Optimizing personalized normative feedback: The use of gender-specific referents

Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs

Volumn 68, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 228-237

  Lewis, Melissa A ^a   Neighbors, Clayton ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL;

ADULT; ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLLEGE STUDENT; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; EVALUATION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GENDER; GENDER IDENTITY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PEER GROUP; PERCEPTION; PERSONALIZED NORMATIVE FEEDBACK; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SOCIAL ASPECT; GENDER SPECIFIC FEEDBACK; TELEPHONE;

EID: 33847218626     PISSN: 19371888     EISSN: 19384114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.15288/jsad.2007.68.228     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. ARBUCKLE, J.L. AND WOTHKE, W. Amos 4.0 Users Guide, Chicago, IL: Smallwaters, 1999.
2. BAER, J.S., STACY, A., AND LARIMER, M. Biases in the perception of drinking norms among college students. J. Stud. Alcohol 52: 580-586, 1991.
3. BARON, R.M. AND KENNY, D.A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Pers. Social Psychol. 51: 1173-1182, 1986.
4. BENTLER, P.M. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol. Bull. 107: 238-246, 1990.
5. BENTLER, P.M. AND BONETT, D.G. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol. Bull. 88: 588-606, 1980.
6. BLUME, S.B. Sexuality and stigma: The alcoholic woman. Alcohol Hlth Res. World 15: 139-146, 1991.
7. BORSARI, B. AND CAREY, K.B. Effects of a brief motivational intervention with college student drinkers. J. Cons. Clin. Psychol. 68: 728-733, 2000.
8. BORSARI, B. AND CAREY, K.B. Peer influences on college drinking: A review of the research. J. Subst. Abuse 13: 391-424, 2001.
9. BORSARI, B. AND CAREY, K.B. Descriptive and injunctive norms in college drinking: A meta-analytic integration. J. Stud. Alcohol 64: 331-341, 2003.
10. BROWNE, M.W. AND CUDECK, R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: BOLLEN, K.A. AND LONG, J.S. (Eds.) Testing Structural Equation Models, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1993, pp. 136-162.
11. COHEN, B.H. Explaining Psychological Statistics, 2nd Edition, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2001.
12. COHEN, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1988.
13. COHEN, J. A power primer. Psychol. Bull. 112: 155-159, 1992.
14. COLLINS, R.L., PARKS, G.A., AND MARLATT, G.A. Social determinants of alcohol consumption: The effects of social interaction and model status on the self-administration of alcohol. J. Cons. Clin. Psychol. 53: 189-200, 1985.
15. DIMEFF, L.A., BAER, J.S., KIVLAHAN, D.R., AND MARLATT, G.A. Brief Alcohol Screening and Intervention for College Students (BASICS): A Harm Reduction Approach, New York: Guilford Press, 1999.
16. FESTINGER, L. A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relat. 7: 117-140, 1954.
17. HAM, L.S. AND HOPE, D.A. College students and problematic drinking: A review of the literature. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 23: 719-759, 2003.
18. KENNY, D.A., KASHY, D.A., AND BOLGER, N. Data analysis in social psychology. In: GILBERT, D.T., FISKE, S.T., AND LINDZEY, G. (Eds.) The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 1, 4th Edition, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1998, pp. 233-265.
19. KLINE, R.B. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, New York: Guilford Press, 1998.
20. KNEE, C.R. AND NEIGHBORS, C. Self-determination, perception of peer pressure, and drinking among college students. J. Appl. Social Psychol. 32: 522-543, 2002.
21. LARIMER, M.E., TURNER, A.P., ANDERSON, B.K., FADER, J.S., KILMER, J.R., PALMER, R.S., AND CRONCE, J.M. Evaluating a brief alcohol intervention with fraternities. J. Stud. Alcohol 62: 370-380, 2001.
22. LATANE, B. The psychology of social impact. Amer. Psychol. 36: 343-356, 1981.
23. LEWIS, M.A. AND NEIGHBORS, C. Gender-specific misperceptions of college student drinking norms. Psychol. Addict. Behav. 18: 334-339, 2004.
24. LEWIS, M.A. AND NEIGHBORS, C. Social norms approaches using descriptive drinking norms education: A review of the research on personalized normative feedback. J. Amer. Coll. Hlth 54: 213-218, 2006a.
25. LEWIS, M.A. AND NEIGHBORS, C. Who is the typical college student? Implications for personalized normative feedback interventions. Addict. Behav. 31: 2120-2126, 2006b.
26. LUHTANEN, R. AND CROCKER, J. A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one's social identity. Pers. Social Psychol. Bull. 18: 302-318, 1992.
27. MARLATT, G.A., BAER, J.S., KIVLAHAN, D.R., DIMEFF, L.A., LARIMER, M.E., QUIGLEY, L.A., SOMERS, J.M., AND WILLIAMS, E. Screening and brief intervention for high-risk college student drinkers: Results from a two-year follow-up assessment. J. Cons. Clin. Psychol. 66: 604-615, 1998.
28. MURPHY, J.G., DUCHNICK, J.J., VUCHINICH, R.E., DAVISON, J.W., KARG, R.S., OLSON, A.M., SMITH, A.F., AND COFFEY, T.T. Relative efficacy of a brief motivational intervention for college student drinkers. Psychol. Addict. Behav. 15: 373-379, 2001.
29. NEIGHBORS, C., LARIMER, M.E., AND LEWIS, M.A. Targeting misperceptions of descriptive drinking norms: Efficacy of a computer delivered personalized normative feedback intervention. J. Cons. Clin. Psychol. 72: 434-447, 2004.
30. NEIGHBORS, C., LEWIS, M.A., BERGSTROM, R.L., AND LARIMER, M.E. Being controlled by normative influences: Self-determination as a moderator of a normative feedback alcohol intervention. Hlth Psychol. 25: 571-579, 2006.
31. PARKS, K.A. AND SCHEIDT, D.M. Male bar drinker's perspective on female bar drinkers. Sex Roles 43: 927-941, 2000.
32. PERKINS, H.W. Social norms and the prevention of alcohol misuse in collegiate contexts. J. Stud. Alcohol, Supplement No. 14, pp. 164-172, 2002.
33. PRENTICE, D.A. AND MILLER, D.T. Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: Some consequences of misperceiving the social norm. J. Pers. Social Psychol. 64: 243-256, 1993.
34. ROSENTHAL, R. Replicability and experimenter influence: Experimenter effects in behavioral research. Psychol. Rev. 11: 5-11, 1980.
35. SCHROEDER, C.M. AND PRENTICE, D.A. Exposing pluralistic ignorance to reduce alcohol use among college students. J. Appl. Social Psychol. 28: 2150-2180, 1998.
36. SEARS, D.O. College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature. J. Pers. Social Psychol. 51: 515-530, 1986.
37. SHEEHAN, M. AND RIDGE, D. "You become really close...you talk about the silly things you did, and we laugh": The role of binge drinking in female secondary students' lives. Subst. Use Misuse 36: 347-372, 2001.
38. SULS, J. AND GREEN, P. Pluralistic ignorance and college student perceptions of gender-specific alcohol norms. Hlth Psychol. 22: 479-486, 2003.
39. TABACHNICK, B.G. AND FIDELL, L.S. Using Multivariate Statistics, 4th Edition, Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon, 2001.
40. TAJFEL, H. Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology, New York: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1981.
41. TAJFEL, H. Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Rev. Psychol. 33: 1-39, 1982.
42. TAJFEL, H. AND TURNER, J.C. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In: AUSTIN, W.G. AND WORCHEL, S. (Eds.) The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1979.
43. TAJFEL, H. AND TURNER, J.C. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In: WORCHEL, S. AND AUSTIN, W.G. (Eds.) Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 2nd Edition, Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall, 1986, pp. 7-24.
44. TERRY, D,J. AND HOGG, M.A. Group norms and the attitude-behavior relationship: A role for group identification. Pers. Social Psychol. Bull. 22: 776-793, 1996.
45. WALTERS, S.T. AND NEIGHBORS, C. Feedback interventions for college alcohol misuse: What, why and for whom? Addict. Behav. 30: 1168-1182, 2005.
46. WECHSLER, H., SEIBRING, M., LIU, I.-C., AND AHL, M. Colleges respond to student binge drinking: Reducing student demand or limiting access. J. Amer. Coll. Hlth 52: 159-168, 2004.
47. WEST, S.G., FINCH, J.F., AND CURRAN, P.J. Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies. In: HOYLE, R.H. (Ed.) Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1995, pp. 56-75.
48. WOOD, W. Attitude change: Persuasion and social influence. Annual Rev. Psychol. 51: 539-570, 2000.