Differences in Clinical Parameters and Tear Film of Tolerant and Intolerant Contact Lens Wearers

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 44, Issue 12, 2003, Pages 5116-5124

  Glasson, Melissa J ^a   Stapleton, Fiona ^a   Keay, Lisa ^a   Sweeney, Deborah ^a   Willcox, Mark D P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IMMUNOGLOBULIN A; LACTOFERRIN; LYSOZYME;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTACT LENS; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TEAR FILM;

ADULT; CONJUNCTIVITIS; CONTACT LENSES; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; DRY EYE SYNDROMES; EYE PROTEINS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMMUNOGLOBULIN A, SECRETORY; KERATITIS; LACTOFERRIN; MALE; MURAMIDASE; OSMOLAR CONCENTRATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHENOLSULFONPHTHALEIN; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TEARS;

EID: 0345283011     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.03-0685     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Farris RL. The dry eye: its mechanisms and therapy, with evidence that contact lens is a cause. CLAO J. 1986;12:234-246.
2. Lemp MA. Report of the National Eye Institute/Industry workshop on clinical trials in dry eyes. CLAO J. 1995;21:221-232.
3. Pflugfelder SC, Tseng SCG, Sanabria O, et al. Evaluation of subjective assessments and objective diagnostic tests for diagnosing tear-film disorders known to cause ocular irritation. Cornea. 1998;17:38-56.
4. Brennan NA, Efron N. Symptomatology of HEMA contact lens wear. Optom Vis Sci. 1989;66:834-838.
5. Begley CG, Caffery B, Kinney KA. Responses of contact lens wearers to a dry eye survey. Optom Vis Sci. 2000;77:40-46.
6. Quinn TG. Turning dropouts into success stories. CL Spectrum 1995;43-47.
7. Young G, Veys J, Pritchard N, et al. A multi-centre study of lapsed contact lens wearers. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2002;22:516-527.
8. Prydal JI, Artal P, Woon H, et al. Study of human precorneal tear film thickness and structure using laser interferometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992;33:2006-2011.
9. Wang J, Fonn D, Simpson TL, et al. Precorneal and pre- and postlens tear film thickness measured indirectly with optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:2524-2528.
10. King-Smith PE, Fink B, Fogt N. Three interferometric methods for measuring the thickness of layers of the tear film. Optom Vis Sci. 1999;75:19-31.
11. Mishima S, Gasset A, Klyce SD, et al. Determination of tear volume and tear flow. Invest Ophthalmol. 1966;5:264-276.
12. Fullard RJ, Snyder C. Protein levels in nonstimulated and stimulated tears of normal human subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1990;31:1119-1126.
13. Bjerrum KB. Tear fluid analysis in patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome using lectin probes. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1999;77:1-8.
14. Guillon M, Styles E, Guillon J-P, et al. Preocular tear film characteristics of non-wearers and soft contact lens wearers. Optom Vis Sci. 1997;74:273-279.
15. Craig JP, Tomlinson A. Importance of the lipid layer in human tear film stability and evaporation. Optom Vis Sci. 1997;74:8-13.
16. Kinney KA. Detecting dry eye in contact lens wearers. CL Spectrum. 1998;21-28.
17. Guillon J-P, Guillon M. Tear film examination of the contact lens patient. Optician. 1993;206:21-29.
18. Faber E, Golding TR, Lowe R. Effect of hydrogel lens wear on tear film stability. Optom Vis Sci. 1991;65:380-394.
19. Young G, Efron N. 1991 Characteristics of the pre-lens tear film during hydrogel contact lens wear. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1991;11:53-58.
20. Cho P. Stability of the precorneal tear film: a review. Clin Exp Optom. 1991;74:19-25.
21. Schoenwald RD, Vidvauns S, Wurster DE, et al. The role of tear proteins in tear film stability in the dry eye patient and in the rabbit. In: Sullivan DA. ed. Lacrimal Gland, Tear Film, and Dry Eye Syndromes 2. New York: Plenum Press; 1998:391-400.
22. Vitali C, Moutsopoulos HM, Bombardieri S. The European Community Study Group on diagnostic criteria for Sjögren's syndrome: specificity and sensitivity of tests for ocular and oral involvement in Sjögren's syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis. 1994;53:637-647.
23. Norn MS. Desiccation of the precorneal film. I. Corneal wetting-time. Acta Ophthalmol. 1969;47:865-880.
24. Vanley GT, Leopold IH, Gregg TH. Interpretation of tear film breakup. Arch Ophthalmol. 1977;95:445-448.
25. Faber E, Golding TR, Lowe R, et al. Effect of hydrogel lens wear on tear film stability. Optom Vis Sci. 1991;68:380-384.
26. Cho P, Brown B, Chan I. 'Reliability of the tear break-up time technique of assessing tear stability and the locations of the tear break-up in Hong Kong Chinese. Optom Vis Sci. 1992;69:879-885.
27. Cho P, Douthwaite W. The relationship between invasive and noninvasive tear break-up time. Optom Vis Sci. 1995;72:17-22.
28. Tsubota K, Nakamori K. Effects of ocular surface area and blink rate on tear dynamics. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113:155-158.
29. Nakamori K, Odawara M, Nakajima T, Mizutani T, Tsubota K. Blinking is controlled primarily by ocular surface conditions. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997;124:24-30.
30. Danjo Y, Lee M, Horimoto K, Hamano T. Ocular surface damage and tear lactoferrin in dry eye syndrome. Acta Ophthalmol. 1994;72:433-437.
31. Da Dalt S, Moncada A, Priori R, Valesini G, Pivetti-Pezzi P. The lactoferrin tear test in the diagnosis of Sjögren's syndrome. Eur J Ophthalmol. 1996;6:284-286.
32. Mainstone JC, Bruce AS, Golding TR. Tear meniscus measurement in the diagnosis of dry eye. Curr Eye Res. 1996;15:653-661.
33. Hamano H, Hori M, Hamano T. A new method for measuring tears. CLAO J. 1983;9:281-289.
34. Blades JK, Patel S. The dynamics of tear flow within a phenol red impregnated thread. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1996;16:409-415.
35. McMonnies CW. Key questions in a dry eye history. J Am Opt Assoc. 1986;57:512-517.
36. Fullard RJ, Tucker DL. Changes in human tear protein levels with progressively increasing stimulus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991;32:2290-2301.
37. Sack RA, Tan KO, Tan A. Diurnal tear cycle: evidence for a nocturnal inflammatory constitutive tear fluid. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992;33:626-640.
38. Guillon JP, Guillon M. Tear film examination of the contact lens patient. Contax. 1988;May:14-18.
39. Carney FP, Keay L, Stapleton F, et al. Hydrogel lens wettability and deposition in vivo. Clin Exp Optom. 1998;81:51-55.
40. Terry RL, Schnider CM, Holden BA, et al. CCLRU standards for success of daily and extended wear contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 1993;70:234-243.
41. Tiffany JM. Composition and biophysical properties of the tear film: knowledge and uncertainty. In: Sullivan DA, ed. Lacrimal Gland, Tear Film, and Dry Eye Syndromes. New York: Plenum Press; 1994:231-238.
42. Pearce DJ, Willcox MD, Demirci G. Secretory IgA epitopes in basal tears of extended-wear soft contact lens wearers, and non-wearers. Aust NZJ Ophthalmol. 1999;27:221-223.
43. Houser MT. Improved turbidimetric assay for lysozyme in urine. Clin Chem. 1983;29:1488-1493.
44. Glasson MJ, Hseuh S, Willcox MDP. Preliminary tear film measurements of tolerant and non-tolerant contact lens wearers. Clin Exp Optom. 1999;82:177-181.
45. Erdfelder E, Faul F, Buchner A. GPOWER: A general power analysis program. Behav Res Methods. 1996;28:1-11.
46. Tomlinson A, Choon Thai L, Doane MG, McFadyen A. Reliability of measurements of tear physiology (Abstract). Cornea. 2000;19(suppl 2);S132.
47. Nunnally J. Psychometric Theory. McGraw Hill Book Company, New York. 1978.
48. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intra-class correlations: uses in assessing reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86:420-442.
49. Dunn G. In: Arnold E, ed. Design and Analysis of Reliability Studies. New York: Oxford University Press; 1989;37-45.
50. Hatch SW. Ophthalmic Research and Epidemiology, Evaluation and Application. Woburn, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1998;197-221.
51. McMonnies CW, Ho A, Wakefield D. Optimum dry eye classification using questionnaire responses. In: Sullivan DA, ed. Lacrimal Gland, Tear Film, and Dry Eye Syndromes 2. New York: Plenum Press; 1998:835-838.
52. Fanti P, Holly FJ. Silicone contact lens wear III: physiology of poor tolerance. Contact Lens. 1980;6:111-119.
53. van Bijsterveld OP, Mackor AJ. Sjögren's syndrome and tear function parameters. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1989;7:151-154.
54. Bjerrum KB. The ratio of albumin to lactoferrin in tear fluid as a diagnostic tool in primary Sjögren's syndrome. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1997;75:507-511.
55. Glasson MJ, Stapleton F, Willcox MDP. Lipid, lipase and lipocalin differences between tolerant and intolerant contact lens wearers. Curr Eye Res. 2002;25:227-235.
56. Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC. Multivariate Data Analysis. 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1995;204-205.
57. Erickson D, Stapleton F, Erickson P. Psychological variables affect self-reporting on a dry eye questionnaire (Abstract). Optom Vis Sci. 2002;78(suppl 12):188.
58. Tomlinson A, Pearce EI, Simmon PA, Blades K. Effect of oral contraceptives on tear physiology. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 2001;21:9-16.