Wettability of silicone-hydrogel contact lenses in the presence of tear-film components

Current Eye Research

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 93-108

  Cheng, Lily ^a   Muller, Susan J ^a   Radke, Clayton J ^a,b  

^a University of California   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Adsorption and absorption; Advancing and receding contact angles; Captive bubbles; Hysteresis; Lysozyme and mucin; Silicone hydrogel contact lenses

Indexed keywords

2 HYDROXYETHYL METHACRYLATE; ISOTONIC SOLUTION; LYSOZYME; MACROGOL; MUCIN; SILICON; TEAR PROTEIN;

AQUEOUS SOLUTION; ARTICLE; CONTACT ANGLE; CONTACT LENS; HYDROGEL; HYSTERESIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TEAR FILM; WETTABILITY;

ABSORPTION; ADSORPTION; CONTACT LENSES, HYDROPHILIC; METHACRYLATES; MUCINS; MURAMIDASE; SILICONE ELASTOMERS; SURFACE TENSION; TEARS; WETTABILITY;

EID: 1042265020     PISSN: 02713683     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1076/ceyr.28.2.93.26231     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Sharma A, Khanna R, Reiter G. A thin film analog of the corneal mucus layer of the tear film: An enigmatic long range non-classical DLVO interaction in the breakup of polymer films. Coll Surf B: Biointer. 1999;14:223-235.
2. Dilly PN. Structure and function of the tear film. In: Sullivan D, ed., Lacrimal Gland, Tear Film, and Dry Eye Syndromes. New York: Plenum Press; 1994:239-247.
3. Adamson AW, Gast AP. Physical Chemistry of Surfaces. New York: Wiley & Sons, Inc; 6th ed., 1997:Chapter 10.
4. Miller C, Neogi P. Interfacial Phenomena: Equilibrium and Dynamic Effects. Surfactant Science Series. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1985:54-85.
5. Lam CNC, Wu R, Li D, Hair ML, Neumann AW. Study of the advancing and receding contact angles: Liquid sorption as a cause of contact angle hysteresis. Adv Coll Inter Sci. 2002;96:169-191.
6. Holly FJ, Refojo MF. Wettability of hydrogels I. Poly (2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate). J Biomed Mater Res. 1975;9:315-326.
7. Lin MC, Graham AD, Polse KA, Mandell RB, McNamara NA. Measurement of post-lens tear thickness. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40(12):2833-2839.
8. Wong H, Fatt I, Radke CJ. Deposition and thinning of the human tear film. J Coll Inter Sci. 1996;184:44-51.
9. Quére, D. On the minimal velocity of forced wetting in partial wetting. C R Acad Sci Paris. 1991;313(2):313-318.
10. Holly FJ, Lemp M. The preocular tear film and dry eye syndrome. International Ophthalmology Clinics Series. Boston: Little, Brown & Co;1973:Vol. 13.
11. Fatt I. Observations of tear film break up on model eyes. CLAO J. 1991;17:267-281.
12. Tonge S, Jones L, Goodall S, Tighe B. The ex vivo wettability of soft contact lenses. Curr Eye Res. 2001; 23(1):51-59.
13. Sarver M, Bowman L, Bauman E, DiMartino R, Lau D, Umeda W. Wettability of some gas-permeable hard contact lenses. Intern Contact Lens Clin. 1984;11(8):479-487.
14. Zhang J, Herskowitz R. Is there more than one angle to the wetting characteristics of contact lenses? Contact Lens Spectrum. 1992;7(10):26-32.
15. Cunanan CM, Ghazizadeh M, Buchen SY, Knight PM. Contact-angle analysis of intraocular lenses. J Catar Refrac Surg. 1998;24:341-351.
16. Tiffany J. Measurement of wettability of the corneal epithelium II: Contact angle method. Acta Ophthalmol. 1990; 68:182-187.
17. Willis SL, Court JL, Redman RP, Wang JH et al. A novel phosphorylcholine-coated contact lens for extended wear use. Biomat. 2001;22(24):3261-3272.
18. Grobe GL, Valint PL, Ammon DM. Surface chemical structure for soft contact lenses as a function of polymer processing. J Biomed Mater Res. 1996;32:45-54.
19. Holly FJ, Refojo MF. Water wettability of proteins adsorbed at the hydrogel-water interface. In: Andrade JD, ed., Hydrogels for Medical ands Related Applications. ACS Symposium Series 31, Chapter 20, 1976:267-282.
20. Refojo MF, Holly F. Tear protein adsorption on hydrogels: A possible cause of contact lens allergy. Contact Lens J. 1977;3:23-35.
21. Holly FJ, Lemp M. Wettability and wetting of corneal epithelium. Exp Eye Res. 1971;11:239-250.
22. Valint, PJ, Ammon DM Jr, Grobe GL III, McGee JA. In-situ surface modification of contact lens polymers, In: Ratner BD, Caster DG, eds. Surface Modification of Polymeric Biomaterials. New York: Plenum Press; 1997: 21-26.
23. Lai Y-C, Friends GD. Surface wettability enhancement of silicone hydrogel lenses by processing with polar plastic molds. J Biomed Mat Res. 1997;35(3):349-356.
24. Merill EW. Poly(ethylene glycol) chemistry: Biotechnical and biomedical applications. In: Harris JM, ed. Poly(ethylene glycol) Chemistry: Biotechnical and Biomedical Applications. New York: Plenum Press; 1992:199-219.
25. McArthur SL, McLean K, St. John HAW, Griesser HJ. XPS and surface-MALDI-MS characterisation of worn HEMA-based contact lenses. Biomat. 2001;22:3295-3304.
26. Dumbleton KA. The physical and clinical characteristics of silicone hydrogel lenses: How they work? Silicone Hydrogels.org. 2002; Available at URL:http://www.siliconehydrogels.org/editorials/previous_editorials_kathryn.asp
27. Winterton L. Personal Communication. 2002.
28. Tighe B. Silicone hydrogel materials - How do they work? In: Sweeney D, ed., Silicone Hydrogels: The Rebirth of Continuous Wear Contact Lenses. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann; 2000:1-21.
29. Jones L, Senchyna M. Protein and lipid deposition of silicone-hydrogel contact lens materials. Silicone Hydrogels.org. 2002; Available at URL:http://www.siliconehydrogels.org/editorials/ previous_editorial_jones_senchyna.asp
30. Weikart CM, Matsuzawa Y, Winterton L, Yasuda HK. Evaluation of plasma polymer-coated contact lenses by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. J Biomed Mater Res. 2001;54:597-606.
31. Cheng L. MS Thesis, University of California, Berkeley, 2003.
32. López-Alemany A, Compañ V, Refojo MF. Porous structure of Purevision™ versus Focus® Night & Day and conventional hydrogel contact lenses. J Biomed Mater Res (Appl Biomater). 2002;63:319-325.
33. Morris CA, Holden BA, Papas E, Griesser HJ, Bolis S, Anderton P, Carney F. The ocular surface, the tear film, and the wettability of contact lens. In: Sullivan D, Dartt D, Meneray M, eds. Lacrimal Gland, Tear Film, and Dry Eye Syndromes 2. New York: Plenum Press; 1998:717-722.
34. Zhao J, Manthorpe R, Wollmer P. Surface activity of tear fluid in normal subjects. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1998;76:438-441.
35. Tiffany JM, Prandit JC, Bron AJ. Soluble mucin and the physical properties of tears. In: Sullivan D, Dartt D, Meneray M, eds. Lacrimal Gland, Tear Film, and Dry Eye Syndromes 2. New York: Plenum Press; 1998:229-234.
36. Tettamanti G, Pigman W. Purification and characterization of bovine and ovine submaxillary mucins. Arch Biochem. Biophys. 1968;124(1):41-50.
37. Shi L. Biomimetic surfaces of biomaterials using mucin-type glycoproteins. Trends Glycosci Glycotech. 2000; 12(66):229-239.
38. Garrett Q, Garrett RL, Milthorpe BK. Lysozyme sorption in hydrogel contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998;40(5):897-903.
39. Fuller RJ, Snyder C. Protein levels in nonstimulated and stimulated tears of normal human subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1990;31:1119-1126.
40. Gachon AM, Richard J, Dastugue B. Human tears: Normal protein pattern and individual protein determinations in adults. Curr Eye Res. 1982;2(5):301-308.
41. Stuchell RN, Farris RL, Mandel ID. Methods of studying proteins in the tear fluid. In: Holly FJ, ed. The Preocular Tear Film in Health, Disease, and Contact Lens Wear. Lubbock, TX: Dry Eye Institute; 1986:462-470.
42. Selsted ME, Marinez RJ. Isolation and purification of bactericides from human tears. Exp Eye Res. 1982;34(3): 305-318.
43. Fleiszig SMJ, Zuide T, Ramphal R, Pier GB. Modulation of pseudomonas aeruginosa adherence to the corneal surface by mucus. Amer Soc Microbiol. 1994;62(5):1799-1804.
44. Creeth JM, Bridge JL, Horton JR. An interaction between lysozyme and mucus glycoproteins: Implications for density-gradient separations. Biochem J. 1979;181(3):717-724.
45. Veronese F. Peptide and protein PEGylation: A review of problems and solutions. Biomat. 2001;22:405-417.
46. Roberts MJ, Bentley MD, Harris JM. Chemistry for peptide and protein PEGylation. Adv Drug Delivery Rev. 2002;54(4):459-476.
47. Benjamin WJ, Piccolo M, Toubiana HA. Wettability: A blink by blink account. Inter Contact Lens Clin. 1984;11:492-496.
48. Sack RA, Jones B, Antignani A, Libow R, Harvey H. Specificity and biological activity of the protein deposited on the hydrogel surface: Relationship of polymer structure to biofilm formation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1987; 28:842-849.
49. Leahy CD. Initial in vivo tear protein deposition on individual hydrogel contact lenses. Opt Vis Sci. 1990;67(7):504-511.
50. Bohnert J, Horbett TA, Ratner BD, Royce FH. Adsorption of proteins from artificial tear solutions to contact lens materials. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1988;29(3):362-373.
51. Maissa C, Franklin V, Guillon M, Tighe B. Influence of contact lens material surface characteristics and replacement frequency on protein and lipid deposition. Opt Vision Sci. 1998;75(9):697-705.
52. Castillo EJ, Koenig JL, Anderson JM, Lo J. Protein adsorption on hydrogels 2: Reversible and irreversible interactions between lysozyme and soft contact-lens surfaces. Biomat. 1985;6(5):338-345.
53. Refojo MF, Leong FL. Microscopic determination of the penetration of protein and polysaccharides into poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate) and similar hydrogels. J Poly Sci C-Poly Symp. 1979;66:227-237.
54. Jones L, Senchyna M, Louie D, Schickler J. A comparative evaluation of lysozyme and lipid deposition on etafilcon, balafilcon, and lotrafilcon contact lens materials. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42(4) #3816 Suppl. S.
55. Brennan NA, Coles M-L. Deposits and symptomatology with soft contact lens wear. Inter Contact Lens Clin. 2000;27:75-100.
56. Wedler FC, Illman BL, Horensky DS, Mowrey-McKee M. Analysis of protein and mucin components deposited on hydrophilic contact lenses. Clin Exp Optom. 1987;90(2): 59-68.
57. Hart DE, Plociniak MP, Grimes GW. Defining the physiologically normal coating and pathological deposit: An analysis of sulfur-containing moieties and pellicle thickness on hydrogel contact lenses. CLAO J. 1998;24(2):85-101.
58. nd edition, Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1997;Chapter 4.
59. Woodward JT, Ullman A, Schwartz DK. Self-assembled monolayer growth of octadecylphosphonic acid on mica. Langmuir. 1996;12(15):3626-3629.