A feasible high spatiotemporal resolution breast DCE-MRI protocol for clinical settings

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 30, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 1257-1267

  Tudorica, Luminita A ^a   Oh, Karen Y ^a   Roy, Nicole ^a   Kettler, Mark D ^a   Chen, Yiyi ^a   Hemmingson, Stephanie L ^a   Afzal, Aneela ^a   Grinstead, John W ^b   Laub, Gerhard ^c   Li, Xin ^a   Huang, Wei ^a  

^a OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Siemens Healthcare   (United States)

^c Siemens Healthcare   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI; Spatial resolution; Temporal resolution; TWIST

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST LESION; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONTRAST TO NOISE RATIO; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; MATHEMATICAL PARAMETERS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RADIOLOGIST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANGIOGRAPHY; BIOPSY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84867140551     PISSN: 0730725X     EISSN: 18735894     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.04.009     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Goto M., Ito H., Akazawa K., Kubota T., Kizu O., Yamada K., et al. Diagnosis of breast tumors by contrast-enhanced MR imaging: comparison between the diagnostic performance of dynamic enhancement patterns and morphologic features. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007, 25:104-112.
2. Kuhl C.K., Schild H.H., Morakkabati N. Dynamic bilateral contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution. Radiology 2005, 236:789-800.
3. Schnall M.D., Blume J., Bluemke D.A., De Angelis G.A., DeBruhl N., Harms S., et al. Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study. Radiology 2006, 238:42-53.
4. Friedman P.D., Swaminathan S.V., Smith R. SENSE imaging of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005, 184:448-451.
5. Kuhl C.K., Mielcareck P., Klaschik S., Leutner C., Wardelmann E., Gieseke J., et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions?. Radiology 1999, 211:101-110.
6. Kaiser W.A., Zeitler E. MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Preliminary observations. Radiology 1989, 170:681-686.
7. Moate P.J., Dougherty L., Schnall M.D., Landis R.J., Boston R.C. A modified logistic model to describe gadolinium kinetics in breast tumors. Magn Reson Imaging 2004, 22:467-473.
8. Buadu L.D., Murakami J., Murayama S., Hashiguchi N., Sakai S., Masuda K., et al. Breast lesions: correlation of the contrast medium enhancement patterns on MR images with histopathologic findings and tumor angiogenesis. Radiology 1996, 200:639-649.
9. Ikeda O., Yamashita Y., Morishita S., Kido T., Kitajima M., Okamura K., et al. Characterization of breast masses by dynamic enhanced MR imaging. A logistic regression analysis. Acta Radiol 1999, 40:585-592.
10. Jansen S.A., Shimauchi A., Zak L., Fan X., Wood A.M., Karczmar G.S., et al. Kinetic curve of malignant lesions are not consistent across MRI systems: need for improved standardization of breast dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI acquisition. Am J Roentgen 2009, 193:832-839.
11. Huang W., Tudorica L.A., Li X., Thakur S.B., Chen Y., Morris E.A., et al. Discrimination of benign and malignant breast lesions by using shutter-speed dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 2011, 261:394-403.
12. Schabel M.C., Morrell G.R., Oh K.Y., Walczak C.A., Barlow R.B., Neumayer L.A. Pharmacokinetic mapping for lesion classification in dynamic breast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010, 31:1371-1378.
13. Eyal E., Badikhi D., Furman-Haran E., Kelcz F., Kirshenbaum K.J., Degani H. Principal component analysis of breast DCE-MRI adjusted with a model-based method. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009, 30:989-998.
14. Vincensini D., Dedieu V., Eliat P.A., Vincent C., Bailly C., de Certaines J., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging measurements of vascular permeability and extracellular volume fraction of breast tumors by dynamic Gd-DTPA-enhanced relaxometry. Magn Reson Imaging 2007, 25:293-302.
15. Brix G., Kiessling F., Lucht R., Darai S., Wasser K., Delorme S., et al. Microcirculation and microvasculature in breast tumors: pharmacokinetic analysis of dynamic MR image series. Magn Reson Med 2004, 52:420-429.
16. Ah-See M.W., Makris A., Taylor N.J., Harrison M., Richman P.I., Burcombe R.J., et al. Early changes in functional dynamic magnetic resonance imaging predict for pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in primary breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2008, 14:6580-6589.
17. Yankeelov T.E., Lepage M., Chakravarthy A., Broome E.E., Niermann K.J., Kelley M.C., et al. Integration of quantitative DCE-MRI and ADC mapping to monitor treatment response in human breast cancer: initial results. Magn Reson Imaging 2007, 25:1-13.
18. Pickles M.D., Lowry M., Menton D.J., Gibbs P., Turnbull L.W. Role of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in monitoring early response of locally advanced breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2005, 91:1-10.
19. trans DCE-MRI parameter. Book of abstract: Nineteenth Annual Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2011, 3097. ISMRM, Berkeley (Calif).
20. Henderson E., Rutt B.K., Lee T.Y. Temporal sampling requirements for the tracer kinetics modeling of breast disease. Magn Reson Imaging 1998, 16:1057-1073.
21. Heisen M., Fan X., Buurman J., van Riel N.A.W., Karczmar G.S., ter Haar Romeny B.M. The influence of temporal resolution in determining pharmacokinetic parameters from DCE-MRI data. Magn Reson Med 2010, 63:811-816.
22. Tagge I.J., Li X., Tudorica L.A., Chen Y., Hemmingson S., Morris E.A., et al. Effects of temporal resolution on breast cancer diagnostic accuracy by quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Book of abstract: Eighteenth Annual Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2010, 4748. ISMRM, Berkeley (Calif).
23. El Khouli R.H., Macura K.J., Barker P.B., Habba M.R., Jacobs M.A., Bluemke D.A. Relationship of temporal resolution to diagnostic performance for dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of the breast. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009, 30:999-1004.
24. Parrish T., Hu X. Continuous update with random encoding (CURE): a new strategy for dynamic imaging. Magn Reson Med 1995, 33:326-336.
25. Semelka R.C., Kelekis N.L., Thomasson D., Brown M.A., Laub G.A. HASTE MR imaging: description of technique and preliminary results in the abdomen. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996, 6:698-699.
26. Han M., Daniel B.L., Hargreaves B.A. Accelerated bilateral dynamic contrast-enhanced 3D spiral breast MRI using TSENSE. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008, 28:1425-1434.
27. Dougherty L., Isaac G., Rosen M.A., Nunes L.W., Moate P.J., Bostan R.C., et al. High frame-rate simultaneous bilateral breast DCE-MRI. Magn Reson Med 2007, 57:220-225.
28. Smith D.S., Welch E.B., Li X., Arlinghaus L.R., Loveless M.E., Koyama T., et al. Quantitative effects of using compressed sensing in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI. Phys Med Biol 2011, 56:4933-4946.
29. Wang H., Miao Y., Zhou K., Yu Y., Bao S., He Q., et al. Feasibility of high temporal resolution breast DCE-MRI using compressed sensing theory. Med Phys 2010, 37:4971-4981.
30. Chen L., Schabel M.C., DiBella E.V.R. Reconstruction of dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast with temporal constraints. Magn Reson Imaging 2010, 28:637-645.
31. Lustig M., Donoho D., Pauly J.M. Sparse MRI: the application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging. Magn Reson Med 2007, 58:1182-1195.
32. Petkova M., Gauvrit J.Y., Trystram D., Nataf F., Godon-Hardy S., Munier T., et al. Three-dimensional dynamic time-resolved contrast-enhanced MRA using parallel imaging and a variable rate k-space sampling strategy in intracranial arteriovenous malformations. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009, 29:7-12.
33. Kunishima K., Mori H., Itoh D., Aoki S., Kabasawa H., Koga T., et al. Assessment of arteriovenous malformations with 3-Tesla time-resolved, contrast-enhanced, three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography. J Neurosrug 2009, 110:492-499.
34. Willinek W.A., Hadizadeh D.R., von Falkenhausen M., Urbach H., Hoogeveen R., Schild H.H., et al. 4D time-resolved MR angiography with keyhole (4D-TRAK): more than 60 times accelerated MRA using a combination of CENTRA, keyhole, and SENSE at 3.0T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008, 27:1455-1460.
35. Parmar H., Ivancevic M.K., Dudek N., Gandhi D., Mukherji S.K. Dynamic MRA with four-dimensional time-resolved angiography using keyhole at 3 tesla in head and neck vascular lesions. J Neuroophthalmol 2009, 29:119-127.
36. Lim R.P., Shapiro M., Wang E.Y., Law M., Babb J.S., Rueff L.E., et al. 3D time-resolved MR angiography (MRA) of the carotid arteries with time-resolved imaging with stochastic trajectories: comparison with 3D contrast-enhanced bolus-chase MRA and 3D time-of-flight MRA. Am J Neuroradiol 2008, 29:1847-1854.
37. Song T., Laine A.F., Chen Q., Rusinek H., Bokacheva L., Lim R.P., et al. Optimal k-space sampling for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with an application to MR renography. Magn Reson Med 2009, 61:1242-1248.
38. Kershaw L.E., Cheng H.L.M. A general dual-bolus approach for quantitative DCE-MRI. Magn Reson Imaging 2011, 29:160-166.
39. Ramsay E., Causer P., Hill K., Plewes D. Adaptive bilateral breast MRI using projection reconstruction time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006, 24:617-624.
40. American College of Radiology (ACR) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 2003, 4th ed.
41. Tofts P.S., Brix G., Buckley D.L., Evelhoch J.L., Henderson E., Knopp M.V., et al. Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999, 10:223-232.
42. Huang W., Li X., Morris E.A., Tudorica L.A., Seshan V.E., Rooney W.D., et al. The magnetic resonance shutter speed discriminates vascular properties of malignant and benign breast tumors in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2008, 105:17943-17948.
43. Li X., Huang W., Morris E.A., Tudorica L.A., Seshan V.E., Rooney W.D., et al. Dynamic NMR effects in breast cancer dynamic-contrast-enhanced MRI. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2008, 105:17937-17942.
44. 10 for pharmacokinetic modeling of osteosarcoma dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data. Magn Reson Imaging 2009, 27:852-858.
45. Fleiss J.L. Statistical methods for rates and proportions 1981, Wiley, New York. 2nd Ed.
46. Sourbron S.P., Buckley D.L. On the scope and interpretation of the Tofts models for DCE-MRI. Magn Reson Med 2011, 66:735-745.
47. Yankeelov T.E., Luci J.J., Lepage M., Li R., Debusk L., Lin P.C., et al. Quantitative pharmacokinetic analysis of DCE-MRI data without an arterial input function: a reference region model. Magn Reson Imaging 2005, 23:519-529.
48. Yang C., Karczmar G.S., Medved M., Stadler W.M. Multiple reference tissue method for contrast agent arterial input function estimation. Magn Reson Med 2007, 58:1266-1275.
49. Fluckiger J.U., Schabel M.C., DiBella E.V.R. Model-based blind estimation of kinetic parameters in dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE)-MRI. Magn Reson Med 2009, 62:1477-1486.
50. Chan R.W., Ramsay E.A., Cheung E.Y., Plewes D.B. The influence of radial sampling schemes on compressed sensing reconstruction in breast MRI. Magn Reson Med 2012, 67:363-377.