Evaluation of a lecture recording system in a medical curriculum

Anatomical Sciences Education

Volumn 3, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 300-308

  Bacro, Thierry R H ^a   Gebregziabher, Mulugeta ^b   Fitzharris, Timothy P ^a  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Basic science education; Cell biology; Education technology; Histology; Learning styles; Lecture recording; Medical education; Neuroscience; Outcomes; Physiology

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPREHENSION; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION; EVALUATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INTERNET; LEARNING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL SCHOOL; MEDICAL STUDENT; METHODOLOGY; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TEACHING; TIME; UNITED STATES; VIDEORECORDING;

COMPREHENSION; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; HUMANS; INTERNET; LEARNING; PERCEPTION; PROGRAM EVALUATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SCHOOLS, MEDICAL; SOUTH CAROLINA; STUDENTS, MEDICAL; TEACHING; TIME FACTORS; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 78649603235     PISSN: 19359772     EISSN: 19359780     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ase.183     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. AAMC. 2007. Effective Use of Educational Technology in Medical Education. Colloquium on Educational Technology: Recommendations and Guidelines for Medical Educators. 1st Ed. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges. 19 p. URL: [accessed 28 May 2010].
2. Ackerman MJ. 1999. The visible human project: A resource for education. Acad Med 74: 667-670.
3. Ackerman MJ, Spitzer VM, Scherzinger AL, Whitlock DG. 1995. The visible human data set: An image resource for anatomical visualization. Medinfo8 Part 2: 1195-1198.
4. Bacro TR, Murphy JC, Reeves BA. 1997. Integration of an Internet anatomy review of the knee joint in a rehabilitation sciences curriculum: ". J Allied Health 26: 159-161.
5. Billings-Gagliardi S, Mazor KM. 2007. Student decisions about lecture attendance: Do electronic course materials matter? Acad Med 82: S73-S76.
6. Bridge PD, Jackson M, Robinson L. 2009. The effectiveness of streaming video on medical student learning: A case study. Med Educ Online 14: 11.
7. Carmichael SW, Pawlina W. 2000. Animated PowerPoint as a tool to teach anatomy. Anat Rec 261: 83-88.
8. Chumley-Jones HS, Dobbie A, Alford CL. 2002. Web-based learning: Sound educational method or hype? A review of the evaluation literature. Acad Med 77: S86-S93.
9. Clarke RM. 1975. Replacement of class instruction in histology by audio-tape and booklet self-instruction sessions. Br J Med Educ 9: 36-37.
10. Cook DA. 2005. The research we still are not doing: An agenda for the study of computer-based learning. Acad Med 80: 541-548.
11. Cook DA. 2009. The failure of e-learning research to inform educational practice, and what we can do about. Med Teach 31: 158-162.
12. Cook DA, Gelula MH, Dupras DM, Schwartz A. 2007. Instructional methods and cognitive and learning styles in web-based learning: Report of two randomised trials. Med Educ 41: 897-905.
13. Cook DA, Levinson AJ, Garside S, Dupras DM, Erwin PJ, Montori VM. 2008. Internet-based learning in the health professions: A meta-analysis. JAMA 300: 1181-1196.
14. Craig P, Wozniak H, Hyde S, Burn D. 2009. Student use of web based lecture technologies in blended learning: Do these reflect study patterns? In: Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education - Same Places, Different Spaces (ASCILITE 2009), Auckland, New Zealand, 2009 Dec 7-9, p 159-167. Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, Figtree, NSW, Australia. URL: [accessed 20 June 2010].
15. Dengler PE. 1983. Computer-assisted instruction and its use in occupational therapy education. Am J Occup Ther 37: 255-259.
16. Dev P, Rindfleisch TC, Kush SJ, Stringer JR. 2000. An analysis of technology usage for streaming digital video in support of a preclinical curriculum. Proc AMIA Symp 2000: 180-184.
17. Fernandes L, Maley M, Cruickshank C. 2008. The impact of online lecture recordings on learning outcomes in pharmacology. JIAMSE 18: 62-70.
18. Friedman CP. 1994. The research we should be doing. Acad Med 69: 455-457.
19. Gosper M, Green D, McNeill M, Phillips R, Preston G, Woo K. 2008. The impact of web-based lecture technologies on current and future practices in learning and teaching. Australian Learning and Teaching Council, Sydney, NSW, Australia. URL: [accessed 20 June 2010].
20. Guttmann GD. 1999. Spilling the beans on java 3D: A tool for the virtual anatomist. Anat Rec 257: 73-79.
21. HEAL. 2008. Health Education Assets Library. East Salt Lake, UT: IAMSE'S Digital Library. URL: [accessed 28 May 2010].
22. Herbertson JE, Butterworth BB. 1967. Comparative study of teaching methods in human gross anatomy. J Dent Educ 31: 317-321.
23. Holden RJ, Karsh BT. 2010. The technology acceptance model: Its past and its future in health care. J Biomed Inform 43: 159-172.
24. Jones NA, Olafson RP, Sutin J. 1978. Evaluation of a gross anatomy program without dissection. J Med Educ 53: 198-205.
25. Keane DR, Norman GR, Vickers J. 1991. The inadequacy of recent research on computer-assisted instruction. Acad Med 66: 444-448.
26. Legris P, Ingham J, Collerette P. 2003. Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Inform Manag 40: 191-204.
27. Lim EC, Oh VM, Koh DR, Seet RC. 2008. Harnessing the IT factor in medical education. Ann Acad Med Singapore 37: 1051-1054.
28. Lovell K, Plantegenest G. 2009. Student utilization of digital versions of classroom lectures. JIAMSE 19: 20-25.
29. LUMEN. 1998. Loyola University Medical Education Network. Maywood, IL: Loyola University Chicago. URL: [accessed 28 May 2010].
30. Mattick K, Crocker G, Bligh J. 2006. Medical student attendance at non-compulsory lectures. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 12: 201-210.
31. McNulty JA, Halama J, Dauzvardis MF, Espiritu B. 2000. Evaluation of Web-based computer-aided instruction in a basic science course. Acad Med 75: 59-65.
32. McNulty JA, Halama J, Espiritu B. 2004. Evaluation of computer-aided instruction in the medical gross anatomy curriculum. Clin Anat 17: 73-78.
33. McNulty JA, Hoyt A, Gruener G, Chandrasekhar A, Espiritu B, Price RJr, Naheedy R. 2009. An analysis of lecture video utilization in undergraduate medical education: Associations with performance in the courses. BMC Med Educ 9: 6.
34. McNulty JA, Sonntag B, Sinacore JM. 2009. Evaluation of computer-aided instruction in a gross anatomy course: A six-year study. Anat Sci Educ 2: 2-8.
35. Meals RA, Kabo JM. 1986. Computerized anatomy instruction. Clin Plast Surg 13: 379-387.
36. MedEdPortal. 1995. Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC. URL: [accessed 28 May 2010].
37. MERLOT. 1997. Multimedia Educational Resource for Learning and Online Teaching. Long Beach CA: California State University. URL: [accessed 28 May 2010].
38. Nieder GL, Nagy F. 2002. Analysis of medical students' use of web-based resources for a gross anatomy and embryology course. Clin Anat 15: 409-418.
39. Petersson H, Sinkvist D, Wang C, Smedby O. 2009. Web-based interactive 3D visualization as a tool for improved anatomy learning. Anat Sci Educ 2: 61-68.
40. Prentice ED, Metcalf WK, Quinn TH, Sharp JG, Jensen RH, Holyoke EA. 1977. Stereoscopic anatomy: Evaluation of a new teaching system in human gross anatomy. J Med Educ 52: 758-763.
41. Rogers EM. 1962. Diffusion of Innovations. 1st Ed. New York, NY: The Free Press of Glencoe. 367 p.
42. Romanov K, Nevgi A. 2007. Do medical students watch video clips in eLearning and do these facilitate learning? Med Teach 29: 484-488.
43. Saxena V, Natarajan P, O'Sullivan PS, Jain S. 2008. Effect of the use of instructional anatomy videos on student performance. Anat Sci Educ 1: 159-165.
44. Schenk MP, Manning RJ, Paalman MH. 1999. Going digital: Image preparation for biomedical publishing. Anat Rec 257: 128-136.
45. Schubert R, Schiemann T, Tiede U, Hohne KH. 1997. Applications and perspectives in anatomical 3-dimensional modelling of the visible human with VOXEL-MAN. Acta Anat (Basel) 160: 123-131.
46. Solomon DJ, Ferenchick GS, Laird-Fick HS, Kavanaugh K. 2004. A randomized trial comparing digital and live lecture formats. BMC Med Educ 4: 27.
47. Spitzer V, Ackerman MJ, Scherzinger AL, Whitlock D. 1996. The visible human male: A technical report. J Am Med Inform Assoc 3: 118-130.
48. Trelease RB, Rosset A. 2008. Transforming clinical imaging data for virtual reality learning objects. Anat Sci Educ 1: 50-55.
49. Trelease RB, Nieder GL, Dorup J, Hansen MS. 2000. Going virtual with quicktime VR: New methods and standardized tools for interactive dynamic visualization of anatomical structures. Anat Rec 261: 64-77.
50. von Konsky BR, Ivins J, Gribble SJ. 2009. Lecture attendance and web based lecture technologies: A comparison of student perceptions and usage patterns. Aust J Educ Tech 25: 581-595.
51. Walsh RJ, Bohn RC. 1990. Computer-assisted instructions: A role in teaching human gross anatomy. Med Educ 24: 499-506.