Rewetting drops containing surface active agents improve the clinical performance of silicone hydrogel contact lenses

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 83, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 143-151

  Subbaraman, Lakshman N ^a   Bayer, Simone ^a   Glasier, Mary Ann ^a   Lorentz, Holly ^a   Senchyna, Michelle ^b   Jones, Lyndon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^b ALCON RESEARCH LTD   (United States)

Author keywords

Comfort; Lotrafilcon A; Protein deposition; Rewetting drops; Silicone hydrogel contact lens

Indexed keywords

CONTACT LENSES; ENZYMES; HYDROGELS; PROTEINS; SILICON;

COMFORT; LOTRAFILCON A; REWETTING DROPS;

SURFACE ACTIVE AGENTS;

DISINFECTANT AGENT; EYE DROPS; LYSOZYME; OPTI FREE REPLENISH; POLYQUATERNIUM 1; PROTEIN; RLM 100; SILICONE; SODIUM CHLORIDE; SURFACTANT; TETRONIC;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTACT LENS; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; DRY EYE; ENZYME DENATURATION; EYE DISCHARGE; HUMAN; HYDROGEL; NORMAL HUMAN; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; VISION;

ADULT; BLOTTING, WESTERN; CONTACT LENSES, EXTENDED-WEAR; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; DRY EYE SYNDROMES; ELECTROPHORESIS, POLYACRYLAMIDE GEL; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; HYDROGELS; MURAMIDASE; OPHTHALMIC SOLUTIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; REFRACTIVE ERRORS; SILICONES; SURFACE-ACTIVE AGENTS; TEARS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33645108964     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.opx.0000204513.76568.57     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Bohnert JL, Horbett TA, Ratner BD, Royce FH. Adsorption of proteins from artificial tear solutions to contact lens materials. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1988;29:362-73.
2. Minarik L, Rapp J. Protein deposits on individual hydrophilic contact lenses: effects of water and ionicity. CLAO J 1989;15:185-8.
3. Hart DE, Tidsale RR, Sack RA. Origin and composition of lipid deposits on soft contact lenses. Ophthalmology 1986;93:495-503.
4. Jones L, Evans K, Sariri R, Franklin V, Tighe B. Lipid and protein deposition of N-vinyl pyrrolidone-containing group II and group IV frequent replacement contact lenses. CLAO J 1997;23:122-6.
5. Bontempo AR, Rapp J. Protein and lipid deposition onto hydrophilic contact lenses in vivo. CLAO J 2001;27:75-80.
6. Sack RA, Jones B, Antignani A, Libow R, Harvey H. Specificity and biological activity of the protein deposited on the hydrogel surface. Relationship of polymer structure to biofilm formation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1987:28:842-9.
7. Castillo EJ, Koenig JL, Anderson JM, Jentoft N. Protein adsorption on soft contact lenses. III. Mucin. Biomaterials 1986;7:9-16.
8. Brennan NA, Coles ML. Deposits and symptomatology with soft contact lens wear. Int Contact Lens Clin 2000;27:75-100.
9. Wahlgren M, Arnebrant T. Protein adsorption to solid surfaces. Trends Biotechnol 1991:9:201-8.
10. Sariri R. Protein interaction with hydrogel contact lenses. J Appl Biomaterials Biomech 2004;2:1-19. Available at: www.jabb.biz/content/175/1525/ 5835.pdf. Accessed December 14, 2005.
11. Morgan CF, Brennan NA, Alvord L. Comparison of the coulometric and polarographic measurement of a high-Dk hydrogel. Optom Vis Sci 2001;78:19-29.
12. Alvord L, Court J, Davis T, Morgan CF, Schindhelm K, Vogt J, Winterton L. Oxygen permeability of a new type of high Dk soft contact lens material. Optom Vis Sci 1998:75:30-6.
13. McNally J, McKenney C. A clinical look at a silicone hydrogel extended wear lens. Contact Lens Spectrum 2002;17:38-41.
14. Holly FJ. Basic aspects of contact lens biocompatibility. Colloids Surf 1984;10:343-50.
15. Jones L, Franklin V, Evans K, Sariri R, Tighe B. Spoliation and clinical performance of monthly vs. three monthly group II disposable contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1996;73:16-21.
16. Bleshoy H, Guillon M, Shah D. Influence of contact lens material surface characteristics on replacement frequency. Int Contact Lens Clin 1994;21:82-94.
17. Guillon M, Allary J, Guillon J, Orsborn G. Clinical management of regular replacement: Part I. Selection of replacement frequency. Int Contact Lens Clin 1992;19:104-20.
18. Bruinsma GM, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ. Bacterial adhesion to surface hydrophilic and hydrophobic contact lenses. Biomaterials 2001;22:3217-24.
19. Cheng L, Muller SJ, Radke CJ. Wettability of silicone-hydrogel contact lenses in the presence of tear-film components. Curr Eye Res 2004;28:93-108.
20. Tighe B. Silicone hydrogel materials - how do they work? In: Sweeney D, ed. Silicone Hydrogels: The Rebirth of Continuous Wear Contact Lenses. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2000: 1-21.
21. Nicolson PC, Vogt J. Soft contact lens polymers: an evolution. Biomaterials 2001;22:3273-83.
22. Steffen R, Schnider CM. A next generation silicone hydrogel lens for daily wear. Part 1: material properties. Optician 2004;227:23-5.
23. Schnider CM. Acuvue Advance with Hydraclear: a new and different silicone hydrogel lens. Refr Eye Care Ophthalmols 2004;Feb:11-3.
24. Jones L, Senchyna M, Glasier MA, Schickler J, Forbes I, Louie D, May C. Lysozyme and lipid deposition on silicone hydrogel contact lens materials. Eye Contact Lens 2003;29:S75-9.
25. Ketelson HA, Meadows DL, Stone RP. Dynamic wettability properties of a soft contact lens hydrogel. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2005;40:1-9.
26. Jones L, Tonge S, Goodall S, Tighe B. The influence of tear and non-tear derived surface active components on the wettability of group IV hydrogel lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1998;75(suppl):274.
27. Lebow KA. Can a lens drop minimize deposits and increase comfort? Contact Lens Spectrum 2003;18:42-6.
28. Dumbleton K, Jones L, Chalmers R, Williams-Lyn D, Fonn D. Clinical characterization of spherical post-lens debris associated with lotrafilcon high-Dk silicone lenses. CLAO J 2000;26:186-92.
29. Keith D, Hong B, Christensen M. A novel procedure for the extraction of protein deposits from soft hydrophilic contact lenses for analysis. Curr Eye Res 1997;16:503-10.
30. Senchyna M, Jones L, Louie D, May C, Forbes I, Glasier MA. Quantitative and conformational characterization of lysozyme deposited on balafilcon and etafilcon contact lens materials. Curr Eye Res 2004; 28:25-36.
31. Subbaraman LN, Glasier MA, Senchyna M, Jones L. Stabilization of lysozyme mass extracted from lotrafilcon silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2005;82:209-14.
32. Barabino S, Rolando M, Camicione P, Chen W, Calabria G. Effects of a 0.9% sodium chloride ophthalmic solution on the ocular surface of symptomatic contact lens wearers. Can J Ophthalmol 2005;40:45-50.
33. Coles ML, Brennan NA, Shuley V, Woods J, Prior C, Vehige JG, Simmons PA. The influence of lens conditioning on signs and symptoms with new hydrogel contact lenses. Clin Exp Optom 2004;87:367-71.
34. nd ed. Oxford: ButterworthHeinemann, 2004:164-216.
35. Jones L, MacDougall N, Sorbara LG. Asymptomatic corneal staining associated with the use of balafilcon silicone-hydrogel contact lenses disinfected with a polyaminopropyl biguanide-preserved care regimen. Optom Vis Sci 2002;79:753-61.
36. Long B, Robirds S, Grant T. Six months of in-practice experience with a high Dk lotrafilcon a soft contact lens. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2000;23:112-8.
37. Fonn D, Dumbleton K. Dryness and discomfort with silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens 2003;29:S101-4.
38. Brennan NA, Coles ML, Comstock TL, Levy B. A 1-year prospective clinical trial of balafilcon a (PureVision) silicone-hydrogel contact lenses used on a 30-day continuous wear schedule. Ophthalmology 2002;109:1172-7.
39. Tonge S, Jones L, Goodall S, Tighe B. The ex vivo wettability of soft contact lenses. Curr Eye Res 2001;23:51-9.
40. Shirafkan A, Woodward EG, Port MJ, Hull CC. Surface wettability and hydrophilicity of soft contact lens materials, before and after wear. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1995;15:529-32.
41. Hong B, Bilbaut T, Chowhan M, Keith D, Quintana R, Turner F, Van Duzee B. Cleaning capability of citrate-containing versus non-citrate contact lens cleaning solutions: an in vitro comparative study. Int Contact Lens Clin 1994;21:237-40.
42. Guillon M, Maissa C. Clinical acceptance of two multipurpose solutions: MPS containing HPMC versus citrate-based MPS without rubbing. CLAO J 2002;28:186-91.
43. Christensen B, Lebow K, White EM, Cedrone R, Bevington R. Effectiveness of citrate-containing lens care regimens: a controlled clinical comparison. Int Contact Lens Clin 1998;25:50-8.
44. rd ed. Kent: Butterworth & Co, 1989.
45. House H, Leach N, Edrington T, Gunning J, Parsick S, Cyert L, Marsden H, Dvorak D, Toscano F, Walter D. Contact lens daily cleaner efficacy: multi-purpose versus single-purpose products. Int Contact Lens Clin 1991;18:238-45.
46. Hood D, Rigel L. A clinical comparison of multi-purpose solutions. Contact Lens Spectrum 1995;10:31-6.
47. Simmons PA, Ridder WH III, Edrington TB, Ho S, Lau KC. Passive protein removal by two multipurpose lens solutions: comparison of effects on in vitro deposited and patient worn hydrogel contact lenses. Int Contact Lens Clin 1999;26:33-8.
48. Lee J, Li T, Park K. Solvation interactions for protein adsorption to biomaterial surfaces. In: Morra M, ed. Water in Biomaterials Surface Science. Chichester: Wiley, 2001:127-46.
49. Garrett Q, Griesser HJ, Milthorpe BK, Garrett RW. Irreversible adsorption of human serum albumin to hydrogel contact lenses: a study using electron spin resonance spectroscopy. Biomaterials 1999;20:1345-56.
50. Ratner B, Horbett T, Mateo NB. Contact lens spoliation - part 1: biochemical aspect of lens spoliation. In: Ruben M, Guillon M, eds. Contact Lens Practice. London: Chapman & Hall, 1994:1083-98.
51. Norde W. Adsorption of proteins from solution at the solid-liquid interface. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 1986;25:267-340.
52. Norde W, Anusiem ACI. Adsorption, desorption and re-adsorption of proteins on solid surfaces. Colloids Surf. 1992;66:73-80.
53. Garrett Q, Garrett RW, Milthorpe BK. Lysozyme sorption in hydrogel contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999;40:897-903.
54. Carney FP, Keay L, Stapleton F, Morris CA, Willcox MDP. Hydrogel lens wettability and deposition in vivo. Clin Exp Optom 1998;81:51-5.
55. Meadows DL, Ketelson HA, McQueen N, Stone R. The effect of tear components on the in vitro wettability of silicone hydrogel lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;46:ARVO E-abstract 906.
56. Allansmith MR. Immunologic effects of extended-wear contact lenses. Ann Ophthalmol 1989;21:465-74.
57. Allansmith MR, Korb DR, Greiner JV, Henriquez AS, Simon MA, Finnemore VM. Giant papillary conjunctivitis in contact lens wearers. Am J Ophthalmol 1977;83:697-708.
58. Donshik PC. Contact lens chemistry and giant papillary conjunctivitis. Eye Contact Lens 2003;29:S37-9.