Adaptive bilateral breast MRI using projection reconstruction time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 617-624

  Ramsay, E ^a   Causer, P ^a   Hill, K ^b   Plewes, D ^a  

^a SUNNYBROOK RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^b DEPARTMENT OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Adaptive reconstruction; Bilateral breast MRI; Dynamic imaging; PR TRICKS; Projection reconstruction

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST LESION; CANCER PATIENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PILOT STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO;

ARTIFACTS; BIOPSY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; KINETICS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PILOT PROJECTS; SOFTWARE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 33748286030     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20685     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Nunes LW, Schnall MD, Orel SG, et al. Breast MR Imaging: interpretation model. Radiology 1997;202:833-841.
2. Kuhl CK, Schild HH. Dynamic image interpretation of MRI of the breast. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12:965-974.
3. Daniel BL, Yen YF, Glover GH, et al. Breast disease: dynamic spiral MR imaging. Radiology 1998;209:499-509.
4. Kinkel K, Helbich TH, Esserman LJ, et al. Dynamic high-spatial-resolution MR imaging of suspicious breast lesions: diagnostic criteria and interobserver variability. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;175:35-43.
5. Leong, CS, Daniel BL, Herfkens RJ, et al. Characterization of breast lesion morphology with delayed 3DSSMT: an adjunct to dynamic breast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;11:87-96.
6. Warner E, Plewes DB, Shumak RS, et al. Comparison of breast magnetic resonance imaging, mammography, and ultrasound for surveillance of women at high risk for hereditary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:3524-3531.
7. Warner E, Plewes DB, Hill KA, et al. Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound and clinical breast examination. JAMA 2004;292:1317-1325.
8. Peters DC, Korosec FR, Grist TM, et al. Undersampled projection reconstruction applied to MR angiography. Magn Reson Med 2000;43:91-101.
9. Vigen KK, Peters DC, Grist TM, Block WF, Mistretta CA. Undersampled projection-reconstruction imaging for time-resolved contrast-enhanced imaging. Magn Reson Med 2000;43:170-176.
10. Korosec FR, Frayne R, Grist TM, Mistretta CA. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:345-351.
11. Song HK, Dougherty L. Dynamic MRI with projection reconstruction and KWIC processing for simultaneous high spatial and temporal resolution. Magn Reson Med 2004;52:815-824.
12. Song HK, Dougherty L, Schnall MD. Simultaneous acquisition of multiple resolution images for dynamic contrast enhanced imaging of the breast. Magn Reson Med 2001;46:503-509.
13. Song HK, Dougherty L. K-space weighted image contrast (KWIC) for contrast manipulation in projection reconstruction MRI. Magn Reson Med 2000;44:825-832.
14. Lee SG, Orel SG, et al. MR imaging screening of the contralateral breast in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer: preliminary results. Radiology 2003;226:773-778.
15. Fain SB, Du J, Parakkal R, Moran C, Kelcz F, Carroll T. A 3D PR sequence (PR-TRICKS) for dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) imaging of the breast. In: Proceedings of the 12th Annual Meeting of the ISMRM, Kyoto, Japan. 2004. (abstract 249).
16. Larkman DJ, deSouza NM, Bydder M, Hajnal JV. An investigation into the use of sensitivity-encoded techniques to increase temporal resolution in dynamic contrast-enhanced breast imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;14:329-335.
17. Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P. SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:952-962.
18. Angelos L, Shimakawa A, Daniel B, Maier C, Brittain J. Bilateral breast imaging using spiral acquisition with parallel imaging. In: Proceedings of the 11th Annual Meeting of the ISMRM, Toronto, Canada, 2003 (abstract 1408).
19. Hoppel BE, Angelos LC, Blawat LR. High resolution 3T MR mammography with higher R-factors. In: Proceedings of the 12th Annual Meeting of the ISMRM, Kyoto, Japan, 2004 (abstract 2605).
20. Greenman RL, Lenkinski RE, Schnall MD. Bilateral imaging using separate interleaved 3D volumes and dynamically switched multiple receive coil arrays. Magn Reson Med 1998;39:108-115.
21. Konyer NB, Ramsay EA, Bronskill MJ, Plewes DB. Comparison of MR imaging breast coils. Radiology 2002;222:830-834.
22. Jackson JI, Meyer CH, Nishimura DB, Macovski A. Selection of a convolution function for Fourier inversion using gridding. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1991;10:474-478.
23. Yang PC, Santos JM, Nguyen PK, et al. Dynamic real-time architecture in magnetic resonance coronary angiography-a prospective clinical trial. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2004;6:885-894.
24. Peters DC, Derbyshire JA, McVeigh E. Centering the projection reconstruction trajectory: reducing gradient error delays. Magn Reson Med 2003;50:1-6.