The impact of lipid on contact angle wettability

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 84, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 946-953

  Lorentz, Holly ^a   Rogers, Ronan ^a   Jones, Lyndon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Contact angle; Contact lenses; Lipids; Tear film; Wettability

Indexed keywords

CHOLESTEROL; CONTACT ANGLE; CONTACT LENSES; SURFACE TREATMENT; WETTING;

CONCENTRATION SOLUTION; CONTACT ANGLE (CA) MEASUREMENT; LIPID TEAR SOLUTIONS (LTS); TEAR FILMS;

LIPIDS;

CHOLESTEROL; CHOLESTEROL OLEATE; LIPID; OLEIC ACID; PHOSPHATE BUFFERED SALINE; SILICONE; TRIOLEIN; EYE DROPS; LOTRAFILCON A; LOTRAFILCON B; SILICONE DERIVATIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CONTACT ANGLE; CONTACT LENS; HYDROGEL; LIPID COMPOSITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TECHNIQUE; TEMPERATURE; WETTABILITY; CHEMISTRY; DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG EFFECT; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; OSMOLARITY;

CONTACT LENSES; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; HUMANS; HYDROGEL; HYDROGELS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LIPIDS; OPHTHALMIC SOLUTIONS; OSMOLAR CONCENTRATION; SILICONES; WETTABILITY;

EID: 38449105356     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e318157a6c1     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Barr T. Contact lenses 2005. Contact Lens Spectr 2006;21:26-34.
2. Kunzler J. Silicone-based hydrogels for contact lens applications. Contact Lens Spectr 1999;14(8 suppl):9-11.
3. Nicolson PC, Vogt J. Soft contact lens polymers: an evolution. Biomaterials 2001;22:3273-83.
4. Tighe B. Silicone hydrogels: structure, properties and behavior. In: Sweeney D, ed. Silicone Hydrogels: Continuous Wear Contact Lenses, 2nd ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2004:1-27.
5. Alvord L, Court J, Davis T, Morgan CF, Schindhelm K, Vogt J, Winterton L. Oxygen permeability of a new type of high Dk soft contact lens material. Optom Vis Sci 1998;75:30-6.
6. Dumbleton KA, Chalmers RL, Richter DB, Fonn D. Changes in myopic refractive error with nine months' extended wear of hydrogel lenses with high and low oxygen permeability. Optom Vis Sci 1999;76:845-9.
7. Dumbleton KA, Chalmers RL, Richter DB, Fonn D. Vascular response to extended wear of hydrogel lenses with high and low oxygen permeability. Optom Vis Sci 2001;78:147-51.
8. Fonn D, Sweeney D, Holden BA, Cavanagh D. Corneal oxygen deficiency. Eye Contact Lens 2005;31:23-7.
9. Jalbert I, Stretton S, Naduvilath T, Holden B, Keay L, Sweeney D. Changes in myopia with low-Dk hydrogel and high-Dk silicone hydrogel extended wear. Optom Vis Sci 2004;81:591-6.
10. Jones L, Dumbleton K. Soft lens extended wear and complications. In: Hom MM, Bruce AS, eds. Manual of Contact Lens Prescribing and Fitting, 3rd ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann Elsevier; 2006:393-441.
11. Keay L, Sweeney DF, Jalbert I, Skotnitsky C, Holden BA. Microcyst response to high Dk/t silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2000;77:582-5.
12. Sweeney D, du Toit R, Keay L, Jalbert I, Sankaridurg P, Stern J, Skotnitsky C, Stephensen A, Covey M, Holden B, Rao G. Clinical performance of silicone hydrogel lenses. In: Sweeney D, ed. Silicone Hydrogels: Continuous Wear Contact Lenses, 2nd ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2004:164-216.
13. Bruinsma GM, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ. Bacterial adhesion to surface hydrophilic and hydrophobic contact lenses. Biomaterials 2001;22:3217-24.
14. Cheng L, Muller SJ, Radke CJ. Wettability of silicone-hydrogel contact lenses in the presence of tear-film components. Curr Eye Res 2004;28:93-108.
15. Court JL, Redman RP, Wang JH, Leppard SW, Obyrne VJ, Small SA, Lewis AL, Jones SA, Stratford PW. A novel phosphorylcholine-coated contact lens for extended wear use. Biomaterials 2001;22:3261-72.
16. Jones L, Long J, Chen P. The impact of contact lens care regimens on the in vitro wettability of conventional and silicone-hydrogel contact lens materials. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43:ARVO E-abstract 3097.
17. Jones L, Senchyna M, Glasier MA, Schickler J, Forbes I, Louie D, May C. Lysozyme and lipid deposition on silicone hydrogel contact lens materials. Eye Contact Lens 2003;29:S75-9.
18. Grobe G, Kunzler J, Seelye D, Salamone J. Silicone hydrogels for contact lens applications. Polym Mater Sci Eng 1999;80:108-9.
19. Nicolson PC. Continuous wear contact lens surface chemistry and wearability. Eye Contact Lens 2003;29:S30-2.
20. Molock FF, Ford JD, Alli A, Love RN, Vanderlaan DG, Turner DC, Steffen RB, McCabe KP, Hill GA, Maiden AC. Hydrogel with internal wetting agent. US Patent 6367929. April 9, 2002.
21. McCabe KP, Molock FF, Hill GA, Alli A, Steffen RB, Vanderlaan DG, Young KA, Ford JD. Biomedical devices containing internal wetting agents. US Patent 7052131. May 30, 2006.
22. Jones L, Subbaraman L, Rogers R, Dumbleton K. Surface treatment, wetting, and modulus of silicone hydrogels. Optician 2006;232:28-34.
23. Jones L, Franklin V, Evans K, Sariri R, Tighe B. Spoilation and clinical performance of monthly vs. three monthly group II disposable contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1996;73:16-21.
24. French K. Contact lens material properties. Part 1: Wettability. Optician 2005;230:20-8.
25. Karlgard CC, Sarkar DK, Jones LW, Moresoli C, Leung KT. Drying methods for XPS analysis of PureVision, Focus Night & Day and conventional hydrogel contact lenses. Appl Surface Sci 2004;230:106-14.
26. Maldonado-Codina C, Morgan PB, Efron N, Canry JC. Characterization of the surface of conventional hydrogel and silicone hydrogel contact lenses by time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry. Optom Vis Sci 2004;81:455-60.
27. Ketelson HA, Meadows DL, Stone RP. Dynamic wettability properties of a soft contact lens hydrogel. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2005;40:1-9.
28. Tonge S, Jones L, Goodall S, Tighe B. The ex vivo wettability of soft contact lenses. Curr Eye Res 2001;23:51-9.
29. Maldonado-Codina C, Morgan PB. In vitro water wettability of silicone hydrogel contact lenses determined using the sessile drop and captive bubble techniques. J Biomed Mater Res A 2007.
30. Rogers R, Jones LW. In vitro and ex vivo wettability of pHEMA and siloxane-based contact lens polymers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;45:ARVO E-abstract 918.
31. Chao CC, Vergnes JP, Brown SI. Fractionation and partial characterization of macromolecular components from human ocular mucus. Exp Eye Res 1983;36:139-50.
32. Mirejovsky D, Patel AS, Rodriguez DD, Hunt TJ. Lipid adsorption onto hydrogel contact lens materials. Advantages of Nile red over oil red O in visualization of lipids. Optom Vis Sci 1991;68:858-64.
33. Nicolaides N. Recent finding on the chemical composition of the lipids of steer and human meibomian glands. In: Holly F, ed. The Preocular Tear Film in Health, Disease, and Contact Lens Wear. Lubbock, TX: Dry Eye Institute; 1986:570-96.
34. Prager MD, Quintana RP. Radiochemical studies on contact lens soilation. II. Lens uptake of cholesteryl oleate and dioleoyl phosphatidylcholine. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;37:207-11.
35. Saatci AO, Irkec M, Unlu N. Tear cholesterol levels in blepharitis. Ophthalmic Res 1990;22:269-70.
36. Andrews JS. Human tear film lipids. I. Composition of the principal non-polar component. Exp Eye Res 1970;10:223-7.
37. McCulley JP, Shine W. A compositional based model for the tear film lipid layer. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1997;95:79-88.
38. Jones L, Mann A, Evans K, Franklin V, Tighe B. An in vivo comparison of the kinetics of protein and lipid deposition on group II and group IV frequent-replacement contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2000;77:503-10.
39. Nicolaides N, Kaitaranta JK, Rawdah TN, Macy JI, Boswell FM III, Smith RE. Meibomian gland studies: comparison of steer and human lipids. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1981;20:522-36.
40. Nicolaides N, Santos EC, Smith RE, Jester JV. Meibomian gland dysfunction. III. Meibomian gland lipids. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1989;30:946-51.
41. Greiner JV, Glonek T, Korb DR, Booth R, Leahy CD. Phospholipids in meibomian gland secretion. Ophthalmic Res 1996;28:44-9.
42. Shine WE, McCulley JP. Polar lipids in human meibomian gland secretions. Curr Eye Res 2003;26:89-94.
43. Haberland ME, Reynolds JA. Self-association of cholesterol in aqueous solution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1973;70:2313-16.
44. Bontempo AR, Rapp J. Lipid deposits on hydrophilic and rigid gas permeable contact lenses. CLAO J 1994;20:242-5.
45. Bontempo AR, Rapp J. Protein-lipid interaction on the surface of a hydrophilic contact lens in vitro. Curr Eye Res 1997;16:776-81.
46. Bontempo AR, Rapp J. Protein and lipid deposition onto hydrophilic contact lenses in vivo. CLAO J 2001;27:75-80.
47. Jones L, Evans K, Sariri R, Franklin V, Tighe B. Lipid and protein deposition of N-vinyl pyrrolidone-containing group II and group IV frequent replacement contact lenses. CLAO J 1997;23:122-6.
48. Copley KA, Zhang Y, Radke CJ. Wettability of soft contact lenses assessed in a model blink-cycle cell. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:2407.
49. Gonzalez-Meijome JM, Lopez-Alemany A, Almeida JB, Parafita MA, Refojo MF. Microscopic observation of unworn siloxane-hydrogel soft contact lenses by atomic force microscopy. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2006;76:412-18.
50. Lopez-Alemany A, Compan V, Refojo MF. Porous structure of Purevision versus Focus Night & Day and conventional hydrogel contact lenses. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;63:319-25.
51. Steffen R, McCabe K. Finding the comfort zone. Contact Lens Spectr 2004;13(3 suppl):1-4.
52. Steffen R, Schnider C. A next generation silicone hydrogel lens for daily wear. Part 1: Material properties. Optician 2004;227:23-5.
53. Lorentz HI, Senchyna M, Jones L. Optimized procedure for the extraction of lipid deposits from silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:E-Abstract 1537.
54. Tighe B, Franklin V, Tonge S. Contact lens care. Part 3: Contact lens material and their interaction with tears. Optician 2001;221:22-8.