Relations versus Properties in Conceptual Combination

Journal of Memory and Language

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 177-202

  Wisniewski, Edward J ^a   Love, Bradley C ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000881579     PISSN: 0749596X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jmla.1997.2550     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Abbot, K. 1989, Downstream from trout fishing in America: A memoir of Richard Brautigan, Santa Barbara, CA, Capra Press.
2. Bower G. H., Black J. B., Turner T. F. Scripts in memory for text. Cognitive Psychology. 11:1979;177-210.
3. Bugelski B. R., Alampay D. A. The role of frequency in developing perceptual sets. Canadian Journal of Psychology. 15:1961;205-211.
4. Cohen B., Murphy G. L. Models of concepts. Cognitive Science. 8:1984;27-58.
5. Coolen R., van Jaarsveld H. J., Schreuder R. The interpretation of isolated novel nominal compounds. Memory & Cognition. 19:1991;341-352.
6. Dermek, A. 1989, The spotter's guide to mushrooms and fungi, New York, Dorset Press.
7. Downing P. On the creation and use of English compound nouns. Language. 53:1977;810-842.
8. Eschmeyer, W. N. Herald, E. S. Hammann, H. 1983, A field guide to Pacific coast fishes of North America, Boston, Houghton Mifflin Company.
9. The facts on file visual dictionary, 1986.
10. Gagne C. L., Shoben E. J. Influence of thematic relations on the comprehension of modifier-noun combinations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 23:1997;71-87.
11. Garrod, S. C. Sanford, A. J. 1994, Resolving sentences in a discourse context: How discourse representation affects language understanding, Handbook of psycholinguistics, New York, Academic Press.
12. Gentner D., Markman A. B. Structural alignment in comparison: No difference without similarity. Psychological Science. 5:1994;152-158.
13. Gerrig R. J., Murphy G. L. Contextual influences on the comprehension of complex concepts. Language and Cognitive Processes. 7:1992;205-230.
14. Glucksberg S., Keysar B. Understanding metaphorical comparisons. Beyond similarity. Psychological Review. 97:1990;3-18.
15. Glucksberg, S. Manfredi, D. A. McGlone, M. S. 1997, Metaphor comprehension: How metaphors create new categories, Ward, T. B.Smith, S. M.Vaid, J. Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes, 327, 350, Washington, DC, American Psychological Association.
16. Levi, J. N. 1978, The syntax and semantics of complex nominals, New York, Academic Press.
17. Luchins A. S. Mechanization in problem solving. Psychological Monographs. 54:1942.
18. Markman A. B., Gentner D. Structural alignment during similarity comparisons. Cognitive Psychology. 23:1993a;431-467.
19. Markman A. B., Gentner D. Splitting the differences: A structural alignment view of similarity. Journal of Memory and Language. 32:1993b;517-535.
20. Markman A. B., Wisniewski E. J. Similar and different: The differentiation of basic level categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 23:1997;54-70.
21. Medin D. L., Shoben E. J. Context and structure in conceptual combination. Cognitive Psychology. 20:1988;158-190.
22. Murphy G. L. Comprehending complex concepts. Cognitive Science. 12:1988;529-562.
23. Murphy G. L. Noun phrase interpretation and conceptual combination. Journal of Memory and Language. 29:1990;259-288.
24. Office stores program catalog., 1995, Evanston, IL, Northwestern University General Services Administration.
25. Reader's digest magic and medicine of plants., 1986, Pleasantville, NY, The Reader's Digest Association, Inc.
26. Reader's digest North American wildlife., 1992, Pleasantville, NY, The Reader's Digest Association, Inc.
27. Schank, R. 1972, Conceptual information processing, New York, Elsevier.
28. Schank, R. C. Abelson, R. 1977, Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding, Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum.
29. Shoben, E. J. Gagne, C. L. 1997, Thematic relations and the creation of combined concepts, Ward, T. B.Smith, S. M.Vaid, J. Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes, 31, 50, Washington, DC, American Psychological Association.
30. Smith E. E., Osherson D. N., Rips L. J., Keane M. Combining prototypes: A modification model. Cognitive Science. 12:1988;485-527.
31. Urdang, L. Abate, F. R. 1983, Idioms and phrases index, Detroit, MI, Book Tower.
32. Webster's collegiate dictionary., 1995, New York, Random House.
33. Wisniewski E. J. Construal and similarity in conceptual combination. Journal of Memory and Language. 35:1996;434-453.
34. Wisniewski E. J. When concepts combine. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 4:1997;167-183.
35. Wisniewski, E. J. Bassok, M. 1997, Stimulus compatibility with comparison and integration.
36. Wisniewski, E. J. Gentner, D. 1991, On the combinatorial semantics of noun pairs: Minor and major adjustments to meaning, G. B. Simpson, Understanding word and sentence, 241, 284, Amsterdam, North Holland.
37. Wisniewski, E. J. Markman, A. B. 1993, The role of structural alignment in conceptual combination, Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 1083, 1086, Boulder, CO, Erlbaum.