Nuclear transport receptor binding avidity triggers a self-healing collapse transition in FG-nucleoporin molecular brushes

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 109, Issue 42, 2012, Pages 16911-16916

  Schoch, Rafael L ^a   Kapinos, Larisa E ^a   Lim, Roderick Y H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Biointerface; Molecular crowding; Multivalent binding; Nucleocytoplasmic transport; Polymer brush

Indexed keywords

CELL NUCLEUS RECEPTOR; KARYOPHERIN BETA; NUCLEOPORIN;

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; CHEMICAL REACTION; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); DENSITY; EQUILIBRIUM CONSTANT; MOLECULAR PROBE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; SURFACE PLASMON RESONANCE; SURFACE PROPERTY;

BETA KARYOPHERINS; DIPEPTIDES; ELECTROPHORESIS, POLYACRYLAMIDE GEL; ESCHERICHIA COLI; HUMANS; MEMBRANE GLYCOPROTEINS; NUCLEAR PORE; NUCLEAR PORE COMPLEX PROTEINS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; RECOMBINANT PROTEINS; SURFACE PLASMON RESONANCE;

EID: 84867627425     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1208440109     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Tompa P (2010) Structure and Function of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins (CRC, Boca Raton, FL).
2. Uversky VN, Dunker AK (2012) Multiparametric analysis of intrinsically disordered proteins: Looking at intrinsic disorder through compound eyes. Anal Chem 84:2096-2104.
3. Gray JJ (2004) The interaction of proteins with solid surfaces. Curr Opin Struct Biol 14:110-115.
4. Lim RYH, et al. (2006) Flexible phenylalanine-glycine nucleoporins as entropic barriers to nucleocytoplasmic transport. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:9512-9517. (Pubitemid 43955856)
5. Frey S, Gorlich D (2007) A saturated FG-repeat hydrogel can reproduce the permeability properties of nuclear pore complexes. Cell 130:512-523. (Pubitemid 47208521)
6. Lim RYH, et al. (2007) Nanomechanical basis of selective gating by the nuclear pore complex. Science 318:640-643. (Pubitemid 350014836)
7. Patel SS, Belmont BJ, Sante JM, Rexach MF (2007) Natively unfolded nucleoporins gate protein diffusion across the nuclear pore complex. Cell 129:83-96. (Pubitemid 46507580)
8. Frey S, Gorlich D (2009) FG/FxFG as well as GLFG repeats form a selective permeability barrier with self-healing properties. EMBO J 28:2554-2567.
9. Jovanovic-Talisman T, et al. (2009) Artificial nanopores that mimic the transport selectivity of the nuclear pore complex. Nature 457:1023-1027.
10. Eisele NB, Frey S, Piehler J, Gorlich D, Richter RP (2010) Ultrathin nucleoporin phenylalanine-glycine repeat films and their interaction with nuclear transport receptors. EMBO Rep 11:366-372.
11. Kowalczyk SW, et al. (2011) Single-molecule transport across an individual biomimetic nuclear pore complex. Nat Nanotechnol 6:433-438.
12. Denning DP, Patel SS, Uversky V, Fink AL, Rexach M (2003) Disorder in the nuclear pore complex: The FG repeat regions of nucleoporins are natively unfolded. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:2450-2455. (Pubitemid 36297519)
13. Cronshaw JA, Krutchinsky AN, Zhang WZ, Chait BT, Matunis MJ (2002) Proteomic analysis of the mammalian nuclear pore complex. J Cell Biol 158:915-927. (Pubitemid 35001082)
14. Alber F, et al. (2007) The molecular architecture of the nuclear pore complex. Nature 450:695-701. (Pubitemid 350207701)
15. Stewart M (2007) Molecular mechanism of the nuclear protein import cycle. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 8:195-208.
16. Grunwald D, Singer RH, Rout M (2011) Nuclear export dynamics of RNA-protein complexes. Nature 475:333-341.
17. Yang W (2011) 'Natively unfolded' nucleoporins in nucleocytoplasmic transport. Nucleus 2:10-16.
18. Lyman SK, Guan TL, Bednenko J, Wodrich H, Gerace L (2002) Influence of cargo size on Ran and energy requirements for nuclear protein import. J Cell Biol 159:55-67. (Pubitemid 35191518)
19. Bayliss R, Littlewood T, Stewart M (2000) Structural basis for the interaction between FxFG nucleoporin repeats and importin-beta in nuclear trafficking. Cell 102:99-108.
20. Isgro TA, Schulten K (2005) Binding dynamics of isolated nucleoporin repeat regions to importin-beta. Structure 13:1869-1879. (Pubitemid 41772955)
21. Peleg O, Lim RYH (2010) Converging on the function of intrinsically disordered nucleoporins in the nuclear pore complex. Biol Chem 391:719-730.
22. Paine PL, Moore LC, Horowitz SB (1975) Nuclear-envelope permeability. Nature 254:109-114.
23. Hoelz A, Debler EW, Blobel G (2011) The structure of the nuclear pore complex. Annu Rev Biochem 80:613-643.
24. Rout MP, et al. (2000) The yeast nuclear pore complex: Composition, architecture, and transport mechanism. J Cell Biol 148:635-651.
25. Peters R (2009) Translocation through the nuclear pore: Kaps pave the way. Bioessays 31:466-477.
26. Yamada J, et al. (2010) A bimodal distribution of two distinct categories of intrinsically disordered structures with separate functions in FG nucleoporins. Mol Cell Proteomics 9:2205-2224.
27. Ben-Efraim I, Gerace L (2001) Gradient of increasing affinity of importin beta for nucleoporins along the pathway of nuclear import. J Cell Biol 152:411-417. (Pubitemid 34285609)
28. Bednenko J, Cingolani G, Gerace L (2003) Importin beta contains a COOH-terminal nucleoporin binding region important for nuclear transport. J Cell Biol 162:391-401. (Pubitemid 36988549)
29. Lott K, Bhardwaj A, Mitrousis G, Pante N, Cingolani G (2010) The importin beta binding domain modulates the avidity of importin beta for the nuclear pore complex. J Biol Chem 285:13769-13780.
30. Tetenbaum-Novatt J, Hough LE, Mironska R, McKenney AS, Rout MP (2012) Nucleocytoplasmic transport: A role for non-specific competition in karyopherin-nucleoporin interactions. Mol Cell Proteomics 11:31-46.
31. Schuck P (1997) Use of surface plasmon resonance to probe the equilibrium and dynamic aspects of interactions between biological macromolecules. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 26:541-566.
32. Knoll W (1998) Interfaces and thin films as seen by bound electromagnetic waves. Annu Rev Phys Chem 49:569-638.
33. Homola J (2008) Surface plasmon resonance sensors for detection of chemical and biological species. Chem Rev 108:462-493.
34. Jung LS, Campbell CT, Chinowsky TM, Mar MN, Yee SS (1998) Quantitative interpretation of the response of surface plasmon resonance sensors to adsorbed films. Langmuir 14:5636-5648. (Pubitemid 128590400)
35. Koutsioubas AG, Spiliopoulos N, Anastassopoulos DL, Vradis AA, Priftis GD (2007) Surface plasmon resonance as a tool for the estimation of adsorbed polymeric layer characteristics: Theoretical considerations and experiment. J Polymer Sci B Polymer Phys 45:2060-2070. (Pubitemid 47217831)
36. Palegrosdemange C, Simon ES, Prime KL, Whitesides GM (1991) Formation of self-assembled monoloayers by chemisorption of derivatives of oligo(ethylene glycol) of structure HS(CH2)11(OCH2CH2)META-OH on gold. J Am Chem Soc 113:12-20.
37. Levicky R, Herne TM, Tarlov MJ, Satija SK (1998) Using self-assembly to control the structure of DNA monolayers on gold: A neutron reflectivity study. J Am Chem Soc 120:9787-9792. (Pubitemid 28462483)
38. Ribbeck K, Gorlich D (2001) Kinetic analysis of translocation through nuclear pore complexes. EMBO J 20:1320-1330. (Pubitemid 32233972)
39. Lofas S, et al. (1991) Bioanalysis with surface plasmon resonance. Sensor Actuator B 5:79-84.
40. Stenberg E, Persson B, Roos H, Urbaniczky C (1991) Quantitative determination of surface concentration of protein with surface plasmon resonance using radiolabeled proteins. J Colloid Interface Sci 143:513-526.
41. Forwood JK, et al. (2010) Quantitative structural analysis of importin-beta flexibility: Paradigm for Solenoid protein structures. Structure 18:1171-1183.
42. Kim JU, O'Shaughnessy B (2002) Morphology selection of nanoparticle dispersions by polymer media. Phys Rev Lett 89:238301.
43. Bright JN, Woolf TB, Hoh JH (2001) Predicting properties of intrinsically unstructured proteins. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 76:131-173. (Pubitemid 33049925)
44. Zilman A, Di Talia S, Chait BT, Rout MP, Magnasco MO (2007) Efficiency, selectivity, and robustness of nucleocytoplasmic transport. PLoS Comput Biol 3:1281-1290. (Pubitemid 47196170)
45. Yang WD, Musser SM (2006) Nuclear import time and transport efficiency depend on importin beta concentration. J Cell Biol 174:951-961.
46. Solmaz SR, Chauhan R, Blobel G, Melcak I (2011) Molecular architecture of the transport channel of the nuclear pore complex. Cell 147:590-602.
47. Paradise A, Levin MK, Korza G, Carson JH (2007) Significant proportions of nuclear transport proteins with reduced intracellular mobilities resolved by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. J Mol Biol 365:50-65. (Pubitemid 44821209)
48. Tokunaga M, Imamoto N, Sakata-Sogawa K (2008) Highly inclined thin illumination enables clear single-molecule imaging in cells. Nat Methods 5:159-161. (Pubitemid 351181742)
49. Ma J, Yang W (2010) Three-dimensional distribution of transient interactions in the nuclear pore complex obtained from single-molecule snapshots. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:7305-7310.
50. Ma J, Goryaynov A, Sarma A, Yang W (2012) Self-regulated viscous channel in the nuclear pore complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:7326-7331.
51. Caspi Y, Zbaida D, Cohen H, Elbaum M (2008) Synthetic mimic of selective transport through the nuclear pore complex. Nano Lett 8:3728-3734.
52. Dunker AK, Brown CJ, Lawson JD, Iakoucheva LM, Obradovic Z (2002) Intrinsic disorder and protein function. Biochemistry 41:6573-6582. (Pubitemid 34547347)
53. Dyson HJ, Wright PE (2005) Intrinsically unstructured proteins and their functions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 6:197-208. (Pubitemid 40314921)
54. Srinivasan N, Kumar S (2012) Ordered and disordered proteins as nanomaterial building blocks. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 4:204-218.
55. Nel AE, et al. (2009) Understanding biophysicochemical interactions at the nanobio interface. Nat Mater 8:543-557.
56. Stuart MAC, et al. (2010) Emerging applications of stimuli-responsive polymer materials. Nat Mater 9:101-113.