Sharing control with haptics: Seamless driver support from manual to automatic control

Human Factors

Volumn 54, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 786-798

  Mulder, Mark ^a   Abbink, David A ^a   Boer, Erwin R ^a,b  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b Entropy Control Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

automation; control authority; curve negotiation; driver support; haptics; lane keeping; manual control; shared control

Indexed keywords

CURVE NEGOTIATION; DRIVER SUPPORT; HAPTICS; LANE KEEPING; SHARED CONTROL;

AUTOMATION; AUTOMOBILE DRIVERS; AUTOMOBILE STEERING EQUIPMENT; CONTROL; CONTROLLERS; MANUAL CONTROL; SAFETY ENGINEERING; WHEELS;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUTOMATION; AWARENESS; CAR DRIVING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MAN MACHINE INTERACTION; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT; SAFETY; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; AGED; ATTENTION; AUTOMATION; AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; AWARENESS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; PROTECTIVE DEVICES; SAFETY; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84867369181     PISSN: 00187208     EISSN: 15478181     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0018720812443984     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. AbbinkD. A. (2006). Neuromuscular analysis of haptic gas pedal feedback during car following (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.
2. Abbink D. A., Boer E. R., Mulder M... Proceedings of the IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium ; 2008 Eindhoven, Netherlands: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers ; 2008. 283.
3. Abbink D. A., Mulder M.. Exploring the dimensions of haptic feedback support in manual control. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering. 2009 ; 9 (1). 1-9
4. Abbink D. A., Mulder M.. Motivation for a neuromuscular basis for haptic shared control. Proceedings of the 11th IFAC/IFIP/IFORS/IEA Symposium on Analysis, Design, and Evaluation of Human-Machine Systems ; 2010a Valenciennes, France ; 2010a. 299.
5. Abbink D. A., Mulder M. Advances in haptics. Zadeh M. H., ed. Vienna, Austria: INTECH ; 2010b: 499-516.
6. Abbink D. A., Mulder M., Boer E. R.. Haptic shared control: Smoothly shifting control authority?. Cognition, Technology & Work. in press ;:
7. Abbink D. A., Mulder M., van der Helm F. C. T., Mulder M., Boer E. R.. Measuring neuromuscular control dynamics during car following with continuous haptic feedback. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part B. 2011 ; 41 (5). 1239-1249
8. Bainbridge L.. Ironies of automation. Automatica. 1983 ; 19 (6). 775-779
9. Brandt T., Sattel T., Bohm M.. Combining haptic human-machine interaction with predictive path planning for lane-keeping and collision avoidance systems. Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium ; 2007 Istanbul, Turkey: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers ; 2007. 582.
10. Cavallo V., Bran-Dei M., Laya O., Neboit M. Vision in vehicles II. Gale A. G. Freeman M. H. Haslegrave C. M. Smith P. Taylor S. P., ed. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier ; 1988: 365-374.
11. Della Penna M., van Paassen M. M., Mulder M., Abbink D. A., Mulder M.. Continuous haptic guidance: Obstacle avoidance-A possible solution to the haptic bifurcation problem. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics ; 2010 Istanbul, Turkey: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers ; 2010. 1628.
12. De Winter J. C. F., Dodou D.. Preparing drivers for dangerous situations: A critical reflection on continuous shared control. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics ; 2011 Anchorage, AK: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers ; 2011. 1050.
13. Duncan J., Williams P., Brown I.. Components of driving skill: Experience does not mean expertise. Ergonomics. 1991 ; 34 (7). 919-937
14. Field A. Discovering statistics using SPSS. London, UK: Sage ; 2009 :
15. Flemisch F., Kelsch J., Löper C., Schieben A., Schindler J. Human factors for assistance and automation. de Waard D. Flemisch F. O. Lorenz B. Oberheid H. Brookhuis K. A., ed. Maastricht, Netherlands: Shaker ; 2008: 1-16.
16. Forsyth B. A. C., MacLean K. E.. Predictive haptic guidance: Intelligent user assistance for the control of dynamic tasks. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics. 2006 ; 12 (1). 103-113
17. Goodrich K., Schutte P., Flemisch F., Williams R.. Application of the H-Mode, a design and interaction concept for highly automated vehicles, to aircraft. Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE/AIAA 25th Digital Avionics Systems Conference ; 2006 Portland, OR: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers ; 2006. 1.
18. Goodrich M. A., Boer E. R.. Model-based human-centered task automation: A case study in ACC system design. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man, and Cybernetics Part A-Systems and Humans. 2003 ; 33 (3). 325-336
19. Griffiths P. G., Gillespie R. B.. Sharing control between humans and automation using haptic interface: Primary and secondary task performance benefits. Human Factors. 2005 ; 47 (3). 574-590
20. Inagaki T., Takae Y., Moray N.. Decision supported information for takeoff safety in human-centered automation: An experimental investigation of time-fragile characteristics. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics ; 1999 Piscataway, NJ: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers ; 1999. 1101.
21. Johansson E., Engström J., Cherri C., Nodari E., Toffetti A., Schindhelm R., Gelau C. Review of existing techniques and metrics for IVIS and ADAS assessment. Brussels, Belgium: Information Society Technologies ; 2004 :
22. Lee J. D.. Fifty years of driving safety research. Human Factors. 2008 ; 50: 521-528
23. Lee J. D., See K. A.. Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors. 2004 ; 46: 50-80
24. Levison W. H., Simsek O., Bittner A. C., Hunn S. J.. Computational techniques used in the driver performance model of the interactive highway safety design model. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2007 ; 1779/2001: 17-25
25. Mayhew D. R., Simpson H. M., Pak A.. Changes in collision rates among novice drivers during the first months of driving. Accident Analysis and Prevention. 2003 ; 35 (5). 683-691
26. McGehee D. V., Lee J. D., Rizzo M., Dawson J., Bateman K.. Quantitative analysis of steering adaptation on a high performance fixed-base driving simulator. Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. 2004 ; 7 (3). 181-196
27. McLean J. R., Hoffmann E. R.. Steering reversals as a measure of driver performance and steering task difficulty. Human Factors. 1975 ; 17: 248-256
28. Merat N., Jamson A. H.. How do drivers behave in a highly automated car?. Proceedings of the Fifth International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design ; 2008 Big Sky, MT ; 2008. 514.
29. Mouloua M., Smither J. A. A., Hancock P. A., Duley J., Adams R., Latorella K. Human performance, situation awareness and automation: Current research and trends. Vincenzi D. A. Mouloua M Hancock P. A., ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum ; 2004: 320-323.
30. Mugge W., Abbink D. A., Schouten A. C., Dewald J. P. A., van der Helm F. C. T.. A rigorous model of reflex function indicates that position and force feedback are flexibly tuned to position and force tasks. Experimental Brain Research. 2010 ; 200: 325-340
31. Mulder M., Abbink D. A.. Sharing control with elderly drivers: Haptic guidance during curve negotiation. Proceedings of the IFAC Conference ; 2010 Valenciennes, France: International Federation of Automatic Control ; 2010. 310.
32. Mulder M., Abbink D. A.. Correct and faulty driver support from shared haptic control during evasive maneuvers. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics ; 2011 Anchorage, AK: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers ; 2011. 1057.
33. Mulder M., Abbink D. A., Boer E. R.. The effect of haptic guidance on curve negotiation behavior of young, experienced drivers. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics ; 2008 Singapore: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers ; 2008. 804.
34. Nakayama O., Futami T., Nakamura T., Boer E. R... Presented at the International Congress and Exposition ; 1999 Detroit, MI ; 1999..
35. Norman D. A.. The "problem" with automation: Inappropriate feedback and interaction, not "over-automation.". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London-Series B, Biological Sciences. 1990 ; 327 (1241). 585-593
36. Parasuraman R., Manzey D. H.. Complacency and bias in human use of automation: An attentional integration. Human Factors. 2010 ; 52: 381-410
37. Parasuraman R., Riley V.. Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors. 1997 ; 39: 230-253
38. Pritchett A. R.. Reviewing the roles of cockpit alerting systems. Human Factors in Aerospace Safety. 2001 ; 1 (1). 5-38
39. Rossetter E. J., Gerdes J. C.. Lyapunov based performance guarantees for the potential field lane-keeping assistance system. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control. 2006 ; 128 (3). 510-522
40. Sanders M. S.. Peak and sustained isometric forces applied to a truck steering wheel. Human Factors. 1981 ; 23: 655-660
41. Sarter N. B., Woods D. D.. How in the world did we ever get into that mode? Mode error and awareness in supervisory control. Human Factors. 1995 ; 37: 5-19
42. Seppelt B. D., Lee J. D.. Making adaptive cruise control (ACC) limits visible. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 2007 ; 65 (3). 192-205
43. Smither J. A. A., Mouloua M., Hancock P. A., Duley J., Adams R., Latorella K. Human performance, situation awareness and automation: Current research and trends. Vincenzi D. A. Mouloua M. Hancock P. A., ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum ; 2004: 315-319.
44. Stanton N. A., Young M. S.. Vehicle automation and driving performance. Ergonomics. 1998 ; 41 (7). 1014-1028
45. Thomas J. A., Walton D.. Measuring perceived risk: Self-reported and actual hand positions of SUV and car drivers. Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. 2007 ; 10 (3). 201-207
46. Thrun S., Montemerlo M., Dahlkamp H., Stavens D., Aron A., Diebel J., Mahoney P.. Stanley: The robot that won the DARPA Grand Challenge. Journal of Field Robotics. 2006 ; 23 (9). 661-692
47. Tsoi K. K., Mulder M., Abbink D. A.. Balancing safety and support: Changing lanes with a haptic lane-keeping support system. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics ; 2010 Istanbul, Turkey: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers ; 2010. 1236.
48. van Paassen M. M.. Heidegger versus Carthesian dualism, or where is my hammer?. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics ; 2010 Istanbul, Turkey: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers ; 2010. 1684.
49. Van Winsum W., Brookhuis K. A., de Waard D.. A comparison of different ways to approximate time-to-line crossing (TLC) during car driving. Accident Analysis and Prevention. 2000 ; 32 (1). 47-56
50. Van Winsum W., Godthelp H.. Speed choice and steering behavior in curve driving. Human Factors. 1996 ; 38: 434-441
51. Walker G. H., Stanton N. A., Young M. S.. Where is computing driving cars?. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 2009 ; 13 (2). 203-229
52. Walton D., Thomas J. A.. Naturalistic observations of driver hand positions. Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. 2005 ; 8 (3). 229-238