Face-to-face versus computer-delivered alcohol interventions for college drinkers: A meta-analytic review, 1998 to 2010

Clinical Psychology Review

Volumn 32, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 690-703

  Carey, Kate B ^a   Scott Sheldon, Lori A J ^b,c   Elliott, Jennifer C ^d   Garey, Lorra ^a   Carey, Michael P ^a,b,c  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MIRIAM HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Alcohol prevention; College students; Computer delivered intervention; Face to face intervention; Meta analysis

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL;

ADULT; ALCOHOLISM; COLLEGE STUDENT; COMPUTER; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERVENTION STUDY; INTOXICATION; MALE; META ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; REVIEW; STUDY DESIGN;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALCOHOL-RELATED DISORDERS; ALCOHOLISM; COGNITIVE THERAPY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTIVATIONAL INTERVIEWING; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; STUDENTS; THERAPY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84866561549     PISSN: 02727358     EISSN: 18737811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2012.08.001     Document Type: Review

References (115)

1. Barnett N.P., Murphy J.G., Colby S.M., Monti P.M. Efficacy of counselor vs. computer-delivered intervention with mandated college students. Addictive Behaviors 2007, 32(11):2529-2548.
2. Barnett N.P., Tevyaw T.O., Fromme K., Borsari B., Carey K.B., Corbin W.R., et al. Brief alcohol interventions with mandated or adjudicated college students. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research 2004, 28(6):966-975.
3. Bingham C.R., Barretto A.I., Walton M.A., Bryant C.M., Shope J.T., Raghunathan T.E. Efficacy of a web-based, tailored, alcohol prevention/intervention program for college students: Initial findings. Journal of American College Health 2010, 58(4):349-356.
4. Borsari, B. E. (2003). Two brief alcohol interventions for referred college students. PhD Dissertation, ProQuest Information & Learning, US.
5. Borsari B.E., Carey K.B. Two brief alcohol interventions for mandated college students. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 2005, 19(3):296-302.
6. Borsari B.E., Murphy J.G., Carey K.B. Readiness to change in brief motivational interventions: A requisite condition for drinking reductions?. Addictive Behaviors 2009, 34(2):232-235.
7. Budman S.H., Portnoy D.B., Villapiano A.J. How to get technological innovation used in behavioral health care: Build it and they still might not come. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training 2003, 40:45-54.
8. Butler L.H., Correia C.J. Brief alcohol intervention with college student drinkers: Face-to-face versus computerized feedback. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 2009, 23(1):163-167.
9. Capone C., Wood M.D. Thinking about drinking: Need for cognition and readiness to change moderate the effects of brief alcohol interventions. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 2009, 23(4):684-688.
10. Carey K.B., Carey M.P., Henson J.M., Maisto S.A., DeMartini K.S. Brief alcohol interventions for mandated college students: Comparison of face-to-face counseling and computer-delivered interventions. Addiction 2011, 106(3):528-537.
11. Carey K.B., Carey M.P., Maisto S.A., Henson J.M. Brief motivational interventions for heavy college drinkers: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2006, 74(5):943-954.
12. Carey K.B., Henson J.M., Carey M.P., Maisto S.A. Which heavy drinking college students benefit from a brief motivational intervention?. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2007, 75(4):663-669.
13. Carey K.B., Henson J.M., Carey M.P., Maisto S.A. Computer versus in-person intervention for students violating campus alcohol policy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2009, 77(1):74-87.
14. Carey K.B., Henson J.M., Carey M.P., Maisto S.A. Perceived norms mediate effects of a brief motivational intervention for sanctioned college drinkers. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice 2010, 17:58-71.
15. Carey K.B., Scott-Sheldon L.A.J., Carey M.P., DeMartini K.S. Individual-level interventions to reduce college student drinking: A meta-analytic review. Addictive Behaviors 2007, 32(11):2469-2494.
16. Carey K.B., Scott-Sheldon L.A., Elliott J.C., Bolles J.R., Carey M.P. Computer-delivered interventions to reduce college student drinking: A meta-analysis. Addiction 2009, 104(11):1807-1819.
17. Chambless D.L., Hollon S.D. Defining empirically supported therapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1998, 66(1):7-18.
18. Chang G. Brief interventions for problem drinking and women. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 2002, 23(1):1-7.
19. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences 1988, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ. 2nd Ed.
20. Collins, S. E. (2003). Weighing the pros and cons: Evaluating decisional balance as a brief motivational intervention for at-risk college drinkers. PhD Dissertation, ProQuest Information & Learning, US.
21. Collins S.E., Carey K.B. Lack of effect for decisional balance as a brief motivational intervention for at-risk college drinkers. Addictive Behaviors 2005, 30(7):1425-1430.
22. Croom K., Lewis D., Marchell T., Lesser M.L., Reyna V.F., Kubicki-Bedford L., et al. Impact of an online alcohol education course on behavior and harm for incoming first-year college students: Short-term evaluation of a randomized trial. Journal of American College Health 2009, 57(4):445-454.
23. Dermen, K. H., & Thomas, S. N. (2003). Brief motivational intervention to reduce drinking and risky sex in college students: Preliminary findings. Paper presented at the Association for Advancement of Behavior Therapy, Boston, MA.
24. Dimeff, L. A. (1997). Brief intervention for heavy and hazardous college drinkers in a student primary health care setting. PhD Dissertation, ProQuest Information & Learning, US.
25. Dimeff L.A., McNeely M. Computer-enhanced primary care practitioner advice for high-risk college drinkers in a student primary health-care setting. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice 2000, 7(1):82-100.
26. Donohue B., Allen D.N., Maurer A., Ozols J., DeStefano G. A controlled evaluation of two prevention programs in reducing alcohol use among college students at low and high risk for alcohol related problems. Journal of Alcohol and Drug Education 2004, 48(1):13-33.
27. Doumas D.M., Andersen L.L. Reducing alcohol use in first-year university students: Evaluation of a web-based personalized feedback program. Journal of College Counseling 2009, 12(1):18-32.
28. Eggleston, A. M. (2008). Components analysis of a brief intervention for college drinkers. 68 Dissertation, ProQuest Information & Learning, US.
29. Elliott J.C., Carey K.B., Bolles J.R. Computer-based interventions for college drinking: A qualitative review. Addictive Behaviors 2008, 33(8):994-1005.
30. Escoffery C., Miner K.R., Adame D.D., Butler S., McCormick L., Mendell E. Internet use for health information among college students. Journal of American College Health 2005, 53(4):183-188.
31. Feldstein, S. W. (2007). Motivational interviewing with late-adolescent/college underage drinkers: An investigation of therapeutic alliance. PhD Dissertation, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM.
32. Feldstein S.W., Forcehimes A.A. Motivational interviewing with underage college drinkers: A preliminary look at the role of empathy and alliance. American Journal of Alcohol and Drug Abuse 2007, 33(5):737-746.
33. Fortney J.C., Burgess J.F., Bosworth H.B., Booth B.M., Kaboli P.J. A re-conceptualization of access for 21st century healthcare. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2011, 26:639-647.
34. Grissom R.J. The magical number. 7±2: Meta-meta-analysis of the probability of superior outcome in comparisons involving therapy, placebo, and control. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1996, 64:973-982.
35. Hallett J., Maycock B., Kypri K., Howat P., McManus A. Development of a web-based alcohol intervention for university students: Processes and challenges. Drug and Alcohol Review 2009, 28(1):31-39.
36. Hedges L.V. Distribution theory for Glass's estimator of effect size and related estimators. Journal of Education Statistics 1981, 6:107-128.
37. Hedges L.V. Fixed effects models. The Handbook of Research Synthesis 1994, 285-299. Russell Sage Foundation, New York. H. Cooper, L.V. Hedges (Eds.).
38. Hedges L.V., Olkin I. Statistical methods for meta-analysis 1985, Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
39. Hester R.K., Delaney H.D., Campbell W. The college drinker's check-up: Outcomes of two randomized clinical trials of a computer-delivered intervention. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 2012, 26:1-12.
40. Higgins J.P., Thompson S.G. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine 2002, 21(11):1539-1558.
41. Higgins J.P., Thompson S.G., Deeks J.J., Altman D.G. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. British Medical Journal 2003, 327(7414):557-560.
42. Huedo-Medina T.B., Sanchez-Meca J., Marin-Martinez F., Botella J. Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index?. Psychological Methods 2006, 11(2):193-206.
43. Hustad J.T., Barnett N.P., Borsari B., Jackson K.M. Web-based alcohol prevention for incoming college students: A randomized controlled trial. Addictive Behaviors 2009, 35:183-189.
44. Jadad A.R., Moore R.A., Carroll D., Jenkinson C., Reynolds D.J., Gavaghan D.J., et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?. Controlled Clinical Trials 1996, 17(1):1-12.
45. Johnson B.T., Scott-Sheldon L.A.J., Carey M.P. Meta-synthesis of health behavior change meta-analyses. American Journal of Public Health 2010, 100:2193-2198.
46. Jouriles E.N., Brown A.S., Rosenfield D., McDonald R., Croft K., Leahy M.M., et al. Improving the effectiveness of computer-delivered personalized drinking feedback interventions for college students. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 2010, 24(4):592-599.
47. Juarez P., Walters S.T., Daugherty M., Radi C. A randomized trial of motivational interviewing and feedback with heavy drinking college students. Journal of Drug Education 2006, 36(3):233-246.
48. Knight J.R., Wechsler H., Kuo M., Seibring M., Weitzman E.R., Schuckit M.A. Alcohol abuse and dependence among U.S. college students. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 2002, 63(3):263-270.
49. Krebs P., Prochaska J.O., Rossi J.S. A meta-analysis of computer-tailored interventions for health behavior change. Preventive Medicine 2010, 51:214-221.
50. Kypri K., Gallagher S.J., Cashell-Smith M.L. An internet-based survey method for college student drinking research. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2004, 76(1):45-53.
51. Kypri K., Hallett J., Howat P., McManus A., Maycock B., Bowe S., et al. Randomized controlled trial of proactive web-based alcohol screening and brief intervention for university students. Archives of Internal Medicine 2009, 169(16):1508-1514.
52. Kypri K., McAnally H.M. Randomized controlled trial of a web-based primary care intervention for multiple health risk behaviors. Preventive Medicine 2005, 41:761-766.
53. Kypri K., Saunders J.B., Gallagher S.J. Acceptability of various brief intervention approaches for hazardous drinking among university students. Alcohol and Alcoholism 2003, 38(6):626-628.
54. Kypri K., Saunders J.B., Williams S.M., McGee R.O., Langley J.D., Cashell-Smith M.L., et al. Web-based screening and brief intervention for hazardous drinking: A double-blind randomized controlled trial. Addiction 2004, 99(11):1410-1417.
55. Kypri K., Stephenson S., Langley J. Assessment of nonresponse bias in an internet survey of alcohol use. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research 2004, 28(4):630-634.
56. Larimer M.E., Cronce J.M. Identification, prevention, and treatment revisited: Individual-focused college drinking prevention strategies 1999-2006. Addictive Behaviors 2007, 32(11):2439-2468.
57. Leffingwell, T. R., Hopper, R., Mignogna, J., Jackson, M., Leedy, M. J., & Lack, C. W. (2007). A randomized trial of a computerized multimedia feedback intervention for high-risk drinking among college students. Paper presented at the Society for Behavioral Medicine, Washington, DC.
58. Leffingwell, T. R., Leedy, M. J., & Lack, C. W. (2005). A multimedia computer-based intervention for college student drinking: Short-term outcomes of a randomized trials. Paper presented at the Association for Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies (ABCT), Washington, DC.
59. Lewis M.A. Gender-specific misperceptions of descriptive drinking norms: Effectiveness of a personalized normative feedback intervention for heavy-drinking college students 2006, 66. ProQuest Information & Learning, US.
60. Lewis M.A., Neighbors C. Who is the typical college student? Implications for personalized normative feedback interventions. Addictive Behaviors 2006, 31(11):2120-2126.
61. Lewis M.A., Neighbors C. Optimizing personalized normative feedback: The use of gender-specific referents. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs 2007, 68(2):228-237.
62. Lipsey M.W., Wilson D.B. Practical meta-analysis 2001, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
63. Lovecchio C.P., Wyatt T.M., DeJong W. Reductions in drinking and alcohol-related harms reported by first-year college students taking an online alcohol education course: A randomized trial. Journal of Health Communication 2010, 15:805-819.
64. Lustria M.L., Cortese J., Noar S.M., Glueckauf R.L. Computer-tailored health interventions delivered over the web: Review and analysis of key components. Patient Education and Counseling 2009, 74(2):156-173.
65. Lysaught E.M., Wodarski J.S., Parris H. A comparison of an assessment/information-based group versus an assessment-only group: An investigation of drinking reduction with young adults. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment 2003, 8(4):23-43.
66. Mallett K.A., Ray A.E., Turrisi R., Belden C., Bachrach R.L., Larimer M.E. Age of drinking onset as a moderator of the efficacy of parent-based, brief motivational, and combined intervention approaches to reduce drinking and consequences among college students. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research 2010, 34(7):1154-1161.
67. Marlatt G.A., Baer J.S., Kivlahan D.R., Dimeff L.A., Larimer M.E., Quigley L.A., et al. Screening and brief intervention for high-risk college student drinkers: Results from a 2-year follow-up assessment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1998, 66(4):604-615.
68. Mastroleo N.R. Comparison of supervision training techniques in a motivational enhancement intervention on college student drinking 2008, 69. ProQuest Information & Learning, US.
69. Matt G.E., Cook T.D. Threats to the validity of research synthesis. The handbook of research synthesis 1994, 503-529. Russell Sage Foundation, New York. H. Cooper, L.V. Hedges (Eds.).
70. Miller W.R., Brown J.M., Simpson T.L., Handmaker N.S., Bien T.H., Luckie L.F. What works? A methodological analysis of the alcohol treatment outcome literature. Handbook of alcoholism treatment approaches: Effective alternatives 1995, 12-44. Allyn & Bacon, Needham Heights, MA. 2nd ed. R.K. Hester, W.R. Miller (Eds.).
71. Miller W.R., Munoz R.F. Controlling your drinking: Tools to make moderation work for you 2005, Guilford Press, New York.
72. Morris S.B., DeShon R.P. Combining effect size estimates in meta-analysis with repeated measures and independent-groups designs. Psychological Methods 2002, 7(1):105-125.
73. Murphy J.G., Barnett N.P., Colby S.M. Alcohol-related and alcohol-free activity participation and enjoyment among college students: A behavioral theories of choice analysis. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology 2006, 14(3):339-349.
74. Murphy J.G., Dennhardt A.A., Skidmore J.R., Martens M.P., McDevitt-Murphy M.E. Computerized versus motivational interviewing alcohol interventions: Impact on discrepancy, motivation, and drinking. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 2010, 24(4):628-639.
75. Murphy J.G., Duchnick J.J., Vuchinich R.E., Davison J.W., Karg R.S., Olson A.M., et al. Relative efficacy of a brief motivational intervention for college student drinkers. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 2001, 15(4):373-379.
76. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism A call to action: Changing the culture of drinking at U.S. colleges. Final report of the task force on college drinking (NIH Pub. No. 02-5010) 2002, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD.
77. Neighbors C., Larimer M.E., Lewis M.A. Targeting misperceptions of descriptive drinking norms: Efficacy of a computer-delivered personalized normative feedback intervention. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2004, 72(3):434-447.
78. Neighbors C., Lee C.M., Lewis M.A., Fossos N., Walter T. Internet-based personalized feedback to reduce 21st-birthday drinking: A randomized controlled trial of an event-specific prevention intervention. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2009, 77(1):51-63.
79. Neighbors C., Lewis M.A., Bergstrom R.L., Larimer M.E. Being controlled by normative influences: Self-determination as a moderator of a normative feedback alcohol intervention. Health Psychology 2006, 25(5):571-579.
80. Noar S.M., Benac C.N., Harris M.S. Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychological Bulletin 2007, 133(4):673-693.
81. Palmer R.S., Kilmer J.R., Ball S.A., Larimer M.E. Intervention defensiveness as a moderator of drinking outcome among heavy-drinking mandated college students. Addictive Behaviors 2010, 35(12):1157-1160.
82. Pequegnat W., Rosser B.R., Bowen A.M., Bull S.S., DiClemente R.J., Bockting W.O., et al. Conducting Internet-based HIV/STD prevention survey research: Considerations in design and evaluation. AIDS and Behavior 2007, 11(4):505-521.
83. Portnoy D.B., Scott-Sheldon L.A.J., Johnson B.T., Carey M.P. Computer-delivered interventions for health promotion and behavioral risk reduction: A meta-analysis of 75 randomized controlled trials, 1988-2007. Preventive Medicine 2008, 47(1):3-16.
84. Prochaska J.O., DiClemente C.C., Norcross J.C. In search of how people change. Applications to addictive behaviors. The American Psychologist 1992, 47(9):1102-1114.
85. Rehm J., Room R., Graham K., Monteiro M., Gmel G., Sempos C.T. The relationship of average volume of alcohol consumption and patterns of drinking to burden of disease: An overview. Addiction 2003, 98:1209-1228.
86. Rooke S., Thorsteinsson E., Karpin A., Copeland J., Allsop D. Computer-delivered interventions for alcohol and tobacco use: A meta-analysis. Addiction 2010, 105(8):1381-1390.
87. Rose G. The strategy of preventive medicine 1992, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
88. Sanchez-Craig M., Spivak K., Davila R. Superior outcome of females over males after brief treatment for the reduction of heavy drinking: Replication and report of therapist effects. British Journal of Addiction 1991, 86(7):867-876.
89. Sanchez-Meca J., Marin-Martinez F., Chacon-Moscoso S. Effect-size indices for dichotomized outcomes in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods 2003, 8(4):448-467.
90. Schroder K.E., Carey M.P., Vanable P.A. Methodological challenges in research on sexual risk behavior: II. Accuracy of self-reports. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 2003, 26(2):104-123.
91. Simao M.O., Kerr-Correa F., Smaira S.I., Trinca L.A., Floripes T.M., Dalben I., et al. Prevention of "risky" drinking among students at a Brazilian university. Alcohol and Alcoholism 2008, 43(4):470-476.
92. Sobell M.B., Sobell L.C. Problem drinkers: Guided self-change treatment 1993, Guilford Press, New York.
93. StataCorp Stata statistical software: Release 2009, 11. StataCorp, LP, College Station, TX.
94. Steiner, J., Woodall, W. G., & Yeagley, J. A. (2005). The E-Chug: A randomized, controlled study of a web-based binge drinking intervention with college freshman. Paper presented at the Society for Prevention Research, Washington, DC.
95. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Results from the 2010 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Summary of national findings (NSDUH Series H-41, HHS Publication No. SMA 11-4658) 2011, Rockville, MD, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
96. Terlecki M.A., Larimer M.E., Copeland A.L. Clinical outcomes of a brief motivational intervention for heavy drinking mandated college students: A pilot study. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs 2010, 71(1):54-60.
97. Terlecki, M. A., Larimer, M. E., & Copeland, A. L. (unpublished manuscript). The impact of a brief alcohol intervention for heavy drinking mandated college student drinkers: 3-month outcomes on alcohol consumption and alcohol-related problems.
98. Testa M., Hoffman J.H., Livingston J.A., Turrisi R. Preventing college women's sexual victimization through parent based intervention: A randomized controlled trial. Prevention Science 2010, 11:308-318.
99. The Century Council Alcohol 101 Plus [Computer software] 2003, Retrieved fromhttp://www.alcohol101plus.org/home.html.
100. Thombs D.L., Olds R.S., Osborn C.J., Casseday S., Glavin K., Berkowitz A.D. Outcomes of a technology-based social norms intervention to deter alcohol use in freshman residence halls. Journal of American College Health 2007, 55(6):325-332.
101. Turrisi R., Larimer M.E., Mallett K.A., Kilmer J.R., Ray A.E., Mastroleo N.R., et al. A randomized clinical trial evaluating a combined alcohol intervention for high-risk college students. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs 2009, 70(4):555-567.
102. Wall, A. (2005). On-line health education curriculum evaluation: Individual and delivery findings among college students. PhD Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL.
103. Wall A. On-line alcohol health education curriculum evaluation: Harm reduction findings among fraternity and sorority members. Oracle 2006, 2(1).
104. Wall A. Evaluating a health education web site: The case of AlcoholEdu. NASPA Journal 2007, 44(4):692-714.
105. Walters S.T. In praise of feedback: An effective intervention for college students who are heavy drinkers. Journal of American College Health 2000, 48(5):235-238.
106. Walters S.T., Neighbors C. College prevention: A view of present (and future) web-based approaches. Alcohol Research & Health 2011, 34(2):222-224.
107. Walters S.T., Vader A.M., Harris T.R. A controlled trial of web-based feedback for heavy drinking college students. Prevention Science 2007, 8:83-88.
108. Walters S.T., Vader A.M., Harris T.R., Field C.A., Jouriles E.N. Dismantling motivational interviewing and feedback for college drinkers: A randomized clinical trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2009, 77(1):64-73.
109. Wantland D.J., Portillo C.J., Holzemer W.L., Slaughter R., McGhee E.M. The effectiveness of web-based vs. non-web-based interventions: A meta-analysis of behavioral change outcomes. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2004, 6(4):e40.
110. Wechsler H., Dowdall G.W., Davenport A., Rimm E.B. A gender-specific measure of binge drinking among college students. American Journal of Public Health 1995, 85(7):982-985.
111. Wechsler H., Lee J.E., Kuo M., Seibring M., Nelson T.F., Lee H. Trends in college binge drinking during a period of increased prevention efforts. Findings from 4 Harvard School of Public Health College Alcohol Study surveys: 1993-2001. Journal of American College Health 2002, 50:203-217.
112. Weinhardt L.S., Forsyth A.D., Carey M.P., Jaworski B.C., Durant L.E. Reliability and validity of self-report measures of HIV-related sexual behavior: Progress since 1990 and recommendations for research and practice. Archives of Sexual Behavior 1998, 27(2):155-180.
113. Weitzel J.A., Bernhardt J.M., Usdan S., Mays D., Glanz K. Using wireless handheld computers and tailored text messaging to reduce negative consequence of drinking alcohol. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs 2007, 68(4):534-537.
114. White H.R., Labouvie E.W. Towards the assessment of adolescent problem drinking. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 1989, 50:30-37.
115. Wood M.D., Capone C., Laforge R., Erickson D.J., Brand N.H. Brief motivational intervention and alcohol expectancy challenge with heavy drinking college students: A randomized factorial study. Addictive Behaviors 2007, 32(11):2509-2528.