An eight-year study of online lecture use in a medical gross anatomy and embryology course

Anatomical Sciences Education

Volumn 5, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 311-320

  Nieder, Gary L ^a   Borges, Nicole J ^a  

^a WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Education technology; Embryology; Gross anatomy education; Internet application in anatomy; Lecture recording methodology; Medical education; Online content delivery; Online lecture format; Outcomes

Indexed keywords

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANATOMY; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION; EMBRYOLOGY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INTERNET; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; METHODOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SEX DIFFERENCE; STATISTICAL MODEL; TEACHING; TIME;

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANATOMY; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; COLLEGE ADMISSION TEST; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; EMBRYOLOGY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; PROGRAM EVALUATION; SEX FACTORS; STUDENTS, MEDICAL; TEACHING; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84868352010     PISSN: 19359772     EISSN: 19359780     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ase.1289     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Adamczyk C, Holzer M, Putz R, Fischer MR. 2009. Student learning preferences and the impact of a multimedia learning tool in the dissection course at the University of Munich. Ann Anat 191: 339-348.
2. AAMC. 2011. Association of American Medical Colleges. Using MCAT® Data in Medical Student Selection. 1st Ed. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges. 23 p. URL: https://www.aamc.org/students/download/267622/data/2012mcatstudentselectionguide.pdf [accessed 12 January 2012].
3. Bacro TR, Gebregziabher M, Fitzharris TP. 2010. Evaluation of a lecture recording system in a medical curriculum. Anat Sci Educ 3: 300-308.
4. Billings-Gagliardi S, Mazor KM. 2007. Student decisions about lecture attendance: Do electronic course materials matter? Acad Med 82: S73-S76.
5. Brawer JR, Lener M, Chalk C. 2009. Student perspectives on the value of lectures. JIAMSE 19: 84-88.
6. Bridge PD, Jackson M, Robinson L. 2009 The effectiveness of streaming video on medical student learning: A case study. Med Educ Online 14: 11.
7. Cardall S, Krupat E, Ulrich M. 2008. Live lecture versus video-recorded lecture: Are students voting with their feet? Acad Med 83: 1174-1178.
8. Charlton BG. 2006. Lectures are such an effective teaching method because they exploit evolved human psychology to improve learning. Med Hypotheses 67: 1261-1265.
9. Cohen J. 1992. A power primer. Psychol Bull 112: 155-159.
10. Cook DA, Levinson AJ, Garside S, Dupras DM, Erwin PJ, Montori VM. 2008. Internet-based learning in the health professions: A meta-analysis. JAMA 300: 1181-1196.
11. Craig P, Wozniak H, Hyde S, Burn D. 2009. Student use of web based lecture technologies in blended learning: Do these reflect study patterns? In: Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of ASCILITE 2009 Same places, different spaces; Auckland, New Zealand; 2009 Dec. 6-9; p 158-167. The Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education: Byron Bay, New South Wales, Australia. URL: http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/auckland09/ procs/craig.pdf [accessed 5 December 2011].
12. Davis J, Crabb S, Rogers E, Zamora J, Khan K. 2008. Computer-based teaching is as good as face to face lecture-based teaching of evidence based medicine: A randomized controlled trial. Med Teach 30: 302-307.
13. Donnon T, Paolucci EO, Violato C. 2007. The predictive validity of the MCAT for medical school performance and medical board licensing examinations: A meta-analysis of the published research. Acad Med 82: 100-106.
14. Drake RL, McBride JM, Lachman N, Pawlina W. 2009. Medical education in the anatomical sciences: The winds of change continue to blow. Anat Sci Educ 2: 253-259.
15. Evans DJ. 2011. Using embryology screencasts: A useful addition to the student learning experience? Anat Sci Educ 4: 57-63.
16. Fernandes L, Maley M, Cruickshank C. 2008. The impact of online lecture recordings on learning outcomes in pharmacology. JIAMSE 18: 62-70.
17. Finnerty EP, Chauvin S, Bonaminio G, Andrews M, Carroll RG, Pangaro LN. 2010. Flexner revisited: The role and value of the basic sciences in medical education. Acad Med 85: 349-355.
18. Fleming DE, Mauriello SM, McKaig RG, Ludlow JB. 2003. A comparison of slide/audiotape and web-based instructional formats for teaching normal intraoral radiographic anatomy. J Dent Hyg 77: 27-35.
19. Freeman MK, Schrimsher RH, Kendrach MG. 2006. Student perceptions of online lectures and WebCT in an introductory drug information course. Am J Pharm Educ 70: 126.
20. Hale LS, Mirakian EA, Day DB. 2009. Online vs. classroom instruction: Student satisfaction and learning outcomes in an undergraduate allied health pharmacology course. J Allied Health 38: e36-e42.
21. Irby DM, Cooke M, O'Brien BC. 2010. Calls for reform of medical education by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching: 1910 and 2010. Acad Med 85: 220-227.
22. Levine TR, Hullett CR. 2002. Eta squared, partial eta squared and misreporting of effect size in communication research. Hum Commun Res 28: 612-625.
23. Lovell K, Plantegenest G. 2009. Student utilization of digital versions of classroom lectures. JIAMSE 19: 20-25.
24. McNulty JA, Hoyt A, Gruener G, Chandrasekhar A, Espiritu B, Price RJr, Naheedy R. 2009a. An analysis of lecture video utilization in undergraduate medical education: Associations with performance in the courses. BMC Med Educ 9: 6.
25. McNulty JA, Sonntag B, Sinacore JM. 2009b. Evaluation of computer-aided instruction in a gross anatomy course: A six-year study. Anat Sci Educ 2: 2-8.
26. Morrison G, Goldfarb S, Lanken PN. 2010. Team training of medical students in the 21st century: Would Flexner approve? Acad Med 85: 254-259.
27. Nieder GL, Nagy F. 2002. An analysis of medical students' use of web-basedresources for a gross anatomy and embryology course. Clin Anat 15: 409-418.
28. Nieder GL, Parmelee DX, Stolfi A, Hudes PD. 2005. Team-based learning in a medical gross anatomy and embryology course. Clin Anat 18: 56-63.
29. Nieder GL, Borges NJ, Pearson JC. 2011. Medical student use of online lectures: Exam performance, learning styles, achievement motivation and gender. Med Sci Educ 21: 222-228.
30. Pilarski PP, Johnstone DA, Pettepher CC, Osheroff N. 2008. From music to macromolecules: Using rich media/podcast lecture recordings to enhance the preclinical educational experience. Med Teach 30: 630-632.
31. Ridgway PF, Sheikh A, Sweeney KJ, Evoy D, McDermott E, Felle P, Hill AD, O'Higgins NJ. 2007. Surgical e-learning: Validation of multimedia web-based lectures. Med Educ 41: 168-172.
32. Romanov K, Nevgi A. 2007. Do medical students watch video clips in eLearning and do these facilitate learning? Med Teach 29: 490-494.
33. Schreiber BE, Fukuta J, Gordon F. 2010. Live lecture versus video podcast in undergraduate medical education: A randomised controlled trial. BMC Med Educ 10: 68.
34. Shantikumar S. 2009. From lecture theatre to portable media: Students' perceptions of an enhanced podcast for revision. Med Teach 31: 535-538.
35. Solomon DJ, Ferenchick GS, Laird-Fick HS, Kavanaugh K. 2004. A randomized trial comparing digital and live lecture formats. BMC Med Educ 4: 27.
36. Spickard A3rd, Smithers J, Cordray D, Gigante J, Wofford JL. 2004. A randomised trial of an online lecture with and without audio. Med Educ 38: 787-790.
37. Sugand K, Abrahams P, Khurana A. 2010. The anatomy of anatomy: A review for its modernization. Anat Sci Educ 3: 83-93.
38. West C, Sadoski M. 2011. Do study strategies predict academic performance in medical school? Med Educ 45: 696-703.
39. Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Pawson R. 2010. Internet-based medical education: A realist review of what works, for whom and in what circumstances. BMC Med Educ 10: 12.