Dynamic MRA with four-dimensional time-resolved angiography using keyhole at 3 tesla in head and neck vascular lesions

Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 119-127

  Parmar, Hemant ^a   Ivancevic, Marko K ^b   Dudek, Nancy ^a   Gandhi, Dheeraj ^c   Mukherji, Suresh K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^b PHILIPS HEALTHCARE   (United States)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 67651230861     PISSN: 10708022     EISSN: 15365166     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/WNO.0b013e3181a58c20     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Lanzer P, Gross GM, Keller FS, et al. Sequential 2D inflow venography: initial clinical observations. Magn Reson Med 1991; 19: 470-6.
2. Holtz DJ, Debatin JF, McKinnon GC, et al. MR venography of the calf: value of flow-enhanced time-of-flight echoplanar imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 166: 663-8.
3. Gandhi D. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance angiography in craniocervical vascular disease. J Neuroophthalmol 2004; 24: 306-14.
4. Willinek WA, Gieseke J, Conrad R, et al. Randomly segmented central k-space ordering in high-spatial resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the supraaortic arteries: initial experience. Radiology 2002; 225: 583-8.
5. Farb RI, McGregor C, Kim JK, et al. Intracranial arteriovenous malformations: real-time, auto triggered elliptic centric-ordered 3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography: Initial assessment. Radiology 2001; 220: 244-51.
6. Korosec FR, Frayne R, Grist TM, et al. Time-resolved contrast enhanced 3D MR angiography. Magn Reson Med 1996; 36: 345-51.
7. van Vaals JJ, Brummer ME, Dixon WT, et al. “Keyhole” method for accelerating imaging of contrast agent uptake. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993; 3: 671-5.
8. Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, et al. SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999; 42: 952-62.
9. Weiger M, Pruessmann KP, Kassner A, et al. Contrast-enhanced 3D MRA using SENSE. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 12: 671-7.
10. Jones RA, Haraldseth O, Muller TB, et al. K-space substitution: a novel dynamic imaging technique. Magn Reson Med 1993; 29: 830-4.
11. Willinek WA, Gieseke J, Conrad R, et al. Randomly segmented central k-space ordering in high-spatial-resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the supraaortic arteries: initial experience. Radiology 2002; 225: 583-8.
12. Coley SC, Wild JM, Wilkinson ID, et al. Neurovascular MRI with dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction angiography. Neuroradiology 2003; 45: 843-50.
13. Aoki S, Yoshikawa T, Hori M, et al. Two-dimensional thick-slice MR digital subtraction angiography for assessment of cerebrovascular occlusive diseases. Eur Radiol 2000; 10: 1858-64.
14. Wetzel SG, Haselhurst R, Bilecen D, et al. Preliminary experience with dynamic MR projection angiography in the evaluation of cervico-cranial steno-occlusive disease. Eur Radiol 2001; 11: 295-302.
15. Bock M, Schoenberg SO, Floemer F, et al. Separation of arteries and veins in 3D MR angiography using correlation analysis. Magn Reson Med 2000; 43: 481-7.
16. Du J, Thornton FJ, Mistretta CA, et al. Dynamic MR venography: an intrinsic benefit of time-resolved MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 24: 922-7.
17. Nael K, Michaely HJ, Villablanca P, et al. Time-resolved contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the head and neck at 3 tesla: initial results. Invest Radiol 2006; 41: 116-24.