancer development. Cell 145:435-446.
6. Branzei D, Foiani M. 2010. Maintaining genome stability at the replication fork. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11:208-219.
7. Carpenter AE, et al. 2006. CellProfiler: image analysis software for identifying and quantifying cell phenotypes. Genome Biol. 7:R100.
8. Cimprich KA, Cortez D. 2008. ATR: an essential regulator of genome integrity. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9:616-627.
9. Courbet S, et al. 2008. Replication fork movement sets chromatin loop size and origin choice in mammalian cells. Nature 455:557-560.
10. Di Micco R, et al. 2006. Oncogene-induced senescence is a DNA damage response triggered by DNA hyper-replication. Nature 444:638-642.
11. Dimitrova DS, Gilbert DM. 2000. Temporally coordinated assembly and disassembly of replication factories in the absence of DNA synthesis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2:686-694.
12. Dominguez-Kelly R, et al. 2011. Wee1 controls genomic stability during replication by regulating the Mus81-Eme1 endonuclease. J. Cell Biol. 194: 567-579.
13. Fekairi S, et al. 2009. Human SLX4 is a Holliday junction resolvase subunit that binds multiple DNA repair/recombination endonucleases. Cell 138:78-89.
14. Forment JV, Blasius M, Guerini I, Jackson SP. 2011. Structure-specific DNA endonuclease Mus81/Eme1 generates DNA damage caused by Chk1 inactivation. PLoS One 6:e23517. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0023517.
15. Hanada K, et al. 2007. The structure-specific endonuclease Mus81 contributes to replication restart by generating double-strand DNA breaks. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 14:1096-1104.
16. Harrigan JA, et al. 2011. Replication stress induces 53BP1-containing OPT domains in G1 cells. J. Cell Biol. 193:97-108.
17. Hirai H, et al. 2009. Small-molecule inhibition of Wee1 kinase by MK-1775 selectively sensitizes p53-deficient tumor cells to DNA-damaging agents. Mol. Cancer Ther. 8:2992-3000.
18. Jørgensen S, et al. 2007. The histone methyltransferase SET8 is required for S-phase progression. J. Cell Biol. 179:1337-1345.
19. Katsuno Y, et al. 2009. Cyclin A-Cdk1 regulates the origin firing program in mammalian cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106:3184-3189.
20. Kiviharju-af Hallstrom TM, et al. 2007. Human prostate epithelium lacks Wee1A-mediated DNA damage-induced checkpoint enforcement. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104:7211-7216.
21. Krutzik PO, Nolan GP. 2006. Fluorescent cell barcoding in flow cytometry allows high-throughput drug screening and signaling profiling. Nature Methods 3:361-368.
22. Labib K, De Piccoli G. 2011. Surviving chromosome replication: the many roles of the S-phase checkpoint pathway. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 366:3554-3561.
23. Lam MH, Liu Q, Elledge SJ, Rosen JM. 2004. Chk1 is haploinsufficient for multiple functions critical to tumor suppression. Cancer Cell 6:45-59.
24. Lambert S, Froget B, Carr AM. 2007. Arrested replication fork processing: interplay between checkpoints and recombination. DNA Repair 6:1042-1061.
25. Lloyd AC, et al. 1997. Cooperating oncogenes converge to regulate cyclin/ cdk complexes. Genes Dev. 11:663-677.
26. Lopez-Contreras AJ, Fernandez-Capetillo O. 2010. The ATR barrier to replication-born DNA damage. DNA Repair 9:1249-1255.
27. Lopez-Contreras AJ, Gutierrez-Martinez P, Specks J, Rodrigo-Perez S, Fernandez-Capetillo O. 2012. An extra allele of Chk1 limits oncogeneinduced replicative stress and promotes transformation. J. Exp. Med. 209: 455-461.
28. Lukas C, et al. 2011. 53BP1 nuclear bodies form around DNA lesions generated by mitotic transmission of chromosomes under replication stress. Nat. Cell Biol. 13:243-253.
29. Mantiero D, Mackenzie A, Donaldson A, Zegerman P. 2011. Limiting replication initiation factors execute the temporal programme of origin firing in budding yeast. EMBO J. 30:4805-4814.
30. Matos J, Blanco MG, Maslen S, Skehel JM, West SC. 2011. Regulatory control of the resolution of DNA recombination intermediates during meiosis and mitosis. Cell 147:158-172.
31. Munoz IM, et al. 2009. Coordination of structure-specific nucleases by human SLX4/BTBD12 is required for DNA repair. Mol. Cell 35:116-127.
32. Negrini S, Gorgoulis VG, Halazonetis TD. 2010. Genomic instability-an evolving hallmark of cancer. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11:220-228.
33. Parker LL, Piwnica-Worms H. 1992. Inactivation of the p34cdc2-cyclin B complex by the human WEE1 tyrosine kinase. Science 257:1955-1957.
34. Petermann E, Woodcock M, Helleday T. 2010. Chk1 promotes replication fork progression by controlling replication initiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107:16090-16095.
35. Poli J, et al. 2012. dNTP pools determine fork progression and origin usage under replication stress. EMBO J. 31:883-894.
36. Remus D, Diffley JF. 2009. Eukaryotic DNA replication control: lock and load, then fire. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 21:771-777.
37. Roy B, et al. 1999. Simultaneous determination of pyrimidine or purine deoxyribonucleoside triphosphates using a polymerase assay. Anal. Biochem. 269:403-409.
38. Sirbu BM, et al. 2011. Analysis of protein dynamics at active, stalled, and collapsed replication forks. Genes Dev. 25:1320-1327.
39. Sørensen CS, et al. 2005. The cell-cycle checkpoint kinase Chk1 is required for mammalian homologous recombination repair. Nat. Cell Biol. 7:195-201.
40. Sørensen CS, Syljuåsen RG. 2012. Safeguarding genome integrity: the checkpoint kinases ATR, CHK1 and WEE1 restrain CDK activity during normal DNA replication. Nucleic Acids Res. 40:477-486.
41. Svendsen JM, et al. 2009. Mammalian BTBD12/SLX4 assembles a Holliday junction resolvase and is required for DNA repair. Cell 138:63-77.
42. Syljuåsen RG, et al. 2005. Inhibition of human Chk1 causes increased initiation of DNA replication, phosphorylation of ATR targets, and DNA breakage. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25:3553-3562.
43. Tourriere H, Pasero P. 2007. Maintenance of fork integrity at damaged DNA and natural pause sites. DNA Repair (Amst.) 6:900-913.
44. Tuduri S, et al. 2009. Topoisomerase I suppresses genomic instability by preventing interference between replication and transcription. Nature Cell Biol. 11:1315-1324.
45. Vassilev LT, et al. 2006. Selective small-molecule inhibitor reveals critical mitotic functions of human CDK1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103: 10660-10665.
46. Wu CL, et al. 2001. Cables enhances cdk2 tyrosine 15 phosphorylation by Wee1, inhibits cell growth, and is lost in many human colon and squamous cancers. Cancer Res. 61:7325-7332.