Emotion affects similarity via social projection

Social Cognition

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 584-609

  Estes, Zachary ^a   Jones, Lara L ^b   Golonka, Sabrina ^c  

^a BOCCONI UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^b WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c LEEDS METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84868550563     PISSN: 0278016X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1521/soco.2012.30.5.584     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Ames, D. R. (2004). Strategies for social inference: A similarity contingency model of social projection and stereotyping in attribute prevalence estimates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 573-585.
2. Bassok, M., & Medin, D. L. (1997). Birds of a feather flock together: Similarity judgments with conceptually rich stimuli. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 311-336.
3. Bauml, K.-H., & Kuhbandner, C. (2009). Positive moods can eliminate intentional forgetting. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 93-98.
4. Biss, R. K., Hasher, L., & Thomas, R. C. (2010). Positive mood is associated with the im plicit use of distraction. Motivation and Emotion, 34, 73-77.
5. Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic.
6. Campbell, D. T. (1958). Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioral Science, 3, 14-25.
7. Chartrand, T. L., van Baaren, R. B., & Bargh, J. A. (2006). Linking automatic evaluation to mood and information processing style: Consequences for experienced affect, impression formation, and stereotyping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 70-77.
8. Clore, G. L., & Huntsinger, J. R. (2007). How emotions inform judgment and regulate thought. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 393-399.
9. Crisp, R. J., & Turner, R. N. (2009). Can imagined interactions produce positive perceptions?: Reducing prejudice through simulated social contact. American Psychologist, 64, 231-240.
10. Davis, H. L., Hoch, S. J., & Ragsdale, E. K. E. (1986). An anchoring and adjustment model of spouse predictions. Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 25-37.
11. Dreisbach, G., & Goschke, T. (2004). How positive affect modulates cognitive control: Reduced perseveration at the cost of increased distractibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 343-353.
12. Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433-458.
13. Dunn, E. W., Huntsinger, J., Lun, J., & Sinclair, S. (2008). The gift of similarity: How good and bad gifts influence relationships. Social Cognition, 26, 469-481.
14. Estes, Z. (2003a). A tale of two similarities: Comparison and integration in conceptual combination. Cognitive Science, 27, 911-921.
15. Estes, Z. (2003b). Attributive and relational processes in nominal combination. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 304-319.
16. Estes, Z. (2003c). Domain differences in the structure of artifactual and natural categories. Memory & Cognition, 31, 199-214.
17. Estes, Z. (2004). Confidence and gradedness in semantic categorization: Definitely somewhat artifactual, maybe absolutely natural. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 1041-1047.
18. Estes, Z., & Alix-Gaudreau, R. (2003). The misattribution of relations in similarity judgments of person concepts. In R. Alterman & D. Kirsh (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-fifth annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 372-377). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Estes, Z., Golonka, S., & Jones, L. L. (2011). Thematic thinking: The apprehension and consequences of thematic relations (pp. 249-294). In B. Ross (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation, Vol. 54. Burlington: Academic.
20. Estes, Z., & Jones, L. L. (2006). Priming via relational similarity: A copper horse is faster when seen through a glass eye. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 89-101.
21. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191.
22. Fischer, I. (2009). Friend or foe: Subjective expected relative similarity as a determinant of cooperation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 341-350.
23. Forgas, J. P. (1995). Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin, 117, 39-66.
24. Gati, I., & Tversky, A. (1984). Weighting common and distinctive features in perceptual and conceptual judgments. Cognitive Psychology, 16, 341-370.
25. Gauthier, I., & Tarr, M. (1997). Becoming a "Greeble" expert: Exploring mechanisms for face recognition. Vision Research, 3, 1673-1682.
26. Gauthier, I., Tarr, M. J., Anderson, A. W., Skudlarski, P., & Gore, J. C. (1999). Activation of the middle fusiform "face area" increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 568-573.
27. Golonka, S., & Estes, Z. (2009). Thematic relations affect similarity via commonalities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 1454-1464.
28. Hampton, J. A. (1998). Similarity-based categorization and fuzziness of natural categories. Cognition, 65, 137-165.
29. Hampton, J. A., Estes, Z., & Simmons, S. (2007). Metamorphosis: Essence, appearance and behavior in the categorization of natural kinds. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1785-1800.
30. Hampton, J. A., Storms, G., Simmons, C. L., & Heussen, D. (2009). Feature integration in natural language concepts. Memory & Cognition, 37, 1150-1163.
31. Katz, D., & Allport, F. H. (1931). Students' attitudes. Syracuse, NY: Craftsman Press.
32. Markman, A. B., & Gentner, D. (1993). Splitting the difference: A structural alignment view of similarity. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 517-535.
33. Markman, A. B., & Gentner, D. (2000). Structure mapping in the comparison process. American Journal of Psychology, 113, 501-538.
34. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415-444.
35. Morris, S. B., & DeShon, R. P. (2002). Combining effect size estimates in meta-analysis with repeated measures and independent-groups designs. Psychological Methods, 7, 105-125.
36. Murray, N., Sujan, H., Hirt, E. R., & Sujan, M. (1990). The influence of mood on categorization: A cognitive flexibility interpretation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 411-425.
37. Mussweiler, T. (2003). Comparison processes in social judgment: Mechanisms and consequences. Psychological Review, 110, 472-489.
38. Novick, L. R. (1988). Analogical transfer, problem similarity, and expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 510-520.
39. Raffray, C. N., Pickering, M. J., & Branigan, H. P. (2007). Priming the interpretation of noun-noun combinations. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 380-395.
40. Rhodes, M., & Gelman, S. A. (2009). Five-yearolds' beliefs about the discreteness of category boundaries for animals and artifacts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 920-924.
41. Ritov, I., Gati, I., & Tversky, A. (1990). Differential weighting of common and distinctive components. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 30-41.
42. Robbins, J. M., & Krueger, J. I. (2005). Social projection to ingroups and outgroups: A review and meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 32-47.
43. Rowe, G., Hirsh, J. B., & Anderson, A. K. (2007). Positive affect increases the breadth of attentional selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 383-388.
44. Schul, Y., & Vinokur, A. D. (2000). Projection in person perception among spouses as a function of the similarity in their shared experiences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 987-1001.
45. Schwarz, N. (2001). Feelings as information: Implications for affective influences on information processing. In L. L. Martin & G. L. Clore (Eds.), Theories of mood and cognition: A user's guidebook (pp. 159-176). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
46. Simmons, S., & Estes, Z. (2008). Individual differences in the perception of similarity and difference. Cognition, 108, 781-795.
47. Sloutsky, V. M., & Fisher, A. V. (2004). Induction and categorization in young children: A similarity-based model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 166-188.
48. Smith, E. E., Shafir, E., & Osherson, D. (1993). Similarity, plausibility, and judgments of probability. Cognition, 49, 67-96.
49. Spellman, B. A., Holyoak, K. J. & Morrison, R. G. (2001). Analogical priming via semantic relations. Memory & Cognition, 29, 383-393.
50. Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1-39.
51. Toma, C., Yzerbyt, V., & Corneille, O. (2010). Anticipated cooperation vs. competition moderates interpersonal projection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 375-381.
52. Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327-352.
53. Van Kleef, G. A. (2009). How emotions regulate social life: The emotions as social information (EASI) model. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 184-188.
54. Whaley, L. J. (1997). Introduction to typology: The unity and diversity of language. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
55. Wisniewski, E. J., & Bassok, M. (1999). What makes a man similar to a tie? Stimulus compatibility with comparison and integration. Cognitive Psychology, 39, 208-238.
56. Wisniewski, E. J., & Love, B. C. (1998). Relations versus properties in conceptual combination. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 177-202.
57. Zarate, M. A., & Sanders, J. D. (1999). Face categorization, graded priming, and the mediating influences of similarity. Social Cognition, 17, 367-389.