Student learning preferences and the impact of a multimedia learning tool in the dissection course at the University of Munich

Annals of Anatomy

Volumn 191, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 339-348

  Adamczyk, Christopher ^a   Holzer, Matthias ^b   Putz, Reinhard ^a   Fischer, Martin R ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WITTEN HERDECKE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Anatomic CD ROM; Dissection course; E learning; Learning behaviour; Learning preferences; Medical education; Multimedia learning

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; ADULT; ANATOMY; ARTICLE; EDUCATION PROGRAM; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMAN; LEARNING STYLE; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL STUDENT; MULTIMEDIA; STUDENT ATTITUDE;

ANATOMY; CD-ROM; DISSECTION; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; QUESTIONNAIRES; STUDENTS; TEACHING; TEXTBOOKS AS TOPIC; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 67651092124     PISSN: 09409602     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.aanat.2009.03.003     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Adamczyk C., Huenges B., Müller-Gerbl M., and Putz R. Das Fähnchentestat als neue Prüfungsform im Fach Anatomie an der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München. GMS Z. Med. Ausbild. 24 (2006) Doc152
2. Bacro T., Gilbertson B., and Coultas J. Web-delivery of anatomy video clips using a CD-ROM. Anat. Rec. 261 (2000) 78-82
3. Barrett E., and Lally V. Gender differences in an on-line learning environment. J. Comput. Assis. Learn. 15 (1999) 48-60
4. Biasutto S.N., Caussa L.I., and Criado del Río L.E. Teaching anatomy: cadavers vs. computers?. Ann Anat. 188 (2006) 187-190
5. Caincross S., and Mannion M. Interactive multimedia and learning: realizing the benefits. Innovations Educ. Teach. Int. 38 (2001) 156-164
6. Chen S.Y., Magoulas G.D., and Macredie R.D. Cognitive styles and users' responses to structured information representation. Int. J. Digit. Libr. 4 (2004) 93-107
7. Conklin J. Hypertext-an introduction and survey. IEEE Computer 20 (1987) 17-41
8. Cook D.A. Web-based learning: pros, cons and controversies. Clin. Med. 7 (2007) 37-42
9. Corton M.M., Don McIntire D., Wai C.Y., Ling F.W., and Wendel G.D. A comparison of an interactive computer-based method with a conventional reading approach for learning pelvic anatomy. Am. J. Obst. Gyn. 195 (2006) 1438-1443
10. Craig S.D., Gholson B., and Driscoll D.M. Animated pedagogical agents in multimedia educational environments: effects of agent properties, picture features, and redundancy. J. Educ. Psychol. 94 (2002) 428-434
11. Durndell A., and Thomson K. Gender and computing: a decade of change?. Comput. Educ. 28 (1997) 1-9
12. Filler T.J., Abele H., Vollmar-Hesse I., and Peuker E.T. Neue Wege der Internet- gestützten Lehre in der Anatomie. Ann. Anat. 181 (1999) 499-508
13. Ford N., and Chen S.Y. Individual differences, hypermedia navigation, and learning: an empirical study. J. Educ. Multimedia Hypermedia 9 (2000) 281-311
14. Ford N., and Chen S.Y. Matching/mismatching revisited: an empirical study of learning and teaching styles. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 32 (2001) 5-22
15. Ghinea G., and Chen S.Y. The impact of cognitive styles on perceptual distributed multimedia quality. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 34 (2003) 393-406
16. Kerres M. Multimediale und telemediale Lernumgebungen. Konzeption und Entwicklung (2001), Oldenbourg, München/Wien
17. Kuhlen R. Hypertext. Ein nichtlineares Medium zwischen Buch und Wissensbank. Edition SEL-Stiftung (1999), Springer, Berlin. 978-3-540-53566-9
18. Lüers G.H., Dünne A.A., Werner J.A., and Putz R. Integration of a seminar on the anatomical basis of otorhinolaryngology (ENT) into the clinical course improves the confidence and performance of students in the clinical discipline. Ann. Anat. 189 (2007) 251-259
19. Lyon H.C., Longecker D.S., Gonzales J., O`Donnell J.F., Isso D., Überla K., Batschkus M., Dugas M., Fischer M.R., Eitel F., Windl A., and Schultz E.K. Correlation between student use of computer based instruction and high exam scores in pathology. J. Med. Educ. Technol. 6 (1998) 20-26
20. MacPherson B.R., and Brueckner J.K. Enhancing the dental histology curriculum using computer technology. J. Dent. Educ. 67 (2003) 359-365
21. Pabst R. Gross anatomy: an outdated subject or an essential part of a modern medical curriculum. Anat. Rec. 237 (1993) 431-433
22. Pereira J.A., Pleguezuelos E., Merí A., Molina-Ros A., Molina-Tomás M.C., and Masdeu C. Effectiveness of using blended learning strategies for teaching and learning human anatomy. Med. Educ. 41 (2007) 189-195
23. Pereira J.A., Meri A., Masdeu C., Molina-Tomas M.C., and Martinez-Carrio A. Using videoclip sto improbe theoretical anatomy teaching. Eur. J. Anat. 8 (2004) 143-146
24. Riding R., and Rayner S.G. Cognitive Styles and Learning Strategies (1998), David Fulton, London
25. Rizollo L.J. Human dissection: an approach to interweaving traditional and humanistic goals of medical education. Anat. Rec. 269 (2002) 81-88
26. Sweller J. Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty and instructional design. Learn. Instruct. 4 (1994) 295-312
27. Trelease R.B., Nieder G.L., Dørup J., and Schacht Hansen M. Going virtual with QuickTime VR: new methods and standardized tools for interactive dynamic visualization of anatmoical structures. Anat. Rec. 261 (2000) 64-77
28. Witkin H.A., Moore C.A., Goodenough D.R., and Cox P.W. Field-dependent and field independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Rev. Educ. Res. 47 (1977) 1-64