Quantitative effects of using compressed sensing in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI

Physics in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 56, Issue 15, 2011, Pages 4933-4946

  Smith, David S ^a   Welch, E Brian ^a   Li, Xia ^a   Arlinghaus, Lori R ^a   Loveless, Mary E ^a   Koyama, Tatsuki ^a   Gore, John C ^a,b,c   Yankeelov, Thomas E ^a,b,c  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL STUDY; COMPRESSED SENSING; CONTRAST AGENT; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DCE-MRI; DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCED MRI; FIELD OF VIEWS; FOURIER SPACE; HUMAN DATA; MEAN ERRORS; PHARMACOKINETIC PARAMETERS; PRE-CLINICAL; QUANTITATIVE EFFECTS; QUANTITATIVE MODELING; SAMPLED DATA; SIGNAL INTENSITIES; SIGNAL TO NOISE; SPATIAL RESOLUTION; TIME COURSE; VOLUME TRANSFER;

IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RESOLUTION; MAMMALS; RESONANCE; SIGNAL RECONSTRUCTION; SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO;

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; FEMALE; FOURIER ANALYSIS; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; MOUSE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; TIME; TUMOR CELL LINE;

ANIMALS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CELL LINE, TUMOR; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; FOURIER ANALYSIS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MICE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 79961038416     PISSN: 00319155     EISSN: 13616560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/15/018     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Candes E 2006 Compressive sampling Proc. Int. Congress Mathematics (Madrid, Spain) pp 1-20
2. Chartrand R 2007 Exact reconstruction of sparse signals via nonconvex minimization IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 14 707-10 (Pubitemid 47434090)
3. Chen J et al 2008 Automatic determination of arterial input function for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in tumor assessment Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Interv. 11 594-601
4. Chen L, Schabel M C and DiBella E V R 2010 Reconstruction of dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast with temporal constraints Magn. Reson. Imaging 28 637-45
5. Chenevert T L, Helvie M A, Aisen A M, Francis I R, Adler D D, Roubidoux M A and Londy F J 1995 Dynamic three-dimensional imaging with partial k-space sampling: initial application for gadolinium-enhanced rate characterization of breast lesions Radiology 196 135-42
6. Choyke P L, Dwyer A J and Knopp M V 2003 Functional tumor imaging with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 17 509-20 (Pubitemid 36528666)
7. Donoho D L 2006 Compressed sensing IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 52 1289-306
8. Dougherty L, Isaac G, Rosen M A, Nunes L W, Moate P J, Boston R C, Schnall M D and Song H K 2007 High frame-rate simultaneous bilateral breast DCE-MRI Magn. Reson. Med. 57 220-5 (Pubitemid 46067953)
9. Eisenhauer E A et al 2009 New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) Eur. J. Cancer 45 228-47
10. Goldstein T and Osher S 2009 The split Bregman method for L1 regularized problems SIAM J. Imaging Sci. 2 323-43
11. Jensen L R, Huuse E M, Bathen T F, Goa P E, Bofin A M, Pedersen T B, Lundgren S and Gribbestad I S 2010 Assessment of early docetaxel response in an experimental model of human breast cancer using DCE-MRI, ex vivo HR MAS, and in vivo 1H MRS NMR Biomed. 23 56-65
12. Jones R A, Haraldseth O, Muller T B, Rinck P A and ksendal A N 1993 K-space substitution: a novel dynamic imaging technique Magn. Reson. Med. 29 830-4 (Pubitemid 23182868)
13. Kety S S 1951 Peripheral blood flow measurement Pharmacol. Rev. 3 1-41
14. Li X, Welch E B, Chakravarthy A B, Mayer I, Kelley M, Meszoely I, Means-Powell J, Gore J C and Yankeelov T E 2010 A semi-automated method for obtaining the arterial input function in dynamic breast data Proc. Int. Socety for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (ISMRM) p 2729
15. Lin L I-K 1989 A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility Biometrics 45 255-68
16. Lockhart A C et al 2010 Phase I study of intravenous vascular endothelial growth factor trap, aflibercept, in patients with advanced solid tumors J. Clin. Oncol. 28 207-14
17. Loveless M E, Halliday J, Liess C, Xu L, Dortch R, Whisenant J, Waterton J C, Gore J C and Yankeelov T E 2011 A quantitative comparison of the influence of individual versus population-derived vascular input functions on DCE-MRI in small animals Magn. Reson. Med. at press
18. Lustig M, Donoho D and Pauly J M 2007 Sparse MRI: the application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging Magn. Reson. Med. 58 1182-95 (Pubitemid 350234205)
19. Mannelli L et al 2010 Evaluation of nonenhancing tumor fraction assessed by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI subtraction as a predictor of decrease in tumor volume in response to chemoradiotherapy in advanced cervical cancer Am. J. Roentgenol. 195 524-47
20. Mouridsen K et al 2006 Automatic selection of arterial input function using cluster analysis Magn. Reson. Med. 55 524-31 (Pubitemid 43352550)
21. Otazo R, Kim D, Axel L and Sodickson D 2010 Combination of compressed sensing and parallel imaging for highly accelerated first-pass cardiac perfusion MRI Magn. Reson. Med. 64 767-76
22. Trzasko J, Haider C and Manduca A 2009 Practical nonconvex compressive sensing reconstruction of highly-accelerated 3D paralllel MR angiograms Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Biomedical Imaging p 1349
23. Van Vaals J J, Brummer M E, Dixon W T, Tuithof H H, Engels H, Nelson R C, Gerety B M, Chezmar J L and den Boer J A 1993 'Keyhole' method for accelerating imaging of contrast agent uptake J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 3 671-75
24. Wang H et al 2010 Feasibility of high temporal resolution breast DCE-MRI using compressed sensing theory Med. Phys. 37 4971-81
25. Wedge S R et al 2005 AZD2171: a highly potent, orally bioavailable, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor for the treatment of cancer Cancer Res. 65 4389-400 (Pubitemid 40775678)
26. Yankeelov T E and Gore J C 2009 Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in oncology: theory, data acquisition, analysis, and examples Curr. Med. Imaging Rev. 3 91-107 (Pubitemid 46773870)
27. Zwick S et al 2009 Assessment of vascular remodeling under antiangiogenic therapy using DCE-MRI and vessel size imaging J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 29 1125-33