Motivational interviewing with underage college drinkers: A preliminary look at the role of empathy and alliance

American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse

Volumn 33, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 737-746

  Feldstein, Sarah W ^a   Forcehimes, Alyssa A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

Author keywords

Alliance; College; Empathy; Motivational interviewing; Underage drinking

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL;

ADULT; ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COLLEGE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DRINKING; EMPATHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MALE; MOTIVATION; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREDICTION; SAMPLE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; ALCOHOL DRINKING; ALCOHOL-RELATED DISORDERS; EMPATHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTERVIEW, PSYCHOLOGICAL; LEGISLATION, DRUG; MALE; MOTIVATION; PSYCHOTHERAPEUTIC PROCESSES; PSYCHOTHERAPY, BRIEF; STUDENTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 34648835973     PISSN: 00952990     EISSN: 10979891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00952990701522690     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Wechsler H, Lee JE, Nelson TF, Kuo M. Underage college students' drinking behavior, access to alcohol, and the influence of deterrence policies. J Am College Health 2002; 50(5):223-236.
2. Hingson RW, Heeren T, Zakocs RC, Kopstein A, Wechsler H. Magnitude of alcohol-related mortality and morbidity among U.S. college students ages 18-24. J Stud Alcohol 2002; 63:136-144.
3. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People for Change. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Guilford Press, 2002.
4. Baer JS, Peterson PL, Wells EA. Rationale and design of a brief substance use intervention for homeless adolescents. Addict Res Theory 2004; 12(4):317-334.
5. Baer JS, Marlatt GA, Kivlahan DR, Fromme K, Larimer ME, Williams E. An experimental test of three methods of alcohol risk reduction with young adults. J Consult Clin Psychol 1992; 60(6):974-979.
6. Murphy JG, Benson TA, Vuchinich RE, Deskins MM, Eakin D, Flood AM, McDevitt-Murphy ME, Torrealday O. A comparison of personalized feedback for college student drinkers delivered with and without a motivational interview. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 2004; 65(2):200-203.
7. Juarez P, Walters ST, Daugherty M, Radi C. A randomized trial of motivational interviewing and feedback with heavy drinking college students. Journal of Drug Education 2006; 36(3):233-246.
8. Borsari BE, Carey KB. Effects of a brief motivational intervention with college student drinkers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2000; 68(4):728-733.
9. Hettema J, Steele J, Miller WR. A meta-analysis of research on motivational interviewing treatment effectiveness (MARMITE). Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 2005; 1:91-111.
10. Neal DJ, Carey KB. Developing discrepancy with self-regulation theory: Use of personalized normative feedback and personal strivings with heavy drinking college students. Addictive Behaviors 2004; 29(2):281-297.
11. Truax CB. Therapist empathy, genuineness, and warmth and patient outcome. Journal of Consulting Psychology 1966; 30(5):395-401.
12. Rogers CR. A Way of Being. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1980.
13. Horvath AO, Symonds BD. Relation between working alliance and outcome in psychotherapy: A meta-analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology 1991; 38(2):139-149.
14. DiClemente CC, Carroll KM, Miller WR, Connors GJ, Donovan DM. A look inside treatment: Therapist effects, the therapeutic alliance, and the process of intentional behavior change. In Treatment Matching in Alcoholism. Babor TF, Del Boca FK, eds. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003; 166-183.
15. White HR, Labouvie EW. Towards the assessment of adolescent problem drinking. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 1989; 50:30-37.
16. Juarez P, Walters ST, Daugherty M, Radi C. A randomized trial of motivational interviewing and feedback with heavy drinking college students. Journal of Drug Education 2006; 36(3):233-246.
17. Baer JS, Kivlahan DR, Blume AW, McKnight P, Marlatt GA. Brief intervention for heavy drinking college students: 4-year follow up and natural history. American Journal of Public Health 2001; 91(8):1310-1316.
18. Moyers TB, Martin T, Manuel JK. Assessing competence in the use of motivational interviewing. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 2005; 28(1):19-26.
19. Pierson HM, Hayes SC, Gifford EV, Roget N, Padilla M, Bissett R, Berry K, Kohlenberg B, Rhode R, Fisher G. An examination of the motivational interviewing treatment integrity code. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 2007; 32(1):11-17.
20. Strang J, McCambridge J. Can the practitioner correctly predict outcome in motivational interviewing? Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 2004; 27:83-88.
21. Tracey TJ, Kokotovic AM. Factor structure of the working alliance inventory. Psychological Assessment 1989; 1(3):207-210.
22. Stiles WB, Agnew-Davies R, Barkham M, Culverwell A, Goldfried MR, Halstead J. Convergent validity of the Agnew relationship measure and the working alliance inventory. Psychological Assessment 2002; 14(2):209-220.
23. CDC. Youth risk behavior surveillance - United States, 2005. Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report 2006; 55(SS-5):1-108.
24. Laforge RG, Borsari BE, Baer JS. The utility of collateral informant assessment in college alcohol research: Results from a longitudinal prevention trial. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 2005; 66(4):479-487.
25. Del Boca FK, Darkes J, Greenbaum PE, Goldman MS. Up close and personal: Temporal variability in the drinking of individual college students during their first year. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2004; 72(2):155-164.