Protein deposition and clinical symptoms in daily wear of etafilcon lenses

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 89, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 1450-1459

  Subbaraman, Lakshman N ^a   Glasier, Mary Ann ^a   Varikooty, Jalaiah ^a   Srinivasan, Sruthi ^a   Jones, Lyndon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Comfort; Contact lens; Deposition; Lysozyme; Protein; Protein activity; Tears

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL SIGNS; CLINICAL SYMPTOMS; COMFORT; CONFORMATIONAL STATE; IN-VIVO; LYSOZYME DEPOSITION; PROTEIN ACTIVITY; PROTEIN DEPOSITION; SOFT CONTACT LENS; SUBJECTIVE COMFORT; SUBJECTIVE FACTORS; SUBJECTIVE SYMPTOMS; TEARS; TIME POINTS; TOTAL PROTEIN; WEAK CORRELATION;

CONTACT LENSES; DEPOSITION; DEPOSITS; ENZYMES;

PROTEINS;

ETAFILCON; EYE PROTEIN; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; TEAR PROTEINS;

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROPHORESIS; HUMAN; HYDROPHILIC CONTACT LENS; IMMUNOBLOTTING; LACRIMAL FLUID; METABOLISM; PROSTHESIS; PROTEIN BINDING; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

ADULT; CONTACT LENSES, HYDROPHILIC; ELECTROPHORESIS; EYE PROTEINS; HUMANS; IMMUNOBLOTTING; METHACRYLATES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROTEIN BINDING; QUESTIONNAIRES; TEARS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84866912414     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e318269e583     Document Type: Article

References (96)

1. Richdale K, Sinnott LT, Skadahl E, Nichols JJ. Frequency of and factors associated with contact lens dissatisfaction and discontinuation. Cornea 2007;26:168-74. (Pubitemid 46168286)
2. Fonn D, Dumbleton K. Dryness and discomfort with silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens 2003;29:S101-4.
3. Fonn D. Targeting contact lens induced dryness and discomfort: what properties will make lenses more comfortable. Optom Vis Sci 2007;84:279-85. (Pubitemid 46624852)
4. Gellatly KW, Brennan NA, Efron N. Visual decrement with deposit accumulation of HEMA contact lenses. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1988;65:937-41. (Pubitemid 19028405)
5. Timberlake GT, Doane MG, Bertera JH. Short-term, low-contrast visual acuity reduction associated with in vivo contact lens drying. Optom Vis Sci 1992;69:755-60.
6. Pritchard N, Fonn D, Brazeau D. Discontinuation of contact lens wear: a survey. Int Contact Lens Clin 1999;26:157-62.
7. Bruinsma GM, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ. Bacterial adhesion to surface hydrophilic and hydrophobic contact lenses. Biomaterials 2001;22:3217-24. (Pubitemid 32923328)
8. Ladage PM, Yamamoto K, Ren DH, Li L, Jester JV, Petroll WM, Cavanagh HD. Effects of rigid and soft contact lens daily wear on corneal epithelium, tear lactate dehydrogenase, and bacterial binding to exfoliated epithelial cells. Ophthalmology 2001;108:1279-88. (Pubitemid 32568140)
9. Lemp MA. Report of the National Eye Institute/Industry workshop on Clinical Trials in Dry Eyes. CLAO J 1995;21:221-32.
10. Nichols JJ, Sinnott LT. Tear film, contact lens, and patient-related factors associated with contact lens-related dry eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:1319-28. (Pubitemid 46780736)
11. Willcox MD, Lan J. Secretory immunoglobulin A in tears: functions and changes during contact lens wear. Clin Exp Optom 1999;82:1-3.
12. Pisella PJ, Malet F, Lejeune S, Brignole F, Debbasch C, Bara J, Rat P, Colin J, Baudouin C. Ocular surface changes induced by contact lens wear. Cornea 2001;20:820-5. (Pubitemid 33029479)
13. Schultz CL, Kunert KS. Interleukin-6 levels in tears of contact lens wearers. J Interferon Cytokine Res 2000;20:309-10. (Pubitemid 30169742)
14. Gilbard JP, Gray KL, Rossi SR. A proposed mechanism for increased tear-film osmolarity in contact lens wearers. Am J Ophthalmol 1986; 102:505-7. (Pubitemid 17183714)
15. Mackie IA. Contact lenses in dry eyes. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K 1985;104(Pt. 4):477-83.
16. Efron N, Brennan N. A survey of wearers of low water content hydrogel contact lenses. Clin Exp Optom 1988;71:86-90.
17. Thai LC, Tomlinson A, Simmons PA. In vitro and in vivo effects of a lubricant in a contact lens solution. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2002; 22:319-29. (Pubitemid 41711141)
18. Guillon JP, Guillon M, Croin F. Hydrogel lens in vivo wettability during sleep. Optom Vis Sci 1990;67(Suppl.):170.
19. Holly FJ, Refojo MF. Wettability of hydrogels. Part I: poly (2- hydroxyethyl methacrylate). J Biomed Mater Res 1975;9:315-26.
20. Fonn D, Situ P, Simpson T. Hydrogel lens dehydration and subjective comfort and dryness ratings in symptomatic and asymptomatic contact lens wearers. Optom Vis Sci 1999;76:700-4. (Pubitemid 29483072)
21. Pritchard N, Fonn D. Dehydration, lens movement and dryness ratings of hydrogel contact lenses. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1995;15: 281-6.
22. Green-Church KB, Nichols KK, Kleinholz NM, Zhang L, Nichols JJ. Investigation of the human tear film proteome using multiple proteomic approaches. Mol Vis 2008;14:456-70. (Pubitemid 351377320)
23. Zhao Z, Wei X, Aliwarga Y, Carnt NA, Garrett Q, Willcox MD. Proteomic analysis of protein deposits on worn daily wear silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Mol Vis 2008;14:2016-24.
24. Green-Church KB, Nichols JJ. Mass spectrometry-based proteomic analyses of contact lens deposition. Mol Vis 2008;14:291-7. (Pubitemid 351279919)
25. Minarik L, Rapp J. Protein deposits on individual hydrophilic contact lenses: effects of water and ionicity. CLAO J 1989;15:185-8. (Pubitemid 19201038)
26. Minno GE, Eckel L, Groemminger S, Minno B, Wrzosek T. Quantitative analysis of protein deposits on hydrophilic soft contact lenses: part I. Comparison to visual methods of analysis: part II. Deposit variation among FDA lens material groups. Optom Vis Sci 1991;68: 865-72.
27. Myers RI, Larsen DW, Tsao M, Castellano C, Becherer LD, Fontana F, Ghormley NR, Meier G. Quantity of protein deposited on hydrogel contact lenses and its relation to visible protein deposits. Optom Vis Sci 1991;68:776-82.
28. Sack RA, Jones B, Antignani A, Libow R, Harvey H. Specificity and biological activity of the protein deposited on the hydrogel surface. Relationship of polymer structure to biofilm formation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1987;28:842-9.
29. Bontempo AR, Rapp J. Protein-lipid interaction on the surface of a hydrophilic contact lens in vitro. Curr Eye Res 1997;16:776-81. (Pubitemid 27354976)
30. Maissa C, Franklin V, Guillon M, Tighe B. Influence of contact lens material surface characteristics and replacement frequency on protein and lipid deposition. Optom Vis Sci 1998;75:697-705. (Pubitemid 28459984)
31. Lin ST, Mandell RB, Leahy CD, Newell JO. Protein accumulation on disposable extended wear lenses. CLAO J 1991;17:44-50.
32. Fowler SA, Korb DR, Allansmith MR. Deposits on soft contact lenses of various water contents. CLAO J 1985;11:124-7. (Pubitemid 15084133)
33. Yan G, Nyquist G, Caldwell KD, Payor R, McCraw EC. Quantitation of total protein deposits on contact lenses by means of amino acid analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993;34:1804-13. (Pubitemid 23120256)
34. Lord MS, Stenzel MH, Simmons A, Milthorpe BK. The effect of charged groups on protein interactions with poly (HEMA) hydrogels. Biomaterials 2006;27:567-75. (Pubitemid 41464252)
35. Soltys-Robitaille CE, Ammon DM, Jr., Valint PL, Jr., Grobe GL, 3rd, The relationship between contact lens surface charge and in-vitro protein deposition levels. Biomaterials 2001;22:3257-60. (Pubitemid 32923332)
36. Subbaraman LN, Glasier MA, Senchyna M, Sheardown H, Jones L. Kinetics of in vitro lysozyme deposition on silicone hydrogel, PMMA, and FDA groups I, II, and IV contact lens materials. Curr Eye Res 2006;31:787-96. (Pubitemid 44581302)
37. Keith D, Hong B, Christensen M. A novel procedure for the extraction of protein deposits from soft hydrophilic contact lenses for analysis. Curr Eye Res 1997;16:503-10. (Pubitemid 27219929)
38. Sack RA, Sathe S, Hackworth LA, Willcox MD, Holden BA, Morris CA. The effect of eye closure on protein and complement deposition on Group IV hydrogel contact lenses: relationship to tear flow dynamics. Curr Eye Res 1996;15:1092-100. (Pubitemid 26395267)
39. Garrett Q, Garrett RW, Milthorpe BK. Lysozyme sorption in hydrogel contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999;40:897-903. (Pubitemid 29153255)
40. Suwala M, Glasier MA, Subbaraman LN, Jones L. Quantity and conformation of lysozyme deposited on conventional and silicone hydrogel contact lens materials using an in vitro model. Eye Contact Lens 2007;33:138-43. (Pubitemid 46763363)
41. Jones L, Senchyna M, Glasier MA, Schickler J, Forbes I, Louie D, May C. Lysozyme and lipid deposition on silicone hydrogel contact lens materials. Eye Contact Lens 2003;29:S75-9.
42. Senchyna M, Jones L, Louie D, May C, Forbes I, Glasier MA. Quantitative and conformational characterization of lysozyme deposited on balafilcon and etafilcon contact lens materials. Curr Eye Res 2004; 28:25-36. (Pubitemid 38161171)
43. Allansmith MR. Immunologic effects of extended-wear contact lenses. Ann Ophthalmol 1989;21:465-7, 474.
44. Allansmith MR, Korb DR, Greiner JV, Henriquez AS, Simon MA, Finnemore VM. Giant papillary conjunctivitis in contact lens wearers. Am J Ophthalmol 1977;83:697-708. (Pubitemid 8136096)
45. Skotnitsky C, Sankaridurg PR, Sweeney DF, Holden BA. General and local contact lens induced papillary conjunctivitis (CLPC). Clin Exp Optom 2002;85:193-7.
46. Skotnitsky CC, Naduvilath TJ, Sweeney DF, Sankaridurg PR. Two presentations of contact lens-induced papillary conjunctivitis (CLPC) in hydrogel lens wear: local and general. Optom Vis Sci 2006;83:27-36. (Pubitemid 43361653)
47. Glasson M, Stapleton F, Willcox M. Lipid, lipase and lipocalin differences between tolerant and intolerant contact lens wearers. Curr Eye Res 2002;25:227-35. (Pubitemid 36307988)
48. Carney FP, Morris CA, Willcox MD. Effect of hydrogel lens wear on the major tear proteins during extended wear. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 1997;25(Suppl. 1):S36-8. (Pubitemid 27337278)
49. Thai LC, Tomlinson A, Doane MG. Effect of contact lens materials on tear physiology. Optom Vis Sci 2004;81:194-204. (Pubitemid 38381300)
50. Farris RL. Tear analysis in contact lens wearers. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1985;83:501-45. (Pubitemid 17210930)
51. Vinding T, Eriksen JS, Nielsen NV. The concentration of lysozyme and secretory IgA in tears from healthy persons with and without contact lens use. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1987;65:23-6. (Pubitemid 17030566)
52. Temel A, Kazokoglu H, Taga Y. Tear lysozyme levels in contact lens wearers. Ann Ophthalmol 1991;23:191-4.
53. Stapleton F, Willcox MD, Morris CA, Sweeney DF. Tear changes in contact lens wearers following overnight eye closure. Curr Eye Res 1998;17:183-8. (Pubitemid 28073784)
54. Korb DR. Tear film-contact lens interactions. Adv Exp Med Biol 1994;350:403-10.
55. Choy CK, Cho P, Benzie IF, Ng V. Effect of one overnight wear of orthokeratology lenses on tear composition. Optom Vis Sci 2004;81: 414-20. (Pubitemid 38780435)
56. Mann AM, Tighe BJ. The detection of kinin activity in contact lens wear. Adv Exp Med Biol 2002;506:961-6. (Pubitemid 36308288)
57. Willcox M, Pearce D, Tan M, Demirci G, Carney F. Contact lenses and tear film interactions. Adv Exp Med Biol 2002;506:879-84. (Pubitemid 36308276)
58. Guillon M, Maissa C, Girard-Claudon K, Cooper P. Influence of the tear film composition on tear film structure and symptomatology of soft contact lens wearers. Adv Exp Med Biol 2002;506:895-9. (Pubitemid 36308278)
59. Morris CA, Holden BA, Papas E, Griesser HJ, Bolis S, Anderton P, Carney F. The ocular surface, the tear film, and the wettability of contact lenses. Adv Exp Med Biol 1998;438:717-22. (Pubitemid 28303811)
60. Velasco Cabrera MJ, Garcia Sanchez J, Bermudez Rodriguez FJ. Lactoferrin in tears in contact lens wearers. CLAO J 1997;23:127-9.
61. Pearce DJ, Demirci G, Willcox MD. Secretory IgA epitopes in basal tears of extended-wear soft contact lens wearers and in non-lens wearers. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 1999;27:221-3. (Pubitemid 29429692)
62. Lever OW, Jr., Groemminger SF, Allen ME, Bornemann RH, Dey DR, Barna BJ. Evaluation of the relationship between total lens protein deposition and patient-rated comfort of hydrophilic (soft) contact lenses. Int Contact Lens Clin 1995;22:5-13.
63. Bruce A, Golding T, Au S, Rowhani H. Mechanism of dryness in soft lens wear - role of BUT and deposits. Clin Exp Optom 1995;78: 168-75.
64. Nilsson SE, Andersson L. Contact lens wear in dry environments. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1986;64:221-5. (Pubitemid 16114920)
65. Nilsson SE, Lindh H. Hydrogel contact lens cleaning with or without multi-enzymes: a prospective study. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1988;66:15-18. (Pubitemid 18088137)
66. van Duzee B. Judging the cleaning ability of lens care systems. Contact Lens Spectrum 1995;10(Suppl.):7-9.
67. Brennan NA, Coles ML. Deposits and symptomatology with soft contact lens wear. Int Contact Lens Clin 2000;27:75-100.
68. Morgan PB, Efron N. Comparative clinical performance of two silicone hydrogel contact lenses for continuous wear. Clin Exp Optom 2002;85:183-92.
69. Subbaraman LN, Glasier MA, Senchyna M, Jones L. Stabilization of lysozyme mass extracted from lotrafilcon silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2005;82:209-14. (Pubitemid 40381667)
70. Subbaraman LN, Bayer S, Glasier MA, Lorentz H, Senchyna M, Jones L. Rewetting drops containing surface active agents improve the clinical performance of silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2006;83:143-51.
71. Glasson MJ, Stapleton F, Keay L, Sweeney D, Willcox MD. Differences in clinical parameters and tear film of tolerant and intolerant contact lens wearers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:5116-24. (Pubitemid 37475378)
72. Guillon M, Maissa C, Styles E. Relationship between pre-ocular tear film structure and stability. Adv Exp Med Biol 1998;438:401-5. (Pubitemid 28303765)
73. Guillon M, Styles E, Guillon JP, Maissa C. Preocular tear film characteristics of nonwearers and soft contact lens wearers. Optom Vis Sci 1997;74:273-9. (Pubitemid 27280267)
74. Guillon JP, Guillon M. Tear film examination of the contact lens patient. Contax 1988;81:14-8.
75. Young G, Efron N. Characteristics of the pre-lens tear film during hydrogel contact lens wear. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1991;11:53-8.
76. Glasson MJ, Stapleton F, Keay L, Willcox MD. The effect of short term contact lens wear on the tear film and ocular surface characteristics of tolerant and intolerant wearers. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2006;29:41-7. (Pubitemid 43372727)
77. Guillon M, McGrogan L, Guillon JP, Styles E, Maissa C. Effect of material ionicity on the performance of daily disposable contact lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 1997;20:3-8. (Pubitemid 127538787)
78. Cheng L, Muller SJ, Radke CJ. Wettability of silicone-hydrogel contact lenses in the presence of tear-film components. Curr Eye Res 2004;28:93-108. (Pubitemid 38200944)
79. Tonge S, Jones L, Goodall S, Tighe B. The ex vivo wettability of soft contact lenses. Curr Eye Res 2001;23:51-9. (Pubitemid 34494014)
80. Lorentz H, Rogers R, Jones L. The impact of lipid on contact angle wettability. Optom Vis Sci 2007;84:946-53. (Pubitemid 351339060)
81. Luensmann D, Zhang F, Subbaraman L, Sheardown H, Jones L. Localization of lysozyme sorption to conventional and silicone hydrogel contact lenses using confocal microscopy. Curr Eye Res 2009;34: 683-97.
82. Castillo EJ, Koenig JL, Anderson JM, Lo J. Protein adsorption on hydrogels: part II. Reversible and irreversible interactions between lysozyme and soft contact lens surfaces. Biomaterials 1985;6:338-45. (Pubitemid 15232636)
83. Kidane A, Szabocsik JM, Park K. Accelerated study on lysozyme deposition on poly(HEMA) contact lenses. Biomaterials 1998;19: 2051-5. (Pubitemid 28537645)
84. Monfils J, Tasker HL, Townley L, Payor R, Dunkirk S. Laboratory simulation of protein deposition of vifilcon and etafilcon soft contact lens materials. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1992;33(Suppl.):1292.
85. Jones L, Mann A, Evans K, Franklin V, Tighe B. An in vivo comparison of the kinetics of protein and lipid deposition on group II and group IV frequent-replacement contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2000; 77:503-10.
86. Keith DJ, Christensen MT, Barry JR, Stein JM. Determination of the lysozyme deposit curve in soft contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens 2003; 29:79-82. (Pubitemid 43189072)
87. Leahy CD, Mandell RB, Lin ST. Initial in vivo tear protein deposition on individual hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1990;67: 504-11. (Pubitemid 20289224)
88. Subbaraman LN, Woods J, Teichroeb JH, Jones L. Protein deposition on a lathe-cut silicone hydrogel contact lens material. Optom Vis Sci 2009;86:244-50.
89. Subbaraman LN, Jones L. Kinetics of lysozyme activity recovered from conventional and silicone hydrogel contact lens materials. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2010;21:343-58.
90. Norde W. Adsorption of proteins from solution at the solid-liquid interface. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 1986;25:267-340.
91. Norde W, Anusiem A. Adsorption, desorption and re-adsorption of proteins on solid surfaces. Colloids Surf 1992;66:73-80.
92. Norde W, Lyklema J. Why proteins prefer interfaces. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 1991;2:183-202.
93. Ratner BD, Hoffman AS, Schoen FJ, Lemons JE, eds. Biomaterials Science. An Introduction to Materials in Medicine, 2nd ed. Boston, MA: Elsevier Academic Press; 2004.
94. Zhao Z, Naduvilath T, Flanagan JL, Carnt NA, Wei X, Diec J, Evans V, Willcox MD. Contact lens deposits, adverse responses, and clinical ocular surface parameters. Optom Vis Sci 2010;87:669-74.
95. Willcox MD, Harmis N, Cowell BA, Williams T, Holden BA. Bacterial interactions with contact lenses; effects of lens material, lens wear and microbial physiology. Biomaterials 2001;22:3235-47. (Pubitemid 32923330)
96. Subbaraman LN, Borazjani R, Zhu H, Zhao Z, Jones L, Willcox MD. Influence of protein deposition on bacterial adhesion to contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2011;88:959-66.