The influence of temporal resolution in determining pharmacokinetic parameters from DCE-MRI data

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Volumn 63, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 811-816

  Heisen, Marieke ^a   Fan, Xiaobing ^b   Buurman, Johannes ^c   Van Riel, Natal A W ^a   Karczmar, Gregory S ^b   Ter Haar Romeny, Bart M ^a  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^c PHILIPS HEALTHCARE   (United States)

Author keywords

DCE MRI; Downsampling; Pharmacokinetic model; Temporal resolution, k space data

Indexed keywords

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; SIGNAL SAMPLING;

DCE-MRI; DOWNSAMPLING; DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCED MRI; K-SPACE DATUM; PHARMACOKINETIC MODEL; PHARMACOKINETIC PARAMETERS; TEMPORAL RESOLUTION; TWO-COMPARTMENT MODELS;

PHARMACOKINETICS;

GADODIAMIDE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; COMPARTMENT MODEL; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYNAMICS; EXTRACELLULAR SPACE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PROSTATE TUMOR; RAT;

EID: 77649164834     PISSN: 07403194     EISSN: 15222594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22171     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Kuhl CK, Schild HH, Morakkabati N. Dynamic bilateral contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution. Radiology 2005;236:789-800.
2. Mann RM, Kuhl CK, Kinkel K, Boetes C. Breast MRI: guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging. Eur Radiol 2008;18:1307-1318.
3. Tofts PS, Brix G, Buckley DL, Evelhoch JL, Henderson E, Knopp MV, Larsson HB, Lee TY, Mayr NA, Parker GJ, Port RE, Taylor J, Weisskoff RM. Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10:223-232.
4. Henderson E, Rutt BK, Lee TY. Temporal sampling requirements for the tracer kinetics modeling of breast disease. Magn Reson Imaging 1998; 16:1057-1073.
5. Aref M, Handbury JD, Xiuquan JJ, Aref S, Wiener EC. Spatial and temporal resolution effects on dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance mammography. Magn Reson Imaging 2007;25:14-34.
6. Ramirez MS, Ragan DK, Kundra V, Bankson JA. Feasibility of multiplemouse dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Med 2007;58: 610-615.
7. Aerts HJ, van Riel NA, Backes WH. System identification theory in pharmacokinetic modeling of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: influence of contrast injection. Magn Reson Med 2008;59:1111-1119.
8. El-Khouli R, Jacobs M, Wei J, Barker P, Macura K, Bluemke D. Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of the breast: kinetic curve analysis to determine the optimal temporal resolution. In: ISMRM 16th Scientific Meeting, 2008. p 3751.
9. Gal Y, Mehnert A, Bradley A, McMahon K, Crozier S. An evaluation of four parametric models of contrast enhancement for dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2007;2007:71-74.
10. Kovar DA, Lewis M, Karczmar GS. A new method for imaging perfusion and contrast extraction fraction: input functions derived from reference tissues. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998;8:1126-1134.
11. Fan X, Medved M, River JN, Zamora M, Corot C, Robert P, Bourrinet P, Lipton M, Culp RM, Karczmar GS. New model for analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data distinguishes metastatic from nonmetastatic transplanted rodent prostate tumors. Magn Reson Med 2004;51:487-494.
12. Medved M, Karczmar G, Yang C, Dignam J, Gajewski TF, Kindler H, Vokes E, MacEneany P, Mitchell MT, Stadler WM. Seminiquantitative analysis of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in cancer patients: Variability and changes in tumor tissue over time. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;20:122-128.
13. Marzola P, Mocchegiani E, Nicolato E, Tibaldi A, Sbarbati A, Osculati F. Chemical shift imaging at 4.7 tesla of thymus in young and old mice. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10:97-101.
14. Furman-Haran E, Margalit R, Grobgeld D, Degani H. Dynamic contrastenhanced magnetic resonance imaging reveals stress-induced angiogenesis in MCF7 human breast tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U|S|A 1996;93:6247-6251.
15. Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP. Numerical recipes in Fortran 77: the art of scientific computing. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1992. 963 p.
16. Gibbons JD, Chakraborti S. Nonparametric statistical inference. 4th ed. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2003. 645 p.
17. Cheng HL. Investigation and optimization of parameter accuracy in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;28:736-743.
18. Laue HO, Althaus M, Behrens S, Hahn HK, Peitgen H-O. Dependency of parameter estimates for the Tofts model on temporal sampling rate and on bolus arrival time. In: ISMRM 15th Scientific Meeting, Berlin, Germany, 2007. p 1722.
19. Buckley DL. Uncertainty in the analysis of tracer kinetics using dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI. Magn Reson Med 2002;47: 601-606.
20. Harrer JU, Parker GJ, Haroon HA, Buckley DL, Embelton K, Roberts C, Baleriaux D, Jackson A. Comparative study of methods for determining vascular permeability and blood volume in human gliomas. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;20:748-757.